S1 | Wealth Management

Stephanie Link: Wealth & Portfolio Management | SALT Talks #32

“In a slow growth world, growth is going to outperform value.”

Stephanie Link is chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower, a national wealth management firm that provides investment, financial and retirement planning services to individuals, foundations and family offices, as well as 401(k) consulting and cash management services to corporations.

Tech stocks take up a very large percentage of the S&P market capitalization which only grew as part of the pandemic. Despite the likelihood of reducing this concentration as the economy recovers, the dominant tech companies have huge opportunities ahead of them for continued growth. “The internet of things is going to be a trillion dollar market by the end of this decade.”

The economic fallout from a pandemic is uniquely different from previous crises like the 2008 recession where financial institutions were responsible for much of the disaster. Lessons learned from Federal Reserve are being put to use this time around. Chairman Jerome Powell has proven comfortable providing aggressive quantitative easing to support a pandemic-ravaged economy.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

David-Rubenstein.jpeg

Stephanie Link

Chief Investment Strategist & Portfolio Manager

Hightower

MODERATOR

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:08)
Hello, everyone, welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the managing director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum at the intersection of finance, technology and geopolitics. SALT Talks are a series of digital interviews we've been doing during the work from home period with leading investors, creators, and thinkers. What we're really trying to do is replicate the experience that we provided our global conference series, the SALT Conference, which is providing our audience a window into the minds of subject matter experts and providing a platform for what we think are big, important world changing ideas.

John Darsie: (00:41)
We're very excited to welcome Stephanie Link today to SALT Talks. Stephanie is the chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower, which is a national wealth management firm that provides investment, financial and retirement planning services to individuals, foundations, and family offices, as well as 401k consulting and cash management services to corporations.

John Darsie: (01:03)
Prior to joining Hightower, Stephanie was the senior managing director and the head of global equities research at Nuveen, where she co managed the CREF stock variable annuity portfolio with $170 billion in assets. She also managed her own US core portfolio with 3.7 billion in assets and oversaw 33 investment professionals who collectively managed about $40 billion. Prior to joining Nuveen, Stephanie spent seven years at TheStreet as the chief investment officer and co portfolio manager of Jim Cramer's charitable trust. And before that, she served for 10 years at Prudential Equity Group as managing director of institutional sales and director of research. She began her career at Dean Witter Reynolds in the institutional sales department.

John Darsie: (01:50)
Stephanie earned a bachelor's degree in finance from Boston college, and she currently serves as the chairperson for the investment advisory council at the Basking Ridge Presbyterian church in Basking Ridge, New Jersey. She's an investment professional with over 20 years of experience managing money, and her professional insights are frequently sought out for industry events and media. And you've likely seen her on CNBC where she's a contributor.

John Darsie: (02:15)
Stephanie, we're very excited to have you today. A reminder to our audience, if you have any questions for Stephanie during today's talk, you can enter them in the Q&A box at the bottom of your video screen. Hosting today's interview is Anthony Scaramucci, a founder and managing partner of SkyBridge Capital, a global alternative investment firm and the chairman of SALT. And with that, I'll turn it over to Anthony for the interview.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:37)
Stephanie, it's great to see you again. As we were talking before we went live, thank you for big footing John Darsie on the room rater, the room looks absolutely fantastic. My son, he just graduated from Stanford, basically he's like, "Dad, why do you ask people about their backgrounds? You can find them on Wikipedia." And I say, "Well, I ask people about their backgrounds because maybe they'll tell us something that's not on Wikipedia." So, Stephanie, what's not on Wikipedia? What could you tell us about your path to money management and that odyssey that you were making as you were trying to figure out your career, what triggered you to go in this direction?

Stephanie Link: (03:17)
Yeah, and it's so great to be here, Anthony and John, thank you guys so much for the invitation. I have to say after being in the business 27 years, 16 years on the sell side, and then 16 years on the buy side, it really has been a remarkable learning experience. The sell side as you know, is under secular pressure, right? And I have been for a long time. Quite frankly, I'm surprised that a lot of sell side institutions still actually exists because a lot of people don't want to pay for research and trying to get paid for that has always been a challenge.

Stephanie Link: (03:51)
And so, I left the sell side and I wanted to run money because I enjoyed picking stocks. I enjoyed marketing or analysts, which is what I was doing on the sell side. So Jim Cramer and I had a mutual friend and he was looking for someone to fund his charitable trust and small amount of money, but a lot of subscribers that are attached to that product. And Jim, he's so visible. And so we met for 30 minutes, we had tea and he hired me on the spot, and I thought, well, this is going to be a really great learning experience. I'll be here for a couple of years and then I'll figure out something else to do.

Stephanie Link: (04:28)
And so, six and a half years later, I'm his longest standing employee. And I'll tell you, we had had some battles before, but he taught me a remarkable amount in terms of actually running a portfolio. Because it's much different, Anthony, you know this, it's much different than being a sell side person, marketing ideas, coming up with strategies and that sort of thing. It's putting your money where your mouth is. And I think that that was such a great experience.

Stephanie Link: (04:55)
And then of course, when I was working for him, I became a CNBC contributor, but it wasn't him that introduced me actually to the CNBC folks. It was, my COO got a phone call from CNBC and said, you know what? I know Stephanie and her dream job was to be Chris McKendry on ESPN. So this is not in Wikipedia. So, he said, well, let's give her a shot. Maybe she'll be okay on TV talking about stock. So, that began my career.

Stephanie Link: (05:25)
And then, TIAA which is now called Nuveen, they were a client of mine. So I had known them for many, many years, and they were looking for someone to be the face of the firm and then also to run money. So I stayed there for five years, but the company continued to see outflows and the buy side is continuing to see outflows. It doesn't matter about the performance. And so, those challenges were frustrating. I think for 27 years I had to cut costs. I had to right size businesses and I was tired of that.

Stephanie Link: (05:56)
So I stepped back and I said, where in the investment world, where is their growth? And I literally LinkedIn to Bob Oros at Hightower, the CEO, and he LinkedIn back to me and we exchanged ideas and he thought, I don't have a job for you, but let's create one. Let's try to figure out how we can build our brand because it is in growth mode. A company that's going to hire someone during this environment in the COVID world, I think speaks volumes. And I'm really looking forward to working with the advisors and helping them grow assets. I'm going to run my own portfolio as well.

Stephanie Link: (06:32)
And then, I'm in charge of the OCIO division, which is just an outsourcing mechanism for the advisors if they like to invest in the products that we manage. So I'm really excited about it, it's different. Growth has a different feel to it for sure.

Anthony Scaramucci: (06:50)
Well, it's great, but it also speaks to your courage that you're willing to venture out in this environment where unfortunately we're all stuck at home. Before I get to the next question, I just got to tell you this quick Jim Cramer story. So I'm 23, I'm at the Harvard Law School. Cramer is a God to guys like me because I wanted to always get into money management. He had worked at Goldman and he was recruiting people, and then he had just left to start his hedge fund. He had started a hedge fund with a guy named Larry Levy. And these guys were in cash during the '87 crisis. And Jim writes about this in Confessions of a Street Addict.

Anthony Scaramucci: (07:24)
So, I got his phone number from somebody, I cold called him. He picks up the phone in that barking squeal voice of his and he says, "What do you want?" I said, I really want to come meet you or to get a job on Wall Street, something like that. For about four minutes, he lit into me, do you read the Wall Street Journal? Of course, I said, no. Do you read the New York Times? Of course, I said, no. He went down a list of publications. He says, "Listen, man, you are not ready for this job. You need to read every single one of these papers and you need to start following the markets," slams down the phone on me.

Anthony Scaramucci: (07:58)
And so, I can never thank him enough for that four minute experience because I went and did all that, Stephanie. I went and read all those things. So, and it prepared me for those job interviews. So, he's a legend and we both obviously have a tremendous amount of respect for him. So let's talk about what we do for a living. Okay, the S&P is now flat on the year. After being down 30, the NASDAQ is up 20 year to date. At SkyBridge, look, I'll compare, we're in structured credit, so we're still down on the year. We're probably down 16 now, although we're getting an 8% yield on our portfolio. I think the stat is very cheap, but this stuff has snapped back. And the composition of the S&P is totally different today than it was in January in terms of where the value is. So, is this justified? What's your opinion of all of this?

Stephanie Link: (08:52)
Yeah, I think it is justified, especially on the equity side, because you've had a massive amount of liquidity. You really have. I mean, the fiscal liquidity and we're going to get more, probably a trillion or another two trillion in fiscal, monetary policy has just been remarkable. Now, if you combine the two, fiscal and monetary policies that are put in place, it's 44% of our US GDP. Just to put it in a context, you know this Anthony. Back in 2008, that percentage of fiscal and monetary policy in that crisis was only 4% of US GDP.

Stephanie Link: (09:28)
So, this is enormous, enormous liquidity. This is a very big tailwind. And while, I'm a little less certain about where the recovery trajectory is going to go, because we've had now reopens and then partial closures, we have up until this month, we have seen pretty good economic data, the snapback. And so you've got this combination and what I said, it's like a debate or a push call between the V-shape recovery in May and June, and then all of a sudden, July reopens, partial closures, what is this going to do to the recovery?

