S1 | Digital Assets

Richard Byworth: Mainstream Adoption of Crypto | SALT Talks #181

“I have a pretty bullish view for this year. $175K is the likely peak we’re going to see this year.”

Richard Byworth is CEO of Diginex, a digital asset financial services and advisory company. Byworth has 20+ years of experience in finance, start-ups, investments and the fintech space.

Creating trusted and secure avenues through which major financial institutions can invest in Bitcoin is an important next step in its growth. The Federal Reserve will continue to expand the money supply as way to service the national debt. As the money supply grows, Bitcoin will only become more attractive as a hedge against inflation. Square, Tesla and Microstrategy have served as major catalysts in the movement towards adding Bitcoin to corporate treasuries. “Every CFO and finance department is having to explain to their board why we’re seeing this phenomenon, what is this Bitcoin asset, and why companies are putting it on their balance sheet to preserve value of their corporate treasury.”

This signals a bullish forecast for Bitcoin that will likely see its peak reach $175K by the end of 2021. As humans we are trained to think in linear progressions, but Bitcoin is growing exponentially. The Internet’s network effect saw the rapid growth of companies like Amazon, Apple and Facebook. Now, expect money to undergo the same type of transformation.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Richard Byworth.jpeg

Richard Byworth

Chief Executive Officer

Diginex

MODERATOR

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darcie: (00:07)
Hello everyone. And welcome back to salt talks. My name is John Darcie. I'm the managing director of salt, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance technology and public policy. Salt talks are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators, and thinkers. And our goal on these salt talks is the same as our goal and our salt conferences, which is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future. And we're very excited today to bring you the latest episode in our salt talks, digital assets series a with Richard BioWorth, who's the CEO of digital ex uh, Richard has over 20 plus years of experience spanning finance startups investments and the FinTech sectors. Uh, previously he was a managing director at Nomura, a Japanese investment bank, and Richard was running derivative and equity linked product sales for Asia Pacific products globally.

John Darcie: (01:06)
Uh, the youngest managing director in numerous history. Richard led the build-out of the number one franchise of convertible bonds in Asia from 2005. Richard has founded several companies and as an active investor, having started his first trading company in 1990, he's a board member of Bletchley park, asset management, Jersey digital ex, and sits on the advisory board to private market.io, which is a private equity fund marketplace. Uh, Richard is a Hong Kong regional ambassador ambassador for the global blockchain business council and has spoken extensively around the merits of blockchain for business and finance at the world economic forum, AKA Davos, and the United nations in Geneva hosting. Today's talk is Anthony Scaramucci, the founder and managing partner of SkyBridge capital, a global alternative investment firm. Anthony is also the chairman of salts. And with that, I'll turn it over to you, Anthony, to begin the interview.

Anthony Scaramucci: (01:59)
John, John, thank you and Richard. Thanks for joining us on your evening in Singapore. We appreciate you being here. Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Okay. I'm sorry. In Hong Kong, the

John Darcie: (02:10)
Hong Kong, the Singaporeans and the Hong Kong knees. Don't like to be a conflict.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:15)
Okay. So he's already starting by or C's already starting. Okay. Don't worry. I'll be kicking him at the knees here shortly, but Mr. By worth, you go from investment banking to crypto. So some of your colleagues think you're nuts. Obviously many of my colleagues have always known that I am nuts, but you don't seem nuts to me. So why did you go from investment banking into crypto?

Richard Byworth: (02:40)
Yeah, for me, um, banking was, was clearly starting to get to a point where it was, it was becoming a difficult industry. So margins have been really compressed ever since 2008. We've seen a lot of bad. She'd just been thrown at absolutely everything and all the businesses that I was involved with derivatives through the Delta, one futures and options, everything was getting compressed and, uh, it just wasn't that much fun anymore. Um, I started doing some, uh, early stage investing and, uh, I invested in a company called [inaudible], which is obviously the company that I'm now the CEO of, uh, back then digital X was a cryptocurrency mining company. I'd got interested in crypto because of the w the way that Yuval Harari in the book sapiens had framed the sort of monetary belief system and kept referencing Bitcoin, which up until then, I'd always thought it was some internet scan.

Richard Byworth: (03:40)
And, uh, so I started to pay attention to look at looking at it in some detail. And once I started to re really peel back the layers of what this asset was and the impact that it could have on the world, it became very clear to me that I wanted to be involved in it. Uh, I started by investing and then as I say, having invested indigenous ex, uh, the founder of [inaudible] approached me and said, would I help him build what he envisaged as being the leading, um, regulatory focus, financial services firm in this space. And that's obviously what we've built, uh, over the last three years. Um, so yeah, that's how I got here. So,

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:18)
So let's talk about digital X, um, your history, the mission, what the company does. Um, I apologize for confusing you with Binance, which is based in Singapore. Sorry about that. Of course. Dorsey had to say that to me and hurt my feelings, but let's talk about digital X.

Richard Byworth: (04:38)
Sure. So like did genetics, um, is a, is a full digital asset ecosystem with, with regulatory focus as its core, uh, principle. So we've got, uh, an exchange at the center of that. Actually, the reason you probably think I'm in Singapore is because the exchange is based in Singapore. Um, due to COVID, I haven't actually managed to get over there yet. Um, but, uh, the exchange ed cost is at the beginning at the middle of everything that we do, the exchange is a derivative platform. Um, it's focused on bringing much more credible derivatives to this space building on what we've already seen in perpetual swap space, and then expanding into options, structured products and everything that we know goes with it from traditional finance. Um, we have our own segregated custodian. Did you vote, that's operated by an X team, administrative defense out of the United Kingdom.

Richard Byworth: (05:33)
Um, we have our own asset manager, um, different to your own. We are a fund of hedge funds. So we look at very alpha centric strategies, looking at the very unique alpha does available in this asset class with all the various different arbitrage aspects. And obviously we spoke about gray scale earlier, um, that premium arbitrage, that discount arbitrage that we now seeing, those are some of the strategies that sit inside the funnel. Obviously the unique alpha that that crypto, uh, offers we have our own boutique investment bank at cross capital. And we also have our own trading platform access, uh, which plugs into two of the largest trading technology platforms in the world, FIS and activity. So that's the full ecosystem.

Anthony Scaramucci: (06:19)
You're, you're a listing on the NASDAQ, which took place in October of last year was quite important to the company. Tell us why it was so important that digit X.

Richard Byworth: (06:32)
So we're obviously focused on bringing trust to the industry, bringing governance to the industry. And I think a lot of people certainly in this region have had issues around the way that some of the companies in this space are governed. Um, you give a good example. There was a recent one of our competitors. Um, the CEO is thrown in, uh, into custody for a while and all the Bitcoin on the platform was trapped there and no one could get the Bitcoin off. And so if you're a hedge fund or an institutional manager trying to walk right on these platforms, you know, you're getting governance, risks, highlighted all over the place, you know, for institutions, as you will know, reputational risk is everything. And if you're running reputational risk through KYC and NRS that many of these platforms run again, you are running reputational risk. And so what we did with, with the build of it was really focused on mitigating all of the reputational and governance risk. And the ultimate level of governance is being a NASDAQ listed company with that sec approval and those governance frameworks that have we're required to have. And so for us, it was really important. Uh, we were obviously the first, uh, ecosystem to be listed on NASDAQ. We've now got Coinbase following in our footsteps. So it's going to be an interesting ride for the next a year or two years, as we see more and more companies come into the space. So

Anthony Scaramucci: (07:56)
We were talking before this started about huddling. We were talking about how, uh, coins Bitcoin in particular, or being taken off of exchanges. And it looks like they're being put into cold storage. What are the implications of that for the space, your business, is this positive? Is it negative? Uh, how do you think it's going to affect pricing going forward?

Richard Byworth: (08:24)
Well, yeah, I mean, as I was saying to you, I think we're in what we, we refer to as a supply side crisis. Um, we've obviously had the harping that happened in may last year. We're now moving into a paradigm where, as you say, you got a lot of institutions, you just take square Tesla, micro strategy. Um, and, uh, and they learn have taken something like 45% of the annual production of Bitcoin post the Harvey and locked it into cold storage. Now they're not alone. I mean, they're the early movers. Uh, we're starting to see, I mean, we had two new corporates this week that announced that they were starting to put Bitcoin on their balance sheet in smaller size. But the point is that now every CFO, every finance department is having to at least explain to their board, why are we seeing this phenomenon? What is this asset that is Bitcoin? And why are companies putting on their balance sheet to preserve the, you know, their value of their corporate treasury? So that's obviously a much broader question, but yeah, I think what we're going to see in prices is massive expansion. I mean, I probably have a pretty bullish view for this year. Um, I'm not sure how bullish you are in Sydney, but I'm a 175,000 is the likely peak that we're going to see this year. Well,

Anthony Scaramucci: (09:50)
When are we wouldn't we inviting by words back on the next salt talk Dorsey, is it next week? Or I'd make sure you get them back

John Darcie: (09:57)
On when it hits 175,000 in a year. All right. Well, here's the problem with

Anthony Scaramucci: (10:04)
Me. Okay. I actually believe that, but when I'm on television, like CNBC, someone asked me because we have people that are not paying as close attention to this as you and I are Richard, I said a hundred thousand and I was, I was met with the shock and awe of the reflects of response of people that are not playing close enough attention to what's going on. So, and then I got ridiculed on Twitter. People said I was too bearish. There was

John Darcie: (10:32)
A dichotomy of reactions. There were, there were mainstream people saying, oh, Anthony's now bought into this cult. And he thinks it's going to go to a hundred thousand by the end of the year. And then all the, uh, the handlers on Twitter were like, why are you so bearish?

Anthony Scaramucci: (10:44)
But, but I think you just, you just brilliantly explained why with reasonably high likelihood. And again, I want to put all those caveats out there for people listening to us, Bitcoin is a volatile asset. It does, you can lose money. We're not suggesting take anything to the bank. Richard is not suggesting that, nor am I, but we're just looking at supply demand fundamentals and the brilliant exposition of what Richard just said about those supply demand fundamentals as why this asset class is moving higher. Okay. It may or may not happen. We both know that, but it's in our best guests. That that's the direction that it's going in. Is that fair to say that way, Richard? I hope, hope you. Yeah.

Richard Byworth: (11:27)
I mean, I think that that's the supply side issue and the question always becomes, why are they buying it? And then you'd have to look properly at the macro backdrop. And you know, again, this is, this is your world. You, you know, you're in a far better position to explain them myself, but you know, if I'll attend effectively what you're looking at with the federal reserve reserve, trying to create inflation, we're going into a period where massive amount of jobs are going to get lost. They've already been lost due to the pandemic, but technology and the deflation that that effectively brings you just look up automated vehicles as an example. Um, you think about truck drivers across the United States, how many people are going to be put out of work by automated vehicles, uh, or, um, with the advancement that companies like Tesla and Google are making. This is extremely deflationary. Now the fed can't have deflation. I mean, they've got a balance sheet of Davidge war 28 trillion today. I mean, they are drowning in debt. If we go into a deflationary cycle, they are not going to be able to handle it. They're never going to be able to pay off that debt. And certainly they're not going to get the tax receipts to even be able to service that debt. Okay. So

Anthony Scaramucci: (12:49)
Let me, let me stop you for one second, because I really want to explain this to people that are not as sophisticated as frankly, you are Richard. They can't handle it because they can't pay the debt back with dollars that are worth more than the dollars that they borrowed. And so when you have a period of deflation, the value of the currencies actually going up relative to assets. And so therefore they're in a debt trap. Uh, this is what's got central bankers scared out of their minds, and this is why the money printing presses are on overtime right now to prevent that from happening. I didn't mean to interrupt you, but I we've got a lot of young people that are listening. So I just wanted to explain that to people. So go back to what you're saying. They can't handle it deflationary spiral. So therefore,

Richard Byworth: (13:39)
Therefore they're fighting this losing battle about trying to create, create growth in, in their GDP number or let's CPI number. But effectively what you've got is, is massive deflation on the horizon through technology advancement. So you've got everything getting cheaper energy production, getting cheaper, you've got massive unemployment that's going to happen. And so they have to keep trying to drive growth through the one weapon that they have. And that's monetary debasement so effectively just printing more dollars. So we're going to see all forms of this. We've started to see what is referred to broadly in traditional finance as helicopter money. And this is effectively just handing out checks to everybody. So they just start spending money. And this is the sort of, is, is, you know, as that progresses, that's really the last step in massive monetary debasement. So corporates are thinking about this from their corporate treasury.

Richard Byworth: (14:40)
And I will, if I'm getting hit on my corporate treasury by 25, 30%, as we saw with the debasement of the dollar last year, then we need to make sure that we're protecting that. And that's what happened with micro strategy. And you're starting to see it with a lot of the macro funds as well. You've got Paul Tudor Jones has moved in Ray Dalio. I'm sure will be one of the next, you've got a lot of macro managers that are starting to understand that the Bitcoin is potentially the very best hedge against this monetary deflation.

Anthony Scaramucci: (15:11)
So, so the past 12 months have been transformational, right? We both would agree on that. Um, numerous institutional players coming into the market. Um, what were, in your opinion, the seminal turning points?

Richard Byworth: (15:26)
I think probably one of the biggest was Michael Saylor, um, discovering Bitcoin and discovering how that could protect his balance sheet. I think he has done an enormously, um, impressive job at educating others around what this means for, um, for their corporate balance sheet. He did a, a, um, conference, uh, a month and a half ago, I believe, um, where he had about 6,000 corporates attend, um, the CFOs finance directors of these companies. And I think this has been really a turning point. You've got CEOs that control that company like Michael and Elon Musk in, in Tesla. They're the ones that can move first. But as I said to you earlier, you've got every corporate boardroom now, trying to understand what is going on, why people are buying Bitcoin on their balance sheet and starting to move into that space and do it doing it themselves. So I think over the next couple of courses, we're going to see more and more of this. And that's why I'm going to end up on your show sooner rather than later, because Bitcoin is going to be 175,000.

Anthony Scaramucci: (16:37)
So let me ask you the question that I'm often asked, and I have a hard time answering, uh, the Bitcoin going from a penny to $175,000. Let's assume that we actually didn't get to that number in 12 or 13 years, scares the bejesus out of people, right? Because we're trained you where I was, anybody that's in the investment management business is trained for all of anything is too good to be true, Richard, then therefore, definitionally, it's not true run from it. Don't run towards it. And yet you've looked at this, Michael Saylor has looked at this, I looked at this, all three of us were trained that way, frankly, yet you see it and you're willing to accept it. Why, what was the intellectual chasm that you had to cross to get yourself intellectually around Bitcoin?

Richard Byworth: (17:36)
It's a great question. I think probably the, the coming back to, why do we think that way we're trained to think about linear progression, right? And the point is that this advancement of technology we're seeing in the current cycle, where we saw with the internet, as we did with Amazon, apple, Facebook, these were companies that were massively enhanced by the network effect of the internet. Now you're starting to see that with money and the value proposition that a digital transferable money globally decentralized from government is able to bring the world. That is just a phenomenon thing. And as Michael Saylor often says, Bitcoin's already won the network race, right. Is a trillion dollar network. Now you've got any competitor. I mean, what our competitors, Bitcoin cash like Klein, Bitcoin SV. I mean, these are dying protocols. You look at likewise, no, one's no one's out of development to that network for six months.

Richard Byworth: (18:40)
It's a dead protocol. As far as we assess it, in terms of the way that we think about listing assets on our platform. So Bitcoin has destroyed anything that has come close to trying to compete with it. And it's one that network effect. If you look at Metcalf's law and the way that network effects have this compounding effect, that's where our brain breaks. When we're thinking about linear models, right? It's this exponential effect that technology can have. And Bitcoin is, is no exception. You know, it's a, it's in a position where it could be a replacement for gold. It's better than gold in so many aspects. Scarcity, portability, divisibility, fungibility, verifiability, all these things it's beating gold, and it's still less than 10% of the entire market cap of gold. So where do we go? I think, uh, yeah, I think 175,000 is, uh, is fairly conservative, but so

Anthony Scaramucci: (19:46)
I want to, I want to see if I can put it in my words and you can agree or disagree, or what you're basically saying is we're trained to think linearly our minds are actually trained to think that way too. That's part of our survival mechanism, but the world is actually in some cases moving exponentially and you have the two things converging at the same time, this dilemma that the central banks are faced with. Uh, so therefore they've, uh, started printing the money digitally, electronically producing the money. And at the same time we need to standardize once again. So there's almost a need for a currency renewal, if you will, or a technological transformation of something that will allow us to trade goods and services that is more standardized and less manipulated by politicians or policy makers. And so this, these two things are happening at the same time and that's why Bitcoin is scaling. And so in order for it to hit that standard, those coins have to be worth blank, whatever plank is you and I can figure out that number. And therefore we'll start thinking about Satoshi's, which are, uh, units of Bitcoin, as opposed to Bitcoin itself. So what am I, what am I missing? Richard?

Richard Byworth: (21:06)
You're not missing anything. You're exactly. Spot on. I think that just to sort of elaborate on one of the points you made it, there are 56 million, according to Morgan Stanley, recent report, 56 million millionaires in the world, right? So 56 million millionaires, all ones who in one Bitcoin, they can't, they actually cannot own one. And by the way, you've got billionaires, like Elon Musk and Michael Saylor, just grabbing as much as they possibly can get before everyone realizes what this is. Right. And what's happening. Right. And then, yeah, I think that the, the thing you asked me a question, it, I walked, got my mind round breaking that linear model for me, it was really like one Bitcoin is one Bitcoin. And if I want, you know, my kids not to give me a hard time when they're 18 years old, they're eight and 10 now and say, dad, why didn't you have any Bitcoin? You know, now it's the sort of the center of everything financial and you know, you think, okay, well I want to get one Bitcoin for each of the kids. And then you go, well, hang on. Maybe I want 10. And then you're like, how many people could actually own 10? Like, you know, 2.1 million people in the world, could I actually own 10 Bitcoin suddenly it starts to really do it on you, how scarce this asset is.

Anthony Scaramucci: (22:31)
Okay. So the scarcity is also a very big issue. Let me ask you this, uh, in, in PR soon to this philosophical change in your mind, uh, where are we 10 years from now? Uh, when quote unquote, to use your own words, Bitcoin is at the center of our financial experience. How do the traditional financial services in the crypto industry converge lay out the case? It's 2031? Where are we?

Richard Byworth: (23:04)
So 2031, let's say Bitcoins, um, approaching $5 million per Bitcoin, as you rightly said.

Anthony Scaramucci: (23:11)
And by the way, I'll already be through my second hair transplant by 2031. Okay. And I'm just saying that to interrupt Darcie from saying it by worth. Okay. Keep going by worth.

Richard Byworth: (23:22)
Yeah. So I think what you're going to have is you're going to have a very large value, uh, of Bitcoin as a single Bitcoin. And I think you, you highlighted it just then Bitcoin divides to eight decimal places. The unit, the final unit is a Satoshi. And we will start to think in Sitoshi. I think $1 today is 9,000 Satoshis and as the price goes higher and higher, you'll probably end up with a situation where one Satoshi is one us dollar, and that will end up being the way that we think about this in terms of scaling. So, um, yeah, I think that's probably the answer. So

Anthony Scaramucci: (24:06)
The traditional finance, how do they reconcile? What this, how does a old school bank get their arms around this?

Richard Byworth: (24:16)
Um, so the way that we're seeing banks move into the space at the moment is the, is the usual way. They need to understand how they avoid that reputational risk. First major reputational risk is a bank moving into this space and getting hacked, right? So they've got to make sure they don't get hacked. So the biggest thing that they have to focus on is custody. How do we deal with custody? How do we deal with custody in a safe and secure way? So many of the conversations that we have with banks are about them getting to the point of understanding how to deal with it, how to either build their own solution, use ours, or use a white label version of our solution. I think I mentioned earlier that our solution has been built by X specialists, um, security specialists from the ministry of defense in the United Kingdom.

Richard Byworth: (25:06)
His CTO is effectively, um, ex infrastructure banking head from, from UBS. And so what they've managed to do is build a very institutionally focused risk policy engine around the way that they deal with custody. And that's the way the banks are getting into it first. So once they understand how to store it, then they can start to offer it to their clients. And then once they start to offer it to their clients, then it's really just a mindset shift around how does blockchain start to really disrupt capital markets? So it's, you know, we're talking about just purely Bitcoin, Bitcoin is a particular asset, right? Then you're starting to move into the smart protocol world. Um, and how are we going to see capital markets disrupted? And I think that is probably going to be where the banks really weighed in is about understanding the way to manage these assets and then actually change the way that capital markets transactions are transmitted using blockchain networks.

Anthony Scaramucci: (26:06)
Okay. It's well said, I've got two last questions that we have to turn it over to the millennial. Okay. Who's going to ask millennial like questions. What is next for Digitech short-term and long-term

Richard Byworth: (26:19)
So in the very short term, we've got a lot of derivative product rollout. That for us is our skillset. We will came from derivative banking. Um, but what that leads into is a broader offering on a platform so effectively allowing people to manage their risk around derivatives. When you think back to what we've been discussing as Bitcoin, you're never going to want to sell your Bitcoin. You're going to, to use your Bitcoin as you will call collateral base and trade derivatives around that sell cools, buy sell, puts, do all of that, manage your finances around this core collateral base. So once you have that derivative set, it's going to be like a private bank for digital assets. So you can buy structured products. You can invest in funds that tokenized, and you can use that collateral base without actually ever selling any of your Bitcoins. And that's that's for us is the longterm goal is that you have that prime services, drug, private bank type function for institutions on the prime side, individuals on the private bank side,

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:24)
What's the symbol for digital X so that our viewers can, uh, look you guys up and potentially invest.

Richard Byworth: (27:31)
Yeah, so we did, as you say, we listed on NASDAQ. Our ticket is ETQ O S um, uh, under the name Digitech. So ed courses is, is the name of our exchange. So a Q O S was the ticker symbol is the ticket. We'll listen, Richard, congratulations. I'm going to turn it over to John Dorsey.

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:50)
Who's sitting there in that very beautiful

Richard Byworth: (27:52)
Room. John Dorsey, the richest person at SkyBridge, possibly the richest person in the world. Go ahead,

John Darcie: (27:59)
Ignore him, Richard. But, uh, in terms of the regulatory environment, so you're sitting there in Hong Kong, what's the regulatory environment, uh, in Asia. And how do you view the global regulatory environment outlook over the next five years or so? Is it an inevitability that, that these countries approve it for full use? Or do you think there's going to be some level of crackdown? Whether it be in India, China, I know has various rules around Bitcoin, the U S government, Janet Yellen, our treasury secretary has made some critical comments about it. What do you see as the regulatory outlook?

Richard Byworth: (28:35)
I think that the regulatory outlook for the U S is quite positive. You look at people like guidelines are sitting at the top of the sec. I mean, he's very pro pro the technology. And I think he understands what it is. Yellen's, you know, I mean, probably not, um, for entirely about the asset, but probably understands the risk. It might be

John Darcie: (28:55)
Held, said she basically took every piece of FID that you could ever find on the internet and rolled it up into one and delivered it and her congressional testimony. Yeah,

Richard Byworth: (29:05)
I think, uh, you know, it's quite rich the fed saying that a big vine is, uh, is an environment. So is Austin, when you think about what the, you know, when you keep pushing that button on a fringing dollars

John Darcie: (29:20)
Or anything manipulated asset, you know, they say, oh, there's manipulation in the, uh, in the Bitcoin market. And that's rich too, obviously Bitcoiners

Richard Byworth: (29:27)
Exactly very rich, but, you know, I mean, I think energy consumption, GDP, everything you want to point out. I mean, everything around the dollar is, is the worst example of what, of, of the environmental issues around Bitcoin. Um, back to your regulatory question around Asia. I mean, if you look at the two key jurisdictions, um, for financial services, it's, it's obviously Hong Kong and Singapore. Um, both those jurisdictions are very focused on trying to understand what is the best way to regulate this asset class. Uh, Singapore actually moved with a very proactive and innovative approach. Uh, whereas, uh, Hong Kong were a little bit more while they move first with providing a regulatory framework, they actually were a bit more conservative. Um, that said, I think that the SFC here in Hong Kong is, is very pro the asset class. Um, they're trying to understand how they can, uh, continue to support the industry.

Richard Byworth: (30:26)
I mean, Hong Kong is probably the largest crypto hub in the world. Um, in terms of talent in this space, one of the reasons that we continue to hire ahead, even though we're based in Singapore, um, Japan has gone down a road of, uh, being the very first regulator to regulate the space, but now has gone extremely conservative, um, and really shutting the doors on foreigners coming in and providing services. So to your question, I think every country is taking a slightly different approach and the people that are looking at banning it well, you know, they, they're concerned about capital controls for obvious reasons, Bitcoin and other digital assets. Cryptocurrencies are a risk to a country that's trying to implement capital controls. So, uh, they don't want their citizens using it and moving money around very easily.

John Darcie: (31:19)
Right? Well, China obviously has, I think it's between 50 and 60% of the global mining operations for Bitcoin. Uh, but at the same time have restrictions on the use because of capital controls, like you mentioned, they're also developing a digital Yuan. What do you think the significance of them developing that central bank digital currency? Do you think down the road when there's not the maybe a stringent need for capital controls that they'll evolve their regulation and, you know, in keeping with the fact that they run 60% of the world's mining operations and are aggressively pursuing a central bank digital currency, do you think that they'll fully adopt and integrate digital currencies and decentralized finance

Richard Byworth: (32:00)
Look? Um, you know, China is very focused on control and central bank. Digital currency is all about control. I mean, they were the first country to issue the central bank. Digital currency has actually already issued the digital Yuan. Um, and so, you know, what I see the play for China is actually more about creating a currency that can be a competitor to the dollar. And so what you'll see with that digital currency for China is, is an internationalization of their currency, um, much more so, and they want to move that into, you know, basis like Russia, Iran, and, uh, and start to provide support for, for those regimes based on, you know, obviously their currency, um, profile. So I think by being the first mover into central bank, digital currencies, they they've seen the opportunity and they want to dominate and they're moving very fast.

John Darcie: (32:59)
You would expect these railings, that central bank, digital currencies are built on to replace the swift system. Do you expect the United States to have to respond by building its own, uh, you know, digitized dollar?

Richard Byworth: (33:12)
Yeah. I think that we will see that from the fed. Um, I think that, you know, because they're in such a position of strength, they don't have to move quite as fast. They can observe what everybody else is doing and then make their own move. And obviously that will be very quickly adopted. Um, so I think the Fed's in a pretty strong position to be able to defend. I mean, the one problem that you've got is that China doesn't have to deal with a democratic process and getting things, things through a Senate, they just get things done. So it's a, it's a, you know, when you're looking at the speed of technology that we touched on earlier, um, you know, when you're in a race like that, this is quite an advantage in that race.

John Darcie: (34:00)
Yeah. You know, not, not to turn this into a political conversation, but there are advantages and disadvantages of both systems in terms of, uh, whether it be drug development or, uh, experimentation with digital currencies. For sure. I want to talk about, you mentioned Michael Saylor as being a very important person and his adoption of Bitcoin being an important turning point. In my opinion, what we've seen from insurance companies in the United States is equally, if not more important, especially if you think of regulatory risks as the biggest threat to, uh, the inevitability of Bitcoin, you know, the idea that the United States could ban it or tax it in an onerous way. So you have mass mutual several months ago announced that they invested a hundred million dollars into Bitcoin by an iDIG NY Digg. Also a great partner of ours that we think is a fantastic organization. They announced this week at $200 million investment into the GP from the likes of Soros, Bessemer Morgan Stanley, the largest wealth management unit in the U S as well as New York life and New York life also put their chairman and CEO on the board of dig. So you, you clearly have several insurance companies that have significant exposure to Bitcoin. What do you think that means for the movement and, and sort of the acceleration of this adoption curve that you talked about?

Richard Byworth: (35:16)
Well, I think it's across the board. I think it's pensions. I think it's hedge funds is macro firms is yeah. As you say, it's insurers, mass mutual is the first big insurer that we've seen move into the space. Um, but it's not going to be the last for sure. I mean, all of these people are sitting on huge, um, huge amounts of capital and needs to put it best to work. And it's all the same trade, right. Is, is against the devaluation of the dollar. So I think, um, yeah, look, mass Mutual's may of gig and Heinz move pulls you to Jones move, Michael sailor's move. All of these were effectively leading their part of the industry. Uh, I think, um, I think, yeah, this is just going to continue. Those are the first movers. When you think about that in the context of the supply side crisis that we are already in, then you see how we very quickly move to 175,000.

John Darcie: (36:07)
Right? I want to talk about the energy piece because we think that you're going to continue to see a lot of comments around ESG, excuse me, around ESG energy usage and all the issues around that, that, you know, Bitcoin poses a risk to the climate. You have the Paris climate accord, you have an administration in the United States. That's more committed to those standards. And, uh, there was a Norwegian billionaire I'm going to butcher his name, but it's tell Ingo Roca. You might do a better job as a, uh, international citizen, but he announced that his company, which is the third largest energy producer in addition to being a conglomerate and Norway is investing into Bitcoin and also going to put their entire corporate treasury, uh, liquid investible assets into Bitcoin. But he talked a lot about in his shareholder letter, which was published a couple of days ago. That was fantastic about how Bitcoin can almost act as a battery that equalizes demand on some of these energy platforms. Can you talk more about the opportunity that actually Bitcoin creates from an energy perspective and why those concerns around climate change, uh, are actually misplaced?

Richard Byworth: (37:10)
I think that what Bitcoin does, and it's really interesting that analogy, I hadn't read that shell the letter, but it's a very, very good analogy because what we experienced, we were a miner ourselves. What we experienced was that you always want to be finding the cheapest energy effectively. What Bitcoin miners are doing is just tracking the cheapest possible energy. And the cheapest possible energy is generally orphaned energy. So it will be, you know, someone's built a hydroelectric power plant to, to support a forestry, uh, industry in Northern Sweden. That was a perfect example of, of, of where we mind. Um, back three years ago, that was orphaned energy because the forestry industry had moved out. Sustainability of the forestry had had limited the amount of deforestation that they could do. And so you'd been left with this hydroelectric power plant that had been built that wasn't being used.

Richard Byworth: (38:10)
And so what we did with, with mining was we effectively took that energy and we monetized it into that battery. I love that into that battery that is Bitcoin, and then transferred that energy into someone that was prepared to pay for it. And so I think, you know, w I looked at it often as this is a way of keeping the network that says, um, that a subsidization across between particularly the EU has done to really grow clean energy. You think about hydro electric power. You think about nuclear. All of this has been very heavily subsidized by the European union. Now, another example was when we were mining in a Gonda, which is the Eastern part of Switzerland, literally a kilometer down the road, we in Italy, there was a, a hydroelectric power station that was going to be shutting. Cause it didn't, it wasn't close enough to the grid.

Richard Byworth: (39:04)
It wasn't pairing enough. It was, it was just not profitable. So they were going to shut down. So we ran an optic fiber cable down to that hydro electric pass station use the energy monetize that kept the power station open and effectively kept that network in place until we get to a point where efficiency or population growth has got to a point where you can transfer that energy or use it in a national grid more effectively. So I always think about it is as being the sort of a placeholder to keep the network together. As what I like is an analogy about the battery. I think it's a perfect analogy. Yeah. Yeah. I mean,

John Darcie: (39:40)
Th that shareholder letter, we think it's one of the most important, excuse me, again, pieces that's been written on Bitcoin this year. You know, it was a, it was spoken in very plain English. It was a very sober assessment of where we are in Bitcoin of why he's decided. And it basically talked about how he missed out on several trends, including the advent of the internet and some things that took place in the energy sector. And he says, this is the next big idea, and I'm not going to miss out. It was, it was a great piece of research it's available on the company website for the entity that he launched, uh, called CT S E T e.io. So anybody who's watching this, I would definitely read that shareholder letter. Um, one of the best pieces we think that's been written on Bitcoin, but yeah, the energy piece, I think is fascinating because as we've spoken to several people on salt talks about this issue, it almost incentivizes the development of cheap clean energy because it equalizes demand on the grid. And so, you know, in some ways Bitcoin will have the opposite effect that, that some of these, uh, misinformed people have as it relates to carbon emissions, you know, inner Mongolia, as an example, just ban Bitcoin mining using coal, you know, China being very conscious of its contribution to greenhouse emissions. So a lot of interesting stuff happening in this space and, and rapid progress, but we'll leave it there. I don't want to take away all of our material for your parents at six months. When, before,

Anthony Scaramucci: (41:01)
Before Richard goes to the question about China, obviously they they're banning Bitcoin. What's your opinion there before we go, and then John can wrap it up,

Richard Byworth: (41:10)
Uh, look, China, bans Bitcoin every six to 18 months. Um, so, you know, as we always say about China, don't, don't watch what they say, watch what they do. Um, and the fact that you've still got such a high proportion of miners sitting in China, not being shut down the flow, still coming. Um, you know, they, they do want to have, uh, input on this network now. Um, I think that China is probably going to stop being one of the central banks or the PVOC is going to be one of the central banks to actually start buying Bitcoin on their balance sheet. Um, I wouldn't be surprised if they've already done it and then just not disclosing.

Anthony Scaramucci: (41:55)
Okay. Well, I just wanted to get that in there. I, that was my inkling, but in my inclination, but, uh, wanted to get it confirmed by you, Richard, go ahead. Young Darcie. We'll

John Darcie: (42:04)
Wrap it up there. I don't want to again, take all of our material for Richard's return appearance in six, 12 months when, uh, we're willing to guarantee

Anthony Scaramucci: (42:12)
On that. Now though, we're we're, we're in the bank. We have a handshake deal. The Bitcoins are at 175,000 and you're our guests on salts. Okay.

John Darcie: (42:23)
If it doesn't make it 175,000 in a year, you'd have to give me all your bills. No, they won't be worth that much in six months. No worries, Richard. Well, thank you for joining us. Uh, hopefully we'll get over to Asia here. When things clear up fully on COVID. We, we did our salt conference in Abu Dhabi in 2019. We've done it in Singapore twice, or whether we go back to Singapore or we bring it to Hong Kong, we'd love to have your participation. Of course, that'd

Richard Byworth: (42:50)
Be fantastic. I look forward to, or maybe even go say,

John Darcie: (42:54)
There you go, and you'll be able to buy your ticket in Bitcoin. So no worries, but thank you everybody also for tuning into today's talk with Richard by worth of digital X, a leading digital asset exchange. Just a reminder, if you missed any part of this talk or any of our previous talks, you can access our entire archive@sault.org backslash talks and on our YouTube channel, which is called salt tube. We're also on Twitter at salt conferences where we're most active. We're also on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook. And please spread the word about these salt talks for your friends. We love growing our community, uh, here on salt talks, but on behalf of Anthony and the entire salt team, this is John Darcie signing off for today. We hope to see you back here soon.

Meltem Demirors & Tegan Kline: Has Bitcoin Won Over Institutional Investors? | SALT Talks #177

“Bitcoin is the ultimate collector’s item. It’s the Honus Wagner card of money.”

Meltem Demirors is chief strategy officer at CoinShares, a digital asset investment firm managing over $4B in assets. Tegan Kline is the co-founder and business leader of Edge & Node, the organization behind The Graph Protocol, an indexing protocol that makes applications on the blockchain possible.

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies will have the same level of impact on value and storage as the Internet had on information and communication. Bitcoin offers greater freedom in the ownership and transfer of money. 70% of the world lives under totalitarian regimes and blockchain technology creates one of the most effective remedies to the encroachment of civil liberties. “In a world where governments vie for control and want to dictate every aspect of our lives, Bitcoin is this bastion of freedom… Bitcoin is the next step in the evolution of what it means to have freedom of expression; financial censorship is to the predominant form of censorship.”

Blockchain technology has led to a fundamental rethink of money and value storage. Bitcoin can often be understood when compared to the value assigned to rare baseball cards. “Bitcoin is the ultimate collector’s item. It’s the Honus Wagner card of money.”

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKERS

Tegan Kline.jpeg

Tegan Kline

Co-Founder & Business Lead

Edge & Node

Meltem Demirors.jpeg

Meltem Demirors

Chief Strategy Officer

CoinShares

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darcie: (00:08)
And welcome back to salt talks. My name is John Darcie. I'm the managing director of salt, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance technology and public policy. Salt talks are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators, and thinkers. And our goal on these salt talks is the same as our goal at our salt conferences, which is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future. We're very excited today to welcome you to the latest episode in our series of salt talks about the digital asset space, uh, with two fantastic panelists who have, uh, started and ran major companies within that industry, our panelists today are Meltem to mirrors and Taegan Klein. Uh, Meltem is the chief strategy officer of coin shares a digital asset investment firm that manages about 4 billion in assets on behalf of a global client base and serves as a trusted partner to investors and entrepreneurs navigating the digital asset ecosystem prior to joining coin shares, Melton helped build and grow the digital currency group, raising capital from the world's largest corporations and managing a portfolio of 120 companies and four subsidiaries before she was bitten by the Bitcoin bug.

John Darcie: (01:24)
Meltem worked in the oil and gas industry and trading, uh, corporate treasury and MNA roles, uh, taken Klein is the co-founder and business leader of edge in node, which is the organization behind the graph protocol, which is an indexing and query protocol making applications on the blockchain possible. I've taken helps leaders and innovators connect more deeply with stakeholders across the blockchain ecosystem. She's the former, an international business development manager and OST relations lead, uh, for orchid and a 16 Z and Sequoia backed blockchain company that created tools and protocols for users to obtain digital freedom and an open and accessible internet. Taegan successfully helped to launch orchid at a $400 million valuation on Coinbase hosting. Today's talk is yours truly John Darcie, again on the managing director of salt, as well as a director of business development at SkyBridge, which is a global alternative investment firm. And the way we like to start out, most of these talks Meltem and Taegan is how did you get bit by that Bitcoin or that digital asset bug we'll start with you Melton, but how did you go from working in oil and gas to deciding that this whole decentralized internet crypto Bitcoin thing was what you wanted to be involved in?