Stephanie Link: (10:06)
And we're already starting to see it. We had two weeks in a row of initial claims being very disappointing. I mean, look at the four week average of initial claims, we'll watch that and we can get into that if you like, but if it continues to go up, that's something that is worrisome to me. But nevertheless, I do think that we are seeing a recovery. And as a result, we are seeing a profit recovery. And in fact, 83% of the companies in the S&P 500 have beat earnings. 65% have beaten on revenues so far this quarter.

Stephanie Link: (10:37)
So we are seeing a little bit better in terms of economic activity and also on earnings. I expect 2021 is going to be a year where we have to normalize earnings to get comfortable about valuations. But I do think you are going to continue to see progress. As I've mentioned, initial claims, a little bothersome, restaurant openings and reservations is flattening out. TSA travel is actually rolling, but on the flip side, you have housing that is extremely strong.

Stephanie Link: (11:08)
I mean, every single company that has had housing in their revenue mix, they've actually beaten on expectations in earnings and they've had some really remarkable things to say. We can get into some of those details if you like too. We also have really a nice recovery in auto. I mean, look at AutoNation. I mean, the CEO of AutoNation said it was the best quarter in their history. So, you listen to these comments-

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:36)
Home sales, home sales.

Stephanie Link: (11:37)
Home sales are off the charts. So I feel like there's the push pole, there's a mix going on in the economy, but that's one of the ... And the reason that we're going to get more fiscal policy is because it is uneven, right? Nothing is perfect, but the market is sniffing out the recovery, next year and the normalization of profits.

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:57)
So, let's talk about the tech sector for a second though, because it's raging and again, there's four or five stocks that are making up a very large percentage now of the market capitalization of the S&P. So it's like the S&P five and then the S&P 495, what are your thoughts on that, Stephanie?

Stephanie Link: (12:16)
Yeah, no, I mean, it's not something I want to see and you bring up a great stat. So if you look at FAANG plus Microsoft, it's 20% of the S&P 500 and they accounted for 80% of the returns in July. So to your point exactly, it is super concentrated. And you mentioned early on again, DX is up 20% on a year, which is also amazing. I would love to see a more broad picture, I really would. And I think you are starting to see pockets as I mentioned, we did get, it's housing, it's auto sales, it's retail sales, it's e-commerce.

Stephanie Link: (12:52)
I mean, I feel like we are starting to broaden just a little bit, but it is still very, very focused for now. But then again, these companies have total addressable markets that are enormous. The internet of things is going to be a trillion dollar market by the end of this decade, wearables is going to be a $55 billion market in the next two years. Cloud is going to be, their total addressable market in the next three years is $600 billion, and SAS cloud, which is a component of cloud is going to be a trillion dollar total addressable market by the end of the decade.

Stephanie Link: (13:26)
So I feel like, and these numbers are probably underestimated given now that we're working from home and all the things that we're doing. And so, I feel like in a way it is justified that they should be doing so well. That said, I mean, on the margin, I've been taking profits because I think you have to. That's one thing Jim Cramer always said, never apologize for taking a profit. And so, I'm very mindful of the expectations and the setups for tech.

Stephanie Link: (13:55)
And we'll see tonight, we get a whole bunch of really, really high profile companies that report tonight. Maybe we'll see a pullback, maybe they'll stall out. But, in a slow growth world, growth is going to outperform value, even though I have a value bias myself as you know, which makes me sad to say, but that's the reality. So you have to have a barbell.

Anthony Scaramucci: (14:17)
Yes. And I've always seen you talking about the fundamentals and that whole Graham and Dodd analysis. So that brings up a very good question, is value over? Is the debate over value over? Has growth won the debate? And is there really not going to be a time where you see value eclipse growth going forward, given the magnitude of the transformation of the future economy?

Stephanie Link: (14:41)
I mean, I think growth has a very hard time if you don't have-

Anthony Scaramucci: (14:43)
I can see sadness in your eyes, Stephanie, as I'm asking you this question.

Stephanie Link: (14:45)
I know. I know, I know. And by the way, I do own some of these tech names, you have to, because my bench is the S&P 500 and they represent a whole of 26% of the market cap. So anyway, I think it's hard in a slow growth environment for value to outperform. And I really think you need better GDP, better growth, and a little bit of inflation. And while inflation break evens are actually on the rise, which is interesting to me and the dollar has pulled back, and that should lead to a value risk on trade, if you will. It's hard when you have such again, total addressable market opportunities for these companies.

Stephanie Link: (15:31)
And so, I think it's a combination, Anthony, I think you can own a little bit of both, but it's not been the right call to be in the value sectors. It really hasn't, even though that they've recovered nicely from the March lows.

Anthony Scaramucci: (15:47)
No, I understand. Listen, I've been vexed with this for the last 10 years since, actually 12 years as the last crisis. What about the traditional 60, 40 portfolio model still viable in your mind?

Stephanie Link: (15:57)
I mean, I think so, and every person is different, right? And depending on your age and your risk tolerance and that sort of thing, I just don't ... I mean, it's so hard to find value in the fixed income market. That's the whole problem, right? And so, that's why I think the equity markets, another reason why the equity markets have done so well is because there is no alternative. And if you can find companies that have a dividend yield of two or 3%, that's way better than what you're getting from a 10 year. So I lean a little bit more on the equity side, diversification, of course, global exposure, a little bit of EM, and then also you have some fixed income, but then you have some alternatives too in your world.

Anthony Scaramucci: (16:45)
Our world is getting beat up, Steph.

Stephanie Link: (16:48)
I know, I know, yeah.

Anthony Scaramucci: (16:49)
Which is a sign, usually that we're on the road of recovery. We got hurt hard in 2008, and then we had our best performance over the next four years. So let's see what happens. John Darsie, go ahead.

John Darsie: (17:00)
Yeah. You talked a little bit about the push pull between value and tech, and there's another push pull going on between passive management and active management. Obviously in the last six to seven years, following the crisis, passive management has massively outperformed, things like hedge funds have been a little bit out of favor. Do you think, given the environment we're in and given the rich valuations on equities right now that a more active management type of approach might go through a period of outperformance for the next three to five years?

Stephanie Link: (17:30)
I mean, I hope so, because that's what I do for a living. That's what you guys do for a living, right? But it hasn't been the case. And in fact, this is one of the reasons why I've mentioned that the buy side is under such secular pressure because there's so much competition, the performance has been okay, in some instances, very good and other instances, not so good. You hope that your clients are longer term and they can ride through the storms if you will.

Stephanie Link: (17:55)
But I really believe this trend, I'm not sure what it's going to take quite frankly, because if performance doesn't really matter, I mean, we were at TIAA, we had great numbers and we still saw outflows every single day. So, I just think that maybe we set up for a reversion, I hope so, but I don't know if there's really concrete evidence that we're even starting that at this point.

John Darsie: (18:20)
Right. And you touched briefly on earnings in your opening, but I want to talk a little bit more about earning season. I follow you on Twitter and I love keeping up with your analysis on different earnings reports that come out. What have we learned so far from earning season and our investors just giving 2020 earnings a pass and focusing on the future? What can we glean so far from what we've seen during this earning season?

Stephanie Link: (18:44)
Yeah, it is interesting that the analysts were so wrong, right? I mean that 83% beat rate is crazy to me, right? I mean, that's very high relative to historical levels. So, people, we came into the earnings period and we were flying blind, we really were. We had no idea. And I've been surprised by two things, one, companies are already starting to talk about currency and the dollar weakness and how it's going to be less of a headwind, took me by surprise a bit.

Stephanie Link: (19:14)
And in fact, Pfizer said just the other day that they're going to see a $300 million benefit, so less bad in terms of getting pressure from the currency side of things, so that's interesting. And then that bodes well for certain industries, multinationals, right? So you would think that maybe if you're going to see any rotation, maybe it is really more global multinationals, if you will. I've been very surprised at how strong, I'll mention it again, housing is. And we know existing home sales are up 20%.

Stephanie Link: (19:43)
But any company, it's Stanley Black & Decker, it's Pulte Homes, it's Lennar, it's Toll Brothers, it's D. R. Horton, they're all saying that housing is absolutely on fire. And by the way, these stocks are still super cheap. So you're going to see again, more of a rotation, I think, into housing. And we'll see about auto. So auto the global data that I get, it suggests that the light vehicle sales around the globe are at 73 million SAR. And that's up from 43 million SAR in April.

Stephanie Link: (20:20)
And so, China is back to last year's levels in auto. North Korea saw last month up 41% jump. So you are seeing this, and I think this is a very controversial topic. I don't think people believe that we are seeing an improvement in auto. And I think that's why you're seeing some of these semiconductor companies do well, right? With the end market exposure to auto, because you're starting to see production back online.

Stephanie Link: (20:43)
So overall, I mean, I think it's still early. I think the companies have really managed well. I think they continue to under promise and try to over deliver. That's what CEOs really truly get paid to do. And so, I'm interested to see the back half, and especially tonight with the FAANG reporting.

John Darsie: (21:03)
Anthony, I'll let you ask the next question. I know you don't like when I dominate the conversation.