Meltem Demirors: (02:39)
Hi, John, it's a delight to be here. Thanks for having me, um, and hosting this conversation. I like to call this story, the Bitcoin origin story, you know, um, different cultures and different communities have different rituals. And definitely the predominant ritual in our industry is everyone has their own crypto origin story. So, um, this is a fun one, and I'm sure you, now that you're a part of the crypto community have told your story many times. Uh Tayga and I know she and I are good friends, and I've heard that story many times. So I'll share mine very briefly. Um, I spent my early career working in the energy industry and at the time that I started to get into Bitcoin, I worked in corporate treasury at ExxonMobil at the duct star in Irving, Texas. These are the days of Rex Tillerson when Exxon mobile at $400 billion market cap was the largest company in the world.

Meltem Demirors: (03:28)
Uh, so it's very different. Time is hard to believe. This was only seven years ago. That was a very different world. And as I was looking around, um, you know, the world was changing very quickly. Um, the things that accrued value were no longer companies that produce physical things. There are companies that operated in the digital realm and it really didn't take a crystal ball to see the direction in which the world was headed. And then on top of that, you know, it sends so much in my time in legacy capital markets and market microstructure and legacy capital markets is just so fundamentally broken. Um, I started my career trading, physical ethanol and methanol through the financial crisis with two phones, strapped to my ear, right, buying and shipping distressed cargoes, buying LOC, et cetera. Then I started trading carbon again, you know, highly phone and voice-driven, and as I started to learn more about Bitcoin interacts with Bitcoin, it was just so obvious to me that what the internet had done for information and communication cryptocurrencies and in particular Bitcoin was going to do for value.

Meltem Demirors: (04:26)
And, um, I had never really taken a risk in my life up to that point, you know, as the good girl went rules, I know what happened to me. Um, and along the way, I was like, you know what, I'm going to take a risk and do something totally crazy. If it doesn't work out, you know, at least I'll get to work with some of the most interesting, most intellectually sort of engaged people I've ever met. And, um, that was seven years ago and the rest is history. I've never had more fun. I've never been more scared, more freaked out. Um, but look, I think if you are an intellectually curious person and you look at what's happening around you, it's just, it's not a question of if, but a question of when, and I think we've already hit that inflection points. So, um, I am delighted that I'm in this industry versus the energy industry when March of last year hit, you know, and, um, the, the oil trade went negative. I think we're at negative $40. A barrel is like, this was the right choice. I think

John Darcie: (05:23)
I was, I was calling up family and friends and trying to figure out if there was anywhere we could store barrels of oil like delivery. But I wasn't able, there was a journalist who actually

Meltem Demirors: (05:32)
Did that. There was a journalist a few years ago actually took physical delivery of a, of an oil contract. I don't recommend it. I think that like the EPA come to your house. Yeah.

John Darcie: (05:42)
I read that one and it didn't sound as glamorous as maybe I thought it would be at the time, but I have a few followup questions on your origin story, but before we get into that, I'm going to ask Taegan the same thing.

Tegan Kline: (05:52)
Yeah, absolutely. Thank you so much for hosting. We're really, really grateful to be here and the next to melt a good friend. And also I think one of the greatest Bitcoin advocates of our time. And so it's really wonderful to be here, but yes. So my origin story, I was in finance, I was on the sales and trading floor in fixed income. And I learned about, um, Ethereum. And for me a theory was really when it kind of captivated my mind and attention. I had learned about Bitcoin in 2011, but still kind of went into a traditional wall street route. Um, but what I learned about Ethereum about four and a half years ago, I really saw the opportunity to kind of create a new financial system outside of the one that existed and kind of compete with that financial system. Um, and so I started kind of trading my own book well at Barclays and then moved over to, uh, the distributed VPN you mentioned. And then the graft really makes sure that, um, the blockchain becomes kind of the future of the internet. What

John Darcie: (06:45)
Was, what was it about a theorem that intrigued you? You know, a lot of people talk about Bitcoin as sort of their gateway drug into the digital asset, decentralized finance world. What was it about Ethereum that gave you that sort of Eureka moment

Tegan Kline: (06:57)
For me, you know, Bitcoin revolutionized finance where Ethereum kind of revolutionizes the internet and kind of Ethereum explodes it into every asset class as opposed to just money and finance. And for me, that's really what clicked. Um, but a lot of the brilliant software engineers that I know, and, and Meltem saw Bitcoin a lot sooner than I did.

John Darcie: (07:18)
Very cool. So Melton, you talked about how you felt scared, you know, you felt butterflies when you left the traditional finance industry and jumped into crypto and it's been obviously fits and starts in terms of how Bitcoin the price of Bitcoin has rallied. And in terms of mainstream adoption and an understanding and acceptance of decentralized finance, when did you start to think to yourself, wow, this actually is going to be something real and this sort of no turning back we've crossed the Rubicon.

Meltem Demirors: (07:46)
Yeah, I think it's the first time I sent a Bitcoin transaction. And I think, um, you know, I, I grew up in Europe. I've lived in the United States for the last 20 years now. Um, but my family's from rural Turkey. And so, um, for me, the aha moment was when I sent a Bitcoin transaction, I think it was, you know, a Sunday night at midnight. Um, and all I had to do was download a Bitcoin wallet, which is just as a software client. And all I needed was a 32 character string, right. Uh, a public address and I could send value. I had never had that experience before today when I want to send money. You know, I think with JP Morgan chase, I have to go to chase bank branch. I recently had an incident where I had to bring two forms of ID and I wasn't even allowed to send my own money, my own bank.

Meltem Demirors: (08:37)
Um, so this idea that 24 7 365, there is this permission was open network that allows anyone with an internet connection and a compatible software client and a public wallet address to send value to anyone anywhere. You don't need to know who they are. You don't need to know about them. Um, to me, it was just so obvious in that moment that this is the direction things were headed. And look, I think there's a really big second narrative that's unfolding here. We live in an age and time where civil liberties are being eroded on a daily basis, right? Surveillance capitalism is the predominant business model of the internet. And I think many of us are becoming aware of the perils of, of these business models. There is no alternative. And so I think what's been introduced by the client and then extended by other protocols like Ethereum, um, and other platforms that are being built and sort of this decentralized open source permissionless manner is in a world where government's right vibe for control and want to dictate every aspects of our lives.

Meltem Demirors: (09:40)
Bitcoin is sort of this bastion of freedom and it has freedom of access, freedom of opportunity. Anyone can build anything on top of the Bitcoin network. Now businesses that interact with Bitcoin are going to be regulated based on the jurisdictions in which they operate and the facts of what their business does, which you know, were subject to a whole lot of regulation. We're regulated more tightly than a bank at this point, I think. But, um, at the end of the day, you know, if you look at what's happening around our world, 70% of the world's population lives under a totalitarian regime, it's to me, right. Bitcoin is like the next step in, in sort of the evolution of what it means to have freedom of expression and financial censorship is the predominant form of censorship. Right? If we look at economic sanctions, if we look at the inability, people have to invest and allocate their capital, they way they want, or even move their capital around.

Meltem Demirors: (10:31)
And how sort of, um, money operates in these tiny networks that are still defined by physical borders, nothing in our life is defined by physical borders anymore, right? We're all in three different locations on a video chat, having conversation, how preposterous is it that our money is still constrained by physical borders that were dreamed up like three millennia ago. It's completely wild to me. And, um, so yeah, as I started interacting with Bitcoin, I was like, this is, I'm an avid reader, OSI five huge nerd. So I was like, this is the future of what money should look like. And once we do that, the types of economic activity we'll be able to enable, not just human to human, but machine to machine payments, as we start to move towards an economy where we have more automation and, you know, non-human entities that exist and operate. It's just very interesting. And I think it opens your mind to all of the possibilities and just unleashes a tremendous amount of creative potential.

John Darcie: (11:24)
Yeah, I think, uh, in terms of mainstream, uh, understanding of adoption of Bitcoin, I think honestly, things like NBA top shots have really cut through to the average American or person around the world, in terms of understanding if a physical piece of cardboard with a rookie card of Michael Jordan on it has value, why wouldn't a digital rendering of the same type of thing has value seeing digital art and things go for what most people would perceive as astronomical, uh, values. But I think it just reinforces the shift to digital money, uh, but taken, I want to build on some of what Meltem just said in terms of regulatory issues, right. Uh, you know, the decentralized finance world, Bitcoin, Ethereum, all these other protocols, they are disintermediating the world and they are, they're definitely threatening the, the autocratic power, not just of, you know, uh, nations that are fully autocratic, but even countries that, uh, monitor people's activity related to money and technology, what type of threat do you perceive as regulation, whether it be in the United States or abroad in terms of its long-term threat to decentralized finance Bitcoin and the whole ecosystem?

Tegan Kline: (12:32)
Yeah, I mean, I think that's a really great question. So, you know, the most powerful thing about Bitcoin to me is that there's no government, there's no individual, there's no corporation, the middle of that, you know, you can send a transaction directly and that does threaten a lot of individuals power. Um, if you look at Bitcoin, it's kind of competition with central banks and central banks have never before had competition. And when we see the fed print $9 trillion in just one year in 2020 alone, which is over 22% of the total circulating supply, which is, you know, no individual should have that kind of power. Um, we will likely see more regulate regulations come in, um, and tried to kind of threaten that power. And we've already kind of seen some of that with, um, the limitations on, on wallets and, and things like that. Um, but I do think that a lot of the regulations that are coming, um, hopefully will kind of continue to be fair. And, um, and yeah, and so, so we'll see kind of the, the powers that be, but hopefully more folks kind of get in and, and, um, contribute to this decentralized ecosystem. And, and, um, it makes, you know, central banks, um, more favorable to individuals yeah.

John Darcie: (13:41)
And melt them in terms of the macro environment, you know, you and I were talking before we went live here, about how much of this right pre contest.

Speaker 5: (13:49)
We did a show, we did appreciate it. And the pre-show

John Darcie: (13:52)
The VIP, the VIP green room, uh, where we were loitering before the show where we talk about the super secret stuff that, you know, it's like sort of the Bitcoin Illuminati, but, um, very secret how much, how much of this recent boom in the prices of crypto assets or digital assets, Bitcoin being the poster child, but also Ethereum and others, how much of it is driven by the macro environment? So the money printing that taken just mentioned, we created over 20%. I think the number is 22% of all dollars in circulation were created in 2020. How much of that accelerated, uh, the rise of Bitcoin? Or do you think it was inevitable just based on the strength of, of the, the technology that underlies Bitcoin?

Meltem Demirors: (14:34)
Yeah. So I want to take a moment and sort of separate the two narratives. I think the macro narrative and attributing Bitcoin's success in the crypto sector's overall success to this money printer Gober narrative. If I may use that God level meme, um, is, is very popular, but look at the end of the day, right? In, in March of 2020, when Jay Powell, you know, did money printer go Burr. Um, and by the way, it's very interesting that for the first time in modern history, we had a meme enter sort of the popular lexicon that alluded to fiscal and monetary policy. I mean, I can't tell you, I had conversations with people who don't know anything about fiscal and monetary policy about the impact of money printing on their savings and their financial wellbeing. And then I think what you really saw is, um, people flocked to assets that would appreciate and value in general, right?

Meltem Demirors: (15:24)
So the momentum that we've seen and the, just the frenzy we've seen for investible assets has really been consistent across the board. We saw a rotation out of core equities into tech, right? The three most popular trades in 2020, where long tech, which continues to be the trade. And that's both in private capital markets and public capital markets, as we've seen, you know, about the crazy outperformance of IPOs Tesla, I think is the poster child for this, right. Um, we've seen this in private capital markets where companies are raising rounds at astronomical valuations pre-product and the types of people I'm competing with and venture deals that used to be other VC firms. Now it's family offices, PE firms, publicly listed companies, foreign wealth funds investing directly. So the cohort of people investing in tech has just shifted monumentally. Second, most popular trade was short dollar, right?

Meltem Demirors: (16:08)
And there are a number of different ways you can shorten dollar. But I think generally, you know, the selloff we saw across bonds and treasuries was indicative of that. And then the fact that the U S now owns, you know, an astronomical amount of the treasuries to notes and circulation is another symptom of that overall reduced foreign ownership of dollar denominated assets, I think is another symptom of that. And then the last trade was long crypto, right? And, um, the long crypto trade I think is interesting because I don't think it's people necessarily saying, wait a minute, I believe Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies are going to be the thing that defines the future. It's really people saying, I need somewhere to put my money. That isn't the dollar cause asset inflation isn't happening in CPI. I know we're looking at, you know, 2.5%, or we finally crossed into 2.6% for CPI inflation.

Meltem Demirors: (16:53)
That's not where inflation is happening. Your stocks are worth more. The market is going up. Not because these assets are worth more it's because the dollar is worth, worth less than I think that's conceptually what people are starting to grasp money is flowing into real estate collectibles, right? We look at baseball cards. You mentioned NBA top shot in December a Honus Wagner card, which is the most rare, like holy grail of all baseball cards sold for $3.7 million in January ALS good version of that card sold for 5.2 million, right? That's almost a doubling in price of that collectible in less than a month's time span. And the way I sort of described Bitcoin to people is Bitcoin is the ultimate collector's item. It is the Honus Wagner card of money. There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin in circulation. There are 47 million millionaires around the world today.

Meltem Demirors: (17:41)
So there's not even enough for every millionaire to own one Bitcoin. Um, so I think, again, as we look at that narrative that's unfolding, it really became a recursive loop, right? It's the macro environment yes. Contributed to people's awareness. But do I believe that people are buying Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation? No, they're buying that coin because then a number go up environment, which is the environment we're in, right? When you print an absolute boatload of money, numbers starts to go up. As people start plowing that money into assets, um, Bitcoin is just another asset that you can plow money into. And as a result, I also think the momentum got sort of took on a life of its own. One of the common misconceptions I want to quickly address John is there's this popular narrative, but there's a lot of leverage in crypto. And the actually is not true. The antithesis of that is true. There's no leverage in crypto.

John Darcie: (18:30)
So is this like tether thing is this whole tether thing now dead now that they settled with the New York attorney general?

Meltem Demirors: (18:35)
No, the FID never does. I've been through seven years of this. The FID never dies. The tether FID will never die. Bitcoin mining boils the oceans. Quantum computing will break the blockchain. Like we do this every cycle. It will never die. It's just that we have better data this time around. Um, but look at the end of the day, I think what happens is anytime there's momentum in decline, people want to get leveraged right now in crypto, you can't really get leveraged. There's no reg T there's nowhere. You can get margin or use your securities as collateral. So the rate to borrow cash in crypto is quite high. It's 12 to 18% annualized. And then the predominant contracts that you utilize to obtain exposure to a lever trade is something called a perpetual swap, which is a, a swap contract. And that's, that's repriced on an, at a daily basis, typically every eight hours and the cash funding cost of that contract can be as high as 10 to 15% per month.

Meltem Demirors: (19:26)
So the cost of having levered exposure to crypto is very, very high. Some periods where we have momentum in the Bitcoin space. We see a lot of people buying these perps swaps and obtaining leverage through this contract, but because the funding rate is so high, when that momentum slows down, we see a lot of de-levering in that contract, which results consequently, in a dip in prices and the market flipping back into backwardation. And so again, I think a lot of what we've seen here is just the Bitcoin market operates is operated the same for the last six years. Really, these dynamics haven't changed. So we're seeing this momentum becoming recursive and I, whenever we stay range-bound that leverage gets taken off. And then we see more people coming in, buying leverage gets added back on again, we see that momentum run, but again, I think this narrative of like, oh, it's the macro environment that has sovereign wealth funds signed Bitcoin?

Meltem Demirors: (20:11)
No they're buying anything and everything under the sun. Um, we've done research on optimal allocation. We found in a traditional 64, 40 portfolio, 4% allocation to Bitcoin that's rebalanced quarterly, sort of the optimal risk reward approach. I'm happy to share that research with your viewers, but again, you know, I'm certainly not out there telling people, put your entire treasury into Bitcoin. I don't think that's prudent. I don't think that helps with money for inter go for any of the things we talked about. Um, so I think a lot of the popular rhetoric, you know, it sounds sexy. Is it prudent or logical? Absolutely not. What I advocate for that. Absolutely not. Do I think people should be exposed to decline? Absolutely. But I also think they should be exposed to a wide range of, of different assets. Yeah.

Tegan Kline: (20:51)
And I think a lot of the listeners there, their roles are to enter, you know, allocate capital efficiently, be it into their business, be into their portfolios, their client portfolios. And at this point it's almost become irresponsible, not to put a piece of your, of that into Bitcoin and other digital assets. And the question really is, do you believe that the dollar will continue to depreciate against Bitcoin? I firmly believe it will. Um, and I think Bitcoin has gone beyond the narrative of just digital gold Bitcoin is better gold than gold. Bitcoin is better than Fiat. You know, Fiat now does not incentivize us to save saving rates are so incredibly low. It incentivizes us to spend it actually beyond that. It incentivizes us to go into debt because the rates on debt are so low that you're incentivized to take on more debt. And that's why we are at the moment in time that we have never, before seen as much debt as we are in. Um, and the market for Bitcoin, you know, is it's a gold and Fiat and savings market kind of combined. Um, and Bitcoin is teaching us to save it, enforced. It forces you to kind of have the mindset of saving because as you hold Bitcoin and think in terms of Bitcoin, everything around you gets cheaper, be it realistic, you know, the Fiat dollar, your lunch, you know, everything gets cheaper. Um, and

Meltem Demirors: (22:05)
Long time preference, I definitely bought them stuff in 2015 with Bitcoin that I wish I hadn't bought.

Tegan Kline: (22:12)
People are just like incapable of spending their Bitcoins for this reason. Um, you know, and you start to just think in terms of Bitcoin, and then you start thinking, you know, what is money and people argue money is for spending. But I disagree with that. I think money is supposed to hold value long enough so that when you do want to spend it, you can. Um, and that's why I think Bitcoin is so powerful.

John Darcie: (22:31)
Yeah. I mean, at dinner last night, I was having this conversation with my wife's grandmother. She's 82 years old, very lucid, but I was trying to explain Bitcoin and digital assets to her because, you know, anytime these things bubble up into the mainstream consciousness, orange pill, her, I tried, but I tried to just explain the origins of money and how the caveman, you know, they bartered. And then they picked rocks that they thought looked nice and they use that as currency. And then Julius Caesar stamped his face on, on coins and just the evolution of money. And she says, well, well, if I send my money from my bank of New York to, to another bank in Austin, Texas, you know that they're obviously they're delivering that money from one bank to the other. I said, well, that's, that's not exactly true. We already have digital money. But the difference is that digital money can 20% more of it can be created in one year based on the stroke of a pen from a central banker. So there's no reason why Bitcoin is any different than any other currency or, or a store of value or collectible that's existed throughout history.

Meltem Demirors: (23:29)
But John, there's something I want to touch on that. I think both of you and Taegan have just raised that maybe will help bridge us into a bit of a conversation around what's happening in blockchain technology and sort of decentralized finance and protocols more broadly. One of the things I think is so interesting to talk is, um, you know, why, why did humans utilize gold? And you articulated it really well, the association of empire and money, right? It was really made by Julius Caesar who stamped his face on a gold coin. And what gold allowed people to do is transport value and energy, right? Um, across vast distances of both space and time, right? If I'm a chicken farmer and I have a chicken, I can transport my chicken, maybe a hundred miles, but I can transport a gold coin, right. Thousands of miles and over a millennia.

Meltem Demirors: (24:17)
Um, and so I think about this idea of like gold was really a store of value because it allowed us to preserve economic activity and transmute it across space and time. Right. And over time, what human civilizations did is we created piles of this gold, right? And we built citadels and fortresses around these piles of literal shiny rocks. And that's how our, our society has developed. And today still, what does a bank do in terms of form and function? You know, BNY Mellon in New York, they have a massive vault in their basement, their stores, gold and other assets. Um, you know, it's like very Lord of Lord of the rings, Gollum style, the gold sitting in the sitting in the basement. Um, and I just think that idea in the 21st century is absolutely preposterous. Like I don't have a vault in my house if I'm traveling, you know, I'm wearing a track suit, I don't have pockets big enough to hold a gold bar. Certainly I'm not traveling around with a briefcase filled with, with gold bars. So I think this idea of, um, you know, so much of what we do in our world has been modernized. I have a super computer in my, in my pocket that I use on a daily basis. How is it that the basis of how we construct and conceptualize value is still based on shiny gold rocks that we store inside of big marble buildings. It just doesn't make any sense to me. People

John Darcie: (25:36)
Talk about Fiat. They say, well, Bitcoin doesn't have an army. That's there to enforce its credibility. I said, actually it does. It has the biggest, it has the biggest and most powerful and most of noxious meme army in the history of the planet, uh, protecting us integrity.

Meltem Demirors: (25:52)
Yeah. But I'll look, and I think this is what's so important. Right? All, all reality is just belief. Um, and we've named a new monetary reality into existence. I think if you look at what's happening in equities as well, I think, you know, Elon Musk for all his faults has also named a new reality into existence. I mean, Tesla, if you look the fundamentals of that business, you know, it's not really sure about that, but in terms of narratives and excellent job, meaning this new reality and this perception into existence. And as you alluded to, you know, Bitcoin doesn't have an ER department, we don't have leaders or people who are spokespeople for Bitcoin. What we have is a group of millions of people around the world who really passionately believe in a different version of reality in the future. And we're all working to try to bring that reality into existence.

Meltem Demirors: (26:41)
Now what's really cool about Bitcoin is from an ideological perspective, the umbrella is big enough to accommodate a lot of different viewpoints, right? And you also have all of these different sort of ancillary ecosystems, like the theory of ecosystem, what taken in her team are working on it, the graph and, you know, thousands of other networks that people are working on. And they're all sort of recursive and complimentary. Um, but what I really would love to talk about a bit more beyond just the asset it's it's felt is like, what are we doing with building companies? You know, the corporation, it is really becoming more powerful than the state. We look at apple, apple has a $2 trillion market cap, you know, more than the GDP of most countries. We look at companies like micro strategy, issuing billion dollar corporate bond is 0%. Like it's just preposterous. Um, but I think one of the things we're also experimenting with is changing the form of corporations and how people engage in economic activity. So I think maybe Taegan could tell us a bit more about, you know, what's happening with protocols and this new way of conceptualizing the way that people build economic value outside of the confines of a corporation with its leaders and mostly male leaders who then become defacto sort of leaders of, of the world. Yeah,

Tegan Kline: (27:55)
Absolutely. You know, protocols and tokens really are kind of this new business model. I think it took a while for individuals to kind of get their minds around SAS as a new business model. And then Salesforce turned it into a 200, $200 billion industry. Um, and you know, and now, you know, there's over 15,000 SAS companies, but tokens are really the next evolution of the business model. And I think that's going to take folks a lot longer to get their minds around than SAS did because it's a little bit, you know, further out there. Um, and so, you know, th th now's the opportunity for individuals to kind of get their minds around that new business model, because that's really where the alpha is. And with tokens, you know, the way, it's the way that you have a sustainable business model, when you have kind of a decentralized protocol and also open-source technology, oftentimes an opensource technology you're asking for donations, and you rely on those donations with tokens, you can see like Bitcoin and Ethereum, the graph chain length, they've all kind of mastered that art of creating the, the token as the business model and not limiting it with SAS or with revenue.

Tegan Kline: (29:00)
And it's kind of a radical idea, but that I think is where a lot of the future potential and opportunity lies. And I do think that, you know, this will be, I think we've already started to see it, but this will be probably the largest wealth transfer we see in our lifetime. And there's so much opportunity ahead. Another thing that I like to speak about is just kind of the future of work and individuals can now work for ideas or protocols, as opposed to just centralized companies where kind of the money trickles up to the top wall street gets a bad rap, you know, for being kind of greedy and money hungry. But analysts on wall street are not making a ton of money. They're like with the regulations came, you know, it kind of dried up a lot of that earning potential. And so you have to work your way up from analyst to associate VP before you can really become like, you know, wealthy within finance. And so this is giving an opportunity for individuals in centralized finance, and also in web to, to come and build in a new ecosystem.

John Darcie: (29:52)
Yeah. I mean, you saw Goldman Sachs his tone, uh, around Bitcoin and digital assets change as soon as Coinbase is a private valuation and its direct listing was trading at the same market cap as Goldman Sachs. I think they looked around the room and said, you know, this is an unstoppable train. We better get out of the way, uh, and maybe grab on, uh, as well. So interesting to see that news this week as well. So let's, let's think into the future, uh, we'll start with Meltem and, and taken. I know you have thoughts on this as well, but what does that world look like? We have flying cars and tunnels. We have web 3.0 for

Meltem Demirors: (30:30)
Flying cars since I was five years old and I haven't gotten it yet, like low key. I'm mad about that

John Darcie: (30:38)
Flying cars. And all we got was a, you know, this is crazy cryptographic money that, that transcends space and time, but, uh, what does web 3.0, look like? What does the world look like with a decentralized internet? What is investing look like in a world that's fully decentralized?

Meltem Demirors: (30:53)
Sure. Um, and maybe the way I'd articulate that John is, um, first of all, what you've just started circulated is inconceivable to most people. So I'll go ahead and say, certainly believe this is evolutionary, right. I don't think it happens overnight. I don't think this is a sudden shift. I think this is evolutionary and happens over a much longer arc of time. Like humans are notoriously bad at internalizing change. Um, and a lot of that is really a limitation, um, based on like how we construct our mental models and our view of the world. So unfortunately I do think this will be a 5, 10, 15, 20 year sort of arc of time. But as you've alluded to the macro environment, we're living in does accelerate some of that timeline because I think it started to show just the extreme level of institutional dysfunction. We have not just in corporations, but in markets, in our, um, governments, in our NGOs, just the institutions that we've constructed are so frail, frankly.

Meltem Demirors: (31:53)
Um, and you know, you see that in the United States, the way this pandemic was handled was just an absolute disaster is embarrassing to be an American during this pandemic. And it's, it's, it's frightening, quite candidly. Um, I think the other pieces, I think a lot of people have not yet accepted or recognized that we no longer live in a world where the us dollar is the great hedge Amman. We live in a multipolar currency world. It's just that most people haven't internalized that yet. And the multi-polar currency world we live in, right. We have new sort of players emerging, certainly China with DCP, their digital, remember the project. And just the fact that finance and transactions like the monetary system in China is entirely digitized. I think that is something most people don't appreciate until they go to China. Like, I went there with my little paper MMB and people were like, please, nobody wants that. Like, you need to use the app. I felt like so incompetent because I was there with like my boomer box and they were like, lady, nobody, nobody does that anymore. I felt China's

John Darcie: (32:57)
End game, you know, just to, to go slightly off topic, but you know, they, they have restricted, you know, usage of Bitcoin. Meanwhile, they're one of the largest miners of Bitcoin. They're launching their own central bank, digital currency. And they're obviously very intrigued by the space. What is the game they're playing, uh, in Bitcoin?

Meltem Demirors: (33:16)
Yeah, look, um, I think it's the idea that all empires play, right. It's domination. Um, and, and when I say domination, I don't necessarily mean that in a negative sense. So historic, I come from the energy industry, right? The last really century of human history in terms of conflict and physical conflict, um, has been defined by the quest for oil, right? And really the shift to the petrodollar as a result of what happened in 1973, like really what has shaped the modern world, even the way we drew borders after world war II, or it was predicated on the basis that we were on the hunt for fuel for oil, the new oil is semiconductors, right? The U S is woefully behind when it comes to semiconductor production. And Silicon Ray is the primary input, compute and connectivity is the most important resource that nation states will have.

Meltem Demirors: (34:08)
And Bitcoin in and of itself is just a giant telecommunications network. Bitcoin is a privately owned, privately operated source communication network that communicates value. And it's the most secure financial network that we have. It's never been hacked. It's never been taken down. There are billions of dollars of value that go into it. In fact, in December a charge in January alone, the Bitcoin network generated 1.3, $6 billion of fees and rewards for people who participated in the physical maintenance of that infrastructure. So I think the new frontier we see emerging is this, this digital frontier, digital warfighter frontier. And that gets fought on several different fronts. It's value, it's cybersecurity, it's disinformation campaigns, right. Um, and we've seen all of that over the last few years. And so what I think has been really interesting to observe, like there are these different sort of poles that are emerging.

Meltem Demirors: (34:57)
There's obviously the U S there's obviously China, Russia is a prominent player. I think we're underestimating the middle east as well. But on top of that, you start to add in online communities, right, as you alluded to Bitcoin is an online community of millions of people around the world who fervently believe in and work for, and work on advocating for making that coin better. Um, Taegan and I just funded an initiative at MIT to fund open-source development of the Bitcoin protocol, neutral and free of corporate influence. But look, there's, there's a lot of effort and energy that people are putting into this, like online, purely digital instantiation of a new type of nation state, which is the coin. Now that sounds a bit farfetched, but I think what we will start to see is, you know, I don't have just one identity anymore. Yes. My digital ID card, you know, my physical ID card, pardon says, I'm Melton.

Meltem Demirors: (35:48)
And I'm a resident of the state of New Hampshire and I'm a citizen of the United States, but online, I can have many different personas and belong to many different communities and have many different identities. And I think, again, this is just part of the natural evolution of how we live our lives. Like where, when I meet someone, I don't talk about where I'm from or where I live anymore. I talk about what I'm into and what communities I'm a part of. I talked about being a Bitcoin, or I talk about, you know, being into scifi books, great tracks. I mean, this is it's fire. Not going to lie. You have to look good. It's a global pandemic. John, I'm trying to have some fun. I know, obviously

John Darcie: (36:26)
I'm dressed head to toe in wool here. So I don't, I don't have shorts on underneath my jacket, but,

Meltem Demirors: (36:31)
And you're still, you're still operating, you know, you have your John, the financier persona on that. There are many elements of, you know, your persona. So, so I do think giving people more flexibility to choose, right, this idea of the exit or voice, right. To choose what communities they want to be a part of is so powerful. And we, as a result of the pandemic, again, we've all spent the last year sitting inside of our houses with nothing to do, but beyond line. Right? And so I think again, um, what governments are missing is like ideas are incredibly powerful and incredibly dangerous to the existing power structure. And this idea has just reached like a point of no return. Now how this idea gets expressed and implemented. There's a lot of different permutations of that. I think you will see nation states and corporations attempt to co-opt the Bitcoin narrative, which we already saw with Facebook's DM, right?

Meltem Demirors: (37:24)
Like I'm saying, oh, this is another type of Bitcoin. I'm like, absolutely not going to work. Is that going to work DM? Um, I think it, I think it well, and I actually think it might be a very positive catalyst because at the end of the day, you know, 3 billion people using Facebook now also having a digital wallet that's compatible with not only DM, but also with other public open blockchains is potentially a great way to orange pill, 3 billion Facebook users. So I'm supportive. And again, I think it's evolutionary at the end of the day, you know, the approaches we took in the past of physically shutting people down or shutting off their access to financial system, how are you going to shut down Bitcoin? Right.

John Darcie: (38:07)
Why, why is quantum computing not an existential threat to Bitcoin?

Meltem Demirors: (38:12)
Because quantum computing is not yet at a point where like it could have quote unquote, the blockchain shot 2 56 is highly secure. And also, I think people forget like the pace of technological innovation on the cryptography side. Like we're talking about robust research academically into next gen cryptography is going to keep pace with whatever innovations exist in super computing. Right. It's sort of like, um, technology is just a tool, right? And there are people it for good and use it for bad and it's sort of a cat and mouse game. Um, but I think the amount of innovation we see happening in the cryptography space will keep pace with whatever innovations we see on the computing side that allow us to potentially break, um, really complex types of encryption.

John Darcie: (38:51)
All right. Taegan, what's the next step in this decentralized internet finance world, you know, first of all, why are blockchains and distributed ledgers better than just normal databases and traditional ways of storing technology and information. And, you know, we've seen the rise of NFTE NFTs, non fungible tokens, whether it be NBA top shots, but it's, what's the next iteration of all this. Yeah.

Meltem Demirors: (39:16)
I mean, I think we're only at the beginning of kind of the decentralized internet, which I call web three. Um, I think that that is really the future. And Dubai is a piece of that, you know, Dubai, you asked, you know, why are blockchains better than databases? Um, and I think the big answer is really open data and getting access to that data. For example, in web to the centralized space with Facebook, LinkedIn, those APIs are closed. So I can't port LinkedIn data to my own application, nor can I afford it to a Crunchbase or, or another application because the API are closed. So I can't access that data in the blockchain space, specifically with the graph, we call them sub graphs, they're open API APIs. And so anyone can pull data from those open APIs to their applications, to another applications. And this is leading. This is creating a lot of innovation in the space

Tegan Kline: (40:05)
And it's kind of like Lego building blocks of innovation

Meltem Demirors: (40:07)
That we're seeing. And Dubai is a prime example of that because of the transparency within Dubai, there was so much more innovation. And I think if we look back to the mortgage crisis from, from 2008, if we had transparency, and if the banks were able to identify where those mortgage backed securities lied, who owned them, I don't think that crisis would have been as big potentially we could have prevented that crisis. And do you buy, because you have all these little fires everywhere, it prevents this big, massive fire because of that trance, that transparency that's there. And this is leading into NFTs, which are non fungible tokens that we've kind of alluded to earlier kind of having ownership of digital art and proving that it's an original, just like you have like an original Gucci belt, um, moving that it's original copy. And so we're seeing a lot of the individuals that made a lot of money in the decentralized finance space, according into the NMT space.

Meltem Demirors: (41:00)
And then that money is going to artists and creators bringing a whole new way of, of individuals into the crypto space. And I think that will only continue, you know, I think where every application that you have on your iPhone will become decentralized. Um, and you know, it will lead into the music space. We have, you know, audience, we have, um, like, you know, different storage systems. Um, and there's so much more to go, you know, we need a social network, we need the Robin hood of crypto. We need the Bloomberg of crypto, all of which, you know, hasn't arrived yet. And there's so much innovation to happen.

John Darcie: (41:32)
Three DS, uh, digital disinformation distribution. Can you tell me what that means? What those are?

Meltem Demirors: (41:40)
Yeah, so, so, um, my business partners like coin shares, um, Danny masters, Ross Newton, John Raymond, Yeti, before they started coin shares, they ran a commodities fund. Um, my background, you know, is more on the corporate finance corporate treasury dominated side. And one of the things they did, um, on the commodity side is they built a really robust approach, sort of analyzing potties market based on something they called the three D's. Um, and so we've done the same thing in the crypto space is something Dan and I like to work on. We have our, you know, daily chats where we sort of spitball and brainstorm. So what we've arrived at is sort of this framework that sort of, um, articulates our approach to building coin shares in our business, which we're an asset management firm, but we're also in an investment firm that builds digital infrastructure.

Meltem Demirors: (42:22)
So the 3d is our digital, everything's becoming digital, and we've already seen that across the finance landscape it's, um, disintermediation, right? So we're removing intermediaries and allowing people to interact directly with one another. And the rise of peer-to-peer financial systems, I think is one example of that. And then the last one that's so critical is distribution. Um, the way that financial products and services are distributed is changing. It used to be that the pipe would go from the fed to a tier one bank, right, to SyFy from the SyFy to a smaller bank, and then from smaller bank to service provider and the service provider to the consumer. And along that path, right, maybe three to 5% of the value gets shaved off through fees and whatever else. Now, what we have is the ability to distribute tokens and digital assets and value directly to consumers and users, which is something that the grafted, right.

Meltem Demirors: (43:13)
They airdrop tokens to people who are participants in sort of bootstrapping the protocol. So this fundamental shift in how we distribute financial products and services, I think is going to lead to a massive amount of, um, disintermediation. And so what we really try to do at coin shares is the analyze data in a data-driven way, right? We have a large research team and we spend a lot of time doing fundamental research on what's happening here. But as we look at the trend of digitization, which we already saw with FinTech, right, that's not a new trend, but it's happening in a much faster way of cryptocurrencies. We see this trend of disintermediation, which now for the first time as possible, I don't need a commercial bank to interact with Bitcoin, which is fun. Like it's mine, it's absolutely mind blowing. If you haven't done it, I highly recommend downloading something like blue wallet and sending even a one Satoshi lightning transaction.

Meltem Demirors: (44:00)
It will absolutely blow your mind, but really the biggest trend. And the one that I think should be scariest to financial institutions is distribution. You no longer need a broker or a guy in a suit to distribute financial products, a dog or cat on the internet, right? And then on dev building a defy protocol can distribute products and services. And because the code is publicly verifiable by anyone who wants to look at it and because everything is extremely transparent, you no longer have this information asymmetry or this gatekeeping that we've the traditional financial system. And I think that is so profoundly transformative people still aren't really grasping it. We're seeing people trying to build products and services around crypto using traditional finance business models. But I don't need to give my Bitcoin to BNY Mellon to lock in a vault. That's not going to keep my Bitcoin any more secure. Um, so I think this idea of distribution fundamentally shifting is one that people are just completely underestimating and those fees are going to flow elsewhere, and it's not going to be bankers and, and, you know, fund managers who get those fees, it's going to be developers and people building protocols and open source tools who capitalize on those feeds

John Darcie: (45:10)
Like taken so taken. What's unique

Speaker 5: (45:12)
About the graph protocol.

John Darcie: (45:14)
What's unique about the graph protocol, how you've built it. She talked about how you, you incentivize, you know, early, uh, developers who bootstrapped the protocol by, by cutting them into, uh, the, basically the currency that operates on the graph protocol. But what's unique about the way you've built in the way you've conceptualized it. Yeah.

Tegan Kline: (45:33)
So the graph has the potential to become larger than any layer, one blockchain, because the graph integrates with every level of the stack. Um, and so you have like the applications on top, they use the graph to index inquiry, their protocol kind of like what Google does for the web. The graph does for the blockchain. You have all this great data within the web, but until Google came up with search, you couldn't access that data. Same with the blockchain. There's a lot of wonderful data there, but getting to that data is really difficult and time consuming. And so we have strapped, you know, 12 months line of code away from those developers and allow the developers to easily serve data to their users. Um, but what's great about the graph is it can integrate with every piece of the stack yet, you know, the, the layer one blockchains, the layer two blockchains, like optimism scale, um, there's many, many different arbitrary, many different layer twos to help with scaling, which is one of the issues, you know, Ethereum has grown so big and there's so much development on Ethereum that folks are kind of looking to go to other places.