Anthony Scaramucci: (21:07)
No, no, no, I do. He's actually very good at it. He said, we know you're a rising star, John, we know. We know, that I'll be soon, you'll be long gone. I'll be on the Pepper Talks when this is over, Stephanie, okay? If this keeps up, okay? Forget about SALT. But, I want you to talk a little bit about the private markets and sorting through the rubble inside the private. How do you look at the private markets after the pandemic? What's your thought there?

Stephanie Link: (21:34)
Well, I mean the private, so what I do is I actually talk about, or I look through from an equity point of view, I look at the Blackstones of the world and I look at the Apollos of the world and I've invested in some of those companies as well, but you're the expert on this field, you'll know better than I. I think there is a place in every portfolio for diversification. And I will tell you just back on the ALTS comment that I've made before, that's the number one item that everyone that I'm meeting, the advisors, that's the number one thing they want help with because they don't know as well. It's not as liquid. It's something that they really do want to have because some of their clients want that exposure, but they know nothing about it. So, it's interesting to me.

Anthony Scaramucci: (22:28)
Yeah, I just think there's going to be room there because of the regulation, things like space. There's still a tremendous amount of midsize to very large companies like SpaceX that we can take advantage of in the private market side, which if you look at the relative valuations, it's attractive. But, I want to ask you about your views about the country, the crisis, the past crises you and I have seen in our careers. Is this different? Does it feel different?

Anthony Scaramucci: (23:04)
You and I could tick off 10 or 12 crises that we've lived through since we got started in our careers. And so we know that we're going to always face them, and I always joke with my team, the thousand year flood happens every four or five years on Wall Street, so it's like one of these things we can't avoid, but is this different? And I hate saying it that way, because I know everyone says, well, well this time is different, it's not different, but it does feel different to me. And I'm just wondering if it feels different to you and if it does, why does it feel different?

Stephanie Link: (23:33)
Yeah, no, I think it's definitely different, I think. If you just go back to the last crisis in eight and '09, and that was a financial meltdown. That was a huge issue with the financial services companies being the ones that really created it and nearly took our country down. I mean, we lost banks. We lost companies, huge companies last crisis. Not that we're not going to lose companies this go round, but this was an intentional shutdown by the government because it's a health crisis.

Stephanie Link: (24:06)
And we maybe weren't as well informed about COVID-19, who knows? I don't know, but we weren't prepared for it like we should have been, we had to take aggressive action. We had to close. We're seeing now what's happening in these partial closers again, as you're seen some of these reopenings. We're all wearing masks now, we weren't wearing masks in March. I mean, there's so much going on, but when you close a country down, we're losing $25 billion a day in the country. I mean, that's just huge.

Stephanie Link: (24:40)
So now that you have partial openings, I do not think partial openings and partial closings, I don't think we're going to close the country down entirely again. I really don't. And I do take a lot of solace in the fact that these companies that are working on a vaccine are really making tremendous progress. I mean, listen to J&J, they just increased their trials, their human trials by two months, they've just, they accelerated it. And so, that's a really good thing.

Stephanie Link: (25:07)
Look at Moderna, look at Gilead, I mean, they're all these companies that are working so hard at trying to get us a vaccine that I'm encouraged that hopefully it's by the end of the fourth quarter, and maybe we can get it mass distribution in 2021. So, I don't know how long this is going to last. I do think though, that we are starting to see a recovery because we are opening, but it's a lot different than what it was in 2008.

Anthony Scaramucci: (25:34)
Yeah. It's just the combination of the financial issues, plus the health scare is something I think is unique, and we had the oil shock going on in April as well. So it just, it was a trifecta that I don't think we've seen all of those colliding together at the same time. We've got a question out here. Let me ask this question then I'll let John ask something, coming in on the fixed income side, what do you think of substituting for Feds or bonds? What's your thought there?

Stephanie Link: (26:01)
I think that that's a great idea because obviously you get more yields for certain. I think you have to be very selective though. It's like picking a stock, you have to have confidence in the fundamentals of the company and the balance sheet and that sort of thing, but absolutely that is a great combination. You can certainly mix in that, along with ... Because you're not getting yield and [inaudible 00:26:21], you're not really getting that much.

John Darsie: (26:26)
So Stephanie, you talked about the Fed earlier and about how much the liquidity they've dumped into the market has impacted asset prices, particularly in the equity market. The Fed is now starting to trim its balance sheet. Is this a completely Fed driven market whereby some of the volatility we're seeing today in markets is driven by concerns that maybe the fiscal stimulus isn't going to be as large or as quick as people would like? I know some of the unemployment benefits are expiring and then you have the Fed trimming its balance sheet a little bit. Is the market completely driven by news flow on policy or are fundamentals playing any role in volatility that we're seeing?

Stephanie Link: (27:05)
Well, I mean, the Fed is really, I mean, they really came out with the bazooka, right? I mean, I thought unlimited QE was one thing and then all of a sudden they're buying junk bonds on the other side. So it's like, wow, I've never seen such extreme action. And, it's very substantial.

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:22)
Could you get them to buy some structure credit for me, Steph. I mean, if you ever get in touch with any of these guys, just, you could mention that for me.

Stephanie Link: (27:27)
Absolutely.

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:28)
Go ahead. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt. I thought maybe I'd just ... I ask everybody I come in contact with.

Stephanie Link: (27:32)
So funny. I will, I will, absolutely.

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:34)
All right, thank you. Thank you, I appreciate that.

Stephanie Link: (27:38)
I would just simply say though with regards to the liquidity, I mean, did you hear ... I mean, I thought Powell sounded even more dovish this week than he did even a month ago, right? And a couple of weeks ago you had a number of Fed governors, also sounding much more dovish like there's more we can do. We're still keeping an eye on everything. I was just surprised that they were still so dovish. And so, I think, I mean, the Fed funds future market actually doesn't have the Fed raising rates until the end of 2022.

Anthony Scaramucci: (28:09)
Yeah. Well, the president has called in privately the most improved player on his team. When I heard that from one of the guys that I still talk to inside the administration, I was laughing at that. I thought that was typical of the president. I mean, if you notice he doesn't tweet about him anymore.

Stephanie Link: (28:26)
No, he doesn't.

Anthony Scaramucci: (28:27)
So, chairman Powell has done a great job. Obviously he's a very cautious guy, but he recognizes what we all recognized last time and if you read the book Firefighting, which was written by Geithner and Bernanke and Paulson, they said do more, be more aggressive. And I think this Fed has decided to do that. I think he's been very helpful to the overall economy.

Stephanie Link: (28:48)
Absolutely, I mean.

John Darsie: (28:49)
At least the expectations, that's half the battle is if investors feel like if anything goes wrong, the Fed will be there with an even bigger bazooka than they had last time, then it encourages risk-taking, which we're seeing in markets today.

Stephanie Link: (29:02)
Absolutely. No, absolutely.

Anthony Scaramucci: (29:03)
You worried about inflation, Stephanie?

Stephanie Link: (29:08)
That's why I mentioned the inflation break evens. Have you seen that chart? If you haven't, you should look at it on Bloomberg because it is an interesting chart. It really has rebounded and it gives me pause for sure. I don't think you're going to see inflation in the near term, maybe in the next three to six months, but I do think you're going to see something. What do you think gold is ... I think gold is telling us that for sure.

Stephanie Link: (29:29)
I am watching the dollar too, because that is also going to be instrumental in the pile on if we do get some inflation, but I think it's probably more like a 12 to 18 months time horizon that we see it. But I have to say, my entire team that I work with right now, they're fairly young. They've never seen inflation in their whole lives. So, there are PMs out there. There are people running money that have never seen inflation, which when it comes, it's going to come pretty fast, I think.

Anthony Scaramucci: (30:01)
Yeah. Well, listen, I'm worried about it as you have to be worried about it and obviously gold prices. But I remember going back to 2010 and '11, where gold was on a little bit of a run, but the Fed was telling you there wasn't going to be inflation. And then what you realized that they were replacing a lot of lost economic output, that's why you didn't get the inflation. However, you got the asset inflation.

Anthony Scaramucci: (30:24)
I think that's where the anxiety comes into the system from a political perspective, because, if you're lowering rates, rates work great on assets. If you own assets, the asset prices go up, but your wages do not necessarily go up. And even though everything has changed, I can still remember 35 years ago in an economics class, a very brilliant economics professor said to me, you're not going to get lots of inflation in the United States without wage growth, but you study wages, and you study wage growth, you don't really have a lot of mobility and wages right now, given the magnitude of people that are looking for work or are currently unemployed due to the work stoppages.

Anthony Scaramucci: (31:04)
So, I just think it's going to be hard to get the inflation, even though the expectation is there. We'll have to see, but I think it's going to look a lot like 2009 and '10. It's going to surprise me. Go ahead, John.

Stephanie Link: (31:17)
That'll be good for stocks.

Anthony Scaramucci: (31:18)
Yeah, no question. No question.

John Darsie: (31:20)
So the pandemic in a lot of ways was like a meteor strike that came completely out of left field. A lot of people were unprepared for it, and we've talked to some hedge fund managers and others who are changing the way they think about risk management as a result of the pandemic. We haven't had a pandemic like this in 100 years, so a lot of people were very unprepared for all the different implications of it. How, if at all, has the pandemic changed the way you think about portfolio construction for clients and about risk management in general?

Stephanie Link: (31:49)
So I would say that I always want to be diversified for sure. And I actually lean towards high quality companies and blue chip companies. My mantra is if I can get the number one or number two company in an industry with a great balance sheet, strong management team, market share growth, they're investing appropriately and properly to continue to see growth in the future, what I call compounders, if you will, those are the kinds of companies that I think will weather the storm better.

Stephanie Link: (32:22)
And they're also the companies that they're not going to not go down in a market. They're going to go down, but they're going to be the first ones to actually recover. So what I called them back in March, these kinds of companies, I called them accidentally high yielders, so that they went down, their yields went up, they had the liquidity, and that was why I actually added in March and April. And it was hard, trust me. I mean, you guys know it, it really, really was hard to buy anything back then.

Stephanie Link: (32:52)
I mean, we had so many very prominent figures in the industry really be very negative and very cautious. And quite frankly, it was alarming. I actually told everyone, just turn the TV off. You can't listen to these kinds of people and you just got to focus on fundamentals. And so for me, that's what drives me. And I don't know if it's necessarily the pandemic has changed that, it's just intensified that, it's just reminded me that I think my process makes sense. And while I might lag on these rip rallies, because it's always that secondary, third groupings that do well and outperform, and the way down you don't get hurt nearly as much. And again, if you're diversified and you do have, is it 60 40, is it 70 30, is it 80 20, you have a balance. I think that will serve you well over the long term.

John Darsie: (33:39)
I'm going to finish with a question about Hightower, which you started there, I think three and a half weeks ago. And it's a very fast growing firm, the independent RIA model is on fire in the marketplace because of how it eliminates conflict of interest between the advisor and their clients. Talk a little bit about your experience so far and why you were so attracted to that independent RIA model and what it's been like dealing with clients in a different way than you were when you were on the buy side?

Stephanie Link: (34:07)
Sure.

Anthony Scaramucci: (34:08)
And full disclosure, Stephanie, John worked at Hightower.

John Darsie: (34:11)
And I'm still invested-

Anthony Scaramucci: (34:13)
And worked very close to a lot of the Hightower [crosstalk 00:34:17].

John Darsie: (34:16)
Invested in the success of the business, so I'm a cheerleader from afar.

Stephanie Link: (34:21)
I will prove you proud. I will make you proud.

John Darsie: (34:22)
All right. Yeah, I'm excited that you joined it. It was a exciting press release to read, so I'm pumped about that.

Anthony Scaramucci: (34:29)
They were about to change the name of the company to Lowtower and then John left. And they said it was okay to stay at Hightower. But go ahead, Stephanie, I'm sorry, I have to rip him a little bit, because look at him, how can I not rip him? But go ahead, Steph, I'm sorry.

Stephanie Link: (34:44)
George Washington in the background.

Anthony Scaramucci: (34:46)
Yeah. Well, he's related to George Washington. I mean, how am I not going rip him? I'm an Italian kid from Long Island with my [inaudible 00:34:53] cup, see.

Stephanie Link: (34:54)
That's awesome.

Anthony Scaramucci: (34:55)
Today is going to be an amazing day. See that, they keep losing, but it's fine.

Stephanie Link: (35:00)
The power of positive thinking, right?

Anthony Scaramucci: (35:02)
So tell us about Hightower.

Stephanie Link: (35:04)
Yeah, I know and it's been a really great experience so far. So, as I mentioned earlier, I wanted to try to find a place that was growing in the business. I had gotten tired of cost cutting and restructuring and reorganizing and laying off. And it just wasn't fun and that was on the sales side and the buy side. And it was a surprise to me. But when I really did a lot of homework on the industry, I think the demographics are very favorable, number one. And number two, the piece that I'm going to be involved in is investing in products, in equities, in multi-asset, in fixed income, in ALTS.

Stephanie Link: (35:38)
I have a great team that's there and we're going to hopefully be able also to get the advisors to outsource to our products. And then, I'm also running my own product. So I'm still running money because I think, well, that's my passion quite frankly. And I obviously, I think to be on TV and to be in the media and to talk about stocks and to talk about the market, I think you have to have skin in the game and to have credibility. And so, that's why we decided I will still have a product, I'll have this other OCIO group too. I'll be working with the advisors, whether they put money with us or not, I'll be happy to talk to their clients as well and to give them advice, if I can.

Stephanie Link: (36:17)
Obviously I'm more equity focused versus fixed income and ALTS, but that's the piece that was also very interesting to me that I could learn. At this point in my career, there's a chance that I could still learn because I learn in the stock market, it's very humbling. Things change every day. But I wanted to know this is the way I think this is where the industry is going and in total. And so, I wanted to be part of that.

Stephanie Link: (36:39)
And then as I've met people, advisors as well as corporate and everyone is so, well, they're kind, and they were very welcoming, but they're also so focused on growth. Every single person, how are we growing? What can we do? Where can we expand? Where is it not working and we can reallocate the resources. I mean, they're being very creative.

Stephanie Link: (37:00)
As I mentioned, Bob Oros, the CEO created this position and we talked about what would be the perfect job for me. And it's a lot, it's like a fire hose, but it's very exciting. And so, I'm thrilled to be part of it. As I mentioned before, to hire in this environment speaks volumes. And I think I made the right choice, so I'm excited.

Anthony Scaramucci: (37:23)
Well, we love the company. And we agree, we love the company. We have a tremendous amount of RIAs over there in your distribution network, and we do a lot of business with them and they do a great job servicing their clients. And I always maintain that you're just not going to sit in ETFs all your ... If you are a high net worth individual, or you're an endowment, you're going to want to speak to people because flying the plane robotically has worked, but it may not always work. And I think it's very important to have those touch points, so they've got to be thrilled to have you, Stephanie.

Anthony Scaramucci: (37:59)
John is very thrilled because I think he owns a small little piece he's indicating. So, he's recognizing that you're already adding value to his life. We are very grateful to have you on. I hope we can get you back as we get closer to the election, because I think the economy is going to look a little different as we get out into the fourth quarter. We'd love to have you back to hear your insights there as well. John, do you have anything else you want to add?

John Darsie: (38:25)
That's it. We appreciate you taking the time, Stephanie. I know you're busy in your new role, but we appreciate you taking time out to join us, and we'll look forward to watching you on CNBC in the coming weeks and months.

Stephanie Link: (38:39)
Thank you so much for the invitation. It was a lot of fun.

Anthony Scaramucci: (38:39)
And congratulations, Stephanie, wishing you the best. Thank you.

Stephanie Link: (38:41)
Thank you. Stay safe.

Jerry Pascucci: Building a Successful Investment Team | SALT Talks #22

“Leaders define cultures, cultures define organizations and culture is the best predictor of a company’s future.“

Jerry Pascucci is a Managing Director of UBS Financial Services. He also serves as Head of Global Alternative Investment Solutions, where he is responsible for research, sourcing, underwriting, strustructuringting, risk management, administration and distribution of all alternative investment products, as well as private equity, credit, real estate, infrastructure and impact offerings.

The hedge fund industry is doing well in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. As opposed to the 2008 financial crisis, there is more capital to work with. With time and operational capability, companies will persevere. Otherwise, there is ambiguity in what will happen when capital investors get into some friction.

On manager selection, “the first thing you have to do is have the license to get involved with that small manager.” A successful investment team has to be able to source and test their hypothesis. This has been made even more challenging without face-to-face meetings, meaning fewer managers are crossing the proverbial finish line with allocators.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Jerry Pascucci.jpeg

Jerry Pascucci

Head, Global Alternative Investment Solutions

UBS

MODERATOR

anthony_scaramucci.jpeg

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:08)
Hello, everyone. Welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the managing director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum at the intersection of finance, technology, and geopolitics. We've been doing these SALT Talks, which is our series of digital interviews with leading investors, creators, and thinkers during the work from home period in lieu of our global conference series. Just like we like to do at our SALT conferences, the goal with these SALT Talks is to provide our audience a window into the minds of subject matter experts and provide a platform for big, important ideas that we think are shaping the future of the world.

John Darsie: (00:43)
Today, we're very excited to welcome Jerry Pascucci to SALT Talks. Jerry is the managing director of UBS Financial Services, and he serves as the head of alternative investments for UBS Wealth Management Americas, where he is responsible for research development, approval, and distribution of all alternative investment products, including hedge funds, managed futures, real estate, and private equity offerings. He's the president and a director of the firm's commodity pool operator, as well as other registered investment advisor entities. His responsibilities include the oversight of product origination, manager selection, investment and operational due diligence, portfolio construction, and distribution of all alternative offerings in the United States region.

John Darsie: (01:28)
Prior to joining UBS in 2010, Jerry served in various capacities at Citigroup Global Markets and related entities in various capacities since 1996. He began at Citigroup Global Markets as a senior credit risk officer focused primarily on marketing counterparty risks associated with hedge fund and commodity pool and clients. He rose to managing director of Citigroup Alternative Investments prior to joining UBS. Citigroup Alternative Investments is a division of Citigroup that administered its hedge fund, fund of hedge fund, and commodity pool businesses, of which the SkyBridge investment team was formerly a part. I know Jerry and Anthony are likely to get into that during the interview.