Tegan Kline: (46:29)
And so wherever developers and users go, the graph will be,

John Darcie: (46:33)
Yeah, obviously, you know, I have a lot of conversations with people in the digital asset space and, and graph has come up in a number of conversations. So congratulations on what you've built with that. I know there's, there's a ton of excitement, uh, in the digital asset ecosystem about what, what you've built and what's continuing to be built on that protocol. Uh, but we could probably go on for another two hours, but we'll wrap it up there for today. Uh Meltem T uh, Taegan, what's your Twitter handles. You guys are very lively on Twitter. How do we follow you on Twitter Meltem and take it.

Meltem Demirors: (47:01)
Sure. I'm at Mel underscore done. Um, and my company's at coin shares co I do have to disclose I am an investor in the graph protocol. Um, so I'm probably a bit biased and all of my personal investments, as well as those I made through coin shares are disclosed on my website, which is Meltem generis.com. Um, I always like to disclose what my interests are. Um, so I am a long-term believer in the graph and obviously in my incentives, they're pretty clear. I just wanted to disclose that since disclosure is a part of traditional finance, that I certainly think we should replicate in the crypto space.

Tegan Kline: (47:36)
Absolutely agree. And I'm the client venture on Twitter. You can follow the graph protocol at graft protocol, and you can follow edge and node at edge node.

John Darcie: (47:47)
Meltem you're my go-to source. When, when people start coming at me with the fact that Bitcoin uses all the is going to use all the world's energy in the next decade, and that it's, uh, a massive suck on, on energy use. You're my go-to resource. I just say, go, go talk to them, melt them, go, go follow them on Twitter. She'll she'll take them. We're putting out.

Meltem Demirors: (48:06)
Yeah. So I have a website. Bitcoin will not boil the ocean.com. Um, queen shares have published a lot of research on the use of renewables and Bitcoin mining. We're about to announce a whole slew of investments we've made in this space, but in my view, Bitcoin will actually be the catalyst for an energy revolution, the likes of which we've never seen before. Um, so I'd love to continue talking about that. There are a lot of great people, including Russ Stephens at N Y dig, who've done great work, sort of helping evangelize that narrative. And so, you know, the energy industry and the Bitcoin industry in an odd way, like my two loves are coming back together again. And if we want to have an intergalactic, you know, experience as humans and intergalactic existence, we need intergalactic money. That's the coin. We also need energy sources that will allow us to be an intergalactic race. So I'm, I'm very optimistic about the longterm compatibility between sustainability energy and Bitcoin more broadly. So anytime you want to chat Sean, I'm your girl. I

John Darcie: (49:01)
Love it. I love it. And Elon Musk is sort of solving all those problems at one time. He's a sorry, in the energy revolution piece, he's taken us to Mars. Uh, and he's also creating star Lincoln, new new telecommunication system, uh, via space. Okay. And

Meltem Demirors: (49:15)
He thought dank means he's got to, encomium strong. Let's not forget. Yeah. And he has tagged

John Darcie: (49:19)
Me. That's what it really comes down to. This is a meme war and he has dank memes. Uh, and so he's winning that battle, but thank you again. Meltem and Taegan for joining us today here on salt talks. It's been a pleasure and thank you everybody who tuned into today's salt talk, uh, with Meltem dimmers and Teagan Klein. Just a reminder, if you miss any part of this episode or any of our previous episodes, you can access them on our website. It's salt.org, and you can also watch them all on our YouTube channel called salt tube. Uh, we're also on social media at salt conferences where we're most active, but we're also on Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn as well. And please spread the word about these salt talks. Particularly if you have an 82 year old, a great-grand mother-in-law who needs to learn about the history of money and why Bitcoin is not boiling the oceans, please send them to these episodes. Uh, this series that we do on digital assets, I think it's been really informative for a lot of people, but on behalf of the entire salt team, this is John Darcie signing off from salt talks for today. We hope to see you back here soon.

Dan Held: Bitcoin’s Market Cycles | SALT Talks #174

“Bitcoin is a great antidote to bad central banking policy. In this world where literally trillions are being printed weekly, Bitcoin shines out as this great way to store value.”

Dan Held is works as Growth Lead at Kraken Digital Asset Exchange. Held has built some of the most popular crypto products like Interchange (acquired by Kraken), ChangeTip (acquired by AirBnB) and ZeroBlock (acquired by Blockchain.com).

The COVID pandemic and the resulting government spending has woken up more people to concerns about inflationary central bank policy. The 2013 and 2017 Bitcoin runs were part of bull markets and suffered pullbacks in a speculative cycle. Bitcoin is set to enter a Super Cycle where it exists within its own local market, especially as it gains broad acceptance. “I call it the Super Cycle because we could see a more intense bull run as the whole world wakes up to Bitcoin’s value prop. Bitcoin’s total addressable market should place its per Bitcoin value at $1M to $10M.”

There have been major inflection points in Bitcoin’s evolution. The latest example is corporate treasuries’ buying of Bitcoin, ultimately creating stability for the crypto asset and moving it towards the mainstream. “To see Tesla buy Bitcoin really put Bitcoin on the map. I did not expect Bitcoin to be bought by treasuries this soon… this was a pivotal moment where people accepted Bitcoin as this mainstream idea.”

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Dan Held.jpeg

Dan Held

Growth Lead

Kraken

MODERATOR

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darcie: (00:01)


John Darcie: (00:07)
Everyone. And welcome back to salt talks. My name is John Darcie. I'm the managing director of salt, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance technology and public policy. Salt talks are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators, and thinkers. And our goal on the salt talk is the same as our goal at our salt conferences, which is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future. And we don't think there's any bigger idea right now, whether it be in the world of finance or elsewhere than digital assets. And we're very excited to bring you the latest episode in our series of salt talks on digital assets and Bitcoin being our focus. Our guest today is Dan held.

John Darcie: (00:55)
If you are involved in the Bitcoin or digital asset world, you will know his name because he's one of the most prolific and interesting writers on Bitcoin. Uh, but if you are not familiar with Dan, you should be, and you should definitely follow up on a lot of his writings, uh, both macro stuff that he's written on Bitcoin, as well as his regular commentary through his newsletter. But Dan is currently the growth lead for cracking his former former company interchange, uh, portfolio reconciliation tool for crypto institutional craters traders was acquired by cracking in July of 2019. Uh, prior to that, he was at Uber on the rider growth and global data side of that business. And before Uber, he helped build some of the most popular early crypto products, including change tip, which was acquired by Airbnb and zero block, which was acquired by blockchain.com and the second ever all Bitcoin acquisition.

John Darcie: (01:52)
He was part of the original 2013 crypto meetup group in San Francisco, which was comprised with the founders of Coinbase ripple, cracking and others. But I know Dan is now coming to us from Austin, Texas as are many people who maybe started out in San Francisco, but Dan welcome hosting. Today's talk is Brett messing. Who's the president and chief operating officer of SkyBridge capital, a global alternative investment firm that now has I believe about $500 million of exposure, long exposure to Bitcoin. Uh, he's going to host today's interview I'll pipe in with a couple of questions maybe at the end, but, uh, with that, I'll turn it over to you, Brett for the interview.

Brett Messing: (02:29)
Thanks, John and Dan, thanks for joining us. Um, you know, I'm a big fan, you know, I subscribe to your newsletter and, uh, your, your stuff has been very helpful to me and, and us on our sort of intellectual journey. Um, we're going to get bullish today. We're going to be unapologetic about it. Um, and I want to start by saying that, you know, I've been on wall street for quite a while and I've seen, you know, many great trades and they all end. And so the trade that I think is going to is buy Bitcoin at the, having sell it 14 to 18 months later. Repeat, repeat like the Olympics. Um, you have a S uh, a Supercycle thesis. I'd like you to share that with our audience. And, um, I'll talk about it a little bit. Sure.

Dan Held: (03:19)
Uh, Brett John, thanks for having me on, uh, always fun to talk Bitcoin, especially bullish Bitcoin, um, been through a lot of different, uh, been through three distinctive bull bear cycles. You don't want to talk

John Darcie: (03:31)
FID. You don't want to talk FID, Dan, you want to stay on the other side of it. We

Dan Held: (03:34)
Can talk about as well, happy to you can throw them my way and I can, I can, I can take him. Um, but today, yeah, talking about the Supercycle theory, you know, we've got these cycles that have occurred in Bitcoin, 20 13, 20 17 are the most prominent newer ones that most people people are aware of in these, we saw Bitcoin's price go up 10 X, 20 X, a hundred X from trough to peak. And then we saw, you know, after that it go down another 80% and the proof for seeding bear market. Now with this new cycle that we're going through, going through currently, Bitcoin is far different than these other ones. Uh, the in 20 13, 20 17, the macro markets were largely in a bull run. It was a bear, it was a bull market. Uh, everything was going well. And so, you know, these speculative cycles were basically a local phenomenon, uh, based on Bitcoins, having, having the, having events that occur every four years reduce the amount of newly-minted Bitcoin that are released to the market.

Dan Held: (04:35)
So if demand stays the same or increases in supply has diminished that the price tends to naturally go up and then we see this speculative cycle occur with this moment. We've not only got a local, um, you know, traditional four year boom bust cycle that's occurring. And we're currently in the bull run part of this cycle. And this is the having cycle that I mentioned before, but also COVID occurred. And the whole world woke up to, you know, starting to question, can my government be trusted with the money with our money? And when we looked at money printer go Burr occurring, you know, during COVID in 2020, people are really starting to question, uh, will my money retain its value over time? Well, can I trust my government to be prudent, uh, to be fiscally responsible? And Bitcoin is a great antidote to bad central banking policy.

Dan Held: (05:28)
It's got a fixed 21 million hard cap. And in this world where literally trillions are being printed weekly, Bitcoin shines out as this example of a great way to store value. That is hard to seize. The monetary policy is immutable. Can't be changed. And just as a very distinctly, you know, different goal, 2.0 sort of assets. So I don't think we're going to see Bitcoin behave like we did in the other cycles where it goes up and then it dropped to 80% of the proceeding bear market. I think we could see, and this is why I call it a Supercycle. We could either see a more intense bull run as the whole world wakes up to Bitcoin's value prop, uh, Bitcoin's Tam or total addressable market should place it as a per Bitcoin value of between a million and $10 million a Bitcoin. Now, this could be one of the final cycles where Bitcoin steps in and is realized by the world as a global store of value asset. Um, we could also see a flavor of the Supercycle where we see maybe a normal bull run, but less of a bear market where we, you know, peak to trough might be only 30% or 40% versus an 80% peak to trough. So that's what I mean by the Supercycle. And that's why I think this time might be a little bit different than the previous market cycles.

Brett Messing: (06:46)
Um, there've been a lot of big events right over the last where ranging from corporate spying, which is something I never thought possible. That was certainly not in the, in the, in the coming years, uh, PayPal. So the on-ramps are becoming easier. Um, the oldest bank in America, and it seems like all the large, which one of them is they're all important. Is there one that you think we'll look back, you know, with the perspective of history and say, you know, that was a key moment that was, uh, you know, that actor played a special role in this.

Dan Held: (07:23)
I think the Tesla moment, just that moment, Michael Saylor played a great moment of, you know, making Bitcoin owned by company. Treasury's a reality, but Tesla, you know, micro strategy and sailor are much lesser known than Elon Musk, who is a legendary investor, a legendary, a product builder, a tech technological innovator. And he's considered like a Steve jobs ask sort of level, um, to see Tesla buy Bitcoin, I think really put Bitcoin on the map. I did not expect Bitcoin to be purchased by treasuries this soon. Uh, this kind of bloom blew away my expectations as well. Um, and we're only getting started, you know, how many companies are currently going through the exploratory process of adding Bitcoin to their balance sheet. You know, when will PayPal do that? When will all of these other companies that are embracing Bitcoin start to put Bitcoin on the balance sheet? I certainly didn't expect this to happen this soon. Um, this kind of blew my mind and I think Tesla was the moment when, you know, micro strategy doing it was cool, but then Tesla was like, whoa, this is a, this is a huge deal. I mean, Tesla is a huge, huge company in Elan's really well known. So I think that was sort of the pivotal moment that Bitcoin people are starting to really accept Bitcoin as a mainstream idea.

Brett Messing: (08:40)
I, I agree with that. And I think there's a, there's another element to that. That's interesting, which is, as you know, whenever anyone buys Bitcoin, they feel like they're late, right? Like they missed it. Elon Musk saw this really right. You know, he and Reed Hoffman and Peter Thiel, and those guys have been in it right since I don't know, eight, nine years. So, you know, for him to take, you know, a billion and a half dollars right up a Tesla, right at 33 34 35, can't remember what their average price was. It doesn't really matter. I think sort of addresses that, that challenge that we as investors all make in making our first Bitcoin purchase.

Dan Held: (09:23)
Yeah. I think what's really interesting about this too, is that this increases Bitcoin's protection against, um, I would say like aggressive anti Bitcoin regulation in the future. If large corporate started buying Bitcoin, it makes it very hard for countries to ban it because if they start banning it, then it immediately causes a huge stock panic where, uh, all these different equities that hold Bitcoin would start to drop. And these are popular equities. Like for example, Tesla is held by a lot of millennials. Um, you know, so I think that, you know, these sort of moments are really, really pivotal for Bitcoin to be perceived as a globally recognized money or a store of value asset it's, um, kind of a night and day sort of, uh, it's like pre corporates buying Bitcoin and post, you know, really represent distinct stages in Bitcoin's development. Um, you know, when I was thinking about the Supercycle theory, which I came out with, uh, over a year and a half, two years ago, you know, I always think he may be, oh, okay, well, the big macro traders will start to buy it. That was kind of a big check mark for me as like Bitcoin being recognized as a global store value asset. Um, but then the corporates coming in, I think this was just a really surprising, really awesome unexpected sort of movement that occurred very, very early. Um, there's so there's trillions of dollars sitting in cash or cash equivalents and, you know, all it takes, I think, um, the Ark invest folks did some research and found if 10% of corporate treasury cash moved into Bitcoin Bitcoin's price per Bitcoin would be around $400,000, the coin.

Brett Messing: (10:59)
And the thing that makes that I think even more exciting, right, is if you look at the S and P 500, most of the cash is on the balance sheets of technology companies, right. You know, apple, Oracle, Microsoft, because like energy companies are all debt financial services companies don't hold that much cash retailer. You can just go sector by sector. So the people who are most inclined to be comfortable with Bitcoin, coincidentally are the ones who were sitting on the vast majority of the cash on S and P 500 balance sheets. So that's, you know,

Dan Held: (11:33)
Yeah. I think that's a great note to make, which is that, you know, who better who's sitting with all the cash and would they be open to investing in some of that cash balance into Bitcoin and the answers as we're increasingly seeing the answer is yes.

Brett Messing: (11:46)
So Dan, I, I am a, um, uh, I guess call me disciple of your super cycle, um, uh, theory. But when you look at the, the overall cryptocurrency market, a lot of those sort of almost call them garbage. Stuff's going up also. So do you think that we may just be seeing a risk on trade? Um, when was your, what's your reaction to that? That observation?

Dan Held: (12:14)
Yeah, I think Bitcoin is still becoming, it's a Bitcoin's evolution. We've seen it be highly volatile and act like a risk on trade for most of its existence. Um, Bitcoin, however, in its final iteration or whatever it is aspiring to be as the risk off trade Bitcoin is aspiring to be a gold 2.0 risk-off sort of sort of trade. Uh, and sometimes it reflects that, for example, uh, Cyprus in 2013, when they started to do the, do the bail ends Bitcoin and started the pump in 2013, based on that, that news, that was the catalyst, uh, when Donald Trump got elected in 2016, Bitcoin moved on that same with Brexit. So Bitcoin does exhibit some, uh, you know, catalyst moments that it exhibits characteristics of a risk-off asset or a risk-off trade. However, I would largely agree that Bitcoin is sort of buoyed in this moment.

Dan Held: (13:07)
Um, based on, you know, we've seen a lot of, uh, as the commonly term, the common fund term stocks as the stocks go up, the kind of like very frothy equities market. You know, I think some of what, how Bitcoin is moving is probably because of that. Uh, as folks are looking across the world and, and looking to put money into different assets in a more frothy environment, Bitcoin is a very volatile fund asset to go trade. Um, so I'm not sure if we can like cleanly classify Bitcoin's price movement as like, oh, this is, uh, this is, uh, uh, folks piling into a more risk on or risk off sort of traded. It's kind of both, which makes it a really weird type of investment because it ultimately is gold 2.0, so it's a risk off trade, uh, but it's becoming a gold 2.0, so it's a speculative as Jerome Powell puts it into a speculative store value. So in that regard, it might be considered more risk on. So the answer is kind of both it's, it's not really a, a clean answer for what your questioning was, but I would say it's exhibiting behaviors of both.

Brett Messing: (14:09)
No, I think it's interesting, you know, I, I think of Bitcoin as being the next great tech stock, right. For the, for this, this coming decade. And I find it interesting that, that the gold narrative has really caught on it as well as it has. And, and Gold's down 20% since August. So it's indisputable that Bitcoin is sucking capital at, at of gold. But I bet if we were to take owners of gold and owners of Bitcoin and created concentric circles, we would see actually very little overlap. Um, so I think the narrative helps people intellectually, but, you know, I, I think it's limiting. Um, but anyway, move, moving along. Um, I don't want to talk FID, right? So FID for those who, who aren't on Bitcoin, Twitter is fear, uncertainty and doubt. But I do want to, I want to ask you is what are the one or two or three real risks to Bitcoin? So if you and I are talking in five or 10 years, and we're like, we got that wrong, I don't know, like we were just wrong. Right? Why?

Dan Held: (15:17)
Yeah. We're sitting down with a whiskey going, why did it all, why didn't it work out? Yeah. So I would say the number one threat to Bitcoin would be governments. Bitcoin was created as an antidote to poor central banking policy and directly undermines the authority and legitimacy of governments across the world. If the money supply is ripped away from governments, it dramatically reduces the size of government and also reduces their power. So Bitcoin inherently is, is anti-government. Um, and so governments have the capacity to limit the growth of Bitcoin. In certain ways they can ban exchanges, they can ban ownership of it. Um, they can heavily tax it. So I would say that's probably the number one threat to Bitcoin would be governments. Those are the most powerful forces that we have on earth that could change and alter Bitcoin's growth trajectory. Do I think that they have the capacity to kill Bitcoin?

Dan Held: (16:11)
No. I just think they could Swart the growth or, or stall the growth. What's kinda funny about Bitcoin though, is that it's, it's such a wild, new idea that most governments haven't taken it seriously, um, that, uh, of its threat, uh, they, they consider it kind of like a very strange, weird child. They're like, great, Bitcoin, you go do your weird thing and you be volatile and exhibit all this behavior that we consider, we consider the asset to be not a threat. Um, but Bitcoin moves so intensely that by the time governments perceive it as a threat, it may be too large to stop where Bitcoin is owned by 30% of fame. Uh, 30% of like the top tech stocks, um, maybe 40% of the population owns Bitcoin to some extent. And at that point, Bitcoin has achieved such a network effect that it becomes impossible to stop at that point.

Dan Held: (17:04)
Um, so I would say governments are the biggest threat to Bitcoin. I wouldn't say it's a killer threat to Bitcoin. Um, there's other ones as well, like flaws in the protocols zero day exploits. These would be unforeseen, uh, technical issues with Bitcoin. So with Bitcoin broke, um, or w which I would consider a very, very low probability. Um, Bitcoin has operated with 100% uptime since 2013. So Bitcoin's network is super resilient and not many changes are made the Bitcoin because changes introduce more complexity and potential for flaws to be found or exploited. Now, I think the Bitcoin community and the Bitcoin developers are very cognizant of that. So changes can occur very slowly to Bitcoin. So I would say like, you know, the, the, uh, very rare occurrence that there could be a big exploit that causes a material issue, especially as Bitcoin is being increasingly adopted by institutions.

Dan Held: (17:57)
And they might perceive that as untrustworthy. Um, you could lump in, I would say like, uh, quantum, quantum computing underneath that that's a popular piece of FID that people like to bring up. I don't think we're anywhere close to quantum computing being in reality. And I think we're going to see far ahead of time, uh, based on NSA and other NIST encryption standards, those would change before those were changed a decade before quantum computing becomes a reality that would crack like AEs 2 56. Um, but you could lump that under, like maybe we are way underestimating, how fast things are moving on the quantum side. So like a technical issue I would say is like a bucket of risk. And then we have like Bitcoin being attacked on that government level. Ultimately there could be another threat which is more societal and behavioral around. What if the world becomes socialist like very, very socialist, um, where almost everyone buys into socialism and that case people don't care as much about preserving wealth.

Dan Held: (18:57)
And if Bitcoin is a very minority sort of group, as we've seen in world war II, different minority groups can be persecuted. If they remain a minority and don't become integrated into, you know, or become such a small group that can be isolated and attacks. I think Bitcoin, in a circumstance where the world almost the entire world becomes socialist, that would be a very hard thing, you know, for Bitcoin to be able to, um, remain if it remains a minority sort of trade, if a very few percent or very small percentage of the population owns it. I don't think that's going to be the case. I think almost all humans choose to want to preserve value and preserve their wealth, no matter what income status they come from or where they come from the across the world. So, but that, that could be a threat to which would be a large behavioral shift in humankind of just people caring less and less about preserving value.

Brett Messing: (19:48)
Uh, that was a little bit of a bummer, but I asked the question, um, you know, but I do agree, I do agree with government and, um, you know, I think one of the exciting things about Bitcoin is as you think about the nature of the institutional adoption, it's happened along different verticals, right? So you've had corporations, hedge funds, mutual funds, endowments, pension funds, the one you haven't had yet as countries, right. We're waiting for it to become a reserve asset. And it's done on me recently. Well, what happens if I ran, starts buying a bunch of Bitcoin, right? Or North Korea, um, again, uh, it's probably unlikely to be sort of a country that we embrace that will go first for the very reasons, um, that there'll be attracted to Bitcoin, I guess that probably just ties back to your government risk, right? Those that agitate our government in a way that's unhelpful.

Dan Held: (20:41)
Correct. I, it, Bitcoin is the enemy of your enemy, right? And I see countries like China and Russia probably embracing Bitcoin first before the United States government, in terms of them buying it as like, we're going to hold this as one of our reserve assets, uh, you know, sort of replacing gold reserves that China and Russia have both stocked up on. Um, I do, you know, I am, I'm a libertarian, so I'm naturally critical of any government. Uh, but I do love the United States. I think the United States is a great shining example of, of how to go build and, and, you know, we, we have a lot of things that we can fix, but I, I still think we're a great country. And I would really, really love to see the U S step into owning Bitcoin and really owning this as an innovative thing, instead of like embracing Bitcoin versus, you know, bracing against it, hoping that it hoping to hold onto the us dollar dominance versus going well, we see this new paradigm of this new sound money coming out. Maybe we could use this as an opportunity to keep America great, but also understand that things are changing and that we should embrace it.

Brett Messing: (21:42)
I think one of the things that, that Bitcoin benefits from, you know, I'm, I'm a Goldman Sachs alumni and I've been disappointed at, at Goldman hasn't moved more quickly. Although I do think they're the one firm that has the capacity to catch up quickly. And I was talking to a colleague and when he's former Goldman guy, and he said, you don't understand David Solomon can't get through his emails on a day. Right. So he, doesn't, it's very hard for these large legacy. And I think, you know, yelling and Powell like, like Bitcoin is isn't on the list, right. They just don't have time in a day to really spend a lot of time thinking about it. You know, when, when I'm going to brown, Janet Yellen went to brown, I was really proud that she became, you know, treasury, but she said some stuff that was really just uneducated.

Brett Messing: (22:28)
And, and, and I thought about this sort of David Solomon line and, you know, uh, applying, but, um, I do have a question about interest rates. So rates have moved up somewhat and the, and what you hear among Bitcoiners. Again, I wearing a Bitcoin hat. I'm very bullish, but you hear some folks say, well, if rates go up, that's inflationary, that's good for Bitcoin. If the economy sucks and rates go down, that's good for Bitcoin, because then there's nowhere to put your money either. That feels like you're just looking for a bull case wherever you can find it. Um, and you know, what do you think about the back backing up of the 10 year? Right. That's not generally good for long duration assets. Bitcoin is the ultimate long duration asset. Um, I have my own thoughts, but I'd love to hear yours.

Dan Held: (23:17)
Yeah. That's a great question. And there's a joke in the Bitcoin space called, uh, you know, this is good for Bitcoin. Uh, you know, FID is printed. Oh, well, uh, people don't understand Bitcoin, which means a lot more could come realize, come to realize the value. So this is a good thing for Bitcoin. So it's a very classic Bitcoin argument that this is good for Bitcoin. Um, I think Bitcoin, I mean, as an uncorrelated asset, which was kind of a, a way that Bitcoin was framed before the gold 2.0 narrative really, really sunk in, in late 20, 20 as an uncorrelated asset, Bitcoin is kind of a weird sort of asset that doesn't really follow a lot of existing paradigms of like, oh, Bitcoin naturally will trade up or down given a certain catalyst or certain other asset moving up or down. So I'm not sure if there's like an easy answer to describe Bitcoin's behavior as interest rates climb or as they, or is it they go down?

Dan Held: (24:08)
Um, I don't think, I don't think Bitcoin is old enough yet. Uh, you know, it's only been around 12 years, but, you know, in terms of being like, even, even sort of a base level of analysis or being liquid enough to be considered like a mainstream asset, it's a very new asset. Um, so I don't think we've really seen that behavior. Now. We could look at other traditional assets like gold and be like, oh, maybe Bitcoin should mimic some of those gold characteristics. Or, uh, as people, you know, as interest rates move up, we would see as a gold is dropped, maybe Bitcoin would drop as well. But as we kind of described earlier, Bitcoin is simultaneously a risk on more technology in investment. Um, but at the same time is aspiring to be a risk-off gold 2.0 sort of trade.

Brett Messing: (24:53)
You know, this is probably where I date myself. You know, when I was in high school, you know, the tenure was at 12, 13, 14, 15% and cash was as high as 20. So to me, one and a half, half a percent to it's all the same. Right. You know, it's almost like it's ridiculously low rates. It's just, it's hard for me to get really agitated about moving from 90 basis points in the 10 year to one for, you know, it's, it, it all seems ridiculously well. Um, uh,

Dan Held: (25:25)
And if we look at rates over time, over the last couple of decades, we've seen a continually decline, you know, as, as we've just really seen, uh, quantitative easing and other central bank mechanisms distort, I would say, accurate market pricing of, of what an appropriate level of risk is. So I, you know, we we've seen sort of, uh, from, from that era, back in the eighties, we had double digit interest rates. You know, that was, that was really, really crazy. But I would say now is equally surprising with how low rates are, right? Like, you know, you look at these interest rates on mortgages and everything else, and you're like, wait a second. Why, why is risk price to so low? Uh, did, did we come up with better ways to assess risk? And, and you look at this and you're like, this is insane. I mean, um, you can go out and borrow really, really cheaply. Uh, but the world hasn't changed how risk is manifested. Um, we've central banks have very much distorted that risk reward mechanism in the form of interest rates, uh, to where I think the market's hugely mispriced.

Brett Messing: (26:27)
So, um, in thinking about Bitcoin, right, in a very fundamental way, it gets simple, right. Which is there's more demand than supply. Right. Um, now, now a big part of the demand was coming from, let's say, I would say one of the big stories of two 20 was gray scale, right? So gray scale is the investment manager who runs GBTC, which is essentially a closed end fund trades on the pink streets. And I think it started 2020 at approximately called $2 billion in assets. And it's over 30 million. Obviously the price has had contributed a lot, but their inflows were so staggering. And, you know, they were accumulating a large percentage of Bitcoin that was mine in a day. And in fact, JP Morgan issued a report that if gray scale inflows were too slow, that Bitcoin would probably fall from 40,000 to 20,000. As we talked today, it's over 50. So we know that was wrong. Grayscale. I didn't check today, but as the weekend was trading at a 5% discount and their, their inflows have really, you know, come to us ground to a halt. Um, can you just give your thoughts on, on that market mechanism, how important it is or is not?

Dan Held: (27:47)
Yeah, great question. So GBTC is a grant or a trust and the way that it functions is that it owns Bitcoin exclusively. So it's a single asset trust and owns Bitcoin and a S institutional traders or high net worth individuals who are accredited can transfer their Bitcoin in, uh, in an in kind transaction or buy it with, with dollars and they can buy at the underlying price. And then there's the market price, which is what the world is, is, is buying GBTC add on, uh, different brokerages. So GBTC, um, the, uh, retail investor level is a great way to get exposure to Bitcoin because you, you can buy it using your traditional brokerage account. And, and so for this convenience, typically GBTC trades at a premium because there is more demand for GBTC than there is Bitcoin and GBTC, and that the ability to arbitrage that away is, is, is tricky.

Dan Held: (28:44)
I'm I'm given folks who are listening a little bit more of a thank you for doing that. Yeah. I it's, it's pretty complicated to a lot of people. Uh, I've I've done a bit of digging into this and, and some people just, you know, if we're, if we just jammed on it, it's a little hard to get context. So, um, the reason why people buy GBTC, it's a great way to get exposure from your traditional brokerage account. The reason why people buy the underlying or transfer in Bitcoin is they can arbitrage the difference between the market price and the underlying price. Um, now it's not reversible, they can't, uh, you know, you can't redeem your shares of GBTC. So it's a one-way transaction. You can't redeem your shares. It'd the GBTC for the underlying asset. Um, you can contribute the underlying asset and then sell it, uh, after a brief lockup period of six months.

Dan Held: (29:28)
So with the GBTC, um, what we've seen is that there's a premium typically over time, then there's a few moments when a trades at a discount, the premium, uh, insure typically what the ensures is that more and more Bitcoin will flow into the fund. And this causes a suction on spot where it sucks away all these coins to take advantage, and they get locked up into this fund to take advantage of that GBTC premium. So, as you mentioned before, this suction from the GBTC fund was so large that it was larger than the total mind, newly minted Bitcoin per day, which is a big deal. And what we've seen though recently over the last week is that the premium has collapsed down to a discount. Now this does occur. Um, hasn't occurred very often, but it does occur for this instrument. What that means is that folks could buy GBTC on the open market and that share of GBTC is worth less than the actual underlying value of all that Bitcoin that's held by the, the grand tour trust.

Dan Held: (30:29)
Um, I expect this discount to only exist for a brief period of time. Bitcoin had a traditional, uh, during these bull runs, there's a couple of pullbacks that occur as the price climbs higher and higher. And we recently had that, and that's where this discount started to appear was during a pullback. So as demand increases again, as, as fervor for Bitcoin increases, I expect the demand to start to build again for the GBTC instrument for these traditional brokerage accounts. Um, there's also the benefit of like, if there's a discount, you technically can arbitrage that the other way, where like, if you buy it, you're buying it at a discount relative to the underlying asset. So I think GBTC discount will probably be a short lived phenomenon maybe for a week or two more now longer term, if an ETF was approved, the GBTC instrument could trade at a, at a permanent discount.

Dan Held: (31:25)
And in that case, there's all sorts of different things that could occur. Uh, the trust could be dissolved and the coins could be redistributed back to the holders of the grant or trust, um, or the fund could be converted into an ETF. So, uh, that, that's sort of my holistic view on, on how, how, why this premium or discount occurs, uh, where we are long-term with this. And then, um, you know, what, what could, what does this mean for the market? I don't think that's a hugely bullish or bearish sentiment. I think it is largely just demand for GBTC as a financial instrument dropped. Um,

Brett Messing: (31:59)
Let's make some reckless predictions. Um, uh, what's your view on an, uh, an ETF, the U S ETF.

Dan Held: (32:08)
All right. Well, I can, I can throw out a random number here. So, uh, from my understanding, so when I, when I first looked at the GBTC trade, I won on it to understand the mechanics around it, but also they reached out to a couple of buddies who are really knowledgeable with the Bitcoin ETF sector or that sector, but, um, process or the application process. And from my understanding, there's a lot of blockers there on the, what would make the sec comfortable with approving a ETF. There were some weird things around, uh, like market pricing, uh, for example, like, uh, they were uncomfortable with some dynamics of how spot prices found with Bitcoin and they wanted market surveillance installed. And most of the venues, uh, that would be used to source spot liquidity for the ETF, um, which is strange because I believe with gold, the gold has a pretty old pig spot trading market and the, and the sec approved a gold ETF.

Dan Held: (33:09)
So from my understanding, there are some blockers that will be unlikely to be resolved in the year 2021. So my guess would be probably 20 early, 20, 22. And this would be after I think we see the peak of the bull run in, in late 20, 21, early 20, 22. So the demand for a Bitcoin ETF becomes so big that the sec has to kind of reconsider some of their, their, um, you know, red Xs on the applications and go, okay, okay, fine. We'll, we'll give you that instrument that you're looking for. So based on insiders that I've talked to, it seems to be pretty far away. Um, so my best guess would be early 20, 22.

Brett Messing: (33:48)
Wow. I'm more bullish than Supercycle Dan held. I think it's definitely a 2021 event. Um, I think that the Canadian experience is an important one, so it kinda announced an ETF and it, and I think it, it serves as a laboratory that addresses, I think, concerns that we're probably well-grounded two, three years ago when the sec last took a very serious look at a Bitcoin ETF, but I think the market has just matured past them. And I also think that, you know, when you have GBTC at 30, 40, $50 billion, just from a pure investor protection standpoint, it trades on the pink sheets. It is a high fee product relative to ETFs that the sec is mission, you know, almost mandates them to, to, um, to do something. Now you may be right because the government just can't move fast so they could, you know, get on this right away. And we could slip into 20, 22, but I don't think that'll happen, but who knows? Right? I mean, it's,

Dan Held: (34:50)
I mean, I, I hope I hope I'm not right. I would prefer a Bitcoin ETF comes sooner than later because I think it's an instrument that needs to be created to allow retail investors better exposure to Bitcoin. I mean, now of course I would recommend that anyone who wants exposure to Bitcoin to buy it on spot and eventually self custody, but certainly folks will want to buy it with their traditional brokerage. And an ETF is an easy way to do that. So I certainly hope it happens in 2021. I would be overjoyed. I think that will be a, a huge pivotal moment for Bitcoin. And just to introduce a ton of new flow, uh, on the demand side to where I, yeah, I, I would be overjoyed to have it. I, I, I guess just over the years, I've, I'm a little bit more cautiously optimistic when it comes to the government moving quickly on Bitcoin regulations or Bitcoin instruments.

Brett Messing: (35:36)
No. Well, it's funny. I, you know, I'm friendly with a number of, uh, Goldman Sachs alumni. Who've been in Bitcoin for a long time. And what I think they have felt until recently a bit like, you know, Charlie brown, Lucy, and the football, where like, they've heard the institutions are coming, they, and, and I'm like, no, no, this is actually happening now. Like I know, you know, it's happening now. And, and I do think that the combination of gray scale size and the Canadian experiment, uh, being so successful are, are game-changers. But again, you always would want to bet on the government taking, you know, a while, you know, versus sort of, you know, moving quickly it, John, sorry.

Dan Held: (36:20)
And to throw a question back at you, I heard that the Goldman Goldman's considering reopening their trading desk, like a crypto trading desk, any, anything that you can share there, Brett. Cause I thought that was super interesting.

Brett Messing: (36:32)
No, I think, um, uh, you know, I think the, the Goldman Sachs CIO is on CNBC about a month ago and, you know, she was taking a sorta cautious position and I think that she sort of threw people off the scent. Um, that's one person's view and, you know, uh, I think, uh, anyone who, you know, I'm not our CIO CIO, you know, you let your CIO do their thing, but you also have to have a business to run. And, you know, Goldman Sachs I think is, is, is seeing everything that's going on. I think this'll be the first step. Um, I can tell you that, you know, I'm a client of theirs on the brokerage side, they have massive demand from their high net worth clients and other people are going to have products and they're going to have to do it. And I think they'll do it quickly. I think you'll probably see them, JP Morgan, maybe Morgan Stanley, you know, be sort of at the forefront in terms of, you know, having products, you know, probably first, uh, for, you know, people that meet certain, you know, net worth thresholds. And then, you know, eventually when the sec cooperates things that are registered and can go out more broadly, Johnny, you want to hop in here,

John Darcie: (37:46)
FID guy. My job is to come in here and rain on the parade and make Dan confront all the different elements of fear, uncertainty, and doubt that exists in Bitcoin world, because I think you do it as well as anyone. And it started with tether or it didn't start with tether, but tether was one of the main, uh, sources of FID people accused tether of essentially creating leverage in Bitcoin know, people are buying Bitcoin with dollars that don't exist. You wrote what I think is the best analysis of why that might not be a problem, but is the tether issue now dead due to this settlement with the New York attorney general or, or, uh, where does that stand right now?

Dan Held: (38:26)
Yeah. Great question. So, uh, by the way, if anyone wants to read these, we keep bringing up my newsletter. If you Google Dan held sub stack, that's where he can go find some of these longer of articles. So I write this every Thursday. Um, you can check it out there now regarding tether tether is a stable coin created by a combination of tether. Plus some entities that are associated with Bitfinex and exchange. Um, tether has been a long source of, uh, FID. So fear, uncertainty, and doubt. There's a couple of different worries. Uh, one is that tether is pumping the price of Bitcoin. Now this is largely based off of a academic research report done by two unit of university of Texas researchers who, uh, violated the core principle of any sort of data science endeavors, which is finding that correlation is causation. So they, they felt that, uh, oh, tether, uh, issuance of new tethers, uh, coincided with Bitcoins, a value rising.