John Darsie: (02:09)
Just a reminder, if you have any interviews, any questions, excuse me, for Jerry during the conversation, you can enter them in the Q&A box at the bottom of your video screen, and I'm going to turn it over to Anthony Scaramucci, who is the founder and managing partner of SkyBridge Capital as well as the chairman of SALT, to conduct the interview with Jerry.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:27)
John, thanks very much, and before I get over to Jerry, I just want to thank you for putting my grandfather up on the wall behind you. It was very appropriate for this because Jerry's grandfather, as he knows, looks very similar to my grandfather, so we both-

Jerry Pascucci: (02:40)
Almost the same.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:41)
Yeah, yeah, we're both very happy that you put us up there.

John Darsie: (02:43)
For all of our recurring SALT Talk listeners, the constant ridicule has led me to continue to change up my background. Hopefully, one day I'll find a background that is suitable for Anthony.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:53)
Well, I appreciate the lineage. Jerry and I certainly do. But, Jer, go back further than John's introduction. Where'd you grow up? I know you live out on Long Island here with me, so tell us a little bit about your upbringing if you don't mind.

Jerry Pascucci: (03:08)
Yeah, okay. And before I do, thanks for having me, Anthony. Great to be with everyone. I'm happy to be part of such a distinguished group of guests in terms of the folks that you've had here. The next five minutes probably won't suggest I'm in that category, but I'll try anyway.

Jerry Pascucci: (03:24)
I live pretty close to where I grew up. My parents were from the outer boroughs. I grew up in Long Island. My dad was a civil servant. My mom was a homemaker. I actually got picked up from an adoption agency stairs about a week before ... I think, in 1969, when I was born, if you got to 10 months, you went into the foster care program, and I got adopted by a middle class family at nine and a half. So when you think about life and how a couple of days or minutes could take a drastic turn, I doubt I'd be sitting here talking to you if that stint in the orphanage lasted an extra two weeks. You can always come back to that, right?

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:09)
Hey, well, amen. So how many brothers and sisters did you grow up with, Jer?

Jerry Pascucci: (04:14)
I have one younger brother.

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:18)
So your parents ended up adopting him as well, or they had him?

Jerry Pascucci: (04:21)
Yeah, actually, they did. I was a public method, and by the time my brother came along five years later, they were able to do it privately, so it was a different experience with my brother. He's blond-haired, blue-eyed, fair-skinned, and my dad used to like to say he was from the north.

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:39)
Hey, Darsie, stop smiling, okay? Look at Darsie over there. You see him in the Zoom smiling away? Look at him.

Jerry Pascucci: (04:44)
I do, I do.

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:45)
Yeah, you never-

John Darsie: (04:45)
I got hazel eyes.

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:47)
You never met people like Darsie, you and me growing up. We never met people like him. It took us to these investment banks, Jerry, okay? But let's talk about ... I want to go back to the first day I met you. Remember when I brought the Italian food into 59th Street?

Jerry Pascucci: (05:02)
I do, I remember. Yep.

Anthony Scaramucci: (05:02)
We were buying the Citibank Alternative Investment Management thing. You were staying at Citi temporarily. Take us through the decision to get over to UBS and how far you go back with Ray and Troy.

Jerry Pascucci: (05:15)
Yeah. The decision about going to UBS ... Well, let me back up. We shared a floor. It was an interesting time because after the Smith Barney merger with Morgan Stanley, we had people working at different firms sitting on the same floor, which was a weird thing. I was in the JV for nine months. I thought I'd be in the JV for nine minutes. But, at the time, Ray and I were partners. Ray was running the business. I was running the portfolios for both the macro and commodity pools that were legacy businesses and the fund of hedge funds that was a legacy business, which back in I guess it was '95 when you were starting to reboot ... I don't even know what decade it is anymore. But it was a long time ago. So we were running our businesses together. The fund of funds was going into the JV. I'm sorry. The commodity pool businesses and some of the other ancillary businesses were going into the JV. The fund of funds was not. So there was a period of time where everyone sat on the floor but had different business cards.

Jerry Pascucci: (06:22)
Leading up to that, the investment team had reported to me, and so I was very involved in what that book looked like on a day-to-day basis. Troy, at the time, was a new hire who I had interviewed. That's another story unto itself, but we've only got 45 minutes. That was interesting. But, clearly, I knew then that he had opinions and he had viewpoints and that he did his homework. His very large binder of very neatly-wrapped pages of analysis told me that right away. So he joined the team early on that I was managing, and off we went.

Jerry Pascucci: (07:03)
By design, I think, even back then ... And this was a long time ago. We were looking for concentrated portfolio. We were looking to have forward-looking views all the time. That was going to be the hallmark of what we did. We weren't trying to compete for what was at the time a business that tended to have 40, 50, 60 names in a portfolio. We just thought that kind of product was already commoditized in in some respects, and inside the type of distribution system we were in, it wasn't all that relevant or valuable. So we really set out to do something different. And Troy, his viewpoints obviously became one of the largest and ultimately the largest influencer into the shape that that would take. It was a differentiated business from go. It lived in between the single manager business and the multi-manager business, and that's exactly where we intended to situate it. I think it proved to be a very useful tool for families, way back then even.

Anthony Scaramucci: (08:07)
Well, and I appreciate that. I think it's a really good narrative for where we are right now because I think that was one of your remarks after March. You were like, okay, well, in the context of its performance, designed the way it was, it acted exactly the way you thought. I think that's a pretty good tie-in back to that narrative. So now you're over at UBS, you're meeting my good friend Brian Hull over there, you're working over there with him, and you're building this asset, this alternative asset management platform. So tell us a little bit about that. Tell us a little bit about the things you're looking for over there.

Jerry Pascucci: (08:48)
Look, we started from scratch there. When I got there, it was just after the crisis. We wanted to invest. It was past the point where people started to become a little bit braver. I didn't get there until 2010. That was good because they hadn't done a product in about 18 months and I didn't really have a lot of demo to do. So there was nothing to tear down, and you could start to build right away. That put you in a position to get going. My thought there, when I left the Morgan Stanley JV, I swore I would never even have a checking account again, nonetheless work for another bank. But I did have a tremendous opportunity going to work for some of the people you mentioned, Bon McCann, John Brown, who I was his first hire there, Brian Hull. That gave me a tremendous amount of optionality and distribution at a time when distribution was really, really important.

Jerry Pascucci: (09:38)
The other thing that that management team gave me, which is a license that I have to this day and which is probably the most valuable license anyone in my seat will ever have, is a no adverse selection license. What that means was there was no arbitrary constraints on what we were going to build, right? It would be just as easy for me to engage with a first-time fund who nobody in the world ever heard of in a nation strategy or something that was out of favor as it was for me to do the next Blackstone fund or the next Millennium product. Not that those things aren't extremely valuable on both sides of that ledger, but I had the ability to run the barbell, which meant things we knew about controlling classes of CMBS and related types of things, which wealth management channels, quite frankly, never saw in a discrete way, we were able to offer. It wasn't like, "Hey, 37 months is a long enough track record but 35 isn't," or, "You can be 29% of that fund but not 31%," or, "You can be in fund two but not in fund one."

Jerry Pascucci: (10:37)
We took that all out of the equation, and that was the contingency for me to sign up. You had to run an investment-driven process that was 100% outcomes oriented. There were other ways to do it, and Bob and Brian and I talked a lot about that and said, "Look, you can go another way. You can build. I'm just not in the business of giving away 7 to 10 years of hard work every five years, so I'm just not your guy if that's the way you want to go." We came to an agreement on what my latitude was going to be, and these people have been steadfast in their support of that.

Jerry Pascucci: (11:09)
So, when I got there, I had a regional remit in the Americas. There was seven or eight billion dollars laying around. There probably wasn't a product launched in 12 or 18 months. Today, my remit's global, and we're approaching a hundred billion in our office.

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:23)
Congratulations.

Jerry Pascucci: (11:24)
So we made some strides. Thank you. We made some strides.

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:27)
So, Jerry, I got to ask you this because you've been around a long time. This is my 32nd year now starting in the business. I grew up at Goldman Sachs, very client-driven at that time. The boss said, "We're long-term greedy. Build the relationships forever."

Jerry Pascucci: (11:45)
That's right.

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:45)
One of the things that's happened in COVID-19 for me is the awareness of how dramatically Wall Street has changed. It has become very transactional. So people you think you have 10, 20, 30-year relationships with, it turns out you actually don't. They start ghosting you if you don't do well. My question is how have you maintained that long-term? How has Brian Hull maintained that? How have other people at UBS maintained that hallmark of it still being a relationship business?

Jerry Pascucci: (12:15)
Yeah. Well, because that's all you got in the end, Anthony. You're going to have your reputation and your relationships, and that's all you're going to have when it's all done. I live every day like tomorrow's my last day, quite frankly, but-

Anthony Scaramucci: (12:27)
Right, well, me too. That's how I grew up. I get that.

Jerry Pascucci: (12:30)
The reality is those are the two things you're going to have. Brian always says, "Leaders define cultures, cultures define organizations, and culture's the best predictor of a company's future." That's a direct quote of Mr. Hull who you know I hold in the highest-

Anthony Scaramucci: (12:46)
Say it again slowly, Jer, because I think it's an awesome quote. I've heard him say it all the time.

Jerry Pascucci: (12:49)
Yeah, he says, "Leaders define cultures, cultures define organizations, and culture is the best predictor of a company's future." And he's right.

Anthony Scaramucci: (12:57)
No question.

Jerry Pascucci: (12:58)
I think if the world knows that you're playing the long game all the time, then they know, and that has to happen in actions, not in words. There's times when it matters, so if you can point to the times when a relationship mattered and you scored high there for the right reasons, then that becomes your legacy. That's what we want ours to be. Not ever-

Anthony Scaramucci: (13:23)
Well, amen.

Jerry Pascucci: (13:24)
Not ever to compromise a client, not ever to compromise a standard, not ever to compromise your reputation, your franchise, your firm. But there are just times when you got to make intelligent decisions at critical moments, and that's what's going to separate you, I think, when the last tally gets taken.

Anthony Scaramucci: (13:45)
Oh, listen, you've definitely demonstrated that over the course of your career, but particularly now. Frankly, SkyBridge has been the beneficiary of that long-term relationship, so I want to say thank you to that. Specific to the hedge fund industry, the industry did reasonably well after 2008. Then passive money took over as the fed started really washing the universe with capital. What do you think about today, the hedge fund industry post COVID-19? Is it going to do well, and what sectors will do better than others, in your opinion?

Jerry Pascucci: (14:23)
Well, look, I think we are by large as an industry doing well. I think when you're running a book, whether you're an allocator or you're a direct risk-taker, you want your big positions to be the ones working and your small positions to be the ones that aren't. Fortunately, on most of the platforms, not only our own here but on most, you tend to have bigger positions in things that have stayed the course and navigated this a little better, like MultiStrat. The places where we're challenged, obviously, in those external leverage dependent areas of the market where we had some problems, you tend to have smaller positions because the capacity for those things is oftentimes lower. So you come in okay.

Jerry Pascucci: (15:08)
I think there are areas where we're going to do very well, be they in downside protection or in dislocation. I think we're going to get into the strategies and the markets we think are favorable or unfavorable as this whole discussion goes on. But by and large, in those areas, I think we look promising. More importantly, I think I'm starting to hear a little bit less of the types of narratives that we heard over the last 10 years, like, "I can't make enough money after tax. What am I paying the fees for? Fees are X percentage of total expectancy. I don't understand the value proposition anymore." We were getting quite a bit of that out of the wealth community, and I would make a big distinction here. It wasn't necessarily clients. It was equally and as much their advice providers that had that position. Once you start to lose them, when you sit in an intermediary business like ours, that becomes problematic. You really have to be articulate through that.

Jerry Pascucci: (16:12)
I would say now the narrative's a little bit more constructive. March and April were quiet. May, June, and July are not. People are actionable and investing. People are revisiting things that they were looking to leave a long time ago, and performance has been okay, right? It's been okay in multiple disciplines and strategies. So it feels okay to me in places. Whether or not hedged equity is going to generate enough alpha, particularly on the short side, looks promising yet TBD. Same thing on macro, which the amount of the imbalance we've had in the world and all the things that we're dealing with that are hard to underwrite, macro should be doing a lot better than it generally tends to do. That's been something that's been prevalent for quite some time.

Jerry Pascucci: (17:04)
But it's a different world. I think it's a different world than it was 10 years ago. I know we're going to talk about that too, but I think it puts us in fairly good stead. I would expect to see some dispersion in those results, though.

Anthony Scaramucci: (17:18)
So let's talk about that. It is a different world. So what makes it different? It's interesting. I was just on with one of our investors, people we're invested in, Dan Loeb at Third Point. We were talking about the differences. He's going to be speaking next week on SALT Talk. We were talking about the differences between 2008 and March of 2020, where basically the entire global financial crisis happened in about seven to 15 trade days.

Jerry Pascucci: (17:45)
Right. It's obviously time that we condensed this whole thing in. I think last time you had far less capital, far more time, and therefore you had a tide that would raise all boats. If you were brave enough when the tide rose, it was hard to get it wrong or harder to get it wrong. I think this time it's very different because you're dealing with things you just can't underwrite from a financial perspective. You can't underwrite the healthcare problem. You can't really underwrite the election because no matter where you go there, there's a whole set of issues you got to contend with and you may be looking at a hard pivot from one posture to another. You've got the civil issues that we're all grappling with and reconciling. So you can't throw the financial modeling at that, right? You can't make a reasonable forecast, which means that it's just the tails are fatter and it's hard to be brave.

Jerry Pascucci: (18:37)
It was also less crowded last time. To me, it's an interesting juxtaposition because some of these opportunity sets have velocity associated with them. But at the same time, I think, and you might hear Dan talk about this a little bit, it's going to require some patience and picking through. So, on the one hand, you're saying, "Hey, hurry up, okay? There's been a lot of mean reversion in certain areas of the market already. What's really left, right?" On the other hand, you're saying, "Be patient. Be careful. It's crowded. It's going to be complex." Whether you're talking about mortgages or corporates, whole loan corporates versus structured, commercial versus resi and property, agency versus non, this onion just has a lot of layers, and there's a lot of capital chasing it. You got a lot of work to do to sift through where the real value's going to be. I think it's very different because there are factors there that we haven't had to contend with in the past, where it's been a financial problem.

Anthony Scaramucci: (19:41)
So go over the structured credit for a second. That was the epicenter of the crisis in March, certainly had a big impact on the SkyBridge portfolio. What's your view now of structured credit? Where are you guys?

Jerry Pascucci: (19:57)
Yeah. So, look, this is an interesting one too, and this is where investing gets difficult. You might have a partner that's got some legacy issues. But sometimes the challenges are the opportunities, as we know. How do you make the decision between chasing a fresh pool of capital with no legacy issues that you're going to pay 20% of the profits away to day one versus a portfolio that you couldn't replace at the price it's currently marked at but there may be some firm issues, enterprise risk issues, reputational issues, or other things, and you got to decide how are you going to deploy that capital? You also, as I just alluded to before, have a tremendous amount of relative value analysis to do, more so than you had to do last time, between all the different things that I mentioned and all the different degrees of freedom and subclasses that you have to go through.

Jerry Pascucci: (20:47)
So I think we come away where most people do. In real estate related structured credit, we think right now relative value is in the residential side. I think commercial real estate is going to be a lot trickier, beyond the obvious hospitality, retail, and development being challenged and industrial apartments and offices to some extent being better. We all know where the concentration of sector exposure is in the controlling classes and securitizations. That's just going to take some time, and the fundamentals there are still pretty tough. The housing market's different, right? The housing market's different. It can go under a lot of support. The consumer being what it is to GDP and housing being what it is to the consumer's going to mean that there's going to be a lot more thrust and figuring out a path forward on the resi side.

Jerry Pascucci: (21:41)
By and large, with corporates, similar type of thing, [inaudible 00:21:48] equity's a difficult thing to assess these days. We all see the filings. We all know what's potentially coming. But we don't understand recoveries, severities, defaults quite well enough yet. So the corporate side is interesting, and you have more support there. Absolute value-

Anthony Scaramucci: (22:08)
But you're getting paid, though, right, Jer?

Jerry Pascucci: (22:09)
Yeah, I think you get-

Anthony Scaramucci: (22:10)
If you look at the spreads, you're getting paid for some of this risk, yes?

Jerry Pascucci: (22:14)
I think you are, but when I alluded to velocity before, right, the best opportunity probably has the highest velocity and mean reversion right now, which is RMBS. The other reason I don't say that RMBS is clearly and by a distance where I would be positioned most favorably is because it has that velocity or decay-

Anthony Scaramucci: (22:37)
Yeah. Oh, we agree.

Jerry Pascucci: (22:37)
... if you want to look at it through the other lens, decay of opportunity set associated with it, that could increase in velocity versus decay in velocity. I think on the commercial side if you own it, right, you're going to have a tremendous opportunity. Most of the commercial real estate exposure we have, certainly on the debt side, is in the hands of people that have tremendous toolkits, own servicing, have tremendous workout capabilities, have no leverage, no external dependence, have 10-year locked capital, have return to multiple with capital already. So when you have that scenario, right, you have unlevered, unencumbered cash flows with time, that's a whole lot different than trying to pick a spot to enter a draw down or make a decision whether you're going to stay with someone or move into a fresh pool of capital and start paying away gains.