Dan Held: (39:27)
So tether pumped Bitcoin, no that's like saying that umbrellas cause rain that's not the case. Um, so that was the first, uh, worry and fut around tether was at tethers using a pump, the price of Bitcoin, but that has largely been debunked as very poor intellectually dishonest sort of research. Um, there's no correlation, there's no causational analysis that's been done to prove that tether causes Bitcoin's price to rise. The second big component of tether FID is that tether in terms of trading volume and an asset in this space is so large that it could represent a systemic risk to Bitcoin. Um, we've seen a lot of different assets come and go in the cryptocurrency space that are of equivalent size in terms of like market cap percentage relative to Bitcoin, we've had outright scams. Um, BitConnect being one of the top five tokens was literally a fabricated scam and that came and went in Bitcoin's price.

Dan Held: (40:23)
Wasn't effected, uh, we've had a lots of other coins come and go. We've also had a lot in other large corn, like XRP that had a recent issue with the sec where there being a there's a there's litigation going on there with concerns over. Um, I think it's either a fraud or securities risk based on how they've launched earth or their token. Uh, ripple is a very highly traded asset and across many different exchanges, including the one I work at cracking. And we didn't see Bitcoin's value plummet when demand for tethers decreased or concerns around Heather's legitimacy increased. Um, we, so with tether the worry that this asset, which I think only represents if we look at the total market capitalization of tethered relative to Bitcoin, I believe it's under two digits. So it's, it's like under 10%. Um, I think, you know, if that went to zero, we wouldn't see this spill over into Bitcoin.

Dan Held: (41:18)
Bitcoin's not buoyed by tether. You can use dollars, [inaudible] Euro pounds to go buy Bitcoin. And there's billions of dollars a day of that good flowing in as demand for Bitcoin, um, tether. Wasn't the only instrument to use to buy a Bitcoin and neither is it a systemic risk to the space. And then finally exchanges like crack. And the one I work at our users hold together, um, just like our users might hold and another asset that, that could go down to zero, uh, as an exchange we don't have there, isn't a fundamental risk to us based on the tether. And we're not holding tether as an asset. Um, it's, it's simply the, uh, asset that's being held by some of our users, just like any other crypto assets and many of those, as we all know, go up and down in value tremendously. Uh, but we haven't seen the exchanges were all built to be, to protect themselves against, you know, highly volatile assets and even scenarios where assets go down to zero.

Brett Messing: (42:17)
Dan. So I like, I agree that the tether thing is nonsense, but the one thing I do find curious, and just given the time you spend in an ecosystem, I like your take on this is, you know, they don't audit together. Um, I, I don't think these guys are going down in the business hall of fame. Um, it's probably the case that they're not back one-to-one fault. Why are people using it? In other words, why isn't there another USDC, stable coin where the market demands, you gotta hot it. Um, I just don't understand why it's actually grown substantially while under investigation by the New York attorney general. It offers to me nothing. I don't see what the attribute is relative to other stable. What am I missing?

Dan Held: (43:05)
Yeah, that's a, that's a great question. And what's really funny here is like w when I wrote about this in my newsletter, I started out with the caveat of like, I don't find tether orbit for next to be a reputable business. I am not defending them as a place I would want to go trade personally. Um, you know, and I don't, I don't want to disparage them too much or throw them under the bus, but needless to say, yes, there have been a lot of shady things done with tether with Bitfinex that I would find very unsavory and I would not recommend folks go trade there for sure. Um, tether is used by offshore exchanges that want to circumvent the U S government regulatory environment. And they need a us dollar equivalent style asset, an exchange like this would be like Binance. Uh, the main Binance exchange, a tether is used as an instrument to essentially as a synthetic dollar or as we call it a stable coin.

Dan Held: (44:00)
And so that it replicates a dollar function for the exchange. So it's largely used by non us folks to have a dollar equivalent asset that they can use to trade with. Um, so that's either they can use it to arbitrage so they can move it between different exchanges for, for more quant arbitrage style trading. They can use it as a way to exit Bitcoin or another crypto asset and hold it in something stable. And so it, it largely replicates the dollar function for exchanges that don't want to go through the regulatory hoops of actually holding you as toddlers and having to interact with the us banking system. Okay. All

John Darcie: (44:40)
Right. We're going down the list of fun energy. So people talk about how Bitcoin, if it continues on its current trajectory of transaction volume and price, it's going to consume more energy than we create on earth. It causes the emission of greenhouse gases. It's not ESG friendly, is that correct? If it's not, why is it not correct? And what is it, what is the situation around energy usage related to Bitcoin?

Dan Held: (45:06)
Yeah. So this is a, this is a very common, very old piece of FID around, uh, concerns of environmental concerns with bees. Don't tell Janet

John Darcie: (45:13)
Yellen that it's an old piece of FID, Dan.

Dan Held: (45:15)
Yeah. I mean yelling, I mean, yelling his or her comments on Bitcoin are literally all the pieces of FID put together into one giant piece of flood. So I wasn't, I was very much impressed whoever she's talking to has literally incepted into her head. All the top pieces of FID rolled together. Um, energy FID though. Okay. People worry that Bitcoin uses a lot of energy. Well, let's look at the existing financial system and look at Bitcoin relative to the enormous amounts of energy that our existing legacy system users think about how big this is. We've got bank, uh, we've got investment bank servers. We have tens of thousands of employees that work in the investment banks that also go home to their homes and they have cars and they have food requirements. And then you have all the regional banks, and then you have all of the commercial bank, the commercial banks and all the regional commercial banks.

Dan Held: (46:06)
And then you have all the bank branches, every single bank of America, JP Morgan, chase, all those retail branches, all the physical energy use to go build those and run the air conditioning and then to pay, to feed all those people in the homes that they occupy. And then you have the court system, which enforces legal contracts or, or money-related contracts and in our, in our economy. Um, and then you have the treasury and they have printing presses that print dollars and they have servers. And then you have the fed, which I think the fed has some absurd amount of employees, like 70,000 people work at the fed or some like that. It's ridiculous. I mean, what do you need 70,000 people for, to enforce a monetary policy. It's insane. Um, and then, and then the list goes on. Then you have the military, which is also used to enforce the legitimacy of the U S dollar.

Dan Held: (46:55)
I mean, think about the atomic, uh, you know, nuclear, uh, like, uh, nuclear reactors that are on, um, submarines and in battleships and the, the, it goes on and on. And it's an absurd amount of energy that's spent on the existing financial system. So Bitcoin should never be viewed in isolation. We should always examine it relative to other energy consumption, especially another monitoring system. Um, and the dollar is a great one to look at because it's massively less efficient than Bitcoin. What happens is folks isolate Bitcoin's metric of consumption, because it's easy to do that versus the long kind of list of different ways you could calculate the existing systems, energy requirements, and because of how simple it is to distill Bitcoin's energy consumption. Folks never look at it relative to everything else. Um, when we look at energy consumption of many other activities, for example, playing Xbox or PS three here, PS4, um, the energy consumption of gaming consoles is equivalent to some countries.

Dan Held: (47:55)
Same with Christmas lights. Uh, the U S uses more energy than an entire country just to power our Christmas lights. Now, energy consumption. Isn't a bad thing. People use the energy because they want to get, they paid for it and they want to go use it for something. I want to watch the Kardashians and you want to watch Nova and someone else wants to go play baseball. Energy consumption is inherent to our universe. The universe is based on the laws of thermodynamics, and we all use energy to live, breathe and do anything we want to do. Every human activity requires energy. And so I think at the core root of this argument, not only is it absurd to look at a Bitcoin's energy usage in isolation, because it's much more efficient than the existing system, but also at the core root it's people don't believe Bitcoin is doing something useful.

Dan Held: (48:41)
That's ultimately what these detractors don't like about Bitcoin is they don't like Bitcoin itself, but how ridiculously subjective, right? The idea that you can criticize someone else's energy consumption, but you don't criticize your own. Like what TV shows do they watch? What food do they eat? Maybe a hamburger has uses more energy than a hotdog. I mean, if you went down the list of like us having a constantly championed the morality of my energy consumption per decision, I make, it would be an absurd world that we live in. Luckily we have a market mechanism that allows us to do this. It's called, I paid for it. I bought my energy. I'm gonna do whatever the hell I want with it. And there's not like an energy police that goes around and shoots me because I'm watching the Kardashians and that's considered a subjectively wasteful thing. Um, so ultimately at the core root of this argument, people just don't like Bitcoin. And they find that its energy consumption is wasteful because they just don't like it.

John Darcie: (49:36)
Yeah. And I find that because Bitcoin has some roots in libertarianism, you know, some prominent libertarians were some of the early evangelists and adopters of Bitcoin. There is this notion among people on the left that Bitcoin is somehow like a libertarian conservative instrument. When in reality it's actually a tool for economic empowerment. And Jack Dorsey has been very vocal about this. And we agree, and I know Brett is fairly progressive guy. He worked for a Democrat as the, uh, basically vice mayor of Los Angeles. And I consider myself a very progressive guy. And if you really educate yourself on Bitcoin, it's, it's a tool for empowerment and allowing people to disentangle themselves from the whims of government. And, um, so I, I hope that over time as members of the progressive movement, start to understand Bitcoin, that it can lose that stigma, uh, as a purely, you know, hyper libertarian type of tool. So it's funny.

Dan Held: (50:34)
Uh, what what's funny is, uh, in this new paradigm over the last couple of years, libertarian ideology is now considered right wing ish, which is kind of bizarre because libertarians really dislike both sides equally, right. Returns are like the weird kid. And they're like, Hey, we don't like Democrats or Republicans. Um, and they're, they're traditionally very like freedom oriented, you know, very socially liberal and fiscally conservative. Um, but which both I would say are very more, actually more liberal when you think about it. I mean, they're both about freedom and, and, and expression and ownership of, of, you know, enforcing property rights and just having basic freedom. Um, but yeah, it is. I do think it's really cool to see Jack Dorsey who's, um, you know, I would consider like more liberal and, and kind of a west coast liberal B uh, really embracing of Bitcoin. I think that changes the narrative. So yeah, I agree. The earlier narrative of Bitcoin being libertarian is being replaced by Bitcoin is kind of for everyone sort of narrative. Yeah.

Brett Messing: (51:28)
Yeah. I think we're wearing, I'm wearing my west coast liberalism. Um, I think getting Bitcoin over 50% renewable and, you know, 67, 8 will be super helpful because I think you're right Dan, but it's a nuanced argument and, you know, I just think it's easier to say it's sun it's when it's hydro, what do you care? Right. And, and I think that that will be the thing that will really end this FID Mo I don't know that we're going to win while you're right. I don't know that that's going to be the winning argument for the people that don't want to hear it.

Dan Held: (52:03)
That's tricky. I, I don't disagree with your premise. That that is a good argument to make around Bitcoin's energy mix. Uh, how much renewable energy does it use? What I have found in my experience debating folks is that even when you address that they move the goalposts. Um, you know, at first it's using too much energy and then, then you go, well, how about the existing financial system? And they go, oh, okay, well fine. But the energy it's using is bad energy. And then you give them metrics around that. And they're like, yeah, but actually Bitcoin is not, you know, I just don't really like Bitcoin. I don't think it's doing anything useful. And so I don't disagree with you, Brett, that's the logical way to argue it. Um, which would be to talk about its energy mix. Um, but I do think with these folks, what I've found is like the core root of the problem is they just don't like Bitcoin,

Brett Messing: (52:51)
Right? We've got to keep working on him, Dan, you know what I mean? It's sort of like, you know, like Martin Luther king said, you know, you gotta, you gotta keep giving people a chance and they'll eventually come around. So, um, sorry, John,

John Darcie: (53:03)
Anna's definitely the Martin Luther king of Bitcoin. And, you know, we're, we're bumping up against our allotted time here. Uh, so I want to cut it off there and I want to have you back on in the future, Dan, again, we were very excited about this talk. We have done the intellectual journey into Bitcoin. You've been a big part of that in terms of reading your newsletters. And so we appreciate all the work you've to educate people. Uh, and, and this was fantastic. So thanks. And we hope to have you on again soon,

Dan Held: (53:31)
I had a blast. Thanks for having me guys. And it does sound like you've done your research. I think these questions were really informed really in depth and a lot of fun to, to answer.

John Darcie: (53:40)
We appreciate that. We're, we're definitely, uh, you know, not, not as deep down the rabbit hole as you, but we're learning. And obviously we have a significant amount of exposure to Bitcoin. So it would be irresponsible for us not to be doing the homework, but thank you. And thank you everybody for tuning into today's salt. Talk again, we, we love engaging with an audience, which is our traditional community at salt that might not be quite as informed on digital assets and Bitcoin in particular. But we love doing these episodes of salt talks to educate people, you know, whether it be financial advisors, RAs, other alternative investors, uh, to help them learn and go down the same journey that we went down. So thank you for tuning in just a reminder, if you missed any part of this talk or any of our previous talks, you can access them all on our website@sault.org backslash talks and on our YouTube channel, which is titled salt tube.

John Darcie: (54:26)
They're all free for anyone to access. Uh, we're also on social media, we're most active on Twitter at salt conference. Dan has a fantastic Twitter follow as well. If you are so inclined, we're also on Twitter. Uh, in addition to Twitter, we're on LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram. Uh, and please spread the word about these salt talks. Again, we love educating a broader cohort of people and growing our community, but on behalf of Brett and the entire salt team, this is John Darcey signing off from salt talks for today. We hope to see you back here soon.

Yan Pritzker: Introduction to Bitcoin | SALT Talks #170

“We are at the Internet moment of 1995 with Bitcoin... we’re standing on the floor of the exponential curve coming up.“

Yan Pritzker is co-founder and CTO of Swan Bitcoin, a Bitcoin investment service that allows users to set up a recurring Bitcoin purchase plan. He is the author of Inventing Bitcoin.

Bitcoin represents the inevitable progression into the digital age where money is digital too. Bitcoin removes the central intermediaries required for financial transactions that serve as barriers for many around the globe. Bitcoin guards against the kind of monetary policy that can render a person’s savings worthless. This has been seen in places like the Soviet Union. “Americans may not always be aware of what’s going on in the rest of the world with how money works because we live in a very different system. We basically make the world reserve currency.”

Due to the distributive nature of Bitcoin and its network effect, it becomes stronger and more valuable as more people enter the space; Bitcoin becomes more de-risked as adoption grows. “We are at the Internet moment of 1995 with Bitcoin... we’re standing on the floor of the exponential curve coming up.“

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Yan Pritzker.png

Yan Pritzker

Co-Founder & Chief Technical Officer

Swan

MODERATOR

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:08)
Hello everyone and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the managing director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators, and thinkers. And our goal on these SALT Talks is the same as our goal at our SALT Conferences, which is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future.

John Darsie: (00:38)
And we're thrilled today to bring you the latest episode in our digital asset series. Certainly one of those ideas that we'd like to cover at SALT that we think is changing the world fundamentally, and we're excited to bring you a guest who we think provides one of the best resources out there for people that are just learning about Bitcoin.

John Darsie: (00:54)
We love when those types of people turn into these talks, so they can start to go down the rabbit hole, if you will, that we started going down a few years ago that landed us on Bitcoin. So our guest today is Yan Pritzker, he's the co-founder and chief technology officer at Swan Bitcoin. He spent the last 20 years as an engineer and product and technology leader for early stage startups.

John Darsie: (01:17)
In 2012, he was the co-founding CTO at reverb.com, which was acquired by Etsy for 275 million in Fiat dollars in 2019. While he was exposed to Bitcoin in early 2011, Yan didn't take it seriously until about 2016 when he began to research it on a daily basis. By 2018, he decided that it was the most important thing he could be working on and left Reverb to start consulting for Bitcoin related companies prior to launching Swan together with Corey Klipstein in 2019.

John Darsie: (01:50)
Yan is the author of the book that I referenced earlier, it's called Inventing Bitcoin. And again, if you're new to the space and even if you're not, and you still want to get a stronger technical understanding of how Bitcoin works, there's no better book out there to start with than Inventing Bitcoin by Yan Pritzker.

John Darsie: (02:06)
Posting today's talk is Brett Messing, president and chief operating officer at SkyBridge Capital. Before I turn it over to Brett to conduct most of the interview, he's sort of our resident Bitcoin maximalist here at SkyBridge. Although we're all very enthusiastic about our entrance into the space.

John Darsie: (02:21)
I want to talk to you about Inventing Bitcoin for a second. So obviously we only have 45 minutes or so here, and you could probably go on for much longer than that talking about all the intricacies of Bitcoin. But if someone was coming to you for the first time saying, "I know nothing about Bitcoin, could you explain it to me in a succinct way relatively quickly." How would you do it sort of going through the outline of your book?

Yan Pritzker: (02:47)
The book is very much focused on understanding Bitcoin as money because this is the key understanding for me that really flipped me. I started writing the book and the subtitle of the book is the decentralized technology blah, blah, blah. And I really started thinking about Bitcoin as technology when I was writing the book, but I very quickly flipped my own thinking to Bitcoin as money.

Yan Pritzker: (03:06)
So succinctly Bitcoin is a new form of money and it's very similar to the digital money that we already know, with digital dollars, with Apple Pay and Google Pay and PayPal and all of that, except for there's no intermediary. And that's a really key point because instead of those dollars flowing over these systems which are either governments or corporate systems, now there's these Bitcoins are flowing between peers. Peer to peer cash is the subtitle of the Bitcoin white paper.

Yan Pritzker: (03:32)
So Bitcoin is a new type of money that kind of takes us into a different world where we don't need these centralized entities in the middle of every transaction where they can censor it, they can change the monetary policy on us and they can make our money worthless. I do come from a country that did that to the money, which is the former Soviet Union.

Yan Pritzker: (03:53)
So Americans may not be always kind of aware of what's going on in the rest of the world with how money works, because we live in a very different system here. We basically make the world's reserve currency and we have that privilege. But everybody else lives in a very different society. And we are all going to be living in a digital society where all of our money will be digital.

Yan Pritzker: (04:12)
So I always think about Bitcoin as a new form of money for a digital society, native to that idea of internet money, but it's open source, it's borderless, and it's not under anybody's control, which is really important for us to have or to continue to have a free society.

John Darsie: (04:26)
And from a technical perspective, again, without going too deep into the science, Bitcoin sort of solves the Byzantine General's problem, which you write about and Vijay Boyapati who we're also having on SALT Talks wrote about in his Bullish Case for Bitcoin. But how does that puzzle work? How do you remove the intermediary in a way that still maintains trust verification and everything you need to operate a financial system?

Yan Pritzker: (04:51)
So Bitcoin is a system that anybody can join. That's really a difference with the financial system. In order for you to transact, you need to have a bank in the middle or a company and that company or bank is specially licensed by the government to do these kinds of things. With Bitcoin, in order to participate in the network, all you have to do is run some software on your computer and anybody can do that.

Yan Pritzker: (05:10)
So Bitcoin takes that ledger that your bank typically has and in your bank there's a database and there's some numbers in it. It says how much money does everybody have? And there is guards around that database. There's either a physical security guards, there's software intrusion systems. There's all this security around that, but essentially it's just a database with the numbers in it.

Yan Pritzker: (05:28)
Bitcoin is very similar. It's just a database with numbers in it. But the difference is that everybody has a copy of the database and anybody can participate in that. Bitcoin provides the same idea that your bank does with the security, but in Bitcoin that security is provided through the usage of real world resources, which is energy. We actually expend electrical energy and very large quantities of it in order to secure Bitcoin from attacks or somebody basically changing those numbers on us.

Yan Pritzker: (05:55)
And that allows anybody in the world wants to participate in the process that we call mining, which is really the production of Bitcoin and also the securing of Bitcoin transactions. It allows that process to be fully trustless, meaning we don't actually have to worry about who these people are that are doing the mining. We don't have to worry about whether they're following the rules, because everybody basically checks that the work that they're doing is correct. And there's a system of checks and balances there that keeps the whole system functioning very similar to how our government has checks and balances, but I would argue even stronger.

John Darsie: (06:26)
Well, we run a full node here at SkyBridge and the power of the Bitcoin network is how distributed it is. And everybody who's involved in it is obviously they have something invested in protecting the integrity of the network. So we're proud to do our small part in that process, but I'll turn it over to Brett, to dive a little deeper into Bitcoin intellectually with you for the rest of the conversation.

Yan Pritzker: (06:49)
Thanks.

Brett Messing: (06:49)
Hey Yan, thanks for joining us. Let me just ... I want to hold up your book so everyone can see-

Yan Pritzker: (06:54)
There you go.

Brett Messing: (06:54)
Because anyone interested in Bitcoin should buy the book. I think your journey is interesting and I think you can help us help other people, which is there's a question we get asked often. So you found Bitcoin in 2011, I'm assuming it was 10 bucks or less. You re-engage with it in 2016, it's probably 500-ish. Maybe you buy some in, I'll let you speak. And then you start building a business when it's 10,000. It's kind of it's up 20X.

Brett Messing: (07:26)
So I think you might know where I'm going with this. We get asked a lot am I too late? It feels late, it's hard enough to buy Bitcoin the first time for a new buyer because you're remembering 2017 and Jimmy Fallon making fun of it and your neighbor's kid asking you about it. And it's something you couldn't take serious and now you realize you might have to, but it's still so hard.

Brett Messing: (07:49)
And then when you couple that with being the guy who top ticks it, I think it just makes it difficult. So how did you think about that? And then how do you think others who are addressing it here today at 50,000s think about it?

Yan Pritzker: (08:06)
So I think it's a very common story that people have multiple touch points with Bitcoin. As you said, my first touch point was in 2011 and I heard about it on Slashdot which was a website for nerds. I think it still exists, not very popular anymore. But essentially it had tech news and it said, "Hey, there's this open-source payment system people are building." I said, "That's interesting. And maybe I'll buy some." Bought some at 30 bucks, watched it go down to $2 and just exited the market?

Yan Pritzker: (08:29)
I just thought, "Okay, I've been taken for a fool." I mean, I didn't have very much money in that. I had like $1000 in. But just the feeling that you got taken for a fool is so strong and you just sell the bottom, you get out of it and you never look at it again. And that's exactly what happened to me. And in 2011, I did that.

Yan Pritzker: (08:44)
Now 2013, there was a change in the market. The price was actually $1000 when I kind of revisited in 2013. So it's gone up tremendously from my first experience at 30. And what made me think of it differently is now there was an app called Coinbase and it was pretty shiny, it looked nice, looked like somebody had put the time into to do it right.

Yan Pritzker: (09:04)
And it was a very different world from in 2011 when you were buying on a very shady exchange called Mt. Gox, was really poor user interface. You have to wire money to very questionable places. And it was basically the change in user experience that made me think, you know what? Maybe there's something here. And then in 2016, again, you had this massive shift in the way that people were thinking about Bitcoin. You had more and more companies coming into it. You had more building. And for me as an engineer and as a startup person, I started seeing an ecosystem emerge.

Yan Pritzker: (09:32)
And watching an ecosystem emerging around something, you start to think of it differently. You don't think of it as this, "Oh, this is just this thing that's worth X amount of dollars." No, actually it's a system and there's infrastructure being built. And that makes you wake up and say, "Okay, well, why are people building infrastructure on this?" There must be something more to it.

Yan Pritzker: (09:48)
I think as the price grows and as the adoption grows, what we're actually creating here is essentially an unstoppable monster. So price is a very good measure of adoption but the reason the price is going up is because there's more demand. It's very simple because Bitcoin supply is very constrained. So the demand goes up, the price goes up.

Yan Pritzker: (10:04)
So as price goes up, more money is invested in infrastructure, more money is invested in mining. For example, in 2011 or 2013, miners were just people with a machine in their garage. Now miners are public companies with millions of dollars at stake, sometimes hundreds of millions, billion dollar market caps.

Yan Pritzker: (10:21)
So it's a dramatic shift in how the network has evolved. And that means that we're at a different place. And this year we know there's a major development with public companies now entering into the space. Tesla, MicroStrategy, or a dozen other companies that are now buying large quantities of Bitcoin at these prices. So now you have to ask yourself, why are they doing that and how many more companies behind them will follow? And we know that there's very, very large demand for this. So for me it's actually being de-risked as it goes further.

Yan Pritzker: (10:49)
All of these kinds of early narratives around Bitcoin is for criminals or Bitcoin as a Ponzi scheme are being disproven every day as more and more people and more and more companies and smart people enter the space. Folks like Jack Dorsey and Peter Thiel don't just do things for fun. They're smart people and they're doing things because they have a reason. So if you really pay attention to these folks, and you also recognize that the ability to enter into Bitcoin, isn't even there for some of them.

Yan Pritzker: (11:14)
If you're $100 billion dollar asset manager, it's very difficult for you to buy a significant stake in Bitcoin, just because of the liquidity and that liquidity is growing every day. So for me, it's not at all about am I too late, is that we're actually too early. If you look at the adoption of Bitcoin, how many per cent of the world has any Bitcoin?

Yan Pritzker: (11:33)
It's certainly a single digits. It's probably under 5%, almost certainly under 2% with any significant allocation. So if you look at that, it's kind of like internet in 1995, where you could have said, "Hey, the internet sucks. It's over, it's been two decades. It's not going anywhere." And people have said that. There's a Newsweek article by Cliff Stoll in 1995, that totally dismissed the internet, and said, "My local mall is doing more business in a day than the internet does in a month." But that was at a time when internet penetration worldwide was half a percent and it was 5% in America.

Yan Pritzker: (12:04)
And I would argue, we are at the internet moment of 1995 right now in Bitcoin, where that's exactly the penetration we have in the world. And we can see it growing exponentially. And you can either dismiss it and say I missed the boat, or you can realize that we're standing on the floor of the exponential curve that's just coming up.

Brett Messing: (12:23)
Thank you. That's interesting. I have a lot of thoughts. I'm trying to think where to go to it. It does seem to me that the defining feature of Bitcoin is the restricted supply. And that it's predictable and it doesn't respond to demand. But as Bitcoin goes up, each coin is worth so much more. So I was thinking about Square. So Square issued earnings yesterday, there was a lot of focus on the fact that they put 170 million of their balance sheet into Bitcoin, which is exciting.

Brett Messing: (12:57)
But if you looked at the amount of Bitcoin they sold to their customers, quarter over quarter, it sort of flattened. It went from like 1.6 billion or 1.7 billion. And if you look at where the price is today relative to where it was in the third quarter, it's up about 4X. So their contribution to the supply demand, balance imbalance is less significant materially so. So doesn't Bitcoin have to become an institutional asset to maintain this price?

Yan Pritzker: (13:31)
Well, I think there's interest from institutions certainly this year. And I think one of the ways you can explain the retail cool off if you will, of Bitcoin is probably because people are looking at it and saying, "Hey, this thing just went up 10X from March, 4X in the last couple of months. Why would I buy the top?" Everybody's thinking they're buying the top.

Yan Pritzker: (13:48)
And when you're a retail investor ... Which is, I mean, I'm happy that they're thinking that way. Maybe they're being a little smarter than the 2017 when everybody did buy the top. And then the top only lasted a few hours, but this time, it seems a little bit different. I mean, these prices are sticking around for weeks, now months, and maybe we've been kind of grinding from 30,000 to 50,000. I do think there's a difference in how institutions are thinking about it.

Yan Pritzker: (14:11)
And as both from my own experience at Swan, because I mean we onboard smaller businesses, but there's certainly no small and medium-sized businesses that are not going to sell tomorrow. They're here for 10 years, 50 years. Some of them are looking at it as something that they're going to just keep in the family and pass on for generations. So it's a very different mindset. So I'm not too worried that retail people are buying less on Square.

Yan Pritzker: (14:32)
Actually, they shouldn't be buying on Square because there's ridiculous withdrawal limits. So don't do that. But I think there is a certain amount of cool off there. I wouldn't use Square as the judge of how Bitcoin is being sold at all. We know, for example, there's $25 billion of interest at NYDIG right now from institutions.

Yan Pritzker: (14:49)
Again, I believe that's because it's just very, very early. It's not going to be 25 billion. It's going to be 250 billion next year, potentially. So we're looking at the beginning of that cycle. And so yes, institutions are going to be adopting it, but you also have to look at what's going on all over the world. We are in the such an American bubble here. And I just have to hammer this home for people who have never been outside the US or haven't looked at financial systems outside the US.

Yan Pritzker: (15:14)
Right now in Argentina, you cannot buy more than 200 American dollars per month. That's Argentina, a reasonably developed first world country, if you will, that's having some issues with their currency. That problem is all over the world. Nigeria, Libya, Turkey, Iran in all of those countries, people are buying Bitcoin. And it's going to be much smaller amounts than institutions obviously, but in mass, as billions of people enter into Bitcoin and hundreds or thousands of institutions do, you're going to see an appreciation in the price. You're going to see an appreciation in adoption. It's hard to see how that doesn't happen.

Brett Messing: (15:48)
I want to push back on that just a little bit. And at the risk of sounding parochial, I mean I think you bring a unique perspective and clearly in the early years, Bitcoin appealed to people in places outside of the US. They got it immediately because they lived through currency collapses. But if you think about what happened in the fall, it was some combination of Michael Saylor, Square, the gray scale vacuuming up and PayPal.

Brett Messing: (16:17)
Four US actors, it just feels like the US financial system is so critical. When people say, "Well, if the US banned Bitcoin, I'll just go somewhere else and sell my Bitcoin." Well, that's fine, but Bitcoin is going to be worth 75% less than it was the day before the US banned it because BlackRock is not going to hold it. It's like you can just go through, so isn't the US important just because of its role in financial markets?

Yan Pritzker: (16:48)
No, I would agree with that. Absolutely. I think the US is important and it's kind of like you just have to think about it proportionally where's the wealth? The wealth is here. So the wealth and the knowledge frankly, is here. So we have the access to the Bitcoin and we should be buying it. The US is absolutely in a position to be a world leader here whether they voluntarily give this position up by banning is a question I don't think it's going to happen because frankly I mean the government is run by corporations and the corporations are now buying Bitcoin.

Yan Pritzker: (17:15)
So I don't really see that happening. We also have senators that are now Bitcoin friendly on the banking committee. So I don't see that ban happening. It's also a big free speech problem. But even if it did, it would be the America basically as if America said, "Oh, you know what? Well, we're just going to ban gold. We're not going to allow our central bank to hold the gold." And like you're pricing it. You're taking yourself out of this system, which is clearly the future of money. And yes, it may cause a dip in the price but another country that is not as scrupulous as the US is going to come in and do that.

Yan Pritzker: (17:46)
So somebody's going to take the reins on this thing. But yes, I do think the US is systemically important in the sense of adoption. Yes they're driving the adoption right now. But just like with the internet, 1995, 5% was in the US, half a percent worldwide. The US was the leader in the internet. And it's good that they continue that leadership and continue encouraging that innovation instead of saying, "Oh we're going to ban open networks and we're going to force everybody to register to run a website."

Yan Pritzker: (18:13)
They could have done that too and they didn't. So I think the US is as pretty smart as far as the regulation is concerned. I think they're going to wake up to this idea that this is innovation, this unlocks unlimited financial potential and it makes us a world leader when it comes down to the Bitcoin replacing the reserve currency. If that ever happens, we better have our beds hedged. You don't want to be at a zero allocation if Bitcoin starts to be used for all trade.

Brett Messing: (18:40)
Does it bother you that we have sort of people that are the head of a sort of regulatory system here in Europe, sort of peeing on Bitcoin at every opportunity, for lack of a better word. I'm talking about obviously Janet Yellen and Christine Legarde.

Yan Pritzker: (18:58)
It doesn't bother me. I mean, they're pretty ... Frankly they're kind of aging themselves out. I mean, if you look at the adoption of Bitcoin, it is very stratified by age. I would argue that probably folks like in the boomer generation, at least for us, they're the majority of the money is coming from them. But the numbers are coming from the millennials people, gen X. So I do think there's a certain amount of old guard that's just going to get turned over.

Yan Pritzker: (19:21)
And also that I mean Bitcoin threatens their entire job. What would be the job of Janet Yellen, or it would look very different than on a Bitcoin standard. So I think it is a big threatening thing. It's kind of like the horse salesman saying cars are noisy and dirty. And it's just going to be a generational shift as people will think of it differently. So I'm not too worried about them saying these things, they're going to have to say them until they are forced not to say them.

Brett Messing: (19:52)
Do you worry about the bands around the globe between China and India, some African countries. We're probably approaching half the world population where Bitcoin has been banned.

Yan Pritzker: (20:06)
I don't know that that's true. I mean, there's definitely been some gray area stuff going on. I don't know if it's half the world where it's banned. I'm not sure about that number. Maybe you have better data than I do, but-

Brett Messing: (20:19)
Wasn't sure if you have 40%. So I was just rounding for [crosstalk 00:20:22].

Yan Pritzker: (20:23)
But hold on a second. If it's abandoned China, then why is all of the Bitcoin mining in China? It's not banned in China and people are getting Bitcoin out of China as well. So it's very hard to stop Bitcoin. And another thing to think about is every time it has been banned in any sort of way, whether it be restrictions on trade or whatever, it causes the local price of Bitcoin to skyrocket. And what does that do? It creates the black markets and what do black markets do? They topple governments. Historically, that's what they do.

Yan Pritzker: (20:51)
If the currency of your local government is weak. And the black market currency is strong, that black market currency starts to gain usage and then game over.

Brett Messing: (21:03)
Yan I'm only asking you these things because I've been accused of being ragingly bullish, so help me moderate a little bit here.

Yan Pritzker: (21:10)
I appreciate that. I'm also raging bullish so it's very difficult.

Brett Messing: (21:12)
To quote a friend Raul Paul, I'm irresponsibly [crosstalk 00:21:17].

John Darsie: (21:17)
We've been told we have to be balanced in these conversations.

Yan Pritzker: (21:19)
Yes, balanced.

Brett Messing: (21:21)
So that's what I'm striving for. We'll have an off Robert cheerleading session after. Can we talk about particularly given your background and the way I think you probably think about things. I'm interested in, what kind of valuation methodology you use or you think people should use. Because it'd be just at a very high level where capital's competing with each other, stocks are competing with bonds, and right now gold is ... So capital is looking for the best pace to allocate it.

Brett Messing: (21:50)
And I think most traditional investors will look for ... How do they know if it's cheap or it's expensive? How do you think people should think about Bitcoin in that context?

Yan Pritzker: (21:59)
Yeah, it's very tricky because I think traditional investors always look at what are the cash flows? What am I getting? What am I actually buying here? You're not buying a cash flow, yielding asset with Bitcoin. You're buying an adoption curve of the future of money, which is a very different thing. And I think a lot of people are still thinking of Bitcoin as a hedge or as an asset in their portfolio with a high sharp ratio or you name it.

Yan Pritzker: (22:22)
I really think that's a flawed way of thinking about it. What you really have to ask yourself is what percentage of the world's value would be stored on a network that allowed that value to move freely, borderlessly, frictionlessly, as opposed to sending money from America to Venezuela and getting horrible fake exchange rates in the middle and getting censorship and getting that money stolen or getting it lost in the bank to bank settlement system, versus I can send $1 billion dollars in a minute to any country in the world instantly.

Yan Pritzker: (22:56)
That's a pretty different experience of money. So the question is what percentage of the world's wealth would be interested in that kind of functionality. You can look at things like the stock market, real estate, gold, all of these things, they have a certain ... And I'm not an economist so this is just me parroting things that I've learned, but these things have a certain amount of money-ness.

Yan Pritzker: (23:16)
The reason people buy the stocks when they have cheap money, what we're seeing Saylor do, he's taking a loan for 0%. He's buying Bitcoin. They can buy a Bitcoin, they can buy real estate, they can buy stocks, they can buy things that are highly liquid, easy to sell and they can park their value in these things. And so the question is, what percentage of those assets are ... What percentage of my house is worth X because I'm living in it versus because I'm going to be able to resell it later.

Yan Pritzker: (23:43)
For example, I live in a neighborhood that is constrained. There's only 100 houses in this neighborhood and you can't build inside of it. So that's it. So my house retains its value really, really well. Because I know that anytime I want to, I can leave the resell at instant demand. Other places where there's unlimited land, they don't hold value so well. So you see people buying a luxury condo in New York for $10 million and holding it and nobody's living there just because of the store of value.

Yan Pritzker: (24:08)
So when you're talking about those kinds of functions, how much better is Bitcoin at that than those other things? And I would argue almost infinitely because a house it has its use value and has its kind of money-ness premium. And then stocks like you have Tesla, it has its future cash flows, but it also has it's premium just because we think it might be easy to sell somebody else, a greater fool, if you will.

Yan Pritzker: (24:30)
Bitcoin is better at those things because it's all pure monetary premium, it's purely money, it's literally cash. So if you believe that, then the way you have to value it as what percentage of the world will want to store their wealth in cash if that cash didn't lose value. And I think that's a very high percentage. I don't know what that number is, but it's certainly tens to hundreds of trillions quite easily.

Brett Messing: (24:54)
I agree. How do you think about Bitcoin volatility? We've had we had a 25 plus percent pullback in January. We had a 22 or 23% pullback this week. I guess personally and at Swan, what are you telling clients? Was your phone ringing a lot this week?

Yan Pritzker: (25:24)
Frankly, no, which is very interesting. So we've only ever had one person sell and that person just had to take some money off the table for personal reasons. We don't actually have a sell button right now on our website. We encourage everybody to hold their Bitcoin for a very long time.

Yan Pritzker: (25:41)
We open up IRAs and Trusts where people are passing on the Bitcoin to their children. The companies that we're onboarding are all looking at it at a 10 plus year horizon. Most of them beyond that. Again, a lot of these are family businesses where they're thinking about keeping Bitcoins-

Brett Messing: (25:54)
You're going to get the opposite of Robinhood. [crosstalk 00:25:57].

Yan Pritzker: (25:57)
Literally yeah. I mean completely the opposite. And I think this is very interesting. This shift to Bitcoin as a store of value, as an inheritance asset, as a long-term play is relatively new. I don't think that's the case in 2017. And that was people just getting retail FOMO, trying to trade all their crypto assets and basically just getting wrecked buying the top.