Jerry Pascucci: (23:24)
We were fortunate enough to have a very late cycle posture coming into this, so we had things we were already doing, not in anticipation of this, but a late cycle posture. So we have some pools that we think are structured right, we have the right amount of time associated with them, they're not foresellers, so they can play some offense, right? So I think-

Anthony Scaramucci: (23:44)
I know. We're in total agreement. That's one of the benefits of-

Jerry Pascucci: (23:46)
Yeah, commercial real estate, from that perspective, very interesting. Our platform, if we just move away from structured credit a little bit, just by and large, I'm offering first loss risk in the places that I think are more resilient sector-wise, right? So maybe that's healthcare or tech or CMT. There's no reason to take first loss risk in wobbly sectors like property and energy and retail because you have the credit markets, you can take the senior position, and, to your point, you can get paid fairly well for the risk you're taking. Why run at the first loss position there at this point? Later on, when it's time to rescue and refi and deal with [inaudible 00:24:28], non-performing, we'll get there. But that's a different kettle of fish, different skill set. That's why the hedge fund business is so relevant in this whole exercise right now, because it's still a top of the stack, securities-driven, foreseller type of opportunity set. The question is understanding whether or not you have to rush.

Anthony Scaramucci: (24:44)
Well, we totally agree, and I think that's one of the things that we've been benefiting from, why we had our best asset fundraising in the month of June, because you're feeding into funds that are not going to participate in forward profits for a period of time, and yet you've got very well-priced assets with high yields.

Jerry Pascucci: (25:04)
That's right. Yeah, it's amazing-

Anthony Scaramucci: (25:04)
I got to turn-

Jerry Pascucci: (25:05)
It's amazing the-

Anthony Scaramucci: (25:06)
Go ahead.

Jerry Pascucci: (25:06)
I'm sorry, I'll wrap up this one. But it's amazing how the market doesn't respect that enough, right? That's because it's an emotional time and people are dealing with a lot of stuff in their businesses and in the health of their families and in trying to work from home. Even in a normal market, investors don't tend to get that discipline right. In this world, where it's a real hard world, it's even harder.

Anthony Scaramucci: (25:28)
Well, I know, I appreciate it. I appreciate you guys seeing that and seeing that as an opportunity in us. I've got to turn it over to John Darsie because we have a tremendous amount of participation right now. We've got questions coming in to Mr. Darsie. So go ahead, John.

Jerry Pascucci: (25:44)
Okay.

John Darsie: (25:44)
Yeah, and just a reminder to everyone watching, if you have any questions for Jerry, you can enter them in the Q&A box at the bottom of your video screen. As long as they're in-bounds, we'll ask them, and you'll get your answer. The first question is about when you're evaluating hedge fund managers' personal characteristics and organizational characteristics, what are some things that you look for when you're evaluating hedge funds for your platform?

Jerry Pascucci: (26:09)
Look, everybody's got the obvious stuff around performance at critical moments and all that stuff. For me, it's culture number one, we talked about that. I got to recognize what your culture is, and you got to be playing the same long game that I'm playing. Character, obviously, and character can mean a lot of things. Transparency, I guess, I would put in that category. Lack of surprises. Talent, obviously, and intellectual capital. Your ability to attract and retain talent is going to give you the durability that I want you to have over the long run. First and foremost, as I said before, as an investor, it's outcomes. It's not, "Hey, you can gather a lot of assets, therefore you're a priority," never been my game. I'd rather generate a great outcome on a small amount of assets than a bad outcome on a large amount of assets.

Jerry Pascucci: (26:56)
So all the risk-taking stuff that you would expect comes into play here, but I think culturally, because of my background and because I spent the earlier part of my career doing two things, right? I was a minimum market lender, which interestingly enough has moved out of the conventional financial system into the alternative world that I now live in, and I was an allocator. Those are the two things that inform me. I think people don't understand how hard it is to liquidate collateral. People don't understand how hard it is to turn things off, even things that are systematic, right? You got to kick the plug out sometimes. Very, very hard decision.

Jerry Pascucci: (27:30)
So I think there are elements of risk-taking that we look for that come from having a career building an investment process as opposed to having a career structuring or selling, right, if you will. That's what's really going to inform what we're looking for a higher level going in. The reason is because people I compete with might do 70, 80 products in a given year for a wealth channel. I'll do 20, which means every mistake I make is glaring, every success I have is glaring. I like it that way, right, because the value that we generate becomes obvious and it distinguishes our business.

Jerry Pascucci: (28:12)
But unless you have an investment background, it's a tough way to live your life, and so we look for people ... Because we're going to have fewer partners and because we're going to apply selectivity to the exercise, I got to believe that we're going to be dancing for a very long time. So that has to factor in early. Even if we think you're great for the moment, if you can't be transparent, we're not going to communicate, I don't respect your culture, you're transactional, you're looking to give me a deal, you're looking to redline every word of every document I show you, you're not long-term outcomes oriented, I go away fast.

John Darsie: (28:55)
The conversation so far has revolved mainly around hedge funds and real estate backed structured credit, but you cover the entire alternative investment ecosystem.

Jerry Pascucci: (29:04)
I do, yep. Yeah.

John Darsie: (29:05)
So private equity was the hot dot for the last several years leading into the pandemic, and we've talked to several distressed credit investors and others on SALT Talks that have expressed some worries about once the federal reserve and government support runs out maybe in the fall, what the private equity space is going to look like. Could you talk a little bit about concerns and opportunities you see in the private equity space?

Jerry Pascucci: (29:31)
Yeah, look, I'm not a huge believer in there's going to be a distraction and good money's going to get thrown after bad and they're not going to be able to find the cheapness because they're working out this or that. Look, I think it's foolish to think if these businesses were run on a mark-to-market basis they wouldn't show some wear and some pressure and some stress in some places. I think that'd be foolish to think. But they don't. They have the benefit of the structural advantages that they carry. As we've seen in the past, on many, many marquee transactions, with time and real operational capability and some help from the system and stimulus and/or rescue or whatever you want to call it, you can turn situations that look pretty grim into situations that turn out pretty well. It's going to be a very interesting vintage.

Jerry Pascucci: (30:26)
We've been saying for years, right, before this came, we're either going to get a break in the world late in the investment cycle, its vintage, and we're going to have overpaid for a lot, but we're going to get a break early in the vintage and we're going to find some unbelievable cheapness. So it's not going to be an average vintage no matter how you cut it. I think that's probably still true. So TBD there. Again, I think you're going to start to see dispersion. It's not really an engineering game as much as it is a straight-up bottom left to top right bull market. Those who really have the operational capability that everyone claims to have are going to fare through this a lot better, even if they wind up having made some of the mistakes that others did going in. How you manage through this is going to be interesting.

Jerry Pascucci: (31:20)
And let's not forget, secondary market is a lot more developed than it was. The co-investment business is a lot more developed than it was. Sometimes I worry about, in private equity, everyone's kind of all over each other's cap stack, if you will. I sometimes wonder what happens when a bunch of really shrewd investors who are all over the capital stack of each other's companies get into some friction. I think we haven't seen that, and we're going to. I think that's going to be an interesting part of this cycle, for sure.

John Darsie: (31:55)
We have two questions-

Jerry Pascucci: (31:56)
I hope that answers your question.

John Darsie: (31:57)
Yeah, no, that's great. We have two questions that are somewhat similar in nature, and I'll combine them into one. We deal with this at SkyBridge as well on a philosophical basis. But how do you combat the IBM problem? It's safer for an analyst to put forward an established manager that has a big brand name versus looking for emerging managers with a new strategy that might be interesting but maybe take some time to establish itself or perform well.

Jerry Pascucci: (32:22)
Yeah. So two ways. What I said to you before, and this squarely falls into that category, if you're not constrained in terms of ... If you don't have the license to think, you can't avoid the problem you just described, right? So the first thing you had to do was have the license to engage in that smaller manager and decide what you were going to believe and whether or not you could articulate that belief. That's step number one. Unless you structurally possess the license, I don't care who you are. You just can't do what you want to do.

Jerry Pascucci: (32:51)
The second thing is it's just got to be in the DNA of the process you run, not once in a while, not only when the world breaks, but it's got to be in your DNA. Your investment team has to be able to source, it has to be able to test its hypotheses, it has to be able to make mistakes, right? If you can't do those things, you can't learn how to have the appropriate discipline to invest earlier or smaller, right? I think you're right. Why in the world in an environment like we're in today would you want to take on any, say, enterprise risk? Right? Those are tougher things to price when you have uncertainty everywhere else. But when you don't, right, you might pivot your tolerances a little bit.

Jerry Pascucci: (33:41)
One of the best relationships I have in my business today and one of the best investment entry points I ever had was in the CNBSP pieces in late 2010, early 2011 with a partner called Rialto. I notice that some of you on the call might know them. Others can check out who they are. But at the time we engaged in that partnership, there wasn't a person on earth outside of the actual commercial real estate business that knew who these people were because they never had an asset management entity, if you will, or a sponsor or anything, if you will. We've invested with that group over every point in the cycle, trough, recovery, peak, and now again. They've proven to have the type of skill set that's durable enough to take you through each time you take a bite.

Jerry Pascucci: (34:32)
But without that willingness to be in a first close in a first time fund at a time when everyone was still consumed by residential real estate problems and not even thinking about commercial with a sponsor no one ever heard of ... It was the second product I ever put on the UBS platform. I could tell you how many phone calls I got like, "Hey, dopey, you work at a bank, did anybody tell you that," or, "You work at a Swiss bank, in case you haven't noticed," or, "What are you thinking?" We just said to ourselves, "Look, we're here to handicap all these exposures and opportunity sets, ex-ante, forward looking," and this is something that I took from the SkyBridge, Citi, Solomon DNA that we built, right? That's our job. Handicap the opportunity set, get the best possible expression, be really communicable about the outcomes you think you can generate, all the possible outcomes, and never look back several years later not knowing why you did what you did when you did it and with whom you partnered.