Yan Pritzker: (26:18)
It's a very different experience right now. People are really thinking about it for the longterm. And with that in mind, the volatility is really not a problem. Again, yes, it goes down by 20 or 30%, but then it goes up by 10X. So I would I would ask where's the problem if you're really in it for the long-term, there shouldn't be any issues with volatility. You can always size your investments to your comfort level.

Yan Pritzker: (26:39)
So I think it's what it is. Dollar cost averaging is we highly promote. Obviously it's kind of how we launched, but dollar cost averaging really it's a very hard to lose strategy on Bitcoin. If you look at it in any three-year timeframe, you're pretty much up. So it's very ... As long as you're willing to stick around three to five years, basically enough to live past the having cycle you should be okay.

Yan Pritzker: (27:01)
And again, looking at it at a 10 year horizon, there's no issue about volatility at all. You can't have Bitcoin without volatility. It's being adopted by people in bursts. So you're going to have that volatility as it gets overvalued and it kind of comes down a little bit.

Brett Messing: (27:17)
Although as Anthony says, everyone's a longterm investor till they have short term losses. So it's-

Yan Pritzker: (27:25)
I really believe that Bitcoin is changing people's emotional ability. Before I used to worry about my stock portfolio, my S&P going down with two or three points in a day, it would be like, "Oh my God, that S&M is dipping. I'm losing a lot of money." Now I look at a Bitcoin dip, 20, 30%. I mean, we're talking about a lot of money here. I don't blink, I don't think about it. And I know that that's the case for a lot of folks that get into Bitcoin because the volatility actually just trains you out of your system to even worry about it. Just because it is so volatile, you have to eventually start ignoring it, or you're just not going to be able to sleep.

Brett Messing: (27:56)
So here's my theory on why that's the case. I think it's true, and you're probably too young for this. Disney used to have these e-ticket rides. When you go to Disney World, the rides were based on how intense they were. Bitcoin is like a Z ticket ride. So when you get on the ride, you know what you're doing, you know what I mean? You're going in with open eyes. It's not like someone's buying GE stock and well all of a sudden it got bottled. All right. So I think probably-

Yan Pritzker: (28:27)
I think that's a good point but I also think though that this has changed in the last couple of years, because in 2017, when people were getting into it, I don't think they knew that what kind of ride they were getting on. They just saw the number going up and they wanted to buy it. And then all of a sudden it started crashing like crazy. But now I think with more history behind us and a little bit of a rear view mirror, it's easier to see that Bitcoin does have these really big "bubbles" that then pop up, but they pop at a two or 3X above their previous top and it's not an issue in long-term.

Brett Messing: (28:55)
Sounds good. That's a good segue. Do you think the cycles continue this way?

Yan Pritzker: (29:02)
It's very hard to say. I mean, Bitcoin has a very interesting release schedule where it's tapering off and we're having less and less Bitcoin released over time. So for the folks that don't know, Bitcoin is actually going to continue to distribute all the way in the year 2140 or a little bit ahead of that. So we have 100 years ahead of us of Bitcoin mining, but it's a smaller and smaller and smaller amounts.

Yan Pritzker: (29:21)
So I think we're going to see different behavior potentially as the amount of Bitcoin on the market shrinks. And people start to really understand the scarcity of it. And perhaps that's what we're seeing now with this year, because one of the differences this year versus 2017, is that we're actually seeing a net outflow or a large outflow. I'm not sure if it's net outflow, but a large outflow of coins from exchanges.

Yan Pritzker: (29:43)
So in other words, it's not people buying Bitcoin and then trying to trade it, it's them taking it off of the exchange and trying to store it for the longterm, which may change the nature of the market because people aren't necessarily trading it all the time. I mean, sure you have guys doing 100X leverage on Bitfinex, but most of the institutional interest is not in that. It's really just to take it and hold it for a long time. So it may change the nature of the market as more of that float is pulled off, we're glad to see.

Brett Messing: (30:09)
My experience with sort of what are called great trades is they never last. And so the great trade is, well, I buy the coin that they're having when the supply is reduced in half and I hold it 14 to 18 months and then I sell it. Maybe I even short it there. And then I repeat this. So it becomes like the Bitcoin Olympics. Every four years, I'm going to do this. And I've spoken to too many people who have that mindset. And if you go on Twitter, people are tracking where we going after the having.

Brett Messing: (30:38)
And it's my personal view that one of two things is going to happen. Either the bull market's going to end way earlier than people think, or it's just going to keep marching forward. So you're going to have these people who get off, regret as they watch it go off. And given that I'm wearing a Bitcoin hat, I'll let you guess which of those two outcomes I think is likely. But I would say the idea that this predictable trend continues, I would put it-

Yan Pritzker: (31:06)
I agree.

Brett Messing: (31:06)
A low percentage.

Yan Pritzker: (31:08)
I agree. I don't think it's going to be as predictable. And I know so many people who have gotten wreck trying to short tops thinking that it is the top of Bitcoin where it has no real top. And again, I would bring it back to the analogy of the internet where in 1995 you saw it like it had a dip in adoption around 1999 or 2000. And there was the dotcom bubble burst. And all of a sudden there was articles about people quitting their internet accounts or something like that. And if you would short the internet at that point that you would have been just destroyed.

Yan Pritzker: (31:35)
Absolutely wrecked, all your models are destroyed. It's the same thing with Bitcoin. If the truth here is that one an adoption curve and this is not a financial asset that goes up and down. No, it's an asset. It just hasn't yet been fully adopted. So it was just like shorting TCP/IP or the internet. I mean, you would be an absolute fool to do that or Amazon for that matter, if you try to short and long-term, you would be just destroyed.

Yan Pritzker: (31:56)
So it's the same problem here. We're in a place where the final state has not yet been achieved and may not be achieved for decades or longer. So you can try to trade those ups and downs. Good luck, but again, it's like trading ... Trying to short the internet. It's just not smart.

Brett Messing: (32:14)
So Yan what do you worry about? If we're wrong, you and I are having a beer, it's 10 years from now. And this seems like a ridiculous video that we made, me wearing a Bitcoin hat and you being bullish having built a business and we're just totally wrong. Why are we wrong?

Yan Pritzker: (32:35)
I think there's some things we don't know about maybe there's fatal flaw discovered in the technology or in the encryption that we just never thought about. Maybe somehow like the government just decides to just perpetually spend billions of dollars attacking the networks, never let it continue forward. And literally just decides to just continue to print money and to do so only for the case of stopping the Bitcoin network to move forward.

Yan Pritzker: (33:01)
I mean, these things could happen. They seem kind of outrageous but those could be probably the things that would make it really at least unusable in some medium term. But I mean, imagine that the US government just taking over the Bitcoin network and amassing all of the world's mining capacity and building factories just to out pace the rest of the world, just to make the thing stop. It seems ridiculous, but it can happen.

John Darsie: (33:24)
Elon's taking us to Mars Yan. We don't have to worry about regulation here on earth.

Yan Pritzker: (33:28)
Exactly, there you go. And we're going to need free money on Mars. We're going to need the money that is not controlled by the US government.

Brett Messing: (33:38)
I guess it's ... What I always say is I think regulatory is always risk number one. I mean, that's and then it's the unknowns. We're talking on Zoom, we're doing this SALT Talk because of the pandemic. Which is what Donald Rumsfeld said, "The unknown unknowns." Which is that's ... But it's far different. I spent most of my career trading energy where you worry about OPEC, you worry about war breaking out or peace breaking out or I mean regulation. There's just ... Bitcoin, I don't know. To your point, I don't worry about it that much but I-

Yan Pritzker: (34:12)
Sorry, go ahead.

Brett Messing: (34:15)
No, you go, please.

Yan Pritzker: (34:17)
I was going to say that I really like to look at Bitcoin's incentive structure and its underlying mechanics to think about what could probably go wrong. And what's interesting about Bitcoin is that has all this self-balancing behavior. The US decides to ban it. Probably we're going to take ourselves out of the mining industry. We're going to tell Peter Thiel to go home. We're going to tell everybody to stop mining, stop buying. Great, then what?

Yan Pritzker: (34:42)
Some other country, there's a vacuum, there's a power vacuum. This is a thing that is worth a lot of money. So it drops by 75%, it's still worth a lot and it starts to gain traction in other places. That country bans it. Somebody else steps in, I mean there's no real game theoretical scenario here where it just dies.

Yan Pritzker: (34:59)
You would have to kill it everywhere and kind of all at once. And it's a very difficult thing to do because it has so many different heads. And again, those heads, if you think about it, the places that would more likely ban it, I don't worry about the US banning it. The places that are more likely to ban it and where you've seen the bans are the places that actually have problems with their currency.

Yan Pritzker: (35:16)
Those are the same places that ban you from buying dollars. Those are the places that are really worried. And what happens in those places is that Bitcoin goes up in value and the people who end up holding it are able to pay bribes in the Bitcoin. They're able to buy off government officials in the Bitcoin. The local currency is worthless. And so you have this self pressuring cycle.

Yan Pritzker: (35:33)
So over time, it kind of self-regulate itself. It's really difficult for it to be killed in any one place and any attempt to kill it that fails only makes it stronger because it's just demonstrated Bitcoin's whole value proposition, which is it's money that can't be killed by governments. So as soon as we see those failures, value goes up, price goes up, adoption goes up, black markets go up, everything goes up. So it's very difficult for that reason. If you look at structurally how it works, and structurally what the incentives are for everybody in the system, it's very difficult to kill it for those reasons.

Brett Messing: (36:05)
It seems to me that as it gets broader ownership and both from the populace and corporate, it becomes unkillable. So maybe you could have killed it five years ago easily, you could have killed 10 years ago. Maybe you can still kill it, but if it continues on the rate it's at, I think it becomes like the Terminator. You can't stop it. I do worry a little bit right now.

Brett Messing: (36:32)
My history is I'm [inaudible 00:36:33] the democratic deputy mayor in Los Angeles, the progressive movement isn't cool with Bitcoin right now. And I think that's important just given what's going on in both the United States politically and globally that it's not seen as a libertarian right-wing idea.

Brett Messing: (36:53)
There was an unhelpful legislation introduced in Congress in the fall. It didn't go anywhere, but I think there's some educating to do. And just to making sure it doesn't ... Everything gets politicized. We don't want Bitcoin to become a partisan issue.

Yan Pritzker: (37:07)
I would agree there and look, my friends, I mean I probably have a circle of friends that's 95% liberal. So I know this better than anybody. And I don't know if I would consider myself a liberal or in the center or where, but I actually think that Bitcoin is very well aligned with liberal values in terms of helping the world and fixing the problems for other people and for society and all that, because it's just a matter of having them see the problem from a different perspective.

Yan Pritzker: (37:32)
And that what is for example liberals are very concerned about wealth inequality. Well, what's the problem. Should we just steal money from billionaires and give it to poor people, or is the actual problem that we're exacerbating wealth inequality because our money's unfair. And if you start to think of it that way, and start to sell the solutions well Bitcoin is a much fairer money than we've ever had because nobody can manipulate it. Nobody can print more of it. Nobody can issue handouts to somebody.

Yan Pritzker: (37:56)
If you're a bank, you can get bailout from the government. You're not going to get a Bitcoin bailout. That's just not going to work that way because nobody can print it. Is there an energy problem? Are we worried about not enough renewables, but guess what? Bitcoin helps balance green energy grids.

Yan Pritzker: (38:10)
It's a solution for many problems that liberals care about. And again, because of my circle of friends, I'm constantly talking about this stuff. I really do think that liberals will wake up to these things at some point when they realize what the truth is, but unfortunately a lot of people have their heads up certain bodily area that and they just don't think of outside of their own bubbles. So they're conditioned to think that the only solution to everything is government. And that's just I think the more you read about this stuff and think about it, it's just not.

Brett Messing: (38:40)
I think the Bitcoin is bad for the energy, is going to be something we hear a lot about this year. I don't think it's coincidence that Janet Yellen mentioned it this past week. Where does that go? That goes to, "Well, should you tax Bitcoin in some way?" Or a form of a Bitcoin carbon tax, if you will.

Brett Messing: (39:00)
I've always worried more about the government taxing Bitcoin in an unfriendly way than a ban. A ban just seems very severe. You can achieve a lot of what you might want to gain with tax policy.

Yan Pritzker: (39:14)
But I also think that we're going to start to see a shift around seeing Bitcoin as a national security issue and not having the government on any Bitcoin being a problem. I'm not saying this is gonna happen this year, but I do think in the next four years is going to start being viewed that way. Especially once we start seeing bigger countries settle trades between themselves as with Bitcoin.

Yan Pritzker: (39:34)
We're already seeing some of that with Iran and Venezuela and Turkey. So it's possible that as that happens, the government starts to change their tune a little bit. But I mean, yes, they could text Bitcoin mining and then what? Then we're just going to shift that entire industry to China. Is that what we want? Do we want to give our entire Bitcoin mining industry to China? That's not the narrative that has been played in America. China's now an enemy number one and we have to be better than them in every way.

Yan Pritzker: (39:59)
If we're going to voluntarily give up an entire industry, potentially an industry that's important to national security. I think we're going to do it wrong if we do that.

Brett Messing: (40:07)
All right. So I have one last question for you then I'll let John take us home. So one of the things that I have found so exciting about this stretch of institutional adoption is if you think about institutions as verticals, you've had corporations buying it, you've had endowments buying it. You've had a few pension funds, you've had a few mutual fund, almost every category has been filled, which is better than I think if we had lots and lots of corporate adoption, but nothing else in those various verticals. So to me, that's super encouraging. So my question to you is who's going to be the first country?

Yan Pritzker: (40:49)
I really do think it's going to be one of the disadvantaged countries. One of the countries has been pushed out of the dollar system. We have reports from Iran that they were forcing their miners to sell Bitcoin to the central bank. We have those reports already. I don't know if they're true. I'm not on the ground, but I'm assuming that the people who are know this.

Yan Pritzker: (41:07)
We know that Ukraine is about to mine Bitcoin in their nuclear facilities. This is being discussed. We know that Venezuela has these problems. Is going to be the countries that we don't like. It's going to be the countries that we're going to claim are terrorists and blah, blah, blah. But I feel really strongly that America has really abused its role in the world to say something like, "Oh, I ran is just like out of the dollar system because we don't like their leaders."

Yan Pritzker: (41:31)
We're punishing an entire country worth of people. They're fine people, they're normal people. They're people trying to live their lives and we're punishing them for their leaders. And those countries, they need to survive. And when there's necessity, necessity is the mother of invention. So it's exactly what we're going to see. We're going to see the "access of evil countries." The Irans and the Venezuela's of the world are going to be the first to adopt Bitcoin.

Yan Pritzker: (41:52)
Our government's going to react very negatively to it. We're going to try to do more censorship and more sanctions and all this. And we're going to find that it's totally ineffective and they're able to trade with each other just fine. And then we're going to look at the situation and say, "Well, guess what we just did? We created a monster." And we either play the game or we're out.

Brett Messing: (42:11)
So you're sort of predicting Silk Road two?

Yan Pritzker: (42:14)
I am predicting Silk Road Two on a national level. That's what it is. It's going to be that. It's going to be, Bitcoin's not for criminals, this for terrorists and it's for terrorist countries and it's for North Korea and Iran and stuff like that.

Brett Messing: (42:24)
It kind of present a marketing problem for Bitcoin. You know what I mean? On some level. I hadn't thought about this, this access we were going first. I had always thought it'll be an African country or Caribbean country or-

Yan Pritzker: (42:37)
It could be Nigeria. I mean Nigeria has a ton of Bitcoin adoption as well. Internally we know that something like 30% of Nigerians have claimed that they've used Bitcoin. And I know for people on the ground that it's very, very high adoption. People are building businesses down there. But I really do think because of the necessity to settle trades is where it comes down to.

Yan Pritzker: (42:56)
It's the necessity to settle trades when you can't use dollars or you can't use any currency of your neighbors because you don't trust them. It becomes a problem and I think that problem gets solved. But look, the Silk Road was a marketing problem for Bitcoin too. For people that don't know, it was 2013, it was a site for selling drugs and assassinations, and God knows what else. It was a huge problem for Bitcoin, but we need to pass that and all of a sudden we have Tesla buying it.

Yan Pritzker: (43:20)
So it's the same thing here where even if there's negative publicity in the first place, then it's the mind shift around yes, it's for criminals because money is for everybody just like the internet's also for criminals. And so are shoes and computers. Yes, these things are for criminals because they're for everybody. So once we get past that idea of is for criminals now, it's all of a sudden what are the actual benefits for that?

Brett Messing: (43:42)
So I'm going to let John speak. I just have one comment, I'm going to lose some Bitcoin cred. I actually read on vacation or spoke about Silk Road, Nick Hilton's book and it was fascinating and fun, but you won't see me wearing a free Ross t-shirt. I'm not saying you should stay in jail forever. I think the sentence was wrong, but we can spend a little time there. I think he's only been there five years. Anyway, so my Q-Rating just went down a little bit in the community.

Yan Pritzker: (44:15)
Nonviolent criminals should not be jailed. Come on.

Brett Messing: (44:16)
So true. We got a discussion on whether there was not-

Yan Pritzker: (44:21)
That's a separate discussion.

Brett Messing: (44:24)
No, I agree with that statement. I just don't know that it's that characterization, but yes, 100% agree with that. John, you want to finish us off?

John Darsie: (44:32)
Yeah. And my Q-Rating going to go down and Switzerland and in my home country, because you talk about criminal enterprise. I mean, most criminal enterprises take place with physical US dollar notes and run through the traditional banking system. So when you see banks attacking Bitcoin because a very small percentage of transactions are used for illicit activity. It rings a little bit hollow if you really understand how money laundering and criminal enterprise works.

Yan Pritzker: (44:58)
And I mean, they pay billions of dollars of fines and nobody talks about it as if it's a problem. It's just the status quo. We're just going to pay a couple of billion no problem, yeah we did some bad stuff. But with Bitcoin, all of a sudden it's like, "Oh no, one thing happened and now we have to talk about it now." It's just because it's new. It's the same thing. When the internet came out, it was the same stuff was said about the internet.

Yan Pritzker: (45:19)
It's going to be for criminals. There's all this nefarious activity online, there's child pornography and there's all this other stuff, look at all these problems. But the internet is a huge net benefit for humanity. I think pretty much everybody at this point would agree on that. Yes, it's used for illicit activity, just like anything else in life is. People are going to do illicit activity if you make things illegal.

John Darsie: (45:40)
So I want to talk about question. You referenced it very briefly. It's a common refrain from Bitcoin skeptics or Bitcoin haters that it uses this massive amount of energy. If we scale Bitcoin, it shows a basic lack of understanding about how Bitcoin works, but they talk about what if we scale the volume of transactions and the price. It's going to consume more energy than we consume on the entire planet.

John Darsie: (46:01)
What do people misunderstand about energy usage and how can we continue to develop energy solutions? You talked about Ukraine using nuclear power to mine Bitcoin, but how can we sort of re build our energy grid in a way that's friendlier for all purposes, but including within the context of Bitcoin?

Yan Pritzker: (46:20)
I think one thing just to address is how Bitcoin actually does scale or how the energy usage is ... What it's proportional to. It's very different mentally from what you might think of. It's not a per transaction usage cost, which a lot of people get wrong. And then project it outwards to say Bitcoin's going to eat the world's energy. And this was written in 2017. It was an article that said by 2020 Bitcoin will use all the energy output of the world. Well, guess what? It didn't do that and the price went up quite a lot.

Yan Pritzker: (46:44)
So what actually happens in Bitcoin is that Bitcoin uses energy proportional to the value of the coin. So if it's $50,000 per Bitcoin, then it costs almost $50,000 worth of energy to produce that Bitcoin. It's just proportional because as the price goes up, more miners come in to want to try to mine it. And Bitcoin actually self adjusts to always be exactly the same amount of difficulty to mine. So if more miners come in, it becomes more difficult so that we can only produce a certain amount of Bitcoin per time period.

Yan Pritzker: (47:15)
So Bitcoin's energy use does not scale with more transactions. It only really scales with the price, but even then as the price goes up and like I said if you Ukraine starts mining in a nuclear power plant, and all of a sudden they're able to mine more than anybody else, then only other nuclear power plants will be able to present the pain of mining.

Yan Pritzker: (47:32)
That's what actually comes down to is that everybody's has to get leveled up in their ability. And this is why I really believe that over time Bitcoin mining will be very strongly co-located with energy companies. You have to be at the source of production. You have to be right by that windmill or by the hydro station or wherever you're producing your Bitcoin.

Yan Pritzker: (47:49)
Because outside of that, you're going to have higher energy costs. And whenever you have higher energy costs, you're now become uncompetitive in the market. Bitcoin has an effect to push out anybody who is not on the absolute cheapest Bitcoin energy production costs. So that's number one is Bitcoin's energy usage is not specific to transactions. We can have a million transactions, and by the way, a Bitcoin transaction is not a person to person payment. This is really another thing people don't understand.

Yan Pritzker: (48:17)
A Bitcoin transaction could be settling thousands of payments. It could be a batch of millions of payments that came from a second layer, like a lightning network, or even from you using your Visa credit card and then paying the bill on Bitcoin. That could be millions of transactions bashed into one Bitcoin transaction. So a Bitcoin transaction is more like a container ship that you send over the ocean containing all this cargo. And you don't talk about it as like it didn't cost you $1 million to ship a piece of plastic from China, is because all this plastic was inside of that container.

Yan Pritzker: (48:45)
So Bitcoin is a very much a settlement network. It's more like fed wire. There's a great article by Nick Carter that came out in CoinDesk if you guys want to more about that, where he makes that analogy and really drives it home. So Bitcoin doesn't scale with ... Its energy usage does not scale the transactions. In fact, that's not a problem at all.

Yan Pritzker: (49:04)
But the second thing to flip the energy narrative on its head is that a lot of these green power plants like Texas, they have wind energy. In order for them to be economical, they have to be built of a certain size and they can't be built of a certain size if there's not that demand for that energy.

Yan Pritzker: (49:19)
So what Bitcoin does is it comes in and it's the buyer of last resort for any energies that's unused. So rather than wasting energy, Bitcoin is actually reclaiming waste energy. It's reclaiming energy that would otherwise not be used by anybody. And it's creating a price for that power plant to be operational, to be profitable and to invest in continuous innovation.

Yan Pritzker: (49:38)
So if we want green energy, we need Bitcoin at every green power plant creating that load so they can actually continue to expand, innovate and develop better solutions. Bitcoin is very unique in that way, because it can be turned on and off. If you want to learn more about that, there's an article I think it's in Forbes.

Yan Pritzker: (49:54)
If you Google about [Orchard 00:49:56] and how they're using Bitcoin with the company called Layer1, they're acting as a dynamic load on that a system where they can be turned on and off in order to balance the grid, which is really, really cool. It really is the key to more renewable development.

John Darsie: (50:10)
We just have a couple of minutes left. So I'm going to do some rapid fire questions where I'll be looking for rapid fire answer. So Bitfinex and Tether just settled with the New York attorney general for 18 and a half million bucks. No admission of wrongdoing. No insinuation that they've been using Tether to manipulate and boost the price of Bitcoin.

John Darsie: (50:30)
Is that issue settled now with Tether? Is all the fear, uncertainty and doubt related to Tether dead, or still that an open issue about whether there's other issues within Tether?

Yan Pritzker: (50:39)
It's probably going to be a perennial issue just because people love to come up with something to criticize. Frankly, we here at Swan. I mean, we sell millions of dollars of Bitcoin and we've never touched Tether. I think if you talk to anybody who actually operates an exchange, they could tell you how much of that is Tether affecting prices. People don't look at OTC markets where Tether may not be used.

Yan Pritzker: (50:57)
I mean, there's a host of issues. This is already been debunked in it. Honestly, I don't think it's going away. People are going to keep going at it, but it doesn't really matter because you could see the price of Bitcoin is just fine.

John Darsie: (51:07)
All right. So next question. We recently had the launch of the first North American Bitcoin ETF in Canada. Purpose Investments was the first, or there was another that came soon after, but Purpose did $400 million of volume in its first two days of trading, despite the fact that the ETF market in Canada is a small fraction. I think it's around 200 plus billion versus 5 trillion in the US. What does that tell you about what it's going to look like when a US ETF comes out and what's your prediction for the timeline for a US ETF?

Yan Pritzker: (51:37)
I think it has to happen very soon and the reason for that is that you have all these proxy stocks that people are buying because they want Bitcoin exposure. They're buying MicroStrategy, they're buying Tesla, the stock is going vertical. It's frankly, irresponsible of SEC not to approve an ETF because what they're doing is they're just creating bubbles and stocks that talk about Bitcoin in any way. So I think it's going to happen very soon and now we have to do it to save face because you can't let Canada win. Come on guys.

John Darsie: (51:59)
Exactly. All right. This was fantastic. Really enjoyed this conversation. Brett, do you have any final words for Yan before we let him go?

Brett Messing: (52:06)
No, just thank you, Yan. And again, we're really grateful that you wrote the book and if you write another book, we'll be at the front of the line.

Yan Pritzker: (52:15)
Awesome.

Brett Messing: (52:16)
And we will continue buying and distributing them because as I said, it's the best one-on-one book I've read.

Yan Pritzker: (52:23)
I appreciate that so much. Thank you guys for taking the time and for having me on. I really appreciate it.

John Darsie: (52:27)
Yep. And again, that's Inventing Bitcoin by Yan Pritzker. It's a relatively quick read. You can get it straight on Amazon but it's a great place to start in terms of understanding the technology and Vijay Boyapati as we've mentioned, the Bullish Case for Bitcoin. You put those two resources together, you're on the path to becoming a Bitcoin maximalist the way Brett and the way Yan is. But thank you everybody for tuning into today's SALT Talk.

John Darsie: (52:50)
We love educating people about digital assets, is something that we've been on a journey over the last several years to learn about it and get comfortable with the custody and the security and other issues that people bring up when they express skepticism about Bitcoin. But just a reminder, we have all these episodes of SALT Talks focusing on digital assets on our website, salt.org\talks. You can go there and view them all on demand, and you can view them all on our YouTube channel as well, which is called SALT Tube.

John Darsie: (53:17)
We're on Twitter, which is where we're most active on social media @saltconference, but we're also on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook, and we're trying to grow our presence there. So we'd appreciate a follow and please spread the word about SALT Talks and about these digital assets SALT Talks. Again, even if people aren't going to be buying Bitcoin, we think it's important to educate yourself about it so you can sort of get over some of these common criticisms whether it be related to energy or other items that people frequently bring up. But on behalf of the entire SALT team and Brett, this is John Darsie signing off from SALT Talks for today. We hope to see you back here soon.

Vijay Boyapati: “The Bullish Case for Bitcoin” | SALT Talks #169

“If you look at addressable market for Bitcoin, it’s gigantic. It’s the largest market on earth, by far. The market for storing wealth and savings is a $100 trillion market, at least.”

Vijay Boyapati, a software engineer who joined early-stage Google in 2002, has become a major Bitcoin advocate, authoring one of the most read articles in support of the monetary good: The Bullish Case for Bitcoin.

It is natural for anyone to feel like they’re late to Bitcoin because they’ve seen people who’ve gotten in earlier, but the crypto-asset is only in its infancy. The addressable market is the largest on earth with Bitcoin able to serve as the world’s means of wealth storage and saving, able to reach a $100 trillion-plus market cap. Liquidity will be pulled from more traditional sectors like real estate and government bonds into Bitcoin, a secure and portable store of value. “Bitcoin as the global reserve currency takes on the role gold had in the 19th century where it’s the final means of settlement for banks and nation-states. If you believe that valuation model, you can go into the ($) tens of millions per Bitcoin because it becomes the global means of saving.”

One of the last credible threats to Bitcoin is nation-states who may see Bitcoin as a threat to their central-bank currency. Excessive regulation or outright bans will be made more difficult as adoption grows. Governments and officials will face growing pressure to accept Bitcoin because its citizens and constituents will have savings in the crypto-asset. “Imagine if you’re a congressman and 20% of your constituents own Bitcoin and you try to regulate or ban Bitcoin. You’re going to get a lot of pushback.”

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Vijay Boyapati.jpeg

Vijay Boyapati

Author

The Bullish Case for Bitcoin

MODERATOR

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:07)
Hello everyone and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the managing director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology, and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators, and thinkers, and our goal on these SALT Talks is the same as our goal at our SALT conference series, which is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future.

John Darsie: (00:38)
We're very excited to bring you the latest episode of our digital asset series, which is an area we've been focusing on especially over the last six months as mainstream interest in the asset class has grown. And our guest today is Vijay Boyapati, who's the author of what I think is one of the most insightful pieces. The Bullish Case for Bitcoin is the name of the essay that he wrote, and it's something that I share with members of my family and people that are just learning about the space. There's complexity to the intellectual arguments that he makes about the value of Bitcoin, but it's also very accessible for the average person. So, I would highly recommend you read that Bullish Case for Bitcoin.

John Darsie: (01:15)
But Vijay, to go more into his background, was born and raised in Australia and moved to the United States through a PhD in computer science. He never started that PhD and he took a job offer at a little firm called Google. And after leaving the much bigger Google in 2007, Vijay spent a year campaigning in the 2008 presidential election, helping to raise millions of dollars for Ron Paul. After becoming disillusioned by politics, Vijay decided to continue to seek change in the world through technology. He discovered Bitcoin in 2011, and he quickly went deep down the Bitcoin rabbit hole.

John Darsie: (01:51)
With a background in Austrian economics, he spent years thinking about the economic framework within which Bitcoin's value proposition could be understood. His thinking on the economics of Bitcoin culminated in an article, as I mentioned before, called The Bullish Case for Bitcoin, which is one of the most read articles on Bitcoin after Satoshi Nakamoto, the founder of Bitcoin, his original whitepaper. And Vijay's essay has been translated into 20 languages, and it's often cited as the most useful resource to give newcomers who are attempting to understand Bitcoin.

John Darsie: (02:23)
Hosting today's talk is SkyBridge Capital president and chief operating officer, Brett Messing, who has led a lot of our digital asset and Bitcoin research here at SkyBridge, and we're very excited to be more involved in the space and thankful to Brett for helping to lead that charge. But with no further ado, I'm going to turn over to Brett to conduct the interview.

Brett Messing: (02:44)
Thanks, John. And welcome, Vijay. I am a fanboy because I'm a geek and because it's a pandemic, I think I've read every serious piece that's been written on Bitcoin and I think yours is the best. I'm pretty excited that you're here.

Vijay Boyapati: (02:59)
Thanks, Brett. I really appreciate that. As I was saying before we started, I'm really excited that you guys have gotten into Bitcoin. It's always exciting for me to see brilliant, successful people have that light bulb go off in their head and understand Bitcoin and then get active and start building around the community, building technology or launching funds. So, I'm really excited to see what you guys are doing as well.

Brett Messing: (03:27)
Well, that's kind of you to say. We're up to about $500 million in Bitcoin and as is often the case, it doesn't feel like enough. If we had anything that was like this amount a year or two years ago, everyone would have fired us. So, why don't we use that as a launching pad, which is, as we were discussing, it feels like Bitcoin is at an inflection point. So, if I can give you a framework, which is your piece, your bullish take combined with where we are, essay question.

Vijay Boyapati: (04:06)
Yeah. I think we were talking about this feeling that a lot of people have when they come to Bitcoin is that "I've missed out" and all of the gains are in the past and not in the future. And I want to sort of break it to everyone who comes to Bitcoin. Everyone feels that way. No matter what price you buy Bitcoin at, you feel like you got in late and that's true of me, it's true of everyone. Whether it be $10 or $100, $1,000, $10,000, whatever it is, you feel late because you've seen people you know before you get in at earlier prices.

Vijay Boyapati: (04:41)
I would just say ... I'll give you a story from my earlier career when I was at Google before it IPO'd. Google IPO'd and there were a lot of analysts who said, "This is crazy. This company is worth more than Ford Motors? That is insane. This is way overvalued. This isn't going to last. It's going to crash." But really Bitcoin was at the beginning of its story, and a long story and probably 30X higher than it was at IPO.

Vijay Boyapati: (05:13)
I feel the same way about Bitcoin right now, especially because if you look at the addressable market for Bitcoin, it's gigantic. It is the largest market on earth by far. The market for storing wealth, storing savings is a $100 trillion market at least. And Bitcoin has taken 1% of that market. So, there's a lot more addressable market to take before Bitcoin reaches saturation. How much of that market will it take in the next decade, I don't know, but I think it has a lot further to go.

Brett Messing: (05:51)
When you look at the events that have happened in the last, I don't know, six, eight months from PayPal making it available to people and they're going to be rolling that out around the globe, to the Tesla purchase, to BNY Mellon getting into the Bitcoin business, to BlackRock, which do you think is the most significant in terms of the adoption curve, if you will?

Vijay Boyapati: (06:18)
I mean, I think they're all significant in their own way. They all add social proof. They all add credibility to the average investor who's looking at Bitcoin and thinking, "Well, I don't know if I trust this thing. Who controls it? What's the authority that's backing this thing?" I think each is a touchpoint, a psychological touchpoint, that everyone sees and it increases their belief that there's something to this. And for some people, they only need one or two touchpoints to sort of get onboard and say, "Yeah, I want to put some savings in this." For some people it's 10 or 20, and it really depends on whether they trust these institutions or other people that they're seeing getting in.

Vijay Boyapati: (07:03)
Elon Musk, I think he's a big one for sure. He has 50 million followers on Twitter, and he has one of the most iconic companies around. And to see that company allocate a meaningful amount of its treasury to Bitcoin is a big signal. So, I guess if I was to put my finger on one, I would say Tesla is a big one.

Brett Messing: (07:27)
Well, I guess in terms of the price move, that would sort of validate that. Right? That was I think the largest one-day move in Bitcoin that we've had, certainly in dollars. I'm not sure on a percentage basis, but the market certainly reacted to that. How do you think about Bitcoin from a valuation perspective, in terms of being too high or too low? There's a couple different models out there. Right? There's the stock-to-flow, which just to remind people, that's where you look at the amount of existing Bitcoin relative to the amount of newly produced Bitcoin and you compare it to other assets. There's Metcalfe's law. Right? That's sort of a networking effect. As more people join the Bitcoin network and Bitcoin itself become more valuable. There's using gold as a proxy, as a percentage of gold's overall market. How do you think about those, or do you, when you think about valuing Bitcoin?

Vijay Boyapati: (08:25)
Yeah. That's a great question. I think stock-to-flow is a really interesting model. I'm still not entirely sure about it. It's certainly been very predictive, and it's interesting just to observe how predictive it has been. The way I think about it is I see that there are largely four valuation models that people have used for Bitcoin over time in my observation following this market for the last decade. And I want to assign a target price to each of this valuation models so you can ballpark think about where Bitcoin should be if you believed each of these models.

Vijay Boyapati: (09:01)
The first one is that Bitcoin is basically short mania. It's a huge bubble. It's completely irrational. Bitcoin has no comparative advantage to anything else. Why does it exist? And if you believe that, then the long-term target price for Bitcoin is obviously zero.

Vijay Boyapati: (09:17)
The second model is that, and this is the model I think people held for quite a long time until the last couple of years, is that Bitcoin, it's an interesting technology and there's something to it, but it has a limited addressable market. It's only interesting to geeks and libertarians and people who want to do things in the gray market. And if you believe that model for Bitcoin, you'd think that its target price would be somewhere in the ballpark of 10,000, maybe on the higher end to 100,000, something like that. The addressable market is tech people essentially and libertarians.

Vijay Boyapati: (09:57)
The third valuation model I have and that I've observed is that Bitcoin is digital gold. It's a monetary good and its closest cousin is gold. It's a non-sovereign store of value. It's a place to store value that's not controlled by any nation state. If you recognize it as superior to gold, the attributes it has as money is superior to gold's attributes so for instance, it's much easier to transport Bitcoin and to transmit it over the wire. Then you look at gold's market capitalization, which is approximately 10 trillion and you can easily slap a target price on Bitcoin as 500,000, which gets Bitcoin to that same capitalization. And if you believe it's superior to gold, as I do, I think it's 10x or 100x superior to gold. I think you could easily see valuation from 500,000 to maybe a couple million.

Vijay Boyapati: (10:52)
Then the valuation model is Bitcoin as a reserve currency, the global reserve currency and it takes on the role that gold had in the 19th century where it's the final means of settlement for banks and nation states to settle trade between each other and settle accounts between each other. If you believe that valuation model, then I think you can go into the tens of millions per Bitcoin because it becomes the global means of savings and it's going to suck liquidity out of every major market. It's going to take liquidity out of government bonds. It's going to take it drastically out of gold. It's going to pull it out of real estate.

Vijay Boyapati: (11:35)
So, for instance, in Vancouver, Washington, which is near where I live, a lot of Chinese investors want to have some of their assets out of the country as a safe haven. What's a good safe haven? Vancouver. They can move to Canada and they can have some savings when they arrive. All of that's going to get blown away. Why would you have a house that stays empty in Vancouver when you can have it in Bitcoin? If you believe that Bitcoin is going to become eventually the reserve currency of the world, as I do, then you get very, very high target numbers for Bitcoin.

Brett Messing: (12:12)
So, Vijay, I've been accused of being overly bullish, so let's stay on this point for a second, which is the idea that Bitcoin demonetizes other assets, right? Real estate, as you pointed out. Art, as you're probably aware, most privately owned art sits in just warehouse, right, mostly in Switzerland for tax reasons. No one's looking at them. Most of it's bought anonymously. So, people aren't even getting credit for owning the art, right? So, it's clearly a store of value and I could see the monetary premium getting slowly diminished out of those assets where let's say art appreciates but the rate of appreciation goes from being double digits to mid single digits, right, where it's almost not noticeable, this demonetization.

Brett Messing: (12:56)
But what I hear you talking about becomes disruptive to the monetary system globally, right, and it seems to me, I'm doing too much talking, that Bitcoin, at least in the United States, is in a great place from a regulatory standpoint, right? Banks are allowed to do it. Anchorage has been designated the first digital bank. So, I feel like we have this one way from now until that point, which we start becoming, we, see I'm using Bitcoin and me as we, a threat. But how do you think about that regulatory risk when you combine that with your endgame?

Vijay Boyapati: (13:33)
Yeah, I think that's another great question. I think it's one of the biggest risks to Bitcoin that people should really think about when they're investing in Bitcoin. The way I think about it is how does Bitcoin or can Bitcoin get enough regulatory capture before it's seen as a threat? I think some nation states are getting that first inkling that hey, this might be a threat to our monetary policy if the world's savings start flowing into something that we can't inflate and something that we can't control. How do we control our own monetary policy?

Vijay Boyapati: (14:10)
There was an article in the Wall Street Journal a few years ago where they said, "Well, maybe the biggest threat is that Bitcoin doesn't go up but that it keeps going up and it keeps going up and then, hey, we, as central bankers thinking about monetary policy, we've lost control. The way I think about this is kind of the same way I think about Uber as a company.

Vijay Boyapati: (14:33)
Uber is a company that would go into markets where the local government and the established players were very antagonistic to Uber and the taxi lobby would lobby the local city government and say, "Look, we don't want Uber to come in and completely disrupt our business," and they were very cozy with local government. So, local governments were typically very antagonistic to Uber and what Uber would do is just barge into this city and say, "Okay, we're providing this app here. We're hiring a bunch of drivers." Users really love it, they start using it and you get this entrenched lobby, which starts saying, "Hey, you can't attack this company. This benefits us. We want this here."

Vijay Boyapati: (15:13)
I think the same thing is true of Bitcoin. We're starting to see some of that capture where, imagine you're a congressman and four years from now 20% of your constituency owns Bitcoin and you start saying, "Well, maybe we should regulate this thing or ban it." Well, you're going to get a lot of pushback. So, I think in the Western democracies the question is whether we get to that point of regulatory capture before nation states begin to crack down and I see really positive signs in that regard.

Vijay Boyapati: (15:45)
We have a senator who's very pro Bitcoin from Wyoming. I think we're going to see several more congressman in the next election and then one election hence from that a lot more because we're really transitioning from Bitcoin being this niche thing to being very widespread and owned by a lot of people in the US and when you have a lot of people with their savings in something, that's a natural protection, a natural lobby and throw in the fact that corporations are now getting into Bitcoin, large funds. These institutions have much more lobbying power than the average person. They don't want their balance sheet to be blown away by a government doing something stupid. It's kind of like it would be very difficult for a government to outlaw 401ks right now. You just can't do that.

Vijay Boyapati: (16:36)
So, the big question to me is, do we make that transition quickly enough? I am optimistic.

Brett Messing: (16:44)
No, I think that's right. I think that the mass adoption rate is the best defense against political actors. I do have to say in the short term, I have a little history in politics. I was actually deputy mayor of Los Angeles. I worry about Bitcoin not being embraced by the progressive movement. [inaudible 00:17:03] being sort of a right wing libertarian thing and I think as a community that's an important bridge for us to build soon. As you're aware there was some legislation that came out of the house that didn't go anywhere from the progressives in the house that was unhelpful to the idea of digital assets. That's something that's just on my radar screen.

Brett Messing: (17:29)
Can you talk about the recent ban in India because they seem like a nation and an economy that should be embracing Bitcoin and instead they're going in the opposite way. You talked about large democracies. Last I checked that's the largest one, right?

Vijay Boyapati: (17:47)
Yeah, I have Indian heritage. I was raised in Australia but I have Indian parents and one thing I could tell you about the Indian government is the Indian government does not trust it's people. That's the problem right there. The Indian government makes people go through all sorts of hoops just to buy a cell phone. So, the lack of trust I think is the fundamental problem there. I think ultimately it's inevitable.

Vijay Boyapati: (18:16)
India could ban Bitcoin and be the last in line, make it's population be the last in line to get Bitcoin. They're just harming their own people, in my opinion. To me it's like saying, "We're going to ban the internet because we're worried people might talk about stuff that we don't like." Okay, sure, you can do that but you can live in the dark ages for another decade while the rest of the world advances. I think their hand will be forced. When that happens, I don't know.

Brett Messing: (18:45)
Okay. Let's discuss volatility, right? It's my personal view that volatility is wrongly characterized as a risk. I view it in Bitcoin as more of an opportunity because most of the volatility has been up. As we talk today Bitcoin has moved. It was 58 on Sunday, it got to 45 today after having a 25% pullback last month. This isn't made for everybody. How do you think about the volatility? Do you think it's going to change? Just your reaction to that.

Vijay Boyapati: (19:27)
Yeah, absolutely. I just think that the criticism that Bitcoin has got that it's volatile is really nonsensical. You can't go from something that was worth zero a decade ago to being a trillion dollars without volatility. It's just impossible. I completely agree with what you're saying. It's really the other side of the coin of opportunity. There's so much upside to Bitcoin that you're going to see a bumpy ride for a while because what's happening is the volatility, especially the upward volatility is a function of new savings moving into Bitcoin.

Vijay Boyapati: (20:06)
When you have, especially in the early days when you had people like the Winklevoss twins put in $10 million into Bitcoin when the price was, I don't know, $20 or $30, that is going to have a sharp effect on the price because the supply is strictly limited and more Bitcoin won't be produced due to the extra demand.

Vijay Boyapati: (20:26)
So, that's part of the reason for the volatility on the upside and that's really magnified now with the size of the institutions who are coming in. We're not talking about $10 million coming in at a pop now. We're talking about $1.5 billion coming in at a pop when an institution says, "Hey, yeah, let's get some of our treasury into Bitcoin." So, I think that's part of the explanation.

Vijay Boyapati: (20:49)
The other part of the explanation is that the concentration of Bitcoin being held by relatively few people, say a few tens of thousands, is still quite high and that's really just part of the process of monetization. Those early owners who had large chunks of Bitcoin, they will diversify as their net worth gets into stratospheric levels and I sort of view it as an iceberg with a tide crashing against the iceberg. The price is going up, crashing against the iceberg, and eventually these ice sheets break off and that's really just a long time holder saying, "Hey, I've got 10,000 Bitcoin. I'm going to sell a thousand Bitcoin now to diversify and improve my standard of living," and that's a chunk of the iceberg, the supply iceberg falling into the ocean, crashing into the ocean and causing some volatility.

Vijay Boyapati: (21:43)
So, I think this is just a natural part of the process of monetization and I think it's going to taper off meaningfully when Bitcoin gets to the market capitalization of gold. Gold still has some volatility. In 2011 to 2014 it dropped almost 50% but it's certainly less volatile than Bitcoin.

Vijay Boyapati: (22:06)
The larger Bitcoin becomes the less volatile, I believe, it will become because when some savings moves into Bitcoin it will be much smaller relative to the size of Bitcoin.

Brett Messing: (22:17)
Mm-hmm (affirmative). Okay, that's interesting. So, the volatility it seems has tracked these cycles, right? The bull cycles have tended to start with havings, right, when the supply of Bitcoin is reduced in half every four years. We really have two data points on this and I sort of wonder ... I have tremendous respect for the Bitcoin community and all the hard work that's happened over the last decade but I wonder if that history sometimes isn't a burden when you look forward. In other words, has something changed meaningfully with the events that we've discussed and the maturation of the asset class? Have you reflected on that? Do you have any thoughts on that?

Vijay Boyapati: (23:06)
Yeah, one thing I find most fascinating is that we have never seen a monetary good being monetized in real time. This is the first time in history that we get to watch it in real time. The process of the monetization of gold took millennia. It's thousands of years before gold transitioned from being a lump of rock in the ground to being used in coinage and then backing on paper notes and so forth. So, we get to see how this works and one thing we're learning, just as you mentioned there, are these hype cycles and it's absolutely fascinating to me that they have this patent, this almost fractal like patent of increasing magnitude where if you look at the 2017 bull market and you superimpose it on the 2013 bull market it looks almost identical and to someone with an engineering or scientific mindset that cries out for an explanation, why is that?

Vijay Boyapati: (24:10)
My feeling is this is kind of part of the social dynamic of monetization that it happens in these phases where you get some cohort of people that are reachable in the cycle that have enough understanding or have heard about Bitcoin enough to be interested in investing in it and you start out with the really strongly convicted in the beginning and then you get people who are more long term investors coming along and the price starts coming up and in the final stage you see speculators who just want to make some quick profits and then you get this crescendo and parabolic move and eventually a climax and a correction and a crash and we see this over and over again. It's just the cohort of people that are reachable in each cycle grows.

Vijay Boyapati: (24:57)
So, the first cohort, who were they? They were cipher punks and cryptographers and people who understood what Bitcoin was immediately. The next cycle was libertarians and people who wanted to use Bitcoin in the gray market. Then the next cycle, 2017, was early adopters. But I think the same social dynamic applies in each of these cycles regardless of who the cohort is.

Vijay Boyapati: (25:23)
Now the cohort is corporations and institutions and it could be the FOMO phase of the cycle is dampened a little bit because corporations are a little more logical than retail investors but maybe not, maybe not. Maybe you'll see corporations and institutions have some of that FOMO too if enough of them jump on board Bitcoin. So, what happens when Google says, "Hey, yeah, we want some Bitcoin," and Facebook does? Do Amazon and Microsoft sit back and say, "Well, okay, we're just going to not have any." I think this could possibly apply to corporations as well.

Vijay Boyapati: (26:05)
Yeah, I'm not sure if I answered your question [crosstalk 00:26:09]-

Brett Messing: (26:08)
[crosstalk 00:26:08] I guess I bring a market perspective to it and when a trade seems to easy it usually ends. The easy trade right now is, okay, I'm going to buy Bitcoin at every halving and I'm going to sell it somewhere between 14 and 18 months thereafter and I'm just going to keep doing that, right? Every couple years I'll put a trade on. I might even short it two years out and whenever something looks that simple it ends up blowing people up. So, I'm just imagining and maybe it's not this cycle, a bunch of people seeling, right, anticipating that. Okay, I got it. My time, the stock-to-flow, everything's telling me it's the peak and then it just goes and it laughs at everybody. You know what I mean?

Vijay Boyapati: (26:51)
Yeah, if I was to think that the model would blow up I'd almost believe it would blow up in the other direction in that the crash doesn't happen and it just slowly, steadily continues to go up. The reason I think that is that the number of people who have become diehard Bitcoiners, regardless of price, these are people who are saying, "I don't want to save in dollars. I just don't and I'm not going to." So, that is a constant flow of capital into Bitcoin.

Vijay Boyapati: (27:22)
So, you look at someone like Russell Okung in the NFL and he's really started a trend in the NFL, several players in the NFL now, I think that's also going to grow, who say, "I want my salary in Bitcoin." So, that financial energy's going to constantly move into Bitcoin. The question for me is, do we ever get to critical mass where we don't have these corrections and it just keeps going up because there's enough financial energy to keep pushing it up?

Vijay Boyapati: (27:48)
I think that's an open question. It might be the case that it doesn't follow past trends but at this point in time it is eerily similar, eerily similar to 2017 and if you were someone who was trying to make a prediction about the future you would say, "This is scary what's happening."

Vijay Boyapati: (28:11)
I was skeptical. I was honestly very skeptical that some of these models were true, skeptical of stock-to-flow, but I'm kind of watching the price movement and if anything, it's moving faster than the 2017 cycle, which shocks me. I thought at this scale Bitcoin would have to slow down a little bit and I think what I've learned is that although it's much bigger, the size of capital moving into Bitcoin is also commensurately much bigger as well.

Brett Messing: (28:40)
But I guess there's an offsetting challenge, right, which is people talk about how on the supply side, right, so we're presently at a place where there's only 900 Bitcoin are mined daily, right? So, at 50,000 to Bitcoin, that's $45 million that has to be accumulated just to keep the price constant, right? At 500,000, right now we're up to $450 million a day of new buying that has to just come in and I guess I wonder how that ... So, the supply, it's not completely constant, right, in terms of ...

Vijay Boyapati: (29:21)
Yeah, that's a good point. The miners are marginal producers. So, they have electricity costs that they need to pay off so when they mine Bitcoin they typically have to sell it very quickly to pay for their expenses but you now have a new dynamic where companies are raising funds on public markets to pay to buy Bitcoin at very low interest rates, which is astounding to me and I think there's one company, I've forgotten what it's called, which is a mining company doing this where they're raising funds in the public markets so that they don't need to sell the Bitcoin that they mine, that they can continue to hold them.

Vijay Boyapati: (30:01)
So, you could have this double effect where not only are people buying but new supply isn't coming on the market, not just the supply was reduced by the halving but miners are holding back and saying, "Look, I don't want to sell for a while because I think this is going to go up." If their expectations change and they're able to pay their costs, their electricity bills, they might become longer term holders too. Then you get a real supply shortage and then that's when things can go incredibly parabolic very quickly.

Brett Messing: (30:33)
So, we got to talk about energy, right, because I think there's been a bunch of nonsense out there. Tether was nonsense and today there was a settlement with a New York attorney general and so I think that issue and use your time well and not dive into that. I think the concern about energy is going to be a real one and one that we're going to hear for a while. So, I guess I'd like your take on that, just generally.

Vijay Boyapati: (31:04)
Yeah, that was one issue I didn't cover in my article and as I discussed with you before we started, I'm turning my article into a book and this is one of the issues that I'm going to be discussing in the book because it is, like you say, it's a big issue. It's a big political issue. It's an issue where certainly one side of the political spectrum is very concerned about it and if that makes them antagonistic towards Bitcoin that is a cause for concern as an investor in Bitcoin.

Vijay Boyapati: (31:31)
What I would say is that firstly you need to compare Bitcoin, if it becomes global money, to the energy footprint of it's competitors and you need to look at gold, how much energy is. If Bitcoin completely disrupts gold, how much energy is going to be saved that way? Gold mining not only consumes a massive amount of energy but it's very, very destructive to the environment, unlike Bitcoin mining.

Vijay Boyapati: (31:59)
Bitcoin mining happens in data centers and typically it happens in places which are using green energy or areas where there's been a massive overbuild and is over capacity of energy.

Vijay Boyapati: (32:13)
So, I'll give you an example. Sichuan in China is a region where they had massively overbuilt, had built hydroelectric dams and there just weren't enough people there. So, that energy was essentially being thrown away. It couldn't be used because energy is not fungible unless in the form of a barrel of oil. Energy that you create in Sichuan can't be transported to Texas, it just can't happen.

Vijay Boyapati: (32:41)
So, that energy gets thrown away. So, Bitcoin is actually a great technology in a sense that it can rescue stranded energy. That's energy that's in places where it's hard to transport or get out or to use in other forms. Really where you see Bitcoin mining happening is in places where they've overbuilt and they're like, how do we use this excess capacity? Or where they may have volatility in demand.

Vijay Boyapati: (33:10)
So, in the United States there's a city called Wenatchee which is quite close to me where a number of large companies like Facebook and Google have their data centers but their usage is very bursty. They'll have a lot of traffic at one point in the day but maybe not in the other parts of the day and they have to sign contracts for a certain amount of energy and say, "We need this amount of energy, peak energy in case our demand, our servers need that much energy at a particular point in time."

Vijay Boyapati: (33:43)
When their servers don't need that much energy that energy is thrown away. So, it's really great in places like that where Bitcoin miners can set up and say, "Look, we'll take all of the excess energy that you're not using at any point in time and we'll pay for it." It is great for these energy providers to be able to sell to Bitcoin miners. It really flattens their demand. It's not so bursty.

Vijay Boyapati: (34:05)
So, Bitcoin mining has, I think, a positive effect on the energy market because it can unlock stranded energy and it can make energy consumption much more reliable for energy providers when they're thinking about investing in building out things like dams.

Brett Messing: (34:25)
I just saw a report that I think it's miners energy usage is 40% renewables. It seems to me that once we get that, right, over 50% and moving higher, will probably be the best way to address this issue, right? Who cares how much hydro or solar you're using.

Vijay Boyapati: (34:45)
Yeah, yeah, exactly and part of the problem is not just Bitcoin specific. It's just a global issue of how do we move people onto sources of energy that don't destroy the environment. It becomes the case that renewable energy is cheaper than the alternatives. That's where Bitcoin mining is going to go.

Brett Messing: (35:08)
So, I have one more question before I throw it to John who I know is chomping at the bit having read your essay again last night. At the Microstrategy conference when Ross Stevens and Michael kicked it off, Ross talked about Bitcoin the network and he specifically spoke about a company called Strike and there's a company I guess called Bottlepay in the UK and it's doing somewhat substantially similar. I'll, in a bad way, just summarize my understanding of what they claim to be able to do.

Brett Messing: (35:40)
Again, coming from LA, the idea of remittances in that market very much strikes home to me. But my understanding is that they'll be able to use the Bitcoin technology where they'll take a dollar, turn it into Bitcoin, essentially zap it to Mexico, it'll then get converted to a Mexican peso at virtually no cost almost instantaneously.

Brett Messing: (36:04)
What would that mean for Bitcoin? Could they actually do that? It sounds like Jetsons kind of stuff but it's super exciting if they can.

Vijay Boyapati: (36:15)
Yeah, so this is all technology that's built with the lightning network and the lightning network, it's like a financial layer built on top of the Bitcoin network. The Bitcoin network is the base layer, it's the settlement network and what it's really for, what it's purpose is for large scale settlement.

Vijay Boyapati: (36:34)
Now people were a bit confused about this in the early days because there weren't many users of Bitcoin and it looked like transaction fees on the base network were very low and it could be like a payment network or a credit card network but it's become very clear that that's not what Bitcoin is for. It's for settlement. It's the equivalent to gold in the 19th century. It's a means of settling between large institutions.

Vijay Boyapati: (36:59)
We'll see that more and more over time but it's still unclear to someone. The payment stuff is going to happen on the higher level, which is the lightning network, which allows people to transact without the cost of transacting on the blockchain, which is becoming more and more expensive. So, you can send payments between people near instantly at almost zero cost on the lightning network.

Vijay Boyapati: (37:23)
It doesn't have quite the trust assurances that you get on the blockchain but for small payments that doesn't matter. You don't need the same kind of level of assurance that your payment has settled when you're buying a coffee, right? You don't need that that you might need if you're a bank settling with another bank and trying to settle a billion dollars.

Vijay Boyapati: (37:45)
So, what you're saying is certainly possible and people are working on it. I think there's a great potential in this and certainly great potential for the remittance market. It's possible. The lightning network is still fairly new and I would say it's not in it's complete final form. It's technically ... It still has some holes in it. So, I think there's a lot of people working on it and it's going to be developed and we're going to see this kind of thing in the future. So, I'm optimistic about what you were saying.

Brett Messing: (38:21)
I imagine it's good for Bitcoin both in terms of it's utility but also again it's social proof, right, just in terms of everyone being aware of what Bitcoin can do for the greater good and therefore, why you should be more comfortable investing in it.

Vijay Boyapati: (38:38)
Absolutely, and it also allows people to own much smaller quantities of Bitcoin and be able to transfer them economically. If you only own five or six dollars of Bitcoin it's not really very economical to be able to transfer that on the blockchain because the fees are in the order of a couple of dollars sometimes. That's incredibly cheap if you're settling an account for $10 million or $100 million. That's a bargain especially because you can do it with a very high level of assurance very quickly but for people who want to make small transfers it's just no economic.

Vijay Boyapati: (39:14)
So, the lightning network is going to make these much smaller micro payments economic for the mass of people in countries like India and Africa and places like that.

Brett Messing: (39:24)
That's great. All right, John, you can have at him.

John Darsie: (39:26)
All right. Finally got my shot at glory here, Vijay. Again, I just want to compliment your piece, the Bullish Case for Bitcoin. If anybody watching this hasn't read it it's sort of a foundational piece in terms of understanding intellectually why Bitcoin could be valuable. You go through the same conversation and journey with everybody when they get introduced to Bitcoin.

John Darsie: (39:47)
Well, this is just funny money, it's made out of thin air. Why would it be worth anything when it's just this computer program and I try to explain. My parents have gone through this, my brothers have gone through this, who aren't in the business, intellectually about why it has value and I think, talking about the game theoretic nature of monetary goods and the Nash equilibrium within your paper. Could you just explain that? Going back to the fundamentals a little bit about why would Bitcoin, just this invention that was created 12 years ago by a pseudonymous inventor named Satoshi Nakamoto. Why would it have value going back to the history of money?

Vijay Boyapati: (40:23)
Yeah, so money is a very confusing subject for a lot of people because money is not valued in the same way that regular goods like stocks or real estate are valued. These goods are valued through cash flow, discounted cash flow analysis. How much dividends is a stock paying or how much rent are you getting from a piece of real estate and you discount that future cash flow into the present, discounted by the interest rate.

Vijay Boyapati: (40:53)
It's not valued like goods like oil or wheat, which are used in production of higher order goods like bread or oil is used for all sorts of things. Money is valuable because everyone else believes it's valuable and it's something that's called an intersubjective reality, which is, it only gets value because other people value it.

Vijay Boyapati: (41:19)
If we'd stop believing it has value then it loses it's value. So, there's this game going on at all times where people are trying to figure out which monetary good should I keep my savings in because there are a number of monetary goods out there. There's fiat, there's gold, there's now Bitcoin and you're in this constant kind of game where people are deciding, should I keep my savings in this one or should I keep my savings in this one and that's the game theoretic part. You're trying to standardize on a money because when I society standardizes on a single money that's tremendously valuable to all of society because money accounts as the foundation for all trade and savings.

Vijay Boyapati: (42:06)
So, the game theory is really people trying to anticipate what other people are going to do. So, when you are making a bet on Bitcoin you're really thinking, are other people also going to make that same bet? You're doing that really based on the attributes that make Bitcoin good as money and you say, "Well, I recognize these attributes are good and I think other people are going to recognize these attributes are good in the future." So, you jump in first in the hope that other people will jump in later on.

John Darsie: (42:40)
Right, and what are those attributes, just very quickly, that make Bitcoin such effective money relative to something like gold or fiat?

Vijay Boyapati: (42:48)
Yeah, so we've known about the attributes that make for good money since the time of Aristotle, so for thousands of years, as durability. So, wheat is not a good money because it decays over time. Portability, so cows are not a good money. They're hard to transport. Divisibility. So, can it be broken into smaller pieces to facilitate trade? Fungibility is another one. So, gold is better as money than diamonds because diamonds are irregular in shape and quality whereas gold, one piece of gold is equivalent to another piece of gold, another one is established history that the longer people have used something as money the more that people will trust that it's going to be valuable as money into the future.

Vijay Boyapati: (43:34)
I think probably the most important attribute of all for anything to be money is scarcity. You don't want to store your wealth in something that can be produced very easily or that's super abundant like sand. So, Bitcoin is superior to gold and fiat along all of the attributes that make for a good money except maybe establish history. Gold is the king of established history.

Vijay Boyapati: (44:01)
But in my mind, that advantage or that attribute is quickly diminishing for gold relative to Bitcoin because I think as people recognize Bitcoin is still around and is still working after a few decades they'll view it as a permanent institution of the world in the same way that people view the internet as a permanent institution of the world. So, that advantage of established history I think is going to be mostly gone in the next decade.

Vijay Boyapati: (44:35)
The other comment I just quickly want to make is that I think fiat money is good for transporting value through space because it can be digital and you can transmit value to another person digitally using PayPal or Venmo. Gold is good for transporting value through time and that's because gold can't be inflated and it can't be debased by governments.

Vijay Boyapati: (44:58)
Bitcoin is good at both. It's good at transporting value through space and time. So, I think it's superior to both gold and fiat money.

John Darsie: (45:07)
I want to dive into risks a little bit and you devote time in your paper to this and in your subsequent writings about what are the legitimate risks to Bitcoin versus some of the fallacious criticisms that it draws from people who either aren't invested and maybe have some FOMO and FUD in terms of missing out on the upside. But what in your view are the real legitimate long term potential risks to Bitcoin?

Vijay Boyapati: (45:33)
Yeah, that's a really important question. So, I think in the early days probably the biggest risk was protocol risk. Was the cryptography that Satoshi built Bitcoin on sound? Was the protocol he built sound? Really that was a test, an experiment that had to be done over many years.

Vijay Boyapati: (45:52)
If you go back and look at some of the early emails, the cryptographers who were first presented his whitepaper were very skeptical. They had been trying to work on decentralized money for over a decade and along comes this person that no one had heard about and said, "I've solved this problem."

Vijay Boyapati: (46:09)
But just over the years after thousands and thousands of very smart people have been trying to break Bitcoin, to hack it, to find some flaw in it we've come to understand that Bitcoin's protocol is rock solid.

Vijay Boyapati: (46:25)
In terms of real risks now I think and speaking with Brett about this, nation state attack to me is the last credible risk to Bitcoin. Are we going to see nation states wake up to the potential threat that Bitcoin poses to their monetary policy and what are they going to do about it? As we discussed, I think that's really a question of whether Bitcoin gets enough political capture, gets enough adoption that it becomes infeasible for nation states to attack Bitcoin and they have to come to terms with it and say, "Well, this is a [inaudible 00:47:02]. Bitcoin has now become a global store of value. What do we do? Do we add it to our reserves? Do we incorporate it in our monetary policy?"

Vijay Boyapati: (47:15)
So, that's an open question for me and I think it's a question that we're going to see answered over the next five to six years because the amount of savings that are going to flow into Bitcoin over the next five years is going to be stupendous. I think Bitcoin's going to overtake gold. It's going to overtake gold and I think it's going to have this geopolitical significance which will make nation states sit up and pay attention.

John Darsie: (47:40)
Right. I want to talk to you about Satoshi for a moment. Satoshi Nakamoto again is the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. Satoshi, to my knowledge, has never sold any Bitcoin that's attributed to him whether it's a him or her or a group of people but conceivably Satoshi is the wealthiest person on the planet if it's an individual that's walking among us.

John Darsie: (48:02)
What risk, in your eyes, do you see to Satoshi at some point in the future ripping off the mask and saying ... What you were talking about earlier is that you're basically buying Bitcoin with the expectation there's going to be greater adoption in the future and it's really a game theoretical sort of money. What is the risk that Satoshi was just running some type of scheme to enrich themselves and make themselves the wealthiest person on the planet and they flood the market with the Bitcoin that is attributed to him, her or that group?

Brett Messing: (48:32)
John, I want a shot at this one.

John Darsie: (48:34)
All right, you take it first, Brett.

Brett Messing: (48:35)
[crosstalk 00:48:35] I want Vijay goes first. He may say what I'm going to say [crosstalk 00:48:39]-

Vijay Boyapati: (48:41)
I'd love to hear what you have to say, Brett.

Vijay Boyapati: (48:44)
I'll give a quick answer. I think it's a tail risk. I think it's a very low probability event. Even if Satoshi were to reveal him or herself and say, "Look, I'm about to dump my Bitcoin on the market." It's a one time thing and it's a part of the process of monetization, the distribution of his coins. It's kind of like discovering gold in the new world. That caused inflation in Europe. That was a one time event but it didn't mean that gold suddenly disappeared from use as money. There was a period of inflation. I think the same thing would be true for Satoshi.

Vijay Boyapati: (49:18)
I think it's extremely unlikely. He has had, or she has had to financial incentive for a long time. Billions and billions of dollars. That would change the lifestyle of any person yet not a single one of those coins has moved. The other reason I think that Satoshi will never reveal themselves is this great physical risk to be known as the person who holds the most Bitcoin. You would need a huge staff of armed guards because Bitcoin has it's property that transactions are not reversible. So, if someone finds you and if you haven't really done a good job of your security they can do what's called a five dollar wrench attack where they say, "Give me all your Bitcoin or I'll take your fingers." If you have a million Bitcoin, it's a scary proposition.

Vijay Boyapati: (50:12)
This is why, honestly, a lot of large Bitcoin holders have custodied their Bitcoin with institutions rather than holding it themselves just for that fear.

John Darsie: (50:22)
Right.

Vijay Boyapati: (50:22)
So, Brett, I'd love to hear your answer.

Brett Messing: (50:24)
Same basic thing. I think the Bitcoin were destroyed when they were valueless and it was launched. Just what I know about human nature, I don't know any human being who could have the discipline to not touch it, setting aside buying a house or an airplane or a sports team. This was a noble mission. They could be solving poverty, solving the pandemic and they're sitting on all this money not doing anything when they could help so many people. It's inconceivable to me that this Bitcoin is accessible by a human being. Anything's possible but as you said, I would put very, very low odds on it.

Vijay Boyapati: (51:07)
Yeah, could I just quickly add to that point that Brett made? I think it was created as a noble pursuit because unlike a lot of these other cryptocurrencies, Satoshi announced it before he launched the network. He said anyone could mine it. In the early years he only mined it to keep the network going because there was only one or two computers on the network.

Vijay Boyapati: (51:29)
A lot of these new cryptocurrencies are what's called pre mined, like the people who create them will take a big chunk of the supply just to enrich themselves. It's very clear that that is not what has happened with Bitcoin. This is something that was created to benefit mankind and I agree with Brett. I think that the highest likelihood is that the keys to those coins were destroyed or perhaps Satoshi's dead. He's not alive anymore so I think it's an extreme tail risk that those coins come back online.

Brett Messing: (52:03)
How many coins do you think are missing? Let's assume the Satoshi's are gone. So, when we say 21 million. What's the real number of float, if you will, once we get them all mined?

Vijay Boyapati: (52:14)
Yeah, the best estimate I've seen is somewhere between three and five million are missing.

Brett Messing: (52:21)
That's a lot, right? You're turning 21 into 16 to 18.

Vijay Boyapati: (52:26)
Yeah, and of those 16 to 18 ... The great thing about Bitcoin is the blockchain is open and transparent and you can do all sorts of analysis on the flow of funds on the blockchain and you can look at Bitcoins that have stayed dormant for a long, long time. It actually gives you a sense of where the market's going. You can tell that you might be getting to a crescendo top when coins from three to five years ago start moving and people who've had Bitcoin for that long say, "It's time for me to cash out." You can look at that and see that on the blockchain.

Vijay Boyapati: (52:58)
What you'll see is that actually the set of coins that are trading on the market at any particular time is a very, very small fraction of the total supply. Most people who are into Bitcoin are in it for the long term so you don't see much movement of the total supply.

Brett Messing: (53:17)
Hmm. Thank you.

John Darsie: (53:17)
Well, I'm going to save the rest of my questions and demand that Vijay comes back for a second episode. We've had multiple episodes with the great Michael Saylor, given there was so much to talk to him about related to his decision of Microstrategy to invest what is now four plus billion dollars into Bitcoin.

John Darsie: (53:36)
So, we're very thankful for your time, Vijay. Thank you for joining us and we hope to have you back and we'll dive even deeper. Maybe after your book comes out. We'll distribute the book to our SALT community and have you back on to dive even deeper into some of the themes that you cover there.

Vijay Boyapati: (53:51)
Yeah, I'd love that. Thanks, John and thanks, Brett. It was a pleasure for me to speak to you guys. Like I said, I'm really excited that you guys are getting into Bitcoin and spreading the word and doing what you're doing with your fund.

Brett Messing: (54:03)
Thanks so much. Thanks for joining us, Vijay. This was great.

Vijay Boyapati: (54:06)
Thanks guys.

John Darsie: (54:07)
Yup. Thank you everyone who tuned in to today's SALT Talk with Vijay Boyapati, the author of the Bullish Case for Bitcoin, which again is one of the seminal writings in Bitcoin in terms of understanding intellectually why Bitcoin has value and the price cycles that it's currently undergoing over the last several years.

John Darsie: (54:27)
Just a reminder, if you missed any part of this talk or any of our previous talks you can access our entire archive of SALT Talks at salt.org/talks. You can access them all on our YouTube channel as well which is called SALT Tube. Those are all free to access for everyone.

John Darsie: (54:43)
We're also on social media. Please follow us there. We're most active on Twitter @saltconference but we're also on LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook.

John Darsie: (54:51)
Please spread the word about these SALT Talks. Again, the digital asset space is an area that we've been doing research on for several years and we're excited to bring the leading voices in that space to you via our SALT Talk series so definitely if you're interested in learning more go to our YouTube channel and watch all episodes of our digital asset series including the aforementioned episodes with Michael Saylor, which were both tremendous conversations about his decision at Microstrategy to invest their corporate treasury assets into Bitcoin.

John Darsie: (55:18)
But on behalf of Brett and the entire SALT team, this is John Darsie signing off from SALT Talks for today. We hope to see you back here soon.

Jalak Jobanputra: The Rise of Venture Capital in Crypto | SALT Talks #166

“When I went to my first Bitcoin conference, I got goosebumps the way I did when I first logged onto the Internet.”

Jalak Jobanputra is the founding partner of Future Perfect Ventures, an early-stage venture capital fund focused on decentralized technology with an emphasis on blockchain tech and crypto assets.

Bitcoin, crypto assets and decentralized technology mark a revolution akin to the Internet. The use of computer networks on the blockchain created greater financial access for communities around the world. Unbanked or under-banked communities like many Kenya can now store and exchange money, through Bitcoin or other crypto assets, across the globe instantaneously without a central intermediary. The restrictions inherent in centrally-controlled fiat currency leave millions without access to financial systems. “In Africa, we have so many unbanked or under-banked people. Just like they never had landline phones, they’re never going to have a banking relationship like we do.”

Bitcoin and other crypto assets have recently seen a surge in adoption from hedge funds and corporation mangers who see this revolutionary decentralized technology as a hedge against inflation. Stimulus and money-printing brought on by the pandemic has accelerated this adoption and seen Bitcoin’s value skyrocket. The Internet-native generation will ensure Bitcoin and crypto assets’ inevitable mainstream integration as these digitally fluent groups discover greater financial independence.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Jalak Jobanputra.jpeg

Jalak Jobanputra

Founding Partner

Future\Perfect Ventures

MODERATOR

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:07)
Hello everyone, and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the managing director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology, and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series that we launched in 2020 with leading investors, creators, and thinkers. Our goal on these SALT Talks, the same as our goal at our SALT conferences, which our guest, we had the pleasure of hosting at our SALT Abu Dhabi conference in 2019, but our goal is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future.

John Darsie: (00:47)
We're very excited today to welcome to the latest episode of our digital asset series with someone who is a pioneer in the space before, quote, it was cool. Her name is Jalak Jobanputra, and I'm going to read a little bit more about her bio before we welcome her onto the camera. Jalak is the founding partner of Future Perfect Ventures, which is an early stage venture capital fund focused on decentralized technology with a focus on blockchain, tech, and crypto assets. FPV was the first venture fund worldwide formed with a thesis on decentralization, and the portfolio includes companies like Abra, Blockstream, BitPesa, The Graph, Everledger, and Blockchain.

John Darsie: (01:30)
In 2017, Jalak was cited as a top five investor powering the blockchain boom, and Crunchbase noted that FPV was one of the top VC funds in blockchain, as I mentioned before, quote, before it was cool. In May of 2018, Jalak was awarded Microsoft's VC Trailblazer Award for her early and bold investments into the sector. She has also been awarded among institutional investor's most powerful fintech deal-makers for the past three years with prior exits, including Ariba which was sold to SAP; Yodlee, which IPO'd; TxVia, which was sold to Google; Viacore, which was sold to IBM; and Schoolnet, which was sold to Pearson.

John Darsie: (02:17)
Previously Jalak was the director of emerging market mobile investments at the Omidyar Network, which was a fund launched by Pierre Omidyar, the co-founder of eBay. Previous to that, she served in a number of different roles related to software and fintech. She graduated magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania with a bachelor's in economics with a concentration in finance from the Wharton School of Business and a BA in communications from the Annenberg School at UPenn. She also received her MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University outside of Chicago.

John Darsie: (02:52)
Jalak, welcome to SALT Talks [inaudible 00:02:54] we're able to get to know you. You've obviously been very early to the digital asset space, so congratulations on that. But where we like to start every one of these talks is a little bit in your own words about your personal background. Obviously I read a lot of your bio there, but something that wasn't in your bio about your personal background and how you got to where you are today. And also, what was your a-ha or eureka moment as it relates to digital assets and Bitcoin? That's something we like to ask everybody. Everybody goes on a journey from skeptic to believer. So, as part of a brief introduction about your personal background, can you describe how you found digital assets and how you became such a ardent believer in the space?

Jalak Jobanputra: (03:33)
Yes. Well, it's great to be here. Thanks for having me. My personal background is very much related to why I got into Bitcoin and crypto back in 2013. I was born in Nairobi and came to the US when I was young and grew up going back to Africa and India. I'm of Indian origin. And this was in the 1980s when these countries were not as developed as they are now. There was really no connectivity. You actually had to wait for a phone line outside to be able to call outside of the village or even the city.

Jalak Jobanputra: (04:15)
So, that was really very much on my mind as I started my career and I started off on Wall Street doing tech telecom on media investment banking in the mid '90s. Was very fascinated by this new thing called the internet in 1995 when I saw the Netscape IPO happen. And I started thinking back to those childhood memories of that connectivity that the internet could enable and since then has certainly enabled, and we now have six billion mobile phones around the world. A lot of these countries all around Africa, India, Asia, Southeast Asia, Latina America have leapfrogged. They never went to the telephone lines; they went straight to mobile. And then Kenya, where I was born, was kind of ground zero for mobile money and E-Mpesa.

Jalak Jobanputra: (05:11)
So, when I decided to start my venture fund in 2013, as part of my exploration, I was thinking about what was next. Yes, we saw the internet. We saw mobile, cloud computing, all of these kind of infrastructure investments and connectivity. And I felt like we were primed for a next wave of technology evolution and revolution that was going to take advantage of that connectivity but create new business models. I was thinking of artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, these sensors that now cost cents and microprocessors that now enable our smartphones to have more processing power than NASA had when we put a man on the moon. I was at Intel Capital in the late '90s out in Silicon Valley. So, very familiar with Moore's law and semiconductor industry and how we were going to be able to do a lot of things that were not previously possible when we didn't have these vast processors.

Jalak Jobanputra: (06:18)
So, Bitcoin was on my list of exploration, and when I went to my first Bitcoin conference I just got goosebumps the way I did when I first logged into the internet in 1994. I really became fascinated by this idea of being able to use this network of computers, this connectivity that I just described, to enable transactions instantaneously across boarders and with no intermediaries. So, just thinking about going back to Africa where we have so many unbanked, under-banked people. Just like they never had landline phones, they're never going to have a banking relationship the way we do in the United States or people do in Europe.