Jerry Pascucci: (35:36)
So if you can instill that in your process, you can invest it in those areas. You can't do them for a living every day. You have to be balanced commercially. They're not even suitable for a good portion of our investor base. But to whom they are, we owe that to them.

Anthony Scaramucci: (35:53)
Well said. At the end of the day, you're serving the customer. All we've tried to do at SkyBridge is a be a fiduciary but also provide an investment opportunity that people would look at over a long period of time, not measured by a month. Jerry, I met you on July 1 of 2010. It's July 13th of 2020, 10 years later. Troy, Ray, and I had a good 120 months. I'm sorry, a good 119 months. We had one bad month. It's sort of nuts. But, anyway, I'm ventilating-

Jerry Pascucci: (36:29)
Look, you got to look at-

Anthony Scaramucci: (36:30)
Pascucci, you're cheaper than my therapist, so I'm ventilating to you, okay?

Jerry Pascucci: (36:33)
You got to look at the way ... Thank you. You got to look at the way that risk is assembled. If that risk was assembled in a sound fashion and you had a clientele that understood the risk they embarked on and were realistic about the lost possibilities and probabilities could be in something as extreme as we've seen, I think you owe that at least some consideration as opposed to a knee-jerk reaction as well.

Anthony Scaramucci: (37:01)
Yeah, so on our next episode of Jerry and Anthony, I'll ask you why some wirehouses sell at the bottom. But since that's not politically correct, we're going to turn it back over to John for more questions. Go ahead, John. Don't answer, Jer. Don't answer.

Jerry Pascucci: (37:14)
No, no, I won't answer that one.

Anthony Scaramucci: (37:15)
Go ahead, John.

John Darsie: (37:16)
So, Jerry, you talked a little bit about process, and we had a follow up question about your ability to judge a manager's character with face-to-face meetings. But in an environment where you're working from home and you have a global pandemic and you can't conduct due diligence in the same way that you typically would, how has that affected your process, not being able to be in the same room with perspective new managers and evaluating decisions on existing managers on your platform?

Jerry Pascucci: (37:42)
Yeah, I won't kid you. It is limiting. Like I said, we do less. So there are fewer people we're going to get to that point with anyway. But it is limiting. It's harder to understand body language. I got invited by someone in the industry to listen to Molly Bloom speak. I wasn't able to make it to that particular session, but it was one of these things like, "Hey, why don't you come to this session and think of a question for Molly?" What I would've said to Molly was, "Your game is a game of tells. How do you see tells virtually, right, when you've got someone from the neck up and you have no idea what they're looking down at?" I think the answer is it's really hard.

Jerry Pascucci: (38:29)
So I think what you have to do there is your referencing's got to get deeper and wider and more off the run. You got to spend more time digging through some of that stuff. If someone's in a room with you and makes you comfortable, it does put your guard down a little bit. Maybe you would've only done six references instead of eight or eight instead of 10. Maybe you would've said to yourself, "Yeah, those references are good enough." But I think in this environment, you need to risk mitigate the fact that you only have a person from the neck up and you have no idea who else is in the room. There's no real panacea for that. I think it's something we're all trying to contend with, and, therefore, this default to safer pairs of hands, low enterprise risk, longer contract records, that trend is going to be very intact for the reason you just brought up.

Jerry Pascucci: (39:25)
It borders on asking yourself whether you're asking responsibly if you decide to go forward with a partnership that you don't feel fully comfortable in vetting. So I do think it's limiting, and that's what's causing some of the ever more concentrating trends in the asset bases, for sure.

John Darsie: (39:44)
So I'll ask you one more question before we let you go, and it goes back to a question that Anthony asked earlier. But the hedge fund industry in general was reputationally somewhat down in the years leading up to the pandemic due to performance and due to the out-performance of equity markets, which have now rallied back to near all-time highs and in the case of some indexes, back to greater than previous all-time highs. But in the post-COVID environment, what do you see as the outlook for the hedge fund industry in general?

Jerry Pascucci: (40:17)
Look, I'm always uncomfortable when the first loss is telling you everything's fine and the last loss is telling you everything's not. I think life works better when it's happening the other way. It's more natural. I can't claim to understand why the stock market seems to predict that we don't really have any issues and the ones that we do have, we can understand, digest, and are all 100% transitory. As a career alternative investor, we tend to be perma-bearers, we tend to have value biases, it's a hard pill to swallow.

Jerry Pascucci: (40:55)
That being said, the fed's going to support risk assets, and there's all kinds of other structural factors that create a very bullish sentiment. And, of course, you do have the winners in this new economy. So I could tell you two things, right? In my mind, the uncertainty's higher, which means the tails are fatter, which means hedge funds have a better chance. Just like death and taxes for me, right? Because it's hard to come up with a null hypothesis that says the world is not riskier tomorrow than it was yesterday, at least for a while. However that winds up, okay, there's so many pathways that lead to so many things that could be so destructive to an economy and a society, be they inflationary or deflationary, that it should provide a pretty fertile environment for trading-oriented strategies. It should provide a good environment for alpha shorting. It should provide a good environment for both bottoms up and top down, hedging, all the things that we have in our toolkit as an investing community to put to work.

Jerry Pascucci: (42:10)
I know it's been a long time. It was a long grind up for the equity markets and a pretty long grind out of favor for the hedge fund community. But I think there are bright spots. I think our opportunity set has to be better as a function of all this, and the volatility when you have things that you can't underwrite financially, like we talked about before, has got to be prevalent. So I think structurally we have the environment that we need to have, dispersion, volatility, shorting, risk mitigation. Leverage will be important at the right times, dislocation, complexity, distress, regulatory evolution. There's nothing that we need that we don't have.

John Darsie: (42:55)
Well, we agree. And, Jerry, thanks so much for joining us. Anthony, I want to let you have the final word before we read the end of the segment here.

Anthony Scaramucci: (43:04)
No, I think Jerry captured it well. We've known each other a long time, and what I love about you, Jerry, is that you combine a total academic understanding of what's going on with a lot of commercial instincts. So hopefully we'll get this out to as many people as possible because there's a lot to be learned in terms of the long-term wisdom that you're sharing with everybody. So thank you, Jer. And, John-

John Darsie: (43:31)
Yeah, we have a-

Anthony Scaramucci: (43:33)
When the SALT Talk is over, Pascucci and I are going to have a conversation with you about the portrait behind you. I just want to make-

Jerry Pascucci: (43:39)
we're definitely going to do that.

John Darsie: (43:41)
I'll keep trying.

Anthony Scaramucci: (43:42)
Yeah, yeah, yeah. No question. I've already sent the-

John Darsie: (43:43)
I try to find a background that makes you happy but-

Anthony Scaramucci: (43:45)
I've already sent it to a lot of our SALT Talk fans who are just silent. There's just silence, John. But go ahead. You have the final word.

Jerry Pascucci: (43:56)
So let me-

Anthony Scaramucci: (43:56)
All right, go ahead, Jerry. Say what you want to say, Jer, because it's horrifying.

Jerry Pascucci: (44:00)
Yeah, well, we'll get to George in a minute. Like I said, I think it's a period of time when we got to celebrate what this nation's about. So I'll tolerate George for the moment or whoever that gray-haired guy is.

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:11)
Not George Washington. It's not George-

Jerry Pascucci: (44:13)
Yeah, or whoever that French guy is or English guy you got back there.

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:16)
No idea.

Jerry Pascucci: (44:18)
Look, I just want to say thanks. This was a great opportunity for us to share some of the features of our business that we find or think or hope to be distinguishing. I thank you, Anthony, for your partnership over the years. We have known each other for a long time. I'm flattered that you would include me in something like this. As I said before, I look at the screen at all these very distinguished people who have accomplished so much in their professions and in their lives, and it's humbling to have my very repulsive face in a box next to those people.

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:50)
Hey, man. Don't kid yourself. You're an industry expert at a time where the expertise is super valuable. At the end of the day, our conference is really hubbed around the main arteries of what you do for a living. So we're thrilled to have you on.

Jerry Pascucci: (45:04)
Well, thank you.

Anthony Scaramucci: (45:04)
Glad you accepted the invitation.

Jerry Pascucci: (45:04)
I'm very grateful. It was fun. I hope we get to do it again, and I hope some people find it useful. But it was terrific being with you.

Anthony Scaramucci: (45:10)
Same here.

Jerry Pascucci: (45:11)
But thanks, John. I like [inaudible 00:45:12].

John Darsie: (45:12)
Yeah, thanks, Jerry. Yeah, somebody in the chat in the Zoom webinar basically said I was inspired by watching Hamilton on Disney+, so we'll go with that.

Jerry Pascucci: (45:23)
Is that stag you got back there your Patronus? What's going on over there?

John Darsie: (45:26)
Exactly. I brought some science fiction into it too.

Anthony Scaramucci: (45:30)
Oh my god.