Jalak Jobanputra: (07:13)
And I felt like Bitcoin was the first real technology that I had seen that enabled people to transact with each other with no central intermediary that was taking out fees. It's really those fees and the cost of infrastructure build-out that has kept a lot of companies and banks from actually serving these populations. So, I was instantly sold. I was instantly sold on Bitcoin. I instantly bought some Bitcoin and-

John Darsie: (07:53)
Why didn't you call me?

Jalak Jobanputra: (07:53)
... made the underlying blockchain technology the underlying thesis of Future Perfect Ventures when I launched it the next year.

John Darsie: (08:03)
Right. No, that's fascinating. And I want to keep going down the Bitcoin rabbit hole before we talk about this broader decentralization movement. So, you wrote a piece. It was published in Recode. It was first published on your blog in 2017. It's pinned to the top of your Twitter profile. Bitcoin at that time was at $10,000 per coin. You talked about how it was going to revolutionize money. You talked a little bit about the outline of that thesis, but could you go through that thesis again, about why you think it's revolutionizing money? And did you expect the story in terms of price appreciation of Bitcoin to play out this quickly, or how has the last three years played out relative to your expectations?

Jalak Jobanputra: (08:45)
Yeah. It has happened very quickly, and I think the excitement and the fact that this is opensource code where anybody, anywhere in the world can build upon this underlying technology is what's helped make it move so quickly, in terms of the underlying technology. Then certainly from a financial perspective and a store of value narrative, we've seen so many macro events that have led to some of the recent price appreciation we've seen where it's now over $50,000.

Jalak Jobanputra: (09:21)
So, in some ways, it has happened very quickly. In other ways, a lot of people who haven't been in this sector for a while don't realize that back in 2014 to 2016 it didn't really do much. And then we had the big run up in 2017 and a big crash right after that. The sector was pretty much forgotten by I'd say folks who were looking at it from a macro standpoint or some of the retail investors, but slowly the building continued to happen by the entrepreneurs and the technologists, the people who were sold on this idea of this borderless system of transactions.

Jalak Jobanputra: (10:08)
Now, this goes back to that thesis of revolutionizing money. If you look at money, it's a transaction mechanism, and the history of money goes through barter and objects and gold, and just fiat as we know it hasn't really existed that long. If you take a step back and think about money that way and you think about the fact that we're still transacting with these pieces of paper that cost more to produce or these coins that cost more to produce than their actual face value, and they're getting devalued by monetary policy and government controls and politics, the idea that computers and a network of computers can provide the next generation of money to us or that ability to transact is really kind of a no-brainer in my mind.

John Darsie: (11:12)
Right.

Jalak Jobanputra: (11:13)
And that's why I think its appealed to internet natives, the generation that doesn't understand why we can't go to a bank 24/7, why we can't transact over the weekends through our banks. I mean, it's silly how we have so much stuff on-demand, but our monetary system is not. And they certainly lived through 2008 and saw how much the banks actually control the money that we work really hard for.

Jalak Jobanputra: (11:49)
And those in emerging markets and where I'm from, it's also I'd say been a no-brainer for longer than a lot of folks in the United States have come along with this concept, because they are used to governments that will put controls on how much money they can move out of the country. We saw that with China. That's why China was an early adopter of the technology. India, demonetization a few years ago, where the government basically said certain bank notes were deemed illegal tender, and the price of Bitcoin at that time went much higher in India than it was in the rest of the world, and we're seeing that happen in Nigeria today when the government of Nigeria recently reiterated that they did not support cryptocurrency.

John Darsie: (12:43)
Right.

Jalak Jobanputra: (12:45)
So, what we've seen around the world is ... And going back to the connectivity I mentioned, now that the world is connected, people can see what's happening in the rest of the world. The genie can't go back in the bottle. And that's why we're seeing exponential growth in the sector. So, we're seeing it now from the institutional level, which is fairly new. So, I'd say the developed world institutions have really kind of caught onto this concept only in the last 6 to 12 months. But we've slowly seen this grassroots support of Bitcoin for many years, and that's been building over time.

John Darsie: (13:29)
Right. So, you referenced that 2017 rally that took Bitcoin up to almost $20,000 per coin, but then we saw it fall back to around 3,000 and change. I think obviously there was a lot of public interest in Bitcoin at the time that receded, and people sort of wrote it off as a pump-and-dump scheme or some type of Ponzi scheme, given that extreme volatility that we saw.

John Darsie: (13:54)
We're now seeing Bitcoin ramp in an even more extreme, rapid way in 2020 and 2021. Why is this rally potentially different than the rally then we saw in 2017? Do you think realized volatility will continue to fall, which it has been lower actually during this rally that it has been over previous cycles in its history? So, do you expect volatility to fall? Do you expect people to have to just weather that volatility? Or, why is it different this time around?

Jalak Jobanputra: (14:24)
Yeah, I think it's night and day, the 2017 rally and what we've seen in 2020 and 2021. And I view it very similar to what we saw in 1999 with the internet. I was out in the Valley, as I said, investing for Intel Capital, and I was in the belly of the beast when we were seeing companies going public on very little, just frenzy around any company that had a dot com next to it. And we saw that in 2017 with the initial coin offerings. Ethereum went public that year. They issued their token, and there was a huge run-up. So, everybody was looking for the next Ethereum.

Jalak Jobanputra: (15:14)
Companies, teams, existent or not, were putting up websites and collecting money from investors that were hoping to get into the next Ethereum or Bitcoin. So, that was very similar to companies just adding dot com. There were a number of companies that just added blockchain to their name, and they had the same experience. History does rhyme, and we saw that in 2017. Then there's the inevitable crash, because most of these companies really had no there there. There wasn't really anything behind what they were doing.

Jalak Jobanputra: (15:56)
And any company like Ethereum, it takes time to build technology that's going to scale, that's going to be adopted. So, with Bitcoin, we've seen increasing scalability, number of transactions. As more people come onto the network, it becomes more stable, more decentralized. So, we've seen that progression, but there was still a lot of questions back then on not only the underlying technology but then all this confusion around these kind of new companies that didn't really have any technology.

Jalak Jobanputra: (16:38)
Then the inevitable crash happened. Some speculators made a lot of money and they disappeared, and then the real builders stayed. What I've seen as an early stage investor, a lot of entrepreneurs that I invested in 10, 20 years ago started becoming really fascinated by the concept of decentralization and what it could mean, and they started getting into this space. And to me, that is the biggest leading indicator of whether any new technology has staying power too, can that technology attract beyond just the early adopters. So, we've seen that happen in a big way over the last three years.

Jalak Jobanputra: (17:22)
Then what's happened on a macro level, we've seen all the stimulus in the era of COVID, concerns about future inflation, government policies, kind of all the reasons that Bitcoin appealed to so many in those emerging markets. We've now seen a lot of hedge fund managers, corporations really looking for a hedge against inflation as well as a search for yield. So, we're going to continue to see that, because I don't see that macro environment really changing.

John Darsie: (18:02)
How much of your bull case right now for Bitcoin is just that the technology is so compelling that its rise was inevitable, and how much of it is based on that macro backdrop that you talked about? Is the macro backdrop with all the money-printing and the growth of the money supply just accelerating what was an inevitable rise of decentralized technology and blockchains, or how do you look at that puzzle?

Jalak Jobanputra: (18:28)
Yeah. I feel like a lot has been turbocharged as far as looking at technology and our thesis. If you look at Bitcoin from a store of value, as an investible asset, that narrative has certainly been given a boost by what we've seen on the macro environment. Bitcoin was really created as an exchange of value or to be an exchange of value. That has morphed into more of a store of value. Now that doesn't mean that it can't eventually be used as an exchange of value or that there's certain regions in the world or certain populations around the world that won't use it that way. We're certainly investing in solutions that can enable that.

Jalak Jobanputra: (19:20)
But I think, if you just look at it as it's come into its own, as the store of value this year ... Now, I was holding it well before this happened, because I believe that it was going to have value in some form or another. The problem with a lot of entrepreneurs sometimes is they have a vision of the world, and, I mean, that's not necessarily a problem. That's what helps them create the technology. But then they become these maximalists who believe that is the only way that technology can be used. And my belief as an investor is that you have to put the technology out there, and then you have to take feedback and see how people use it.

Jalak Jobanputra: (20:10)
I first encountered that when I spent time in Africa amongst women. I spent a summer before I joined Intel after business school training women entrepreneurs in rural areas all over Tanzania. I lived in Dar es Salaam. And this is pre-internet. They had mobile phones, but they didn't have internet connectivity through their mobile phones. It was fascinating what they would use those phones for, and I can guarantee no one in the US was thinking of the usage the same way, and we've seen that with WhatsApp and a number of other applications that took hold in some of these markets. So, I just believe that-

John Darsie: (20:56)
Yeah, what a perfect storm.

Jalak Jobanputra: (21:00)
... you can't create a technology and then dictate how people use it. So, this year has been fascinating to see what Bitcoin has become to most of the world. But I believe that the technology was strong, and the whole idea of crypto economics, which is to me just part of the genius behind the Bitcoin blockchain or blockchain technology and crypto assets in general, and that's what really allows verification of transactions without intermediaries, is the fact that the system is incentivized to stay honest and to keep creating value. It's in some ways so simple, but it's technically very complex. But I felt like this was going to be used in some form or another, and so I've been a holder since 2013 and believe it going to continue to [crosstalk 00:21:58]

John Darsie: (21:58)
HODL-er, HODL-er.

Jalak Jobanputra: (21:59)
Yes. I didn't want to go too into stuff like that.

John Darsie: (22:02)
Didn't get into the [inaudible 00:22:02] But you talked about how the genie is sort of out of the bottle. You still see some countries make noise about potentially Bitcoin. Like you mentioned, people that grew up in countries that have hyperinflation, whether it be Argentina or countries in Africa that experienced these bouts of hyperinflation, the story resonates with them in a very real way. But how likely do you think it is that someone like India, who is talking about it now, the potential for banning Bitcoin, how likely do you think it is that they do ban Bitcoin?

John Darsie: (22:35)
Is Bitcoin bannable? Let's say the United States and India and China and Germany decide that, you know what, we're printing all this money, we're creating this hyperinflationary environment. We can't allow something like Bitcoin to be out there. We're going to ban Bitcoin from existing. We're going to prevent at least people in our country from owning Bitcoin, make it illegal. Is Bitcoin bannable? What would that look like if countries went out there and tried to ban it, or is it past the point of no return now where it's going to find a place to live?

Jalak Jobanputra: (23:07)
Well, we've seen this happen over the years. China did this in 2017, I believe. I don't remember the exact year. People continued to access these networks through VPNs. If you actually were in China, you realized that there was a lot of mining happening. So, the reality on the ground was very different than the narrative.

Jalak Jobanputra: (23:30)
India effectively did that. We are an investor in a company called Unocoin, which was the first crypto exchange in India. We invested in the company in early 2017, and later that year India basically banned any banks from banking crypto-related companies. People became really concerned, the average population, the retail investors, and effectively almost shut down the crypto market in India. But what happens behind the scenes is the entrepreneurs, the people who care deeply about the ethos of monetary sovereignty and see that happen, they continue to build. Unocoin led a Supreme Court challenge, which overturned that ban last ... Or, it was actually earlier, early 2020. I've lost track of time.

John Darsie: (24:35)
Yeah, time is like a flat circle at this point.

Jalak Jobanputra: (24:38)
And the market's grown significantly since then. Now India is once again saying that they're going to or threatening to ban. Now my theory on all of this is a lot of these countries want to figure out what their central bank digital currencies are going to look like, because they are threatened by an alternative to their central bank currency, and they want to figure out a system where they can offer digital versions of their currency and then figure out how something like Bitcoin or independent cryptos would fit into that system.

John Darsie: (25:17)
How would they fit into that system? We ask that frequently on these talks about, in a world where there's US dollar built on the blockchain, there's a yuan, there's a ... Currencies around the world have their own central bank digital currencies. How does Bitcoin fit into that? Is it a threat? Is it accretive to Bitcoin? How does it live in that world?

Jalak Jobanputra: (25:38)
Well, I personally believe it's accretive to Bitcoin. I have this investment thesis that I've always had, is that no income bank is safe. So, you look at Blockbuster back in the day who said that no one was going to actually watch movies through the internet. It just wasn't going to happen. Either from a technical or a user perspective, they wouldn't do that. So, central banks I believe haven't thought that there was any threat to their power, and Bitcoin and then companies like Facebook saying that they're going to issue their own digital currency kind of changed the central bank perspective on that.

Jalak Jobanputra: (26:28)
So, again, going back to once people feel like they've had exposure to something and it's taken away from them, they are hyper-aware of that. If they never had exposure, then they don't know what they're missing. But we've now gotten to the point where most populations around the world have had some exposure, have heard about this, and have also seen their own governments, how they're acting versus other ... We've seen it here in the US in the last few months. So, I believe that central banks are going to have to have policies that take into account that there are competitors to their fiat currencies and offer value back.

Jalak Jobanputra: (27:13)
Now, there's always a threat that they can try to shut off access. I think one of the biggest threats is taxation and how they tax cryptos. So, those are very real threats, but I think we also, and governments, need to also be aware that people have power. And we look at GameStop and what just happened, and it may all seem unrelated, but I think that shows that the grassroots movement, retail investors, people in the ground that now have access to more information than ever will rise up if they feel threatened, and especially if they feel that their hard-earned money and livelihood is at stake.

John Darsie: (28:01)
All right. So, I want you to pretend like you're the PR representative for Satoshi Nakamoto, and you're going to talk to the Indian government. You live in Miami. You actually [inaudible 00:28:11] investors and entrepreneurs that have moved to Miami. But the mayor of Miami, Francis Suarez, has been very proactive in pulling people from Silicon Valley by being very pro-business, pro-tech, and most recently pro-Bitcoin and trying to create a regulatory framework and an environment that's conducive to iterating in terms of blockchain and Bitcoin.

John Darsie: (28:34)
So, if you were to talk to the government of India and you said, "You know what? Rather than banning Bitcoin, how about you embrace Bitcoin and you create an ecosystem that's conducive to innovation within the block chain space?" Why would that be such a powerful thing for a country to go all in on Bitcoin? There's been some prominent voices in the VC community who have written about this, but I think it's an interesting topic and would love your perspective on it.

Jalak Jobanputra: (28:58)
Well, I think it's a proxy for innovation in general, and if you look at countries like India, Kenya ... And let me just tell a little story about Kenya and my interaction with the central bank governor of Kenya. I'm an investor in a company called Bitpesa. I was one of their founding investors in 2014. They're now called Aza. They're the first company to look at using the Bitcoin blockchain as a back end for financial transactions, both at the institutional and retail level, both within the continent of Africa and then across continents.

Jalak Jobanputra: (29:42)
And the idea there was right now the banking system, the correspondent banking system, requires many, many different banks to get involved, which add fees and layers of fees where a transaction from Kenya to the Ivory Coast can cost up to 20% of the transaction, which even for institutions is something that they don't want to do. So, being able to just reduce that to one transaction in and out of a Bitcoin or any other crypto and provide that liquidity and do it in an instantaneous way with lower fees, they've seen tremendous growth over especially the last year.

Jalak Jobanputra: (30:24)
I once asked the central bank governor out there, "Why are you so threatened by Bitpesa?" Because they were. They tried to shut it down initially. Now they're working with the company, as are many other countries within Africa, but they ... He had a point, where he said, "We're just being accepted into the global monetary system, and we can't afford any missteps. We're being watched by everybody." And it provided perspective. For all of these emerging markets, they need to make sure that their monetary policy is sound, but I think this is an opportunity for especially India to take the lead and also, along those lines, not only take the lead but leapfrog. I've been-

John Darsie: (31:25)
You've been banging that drum?

Jalak Jobanputra: (31:27)
I'm sorry?

John Darsie: (31:29)
You've been banging that drum?

Jalak Jobanputra: (31:30)
Yes. Yes. I've been a big India bull for ... I mean, I started investing in India in 1999 when I was at Intel. One of my companies there IPO'd. India's certainly been through many challenges. It can be very bureaucratic. Some of the policies just don't make sense. But I think, given what we're seeing right now with China and COVID and some of the supply chain disruptions we saw by reliance on just one country and one region, India's really had an opportunity and stepped up to that opportunity on the supply chain side. A lot more businesses, including Apple is now doing more manufacturing there.

Jalak Jobanputra: (32:17)
And I think we can move that to then looking at money and then looking at fintech and taking a leadership role, and India has an opportunity to do that. Now that doesn't mean they don't issue their digital rupee, but they could be a model of how the rupee can interact with a currency that is independent of any other controls or reliance on the dollar. And I'm a US citizen. I'm an immigrant. I'm a big fan of the US. It's been great to me. But I also think that dependence on any one country, and we've seen this, is not a good thing. That's why we're investing in decentralization.

Jalak Jobanputra: (33:07)
The whole concept of Bitcoin and blockchain tech is no single point of failure. So, India has an opportunity to not only further their own goals of being a major player, and I believe they already are, but maybe the foremost player on the world's stage by really looking at the intersection of a digital currency as well as decentralized currency, and there's an incredible amount of talent there. It's a very entrepreneurial country. So, I think it has all the makings and ability to do this.

Jalak Jobanputra: (33:46)
Another point is that they were the first country to have a digital identity system. When I was at Omidyar, I worked on this project with the Indian government. And a lot of people thought there is no way that you're going to be able to get people in rural areas, farmers, people who weren't literate to actually buy into this system of this digital identity. But once these people saw that they were able to get their government subsidies, payments through this digital system, they all signed up, and it actually ended up being very efficient. Almost the whole country is now on this digital identity system. So, that's another infrastructure layer that can underpin a blended monetary system.

John Darsie: (34:46)
Let's talk more about that. It was actually my next question, because I think it's a fascinating topic, especially in the midst of a global pandemic, especially in the midst of a vaccine rollout where we're trying to track who's vaccinated, who's not vaccinated, who is at risk, who's eligible for the vaccine. A digital identity network would obviously solve a lot of those issues and make it much more organized. Where are we in the United States around that idea of digital identity? We had an Israeli entrepreneur and doctor on SALT Talks recently talking about how they have a digital identity system in Israel and it's been very helpful for vaccine rollout, and they've rolled out the vaccine very effectively.

John Darsie: (35:26)
But let's think very futuristically here. If the United States did roll out a digital identity system, every child that's born gets cataloged in this system, they're tracking different elements of your life, your finances, what could the world look like if we had a truly robust digital identity system?

Jalak Jobanputra: (35:45)
I think there's tremendous potential obviously if that were to happen. The challenge is the privacy implications around that. And the United States is a place where you can't track people the same way you can in a place like Singapore or Israel.

John Darsie: (36:04)
Right.

Jalak Jobanputra: (36:05)
If you look at COVID response, Taiwan, basically your phone could be tracked and, if you didn't answer your phone or if they thought you left your home, you would have the police come to your place. So, I think there are certainly privacy implications around identity systems, and in some ways we're beyond that point, but in other ways, if you start pushing it too much, people are [crosstalk 00:36:37]

John Darsie: (36:36)
Right. Yeah. People think they're not being tracked in the United States when they probably are and they just realize it yet.

Jalak Jobanputra: (36:43)
They are. I mean, they are, but they aren't in the same overt way. Otherwise, our response in COVID would have been very, very different.

Jalak Jobanputra: (36:53)
Now where I think blockchain technology and technology in general really could play a role here is the concept of things like homomorphic encryption of zero-knowledge proofs. To kind of put it in layman's terms, these are technologies that allow you to create identifiers without revealing the underlying information.

John Darsie: (37:17)
It's encrypted in some way.

Jalak Jobanputra: (37:18)
Yeah. Yeah. And we're investors in a number of early stage companies working on these technologies, and that's where you can still preserve some of the procedure, or you can decide you want to give up some of that privacy maybe in return for certain services, that "if I was able to get the vaccine sooner, I may be willing to give up my date of birth and my address, which otherwise I wouldn't have to give up." So, I think there are ways, and I've been really fascinated by this topic of data and data availability and data privacy, and the technology is now allowing for more granularity here in how we divide up data. There's been no pressure for companies like Google and Facebook to adopt any of these, but we are now seeing a big pushback around the business models, around data collection.

Jalak Jobanputra: (38:20)
One of the reasons I got really interested in decentralization was this whole idea of I could actually own my data, hold it in a wallet, and then permission it out whichever way I want to, and it's not that different, say, than Bitcoin where I hold a private key to my Bitcoin, I can release it when it gets matched with a public key. And you can do that. You can look at a Bitcoin as just any piece of data, and you can do it with your health care data, you can do it with your credentialing. So, it's kind of mind-blowing all the business models that can emerge from this underlying technology, and I think identity is a big piece of it. The challenge is, when you start to cross borders, there are different policies around data, and how do you reconcile that, and I do believe technology will allow us to do that soon.

John Darsie: (39:19)
Yeah. In some ways, you could view the aggregation of data as being sort of Big Brother, but in a lot of ways it empowers the individual to own their own data. So, Facebook or Google, their product is built on top of our data. The market cap of those companies is based on the fact that our data is extremely valuable. So, why should we not be empowered to decide how that data is used and be able to monetize it? It's a fascinating topic. Maybe the company you're invested in ... I have a friend who started a similar company. I don't know if it's the same one or not, but we can sync up offline about that.

John Darsie: (39:52)
But I want to talk about non-fungible tokens for a second. So, my brother is a big sports card collector, which has been good for him, because we're in the middle of a boom in terms of the prices of sports cards and trading cards and other scarce assets. But non-fungible tokens, one application for them has been NBA Top Shots, for example. So, basically you can collect digital highlights from NBA games. Could you talk about, for people who are less familiar with what's happening in the space, what they are and why they're interesting from a blockchain, decentralization perspective?

Jalak Jobanputra: (40:28)
Yeah. And this is one of the areas we've been most interested in also. I'm very into art. I actually did collect baseball cards, believe or not, when I was younger.

John Darsie: (40:41)
There you go.

Jalak Jobanputra: (40:41)
I was a big baseball fan. But it seems like basketball is really where a lot of the value creation as been.

Jalak Jobanputra: (40:50)
So, there's this concept of assigning value to an asset that then it could be a physical asset or it could be a digital asset, but then could be tracked, and the provenance of that particular asset can be tracked. So, you can start looking at ... Say you take a baseball card, and it's verified that that I own this baseball card, and how many editions of it are out there are part of the dataset, what condition it is in, how many times it's changed hands. All of that is part of the dataset, and then that can be valued in a marketplace, say, a digital marketplace, and traded.

Jalak Jobanputra: (41:45)
Now the whole thing can be traded, or we can just trade an interest in that particular asset. So, I could say, "I want to sell off 10% of it," and then people who are interested in or if they think it's going to appreciate, just like anything, they would invest their capital in it or crypto in it. If I decide to sell the entire asset, it gets distributed accordingly. So, it enables a lot of micro marketplaces to take hold.

Jalak Jobanputra: (42:27)
Also an investor in a company called Everledger. They put diamond provenance information on the blockchain starting in 2015. They've started working with brands and retailers who want to issue digital versions of clothes that people then can collect. They can potentially use it on gaming sites or they can just collect it with the idea that it's going to be worth something down the road. There also may be a physical asset that is linked to that digital asset. So, there are so many potential opportunities around these digitized tokens that can be tied to real-world, physical assets, or they can just reside in the digital world.

Jalak Jobanputra: (43:16)
And any creator who thinks that their work is worth something ... So, digital art. They can create 10 versions of an art piece, issue it, and right now any artist has to go through galleries. There's a huge supply chain, value chain that exists in the art world. And this is, again, very similar to Bitcoin. It's a currency that can exchange hands directly between people without banks, and this is the idea around any assets, and it's happening a lot around sports memorabilia, whether it's physical or purely digital. It's happening a lot around the art world. So, it's kind of wide open. We're in very, very early days, but I do think the sports world has been leaders in taking advantage of or thinking about the opportunity.

Jalak Jobanputra: (44:24)
You can also potentially tie an experience to a token. So, if a sports athlete wants to issue a card of himself, he can also say, "Well, the first 10 people who purchase this, or if you purchase it above a certain price, you get access to an experience." That experience could then become tradable. So, again, this idea of granularity around assets and programming assets and then price discovery and value discovery, I don't think we've seen the beginnings of [crosstalk 00:45:04]

John Darsie: (45:04)
Right. You just came up with a great idea for the next iteration of Cameo. I don't know if you're familiar with that platform, but you could create scarcity for the ability to get a unique experience or a unique message from a celebrity. It's a fascinating concept. And just intellectually, some people say, "Well, digital art. That doesn't make any sense to me. It lives on the internet. It's not like a painting you can hang on your wall." And I just say, somebody could forge a physical painting the same way that there could be illegal replication of digital art or digital trading cards or whatever it may be.

John Darsie: (45:41)
And money is the same thing. Money is only as valuable as a society and as a globe that we decide it as. So, I don't see any reason why digital art, digital money, or digital collectibles is really any different in a digital native world than physical items. You could argue as well that it's significantly more valuable. Some people say gold and Bitcoin are going to reach parity in terms of being a store of value, but then other people say, "Well, why stop there? There's no reason why Bitcoin can't dramatically exceed gold's market cap."

John Darsie: (46:15)
So, Jalak, it's been fascinating talking to you. Hopefully we can have another appearance from you at one of our SALT conferences in the future in person, once that becomes safe again. But I'm jealous of you being down in Miami. As I mentioned before we started, I was down in South Florida for a good part of the beginning of this year, but as I look outside my window, it's snow. I'm jealous. But congratulations on all your success and being so early to the space

Jalak Jobanputra: (46:41)
Thanks for having me. It's exciting times in Miami too with what the mayor is doing and a lot of crypto folks and tech folks down here.

John Darsie: (46:51)
Yep, absolutely. I'll definitely be down before long to soak up some of that sunshine. And thank you everybody for tuning in to today's SALT Talk as well to learn more about this digital asset space. We think that's very important that you have an open mind about what's happening in the world, or else you're going to get left behind. You still see derision from some of the old guard around what's happening with Bitcoin and decentralization. So, it's good to open your mind and learn about these topics.

John Darsie: (47:17)
Just a reminder, if you missed any part of this episode or any of our previous episodes, including episodes with a variety of thought leaders in the blockchain/crypto universe, you can access them all on our website at SALT.org/talks. Also, we're on social media. Please follow us on Twitter: @SALTConference. You can follow Jalak on Twitter as well where she's a fantastic follow. But we're also active on Instagram, LinkedIn, and Facebook as well.

John Darsie: (47:43)
And please spread the word. We love spreading these message. These educational segments that we do on SALT Talks, we love broadening our community and broadening their message. But on behalf of the entire SALT team, this is John Darsie signing off from SALT Talks for today. We hope to see you back here soon.

Dante Disparte: The Rise of Stablecoins in Crypto | SALT Talks #162

Dante Disparte is the Executive Vice President of the Diem Association. Dante serves as a member of the executive committee leading public policy, social impact, membership and communications. The Diem payment system is built on blockchain technology to enable the open, instant, and low-cost movement of money. People will be able to send, receive, and spend their money, enabling universal access to financial services.

Diem, previously known as Libra, is a permissioned blockchain-based payment system proposed by the American social media company Facebook, Inc. The plan also includes a private currency implemented as a cryptocurrency.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Dante Disparte.jpeg

Dante Disparte

Executive Vice President

Diem Association

MODERATOR

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

Anthony “Pomp” Pompliano: The Investment Case for Bitcoin | SALT Talks #159

Anthony "Pomp" Pompliano is the co-founder of Morgan Creek Digital. He is the host of The Pomp Podcast, where he talks to investors about business, finance, Bitcoin, and crypto.

Morgan Creek Digital is a hedge fund that specializes in blockchain technology and digital assets and is backed by investment management firm Morgan Creek Capital. The firm was founded by Mark Yusko, Jason Williams and Anthony Pompliano in 2018.

He has built and sold numerous companies, ran Product & Growth teams at Facebook and Snapchat, and invested over $100 million in early-stage technology companies.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Anthony Pompliano.jpeg

Anthony Pompliano

Founder

Pomp Investments

MODERATOR

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:07)
Hello everyone, and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the managing director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators, and thinkers. And our goal on these SALT Talks is the same as our goal at our SALT conferences, which is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future.

John Darsie: (00:38)
And we're very excited today to welcome you back to our latest episode in our digital asset series, but really our guest today, while he's known largely for his investments into digital assets and Bitcoin and crypto, he is much more than that. He's also an early stage investor in a lot of tech companies as well. So we're very excited today to welcome Anthony Pompliano aka Pomp to SALT Talks. Pomp has invested over $100 million in early stage technology companies, including multiple unicorns.

John Darsie: (01:08)
He's the host of The Pomp podcast, one of the top 10 most popular investing podcasts in the world. And he writes a daily letter focused on digital assets to over 100,000 investors each morning. I know that subscriber base is quickly growing. So by the time you're watching this, it'll probably be over 150, 200,000. Pomp previously co-founded Morgan Creek Digital and ran numerous product and growth teams at Facebook. He started his career serving as an infantry sergeant in the US army during Operation Iraqi Freedom. And as a North Carolina native, it's always a proud moment for me to welcome another North Carolina native here to SALT Talks. So, Pomp welcome.

John Darsie: (01:47)
Hosting today's talk is Anthony Scaramucci, the founder and managing partner of SkyBridge Capital. A global alternative investment firm, which as you may know recently invested what at the time was about $180 million into Bitcoin starting in November through December of 2020, that's quickly more than doubled our value of Bitcoin holdings is somewhere around 400 million at this point. We also launched a SkyBridge Bitcoin fund as a private vehicle for accredited investors to invest into Bitcoin. So Anthony is also the chairman of SALT. That's enough for me though. I'll turn it over now to Anthony for the interview.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:21)
Darsie, I just took a picture of you, me and Pomp. Pomp caught that, so he was smiling. You were rambling on and I was wavering whether or not to cut you out of the picture just to have the two handsome Italians in the picture, but since your name ends in a vowel, I think I-

John Darsie: (02:37)
It ends in a vowel so I'm like an honorary Italian at this point.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:39)
I think I included half your face, just so you know. I just want to make sure that you're aware of that, okay? Anthony, first of all, it's a pleasure to have you on. We got so much to discuss, but I want to go back to the podcast that you were kind enough to invite me on. And I would say it's almost two years ago now, right? Probably 18 months ago. And were you getting vibe from me during that podcast that I was moving towards Bitcoin? Yes or no?

Anthony Pompliano: (03:04)
I think that my big takeaway was, this guy's really smart and he's eventually going to get there. And I couldn't really put my finger on where you were at the moment, but you understood enough about the macro economy and what digital asset promise was. So I figured you'd get there pretty quickly, and you obviously did.

Anthony Scaramucci: (03:24)
You describe an aha moment. Some people say it's a Eureka moment. Michael Saylor says he had a Eureka moment over the summer. And then he said, "My God, please let me buy this stuff ahead of the other people that are going to get to their Eureka moment." When was your aha moment with Bitcoin and other digital assets Anthony?

Anthony Pompliano: (03:44)
I first heard about it in 2014 when I was working at Facebook. I did absolutely nothing, didn't even Google it. In 2016, I had a young guy who was a freshman in college pitch me on mining. And that was really when it kind of hit me. My father has been in the data center business for 40 years. And so when I saw mining, it basically was data centers on steroids, right? There was a better unit economics, there was persistent demand for the computing power, there was no sales force, et cetera. And so that's really what started the journey for me. I went and I bought some mining equipment, I set it up and cashflow started coming in from there. It was just, how far down the rabbit hole could you go till today?

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:29)
I want to be Bitcoin skeptic, okay? I'm going to put my sky... This is my SkyBridge Bitcoin hat on. And since I have a full head of hair, I don't like wearing hats. So I'm going to reverse it. Oh, wait a minute. There's a Bitcoin sign on the side there. I'm going to sideways the hat, okay? Now I'm going to be a Bitcoin skeptic and it's worthless Pomp, all it is, is a crypto graphic encryption on the internet. What is the big deal for that? Goldman Sachs just said that it's irresponsible to put it into clients' accounts. What I find ironic is Coinbase is going to have a larger market cap than the 151-year old Goldman Sachs when it goes public. But I want you to explain to the fear, uncertainty and doubt crowd, the FUD crowd, what they're missing.

Anthony Pompliano: (05:23)
Look, I think that the first thing to understand about Bitcoin is it's simply just an open, decentralized digital protocol. And all that means is that anyone with an internet connection can essentially use this open protocol. And so what it's used for is to send value back and forth. And so we use all kinds of different payment systems in the traditional world, whether it's Visa, MasterCard, you can use all sorts of banking, ACH, SWIFT, all these different things.

Anthony Pompliano: (05:51)
And what we find with something like Bitcoin is that, there's two key, I think improvements on those legacy systems. One is that it is decentralized, meaning that it is not controlled or owned by anyone individual or organization and also two is, it is artificially capped, deflationary, hyper secure asset. Meaning that no one can create more of it. And so I think in today's macro environment what you're finding is, there's two types of people who are basically finding this valuable. There are people who are using it as a store of value. They're saying the dollar is guaranteed to lose value. And based on Bitcoin's market structure of a fixed supply asset, if demand continues to rise, then you are guaranteed to have your purchasing power growth over time, have the US dollar price appreciation.

Anthony Pompliano: (06:43)
And then there's a second group of people who are using it as a medium of exchange. And that medium of exchange essentially allows people to send money or value anywhere in the world at any time, near instantaneously, for very low cost, without asking for permission from anyone. So if you want to send it to any other person with an internet connection in the world, you can do that. And so I think that those two key use cases are really driving the growth of an asset that 12 years ago didn't exist, today is a 700 plus billion dollar asset and continuing to grow at a pretty aggressive rate.

Anthony Scaramucci: (07:18)
Anthony, I took my hat on because... I mean, I took the hat off because I was really starting to believe you, I was getting excited, but I got to put the hat back on now. I'm putting the hat back on, okay? And I got to ask another skeptical question because there are a lot of fuddy-duddies out there. There are 70, 89-year old people. There are people my age that act like they're 150 and they think SkyBridge Capital is crazy, you're crazy, Michael Saylor is crazy and we're selling nothing. And we're making a greater fool bet that there's a greater fool out there that will buy what's in our portfolios from us at a higher price than the price that we bought it at. Why are they wrong? What is the fundamental mechanism that you're looking at from a metric point of view to measure value in Bitcoin?

Anthony Pompliano: (08:13)
Well, the first reason why they're wrong is because my Bitcoin is not for sale, right? And so it doesn't matter what price somebody offers me, I'm not selling the Bitcoin. And so the greater fool theory would be that I bought it at a low price and somebody's going to pay me at a higher price and I'm going to give it to them, but that's just not the case. And it's not the case for many Bitcoiners.

Anthony Pompliano: (08:30)
What they've done is they've fundamentally shifted from a dollar denominated world to a Bitcoin denominated world. And I think that's a really key piece. And you see this in the data in terms of 60 plus percent of Bitcoin hasn't moved in the last 12 months, even though there's been hundreds of percent of upside, there's been 50% drawdowns in a single 24-hour period, through all of that volatility, 60 plus percent hasn't moved.

Anthony Pompliano: (08:52)
And so these people have a very deep seeded belief that this is an asset they're going to hold for the long period of time regardless of what happens to the US dollar exchange value of it. And I think that when you start to really look at how do you value something like this? Prices simply determinative of supply and demand, right? And the beauty of this asset compared to most markets is that if we look at other assets, we essentially have to do work and our best estimate as to what the supply will be, and also what the demand will be, right? There's two inputs into the equation to determine the price today, and then what the price will be in the future.

Anthony Pompliano: (09:27)
When it comes to Bitcoin, one side of that equation is not a variable, right? We know with 100% certainty, because we can verify in the code exactly what the total supply of Bitcoin is, what the circulating supply is and what the daily incoming supply is. And so that verifiability of the actual supply side of the equation means that we have a 100% certainty, and we can know what that input is.

Anthony Pompliano: (09:52)
What that then leads to is an analysis on the demand side of the equation. And what people then want to speculate about or debate about is, why is demand increasing? Why will demand continue to increase? And I think that that's where you get this spectrum of arguments, everything from store value to medium of exchange. I personally believe that Bitcoin is at least a 10X better improvement in the technology from a store value standpoint than gold. Many people probably think it's even higher than that. It could be a 100X or better.

Anthony Pompliano: (10:20)
And so when you see that very significant improvement from a technology standpoint and a store value, what you're going to find is more and more capital will flow into the asset. And as demand increases for a fixed supply asset with a known supply schedule, the price will continue to appreciate. Five, six years ago, you could have made the argument, "Hey, there's not a lot of trading volume. This is kind of a speculative asset. The market may be manipulated." All of these detractions that I think a lot of people did make.

Anthony Pompliano: (10:50)
Today, when you fast forward, what you find is you've got an asset that has tens of billions of dollars in daily volume, it's on regulated exchanges, it's held by many of the most well-respected financial institutions in the United States. And the price has pretty healthy, pretty high volume price discovery. And so what I think Bitcoin is worth is obviously what the market is determined. Today that's sitting around 36, $37,000. And then the big question is just, how deep is your conviction that demand will continue to increase in the future and price will be a proxy or a result of that increase in demand?

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:27)
But Anthony, this was a penny, then it went to a dollar, then it went to $400. Now it's at, let's just call it for the sake of where we are today, 36, $37,000. Haven't I missed the run in Bitcoin.? Isn't it fully priced at these levels given where it started?

Anthony Pompliano: (11:52)
I mean, look any asset starts out at a low price and then has volatility. It can go up, it can go down. If you look at something like Amazon, I think Amazon stock, when they IPO'd in the late '90s was $18. Today Amazon's price is over $3,300 per share. And that's not a straight line, right? There's all kinds of splits and everything along the way. Lots of volatility. Amazon's stock at one point dropped over 90%. There's also double digit drawdowns on an annual basis. The average intra-year drawdown of Amazon stock is over 30%. And so when you have a highly volatile asset, the reason why that's happening is because there's innovation, there's a repricing of the asset, right? The world is trying to figure out what is this worth?

Anthony Pompliano: (12:39)
And so if you had looked at Amazon's stock at $18, you could have looked backwards and said, "Oh, I could have invested in the seed round or in the series A, I missed it. Now it's a publicly traded company and there's going to be no returns." You would have been wrong. If you had then waited till it was a 100 or 250 or 500 or a 1,000, or even $2,000, you still along the way would have thought, "Oh, I missed it." But what you ended up finding is for the small few assets that actually are disruptive, that are highly innovative, and that do benefit from true market price discovery, you aren't late. Actually what ends up happening is you're probably underestimating the future price performance or the future appreciation. You're underestimating how addressable the market is.

Anthony Pompliano: (13:18)
And so I think an asset like Bitcoin is a perfect example where what you're talking about, it's about a 100 million people globally out of seven and a half billion people in the world. Only a 100 million people have any sort of relationship, ownership or interaction with this asset. And so what you're essentially saying is that a 100 million people would be the total adjustable market. That it's captured everything that it's going to capture, and there's going to be no one else who's going to want this.

Anthony Pompliano: (13:45)
In fact, what we know though from history is that money is a very, very viral product, right? You have to send it to somebody. And so you're constantly bringing more and more people into a monetary network or a monetary system. And so I think that the belief that it's too late really just refutes or ignores history, and then also is a pessimistic view of the future. It's to say that all of the innovation is done, all of the people who need this have found it and therefore there's no future value to capture or create. And I just don't agree with that.

Anthony Scaramucci: (14:18)
I'm going to give some stats for people actually. Amazon went public in May of 1997. It was May 15th, 1997. If you put $10,000 Anthony into Amazon, it's worth 21 million, $140,000 as of yesterday's close. And so if you accept, which I have accepted that Bitcoin is actually a monetary network akin to what Amazon is, is a retail network, which Google happens to be an ad and search network. Then Bitcoin has a lot of room to go given that adoption number that you just presented.

Anthony Scaramucci: (15:03)
I'm going to turn it over to John in a second because he's a millennial and he thinks he'll ask smarter questions than me, Anthony Pompliano. But I'm going to try to ask one last [inaudible 00:15:13].

John Darsie: (15:13)
Anthony knows it's true. The young Anthony Pomp knows it's true but continue.

Anthony Scaramucci: (15:18)
I'm going to try to ask one more, which I happen to think is a smart question, but I want to get your arms around it. And this is about banning Bitcoin. It's about banning Bitcoin in China. It's about banning Bitcoin in India and regulations out there and fuddy-duddies out there. They're in regulatory agencies that want to knock out Bitcoin. I want you to answer that question. What do you say in response to that? And then secondarily, the Chinese are repairing a digital Yuan, and how does a digital Yuan big foot or not big foot something like Bitcoin?

Anthony Pompliano: (16:00)
When we talk about banning something, what you essentially are doing is you're essentially creating a law that's highly unenforceable but a law that would say if you are within a geographic boundary, if you're a citizen of a specific country, you are not allowed to interface with this open decentralized protocol. And so the way that I usually talk about this is the internet is an open decentralized protocol. And so there are countries who have banned the internet, right? North Korea is a great example. If you are a citizen in North Korea, you can not use the internet. That hasn't worked out so well for that country.

Anthony Pompliano: (16:33)
And so regardless of any one country's viewpoint on banning or not banning, the open digital decentralized protocol is going to be used by people, right? It's out there, you can't shut it down. And so it is going to be adopted. And so countries have a choice. They can either choose to be pessimistic and they can choose to ban the participation of their citizens, or they can be innovative and optimistic. And they can say, "Actually, if anyone's going to benefit from this, we should be the ones that benefit the most and therefore we should go and we should embrace this."

Anthony Pompliano: (17:03)
And so when you go around a geographic map, if you look at something like China, China has essentially taken the stance that we're not huge fans of this Bitcoin thing, we're going to create our own digital currency, we're going to take some of the principles of it but we want control. We want to be able to surveil it, we want to be able to control it. And so we'll see how that plays out, but I tend to think that that won't be a great outcome, but you can see that there is a theme here of countries like China or North Korea who are banning their citizens from participating in that open de-centralized protocol.

Anthony Pompliano: (17:35)
If you look at something like India, there's a legislation that's recently been proposed that would outlaw the participation in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The legislation is actually misinformed in that they call them private currencies. But there's nothing private about it. It's an open, publicly available. Anyone with an internet connection can interface with this. And so you can't actually enforce a ban but what you can do is you can threaten people and all of that.

Anthony Pompliano: (18:01)
What we know is that when a country does ban their participation, you can look at somewhere like Pakistan who banned the participation in Bitcoin, but a key thing happened. Adoption went up and not down. And so, even though they per posed and eventually passed legislation that banned their citizens from participating, it actually drove more adoption, not less. And this came from not only mining it, right? From a cashflow perspective, but also people who wanted to participate in the digital economy, who wanted to freelance, who wanted to do work and get paid.

Anthony Pompliano: (18:32)
Well, in Pakistan, they can't get paid in some other currencies. And so Bitcoin became this censorship resistant way to ensure that they got paid for their goods and services. So I think that that is a word of caution for people in the United States. And there's folks, everyone from some politicians to other people in the regulatory world, all the way to Wall Street asset managers who believe that America should ban Bitcoin. And what I continue to say is that couldn't be more of an anti-American view of the world, right?

Anthony Pompliano: (19:04)
The view that, hey, there's a piece of technology, that piece of technology is going to be used by people all around the world, regardless of if they are our enemy or our friend. But we, as in the United States are going to select, to opt out, to prevent our citizens from embracing this new piece of innovative technology because we deem that some other country may benefit from it as well.

Anthony Pompliano: (19:26)
And so people who are advocating for the banning of Bitcoin are no different than people who would be advocating for the banning of the internet in the United States. They essentially are asking the US government to sanction US citizens, to cut us off from this new digital global financial system. And not only do I think it's, un-American, I think it's a dangerous point of view, right? It's a misinformed point of view.

Anthony Pompliano: (19:45)
I think that what we're going to end up with is, we've now got Bitcoiners in Congress, we've got Bitcoiners on the Senate banking committee, we've got Bitcoiners inside, many of the largest financial institutions in the United States. We even have Bitcoiners who are running some of these regulatory bodies and where I think we're going to end up is exactly where we should. We're going to embrace it, we're going to realize this is a disruptive piece of innovation technology and it's an open decentralized protocol that everyone in the world's going to have access to. And so if America wants to retain their position of leadership on a global stage, we should take every step possible to make sure that we use it to further that position, rather than try to somehow inhibit our growth and our future innovation potential by banning it.

Anthony Scaramucci: (20:26)
And just address the sovereigns who now have fiat currency digitizing their currency, what's the implication there?

Anthony Pompliano: (20:34)
Historically, we've lived in a single currency world. So any one of us gets paid in a single currency, we store all of our wealth in that currency and then we eventually pay our taxes and pay for goods and services in that currency. And the reason why that happens is because there's a high switching costs when it comes to different currencies. And so if I want to go from, let's say dollars to euros, I have to go to the bank, or I have to go to a currency exchange, or at an airport or somewhere else. And so it's a high friction activity to switch currencies if I'm not a Wall Street currency trader.

Anthony Pompliano: (21:05)
And so what we're going to see here is, every currency is going to get digitized, whether it's Bitcoin and other decentralized currencies, whether it's private currencies, things like Facebook's Libra or Diem I guess it's now called. Or, other fiat currency. So there's going to be a digital dollar, a digital Euro, digital Yuan, digital RMB. And when you have digital currencies, now you've gotten to feature parody on a technology landscape. So every currency is digitized. There is no competition or any switching costs by going from one currency to another, it's literally the click of a button. And by reducing that friction, what it does is it now brings the competition from the technology layer, it brings it up to the monetary policy layer.

Anthony Pompliano: (21:42)
And so what you're going to see is regardless of what currency you get paid in, regardless of where you live in the world, with a click of a button, you can switch from your native currency that you get paid in to any other currency in the world. And when you look at the monetary policy structure of all of these assets, Bitcoin's monetary policy is superior in every way when it comes to protecting purchasing power.

Anthony Pompliano: (22:03)
Now, what we're actually going to do is we're going to digitize these fiat currencies. We're going to onboard billions of people with digital wallets, and then we are going to drastically reduce the switching costs. And so what people are likely to do is they're going to get paid in their native currency, they're going to switch into something like Bitcoin to protect their purchasing power as part of their savings or investing strategy. And then if they then have to pay for taxes or goods and services in their native currency, with a click of a button, they'll switch back and they'll actually pay for those expenses.

Anthony Pompliano: (22:28)
And so I think that the fiat currencies are going to get digitized. They're not going to necessarily be competitive from a zero sum game with something like Bitcoin. In fact, they're actually going to be very additive. They're going to drive adoption of digital wallets, and they're going to drive down the friction of the switching costs between currencies. And I think that in that environment, Bitcoin ends up being the greatest beneficiary, because what it has is it has the digital application of sound money principles that if anything we've been taught over time is that capital will flow to the soundest, hardest money. And that's what Bitcoin is. And so I think that we want the governments to go and digitize their currencies because it will ultimately really benefit those who are working in this digital de-centralized world.

John Darsie: (23:14)
I'm going to jump in now Anthony, your time is up. It's my turn to talk. So Pomp, Michael Saylor has become a great friend of ours as we've done our journey into Bitcoin. We've hosted him on two SALT Talks. He hosted his own conference recently that was focused on Bitcoin for corporations. So he was a pioneer in that space. He owns, I don't know, a billion odd, maybe billion and a half dollars worth of Bitcoin today.

Anthony Pompliano: (23:39)
Two billion now.

John Darsie: (23:39)
He had a great session during that conference with Ross Stevens from NYDIG, or from Stone Ridge, which is the parent of NYDIG who's a really impressive player in the space that's bringing the institutional world into crypto in a really effective way. And Ross gave a tour de force on the macro economic backdrop for why he had his Eureka or aha moment on crypto, and on Bitcoin specifically.

John Darsie: (24:04)
How much in your view was Bitcoin as Elon Musk tweeted, inevitable that people were going to learn about this one hell of an invention as Ray Dalio called it? And how much of it's driven by the macro economic backdrop, this massive expansion of the money supply, money printing by central banks. Did it just accelerate a trend that was already happening? Or what's your view of the macro economics and how that's driving the adoption of Bitcoin?

Anthony Pompliano: (24:30)
Look, I think that what's really interesting about Bitcoin is, I have yet to meet somebody who spends the time, is open-minded, intellectually curious, does the work, learns about Bitcoin, can explain it back in very simple terms, right? Showcasing their understanding and does not believe that it will have a place in the world. There may be disagreement in terms of how important it will be or how large it will be or who will hold it. But I have a very hard time finding anyone who says it will be worthless, right? If they've done the work and become educated on it. So I think that's a key piece. And so what that tells you is that, as more and more people learn about it, the inevitability of understanding this will be a thing, was always there.

Anthony Pompliano: (25:11)
Now, what I do think has happened is in the macro environment, in terms of monetary policy intervention and frankly just a lack of discipline across economies and central banks is that we essentially had a $3 trillion marketing campaign or this $4 trillion marketing campaign running the United States last year for Bitcoin. And really what it started out as was, "Hey, there's a public health crisis that is going to lead to an economic crisis. When that economic crisis happens, we are going to have elected officials and the federal reserve that's going to step in, they're going to intervene, they're going to manipulate the market to try to mitigate short-term pain." When they did that, anyone who was paying attention said, "Wait a second, they're going to print a lot of money." There is a fear of inflation, whether it comes or not, we fear that the inflation is coming. And therefore there is a potential issue at hand.

Anthony Pompliano: (26:00)
And they went on a global scavenger hunt looking for the best market or asset in which they could move their wealth so that they could protect the purchasing power and benefit from the activities of the central bank. And so what ended up happening is many, many intelligent, very intellectually rigorous people all arrived at the same conclusion, which was that the inflation hedge bucket of assets is going to do very well in this environment. And inside of that bucket, Bitcoin will be the big winner. Bitcoin will outperform all of the other assets, whether you look at real estate, precious metals, even stocks, to some example, et cetera.

Anthony Pompliano: (26:34)
So far, and we're not out of the woods yet, but so far, what we have seen is that if you came to that conclusion, you were right. And so I think that in March of 2020, Bitcoin was trading somewhere between eight to $10,000. And I think it was March 12th, it literally fell below $4,000, right? I mean, just absolute fell off a cliff. At that time, there was a lot of people who said it's going to zero.

Anthony Pompliano: (26:58)
But what I continued to tell people and I think what's really important to understand was, we were in a liquidity crisis. And during a liquidity crisis, investors sell off any asset that has a liquid market so that they can raise dollars, right? The dollar strengthens, asset prices sell off, you get correlations going towards one. And that's what happened to Bitcoin, it happened to gold, happened to stocks, across the board. But now all of a sudden, as there was this liquidity injected into the market, and you literally just had a system that was flush with cash. Everyone ran for protection and Bitcoin ended up being a great beneficiary of that.

Anthony Pompliano: (27:30)
What I think has happened is not only an acceleration of just the adoption in terms of individuals and some financial institutions buying it. But I think actually psychologically people were reminded. We live in a system that is guaranteed for the dollar lose value. And it is a system in which if you can find a capped supply asset, where demand will continue to increase over time and has utility, as both a store value and a medium of exchange, it is likely to do much, much better because of the programmatic monetary policy and the decentralized security that it brings.

Anthony Pompliano: (28:02)
And so that's where you see people going from, "I know nothing about Bitcoin, I don't want to spend the time on it, I've got a pretty good life." To now rotating and saying, "Wait a minute, this is the most important invention." Right? Or, "This is something I'm going to go take literally 90 plus percent of my balance sheet. I'm going to go convert it from dollars into Bitcoin." And I think that when you get that level of interest, something is happening and the big message to people is always, in my opinion, if you have zero exposure, that's the wrong answer.

Anthony Pompliano: (28:33)
I don't know if the right exposure for you is 25 basis points or 25%, but you got to go do the work. You got to get educated. And if you, for some reason, think that you are smarter than the market, both in terms of the individuals and the organizations that are participating here, or you think that you are going to identify some trend reversal across all of these different market data points from transactions to users to market volumes, et cetera, then you were gambling, right? You were essentially defining what the market is telling you and maybe you're right. But what I do know is that the cost of being wrong here is getting to the point where there's a high risk to being wrong.

Anthony Pompliano: (29:16)
So instead what you should do is, you should figure out what the allocation is to the asset, you should put into your portfolio, you should forget about it and come back and look at it in 10 years. And you'll either have lost a small percentage of your portfolio or it will have appreciated so aggressively that you'll be really, really happy and really thankful that you actually put it in the portfolio.

John Darsie: (29:34)
One thing I've read, you do a lot of writing and you do a lot of a podcasts as well is you talk a lot about investing in things with asymmetric outcomes. And so I think everybody goes on an intellectual journey with Bitcoin. And for me, it was just the notion that you mentioned that it's just asymmetric, right? I mean, the likelihood of it going to zero seems very low at this stage. It feels like the horse is out of the barn, crossed the Rubicon, whatever metaphor you want to use. But the asymmetry that's there seems so compelling.

John Darsie: (30:02)
And it feels like one of the reasons why corporations now are listening to Michael Saylor, there was several thousand people on that call he did, the virtual conference that he did basically where he's opening up the playbook in an open source type of way and explaining to people, "Okay, this is how I did it, this is why I did it." And the interest level from not just CFOs and executives from small companies, these are major companies saying, "It might be a risk for me to hold dollars. So what would it hurt for me to put a small portion of my balance sheet into Bitcoin?" Is that your analysis on why corporations are looking at this?

Anthony Pompliano: (30:35)
Yeah. Look, it's very rare that you've got any sort of treasury management strategy that would allow you to one, protect against inflation or other degradation of your purchasing power. Two, to do it in a asymmetric way, right? Meaning that you can actually put less of your treasury in. So reduce the risk from a percentage of exposure but still gain the same upside potential. And so an easy way to look at that is if you had an asset that you thought could double in value and you took 1%, that would eventually end up being 2% of the portfolio, everything else staying the same.

Anthony Pompliano: (31:12)
Well, if instead that 1% allocation went into an asset that you actually thought could have 10X upside, right? It just ends up being much more beneficial. So if you go back, this data's a little bit outdated but probably about 18 months ago, this was true. If you go back in the five prior years and you took a 60/40 global portfolio, and you took half a percent of your stock portfolio and half a percent of your bond portfolio and put that total of 1% into Bitcoin, you would have taken a global 60/40 portfolio that annualized at 7.2% and you would have taken it up to 9.2%. So you would've got that 200 basis point upside.

Anthony Pompliano: (31:48)
If you had taken that same 1% and it had gone to zero, you lost all of your money, you would have gotten from 7.2% to 7%. So a 20 basis point downside. And so when you have assymetry that is 10 to one upside the downside based on a very small allocation, it ends up again being more risky to not have the exposure than to actually have the exposure. And I think that's the message that corporations are starting to understand is they're saying, "Wait a second, is it worth betting the company?" Right? Is it worth making this big, in some cases multi-billion dollar bet that this thing is not going to end up actually having value in the future. And I think that the opportunity cost is too high at this point.

Anthony Pompliano: (32:27)
And so you're going to see some people are going to do 1% and then some people are going to go do big double digit percentages, right? But I think that's the beauty of it is the work that Michael Saylor and Macro Strategy is doing is, they don't care where you end up. They just want to make sure you have the information. They're saying, "These people are intelligent, they're experienced, they can make decisions for their own shareholders. But if we give them the information, we think that that's the best scenario." And I tend to agree with them.

John Darsie: (32:49)
One thing I admire about you as well is that you're not afraid to debate people, right? You debate people all day on Twitter. You recently did a debate on Real Vision with Mike Green, who's a very smart guy and a skeptic on Bitcoin to say the least. And I would say a detractor probably would be a better term.

John Darsie: (33:09)
But one of the accusations that he made and that people make frequently is about Tether and its ability to manipulate Bitcoin or manipulation in general around the price of Bitcoin given the opaque nature of, we don't know who the founder is, Satoshi Nakamoto and there's all kinds of things that people come up with in terms of the manipulation on the price of Bitcoin. How do you respond to that accusation? And if you don't think that's a credible risk that exists for Bitcoin, what are the most credible risks in your eyes?

Anthony Pompliano: (33:39)
If you just look at, let's compare two systems, legacy system, and this new digital decentralized system. In the legacy system, you can't tell me how many dollars are in circulation, you can't tell me what any future monetary policy decisions are, you can't show me any of the transactions and you can't tell me how many dollars are printed or taken out of circulation on a day-to-day basis, right? Talk about opaqueness, there's just no transparency whatsoever to the point where people literally can't tell you how many dollars are actually in circulation. They can't prove it. So it's a narrative based system, right? And that's actually served us pretty well for the last number of centuries, where we just understood generally, or how to best guess estimate. And that was kind of the best we had. And so we ran with it and it was fantastic.

Anthony Pompliano: (34:24)
When you look at Bitcoin, everything is provable, right? So there's an auditability to the actual monetary policy. And what I mean by that is I can show you exactly what the total supply is, 21 million Bitcoin. I can show you exactly how many are in the circulating supply, which is 18.6 million. I can show you exactly how many Bitcoin are coming into circulation on a daily basis, 900 Bitcoin per day. And then I can actually tell you almost to the day exactly what the future monetary policy decisions are going to be for the next 100 years. I can actually prove it to you and you can audit it in the code.

Anthony Pompliano: (34:57)
And so when it comes to manipulation, right? Just on the surface, which one of those systems do you think is going to be easier to manipulate? Do you think it's going to be the system where there's complete opaqueness and literally no transparency and no provability or auditability? Or the system that has 100% transparency, complete validation and auditability? Of course, it's going to be the former, not the latter.

Anthony Pompliano: (35:18)
Now, when it comes to actual manipulation, right? We have in the legacy system stated manipulation, right? When the federal reserve and elected officials step in and they manipulate interest rates, when they manipulate the quantitative easing, right? They are actively taking actions and they're announcing to the world, "We are trying to take an action today that will lead to a future outcome that we think is positive." Sometimes they're right, sometimes they're not. Frankly, there is no final conclusion, right? It's up for debate.

Anthony Pompliano: (35:46)
And so what they have is they have a very short-term pain mitigation strategy that interventionism is the default and manipulation is the standard. When you then move to the Bitcoin system, there's a whole bunch of theories. It's not just Tether, right? I mean, there's a whole bunch of theories of price manipulation and all these different things. But the beauty is that it's all on chain.

Anthony Pompliano: (36:07)
And so without getting into the details of who owns what corporations, what nation states are there, all these things that I frankly just push to the side and say, "It's all my new details." Is, let's give the detractors all the credit and say, "Every single thing that they're saying is right." Which I don't believe. Let's just say that they're right. Bitcoin still is not going to go away. Bitcoin's adoption is not going to stop and I do not believe that it would change the argument for why people should have access and exposure to Bitcoin.

Anthony Pompliano: (36:39)
When you take that into account, what ends up happening is it ends up highlighting the fact that most of these detractors are basically upset or, with no pun intended, salty for a couple of different reasons. They either one, missed it, meaning that they didn't buy any, it went up a lot and to Anthony's point, they feel like I can't possibly buy it at this high price. Two is, they stake their reputation on it being a failure. And so they need to double and triple down rather than change their mind in public. Or three is that, this asset and this network, and what has happened over the last 12 years violates their worldview. With Mike specifically, and for those that want to go watch the debate they'll see it is, I think that Mike is actually in the third bucket, which is that he has a worldview, this asset violates that worldview and therefore he does not believe that it will be successful in the future.

Anthony Pompliano: (37:29)
As I closed out the debate though, I said, "The beauty of this is, it doesn't matter what his opinion is, it doesn't matter what my opinion is. The market will determine what happens. And if you're an investor, if you're an operator, if you're an individual sitting at home, all you have to do is just watch the market. If the market adopt something, then the market is the ultimate referee and it levees this decisive victory in the hands of the holders or those that are long. If the market rejects something and the price goes down and an adoption dissipates, and the market has levied to decisive victory in the hands of those who are short, or those who are the detractors."

Anthony Pompliano: (38:00)
So far, the bulls are winning and the bears are losing. That could change, sure. But I think that's ultimately what it comes down to is this system is the best we have, it's better than a legacy system and the market will be the referee. And I like the odds for for three of us on being on the right side of history.

John Darsie: (38:17)
And it's something Bill Miller, the legendary, people call him a value investor. But to your point, he's a guy who adapts with the times. And when he sees the environment change, his mindset changes. He's not crystallized in the way he thinks. He's got more pliability in his brain, still as a guy who's been in markets for many decades. But he says that Bitcoin is the only asset that he can think of that, the higher the price goes, the less risky it gets because of the adoption curve that's taking place. And I feel that as well.

John Darsie: (38:46)
When I see Bitcoin go back to 30,000, as we've seen it bounce around in the 30s over the last few weeks and months. At 30 I'm saying, "Wow, I don't know that I really want to buy this." When it gets back to 40 I'm saying, "Okay, I got to double down on my position here. And I got to do like your friend Jason Williams and ape into some Bitcoin." But it's fascinating in that regard, just the pure psychology that goes into buying Bitcoin. So I want to move where Bitcoin maximal is at SkyBridge from a-

Anthony Scaramucci: (39:17)
Sorry. Before you go there Darsie, I got to chime in for a second. So you're never selling your Bitcoin, but let's say you become very wealthy as a result of your Bitcoin. Then what do you do? You just don't sell it? You live in your hoodie for the rest of your life? What's the game plan?

Anthony Pompliano: (39:33)
Well, if you think of-

Anthony Scaramucci: (39:34)
Sorry Darsie. I had to get in and just ask this question because Pomp has thought this whole thing out.

John Darsie: (39:37)
No, that's what it's all about.

Anthony Pompliano: (39:38)
If you think of, let's say, go to Indian culture, right? In India, what families do is they go to work, they make a living, they take that, they convert it into a store value asset, usually gold jewelry, et cetera. And then they pass it down from generation to generation. And so there's no reason to come out of that store of value. That is the family's wealth, right? And if you think of it in terms, if you had an Indian American today, right? And I've got many friends I've talked to about this. The idea that they would sell their families gold, right? In terms of go into something that is not that store of value would be blasphemous.

Anthony Pompliano: (40:12)
Now, if you look at Bitcoin as digital gold versus analog gold, that's one thing. But if you were to go sell it into dollars and then go spend it, people would be pretty upset. And so I think it's a similar thing here, which is, I view Bitcoin as something that I will hand to my kids one day, right? And so what I do is I basically keep a small amount of money that I need for living expenses, et cetera. As Anthony so poetically pointed out, I have not a very high threshold for the amount of money that I spend on a monthly basis. And I basically take all of my dollars and I convert them to Bitcoin. I'm super happy, I don't trade, I don't do anything crazy. And I live a pretty relatively simple life.

Anthony Pompliano: (40:54)
But the reason why that's so valuable is because the more patience I have, the longer time horizon that I have, the more that I've benefited. And so what it's actually done is it's helped me go back to some timeless investing principles which is, you should buy assets that you want to hold for a long time, and then you should sit on your hands and not try to be too smart. That's exactly what I've done. And I've done pretty well on that.

Anthony Scaramucci: (41:15)
What could go wrong Anthony? What could go wrong?

Anthony Pompliano: (41:18)
I think the number one threat to Bitcoin is actually, what I call it a self-inflicted wound, right? Meaning that there's still active code that's being written and being contributed. And so if a bug was to be introduced or some kind of major critical flaw, that would be a pretty bad situation and is definitely a threat.

Anthony Pompliano: (41:37)
Now, there's obviously things that are done to mitigate that, there's a very extensive process in terms of the review of the code, how it gets contributed and there are some repercussions if something bad was introduced that could mitigate or avoid actual catastrophe. But that to me is the number one thing. The second thing I think is, the narrative, right? Is if you can psychologically convince people that Bitcoin is only used by criminals, which the data vehemently rejects. Less than 0.4% of all transactions were used for illicit purposes based on the recent studies. But if you can convince people of that, you can drastically reduce the speed of adoption, right? You can convince people that only bad people hold this asset, it's much less likely to actually happen.

Anthony Pompliano: (42:21)
So I think that those are the two major threats. One is a technical threat. The other is a psychological or societal threat. There's other threats that exist. There's people who think that, all of the global superpowers will get together and they will ban ownership. There's people who believe that there's the possibility of a 51% attack, all of these things. And without spending hours and hours, sitting and debating the merits of those concerns or what's being done to mitigate them. I tend to think that most of those have very low probability of being successful. And really the two highest probability is one, you can have a technical flaw that's introduced, or two, is you can basically psychologically convince people that this is not going to be a thing. But even that, it seems to be mitigated at this point in terms of the narrative really switching.

Anthony Scaramucci: (43:10)
You worried about a bug Anthony?

Anthony Pompliano: (43:13)
I am not. Listen, I've had the great pleasure of meeting a number of the Bitcoin developers. These are some of the most intellectually sharp people that you could meet. They're obviously human. And so they're not perfect. But the beauty is that Bitcoin optimizes for security, stability, and sustainability. And so the development process, one of the big knocks against Bitcoin from other people in the crypto community is that the development process is slow, right? Or that it's not highly iterative. And what people don't realize is that's by design, right? You now have an asset that has over $700 billion of value that is at stake.

Anthony Pompliano: (43:51)
And so you want to make sure that you're very careful. You want to make sure that you're always double and triple checking things and really ensuring that the process at which you develop the code and commit the code is minimizing any error. And so far that's been a successful endeavor. And I think that the people who are responsible for that have done a great job. And so I don't worry about that on a day-to-day basis.

John Darsie: (44:15)
This metaphor just came to me, but I feel like Bitcoin is like the US constitution, right? It's like the core values of the system are hard-coded and you're never going to be able to change them and that's why our country is able to sustain itself. But it's something that the founders allowed you to build on top of it as was necessary as time change. And so it's an interesting analogy to me. And the explanation you just gave made me think about it in that way. But, I want to talk about-

Anthony Pompliano: (44:40)
Yeah, I think-

John Darsie: (44:40)
Yeah, go ahead.

Anthony Pompliano: (44:41)
...one thing John that I think is really unique about that, right? Is we could change the constitution if we want, if enough people got together and said, "Hey, we should take away an amendment or add an amendment." Or, whatever. We can change it right? I think you and I probably both agree that it's very, very unlikely, right? Just given how serious of a situation and how much you would have to build consensus in order to do that. Well, the same thing is true of Bitcoin as well. In terms of, if you can get more than 51% of people to agree to a change, it could happen. But now that we're talking about tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions of people, a fully diversified decentralized system, the odds of that happening are near zero, right?

Anthony Pompliano: (45:22)
So I think it's actually a great analogy to consider the constitution, both in terms of the hard-coded ethos and rules. But also there is flexibility that there could be change if absolutely necessary, and you could build the social consensus but very, very unlikely for it to happen.

John Darsie: (45:38)
Well, my last question I want to ask you is, outside of Bitcoin. So we, as a firm at SkyBridge, we're very much focused on Bitcoin. We think it's going to be the big winner in the space. We are curious about other things that are going on, but I would say unlikely in the near term to invest in other areas of the market, but we don't necessarily think there won't be growth there.

John Darsie: (45:56)
So you launched a website, a jobs board called pompcryptojobs.com, which I think is a testament to the growth that's taking place in the industry that you could build such a robust database of jobs in the industry. What are the most exciting things that you're seeing from a corporate perspective? Companies that are innovating in the space, other protocols that are being built that you're most excited about and what is the fact that you launched that job board say about what you view the future of the industry being?

Anthony Pompliano: (46:24)
Look, at the end of the day while people may know me for all the tweeting and all the content stuff, or they may know me from the investing side. I like to build things, right? And I'm probably one of the most opportunistic, capitalistic people you'll meet in the sense of, if I see something that can be built and no one else is building it, then I have no problem waiting into the arena and competing. And so when it came to the job board, I kept talking to a lot of people who didn't work in the industry and they would say, "Hey, I want to transition, do you know of any open jobs?"

Anthony Pompliano: (46:55)
And then I've got the fortunate day-to-day activity of talking to a lot of the founders of these businesses. Some of them just starting out and very small, some of them very large corporations at this point. And they kept saying, "We can't find great candidates. It's the hardest thing, it's finding the right people." And so it was easy to identify, hey, there's a market opportunity to create a marketplace where you bring together job candidates and job roles.

Anthony Pompliano: (47:17)
I reached out to three companies that I felt were industry leaders in Blackfin, Gemini and Coinbase. They all immediately said, "Yes, we'd love to be a part of this." We put it together and in just the first week, we've had over a 1,000 people upload their resumes. We've had almost a 100 companies. There's hundreds of open roles. And there's been, I think over a 100,000 views of those open roles. And so it's very obvious that there's a need for this. I think it'll continue to grow.

Anthony Pompliano: (47:44)
But what it ultimately shows is, when you look through that job board, there's all types of different roles, right? Whether you're technical or non-technical, whether you're a finance executive, or you're a marketing executive, you're operations, you're security, you're PR, pretty much go down the line of any traditional industry, all the different roles that are there, those roles are open in this industry. And so I think that if you want to transition to work in Bitcoin and crypto, the opportunities are there. And what really excites me I think is, the advice I always give to young people who are just coming out of college is, don't start a company and don't go work at IBM, right?

Anthony Pompliano: (48:23)
What you want to do is you want to go find a series A or a series B company that's a rocket ship. You want to jump on, you want to do a great job that can give you more and more responsibility as that business grows. And you, over the next couple of years will have your first stamp of approval and your career will be associated with the success of this business, even if you had nothing to do with the success, right?

Anthony Pompliano: (48:43)
And so I think that that's one of the enticing parts about this industry is there are so many companies that are going from creation to multiple billions of dollars in value that there's just tons of open roles, there's tons of things for people to do. And so if you're a self-starter, you've got some sort of skill set, you're intelligent and you're excited about the future, just go there, find an open role and let's get to work.

John Darsie: (49:05)
And going back to Anthony Scaramucci's earlier point about Goldman Sachs coming out as another detractor of Bitcoin, you could easily see Coinbase when it IPO's here likely in 2021 have a higher market value, market cap than Goldman Sachs, which I think says it all. But Pomp, thanks so much for joining us. This was a lot of fun. Anthony, you have any final words for Pomp before we let him go?

Anthony Scaramucci: (49:29)
No. Pomp, you don't need to hear this from me, but I'm proud of what you're doing as an American entrepreneur and stick to your vision and keep it up. Hopefully we can be helpful to you. And hopefully we get you to a live SALT event at some point. It's hard for me to imagine that you've missed some of these events, but I think you would add something. So I'm looking forward to that as well.

John Darsie: (49:50)
I appreciate you guys having me.

Anthony Pompliano: (49:52)
Yeah. We missed loading the boat in 2014 when the Winklevoss Twins came to the SALT conference in Las Vegas and said, "Guys, you got to jump on this Bitcoin thing." Everyone was like, "All right, Winklevoss. What are you talking about?" But I wish they had pulled me aside and said, "You got to do this." But anyways-

Anthony Scaramucci: (50:10)
I've always pushed back on John for that because we're institutionalists and you have to, to your point about sticking to your knitting and sticking to your investment thesis, I'm more comfortable with Bitcoin at 30,000, believe it or not, than I was at 400. You have the network in place now. You have that scalability, you have a metrical ability to make an analysis of what the value is. And that's where I think Sharmin from Goldman Sachs is just making a mistake. She's not looking at it carefully enough.

Anthony Scaramucci: (50:41)
And like you say, there's a lot of market participants that are betting against her. We'll have to what happens. It makes it fun, but we also caution cautious clients that you just have to have a small amount of this. I do believe Anthony and John, this is going to be part of the index matrix that people are going to be judged by on a going forward basis. And so, when you look at an asset allocation model that includes hedge funds and private equity and gold and stocks and bonds, well, guess what? It's going to have a sliver of Bitcoin in there and maybe other digital assets. And so IF you're going to be benchmarked against it, You really have to think about it very carefully.

John Darsie: (51:21)
And thank you everybody for tuning into today's SALT Talk and continuing. For those of you who are less familiar with the digital assets, Bitcoin space, for continuing to learn with us. And for those who are familiar, thank you for continuing to engage with us and being our partners if you're invested in our SkyBridge Bitcoin fund.

John Darsie: (51:39)
Just a reminder, if you missed any part of this talk or any of our previous talks or you want to sign up and watch our talks live in the future, you can go to our website, salt.org\talks and sign up for all upcoming talks and view our entire archive. Our YouTube channel also has every episode of these SALT Talks. Please follow us on social media. We're on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook, and please spread the word about SALT Talks. We love growing our community, which we've done a great job of during the pandemic. So we're excited to continue growing the digital side of SALT. But on behalf of the entire SALT team, this is John Darsie signing off for today. We'll see you back here again soon on SALT Talks.

Mike Novogratz & Ari Paul: The Future of Crypto | SALT Talks #144

“People were not just in it for money, but were in it for change… There are a lot of Bitcoin tattoos… It’s cool to be part of a revolution to do good.”

Mike Novogratz is CEO of Galaxy Investment Partners, a cryptocurrency investment firm. Ari Paul is the co-founder and chief investment officer of BlockTower Capital, an investment firm that manages a portfolio of crypto assets

In the early stages around 2013, Bitcoin was a speculative asset that appealed mainly to libertarians and those with frustrations surrounding recent economic crises. The passion behind the decentralized finance community was unmatched and served as an early indicator to its eventual rise. Before recognizing Bitcoin as the answer, it was clear that the rapid expansion of money supply would call for a response. With concerns around inflation, Bitcoin serves as the guard against that. “The bet of a lifetime is going to be betting on currency depreciation… it didn’t click for me that Bitcoin could be that asset until 2014.”

Until recently, the majority of Bitcoin purchases happened at the retail level. That is partly responsible for its initial volatility. As major financial institutions become more involved and put it on their balance sheets, expect Bitcoin to stabilize and grow in value.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKERS

Michael Novogratz.jpeg

Mike Novogratz

Founder & CEO

Galaxy Digital

Ari Paul.jpeg

Ari Paul

Co-Founder & Chief Investment Officer

BlockTower Capital

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:07)
Hello, everyone and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie, I'm the Managing Director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology, and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators and thinkers, and our goal on these SALT Talks is the same as our goal in our SALT Conference Series, which is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future.

John Darsie: (00:38)
We're very excited to bring you the next edition in our digital assets series of SALT Talks with Michael Novogratz and Ari Paul. First I'll introduce Mr. Novogratz. Michael Novogratz is the founder and CEO of Galaxy Digital. He was formerly a partner and President of Fortress Investment Group. But prior to Fortress, Mr. Novogratz spent 11 years at Goldman Sachs, where he was elected partner in 1998. Michael served on the New York Federal Reserve's Investment Advisory Committee on Financial Markets from 2012 to 2015, and he serves as the Chairman of the Bail Project and has made criminal justice reform a focus of his family's foundation. He also serves as the chairman of Hudson River Park Friends, and sits on the boards of NYU Langone Medical Center, the Princeton Varsity Club, Jazz Foundation of America and Artists for Peace and Justice.

John Darsie: (01:29)
Just some editorialization from my perspective, Mike was one of the first major players from what I guess you could turn the legacy alternative investment universe to really dive headfirst into bitcoin and digital assets. We have to give him a lot of credit for that.

John Darsie: (01:44)
Ari Paul co-founded BlockTower Capital in 2017, and began his career in the financial services industry in 2006. Between 2006 and 2010, Ari was a trader and derivatives market maker at SUSquehanna International Group, and then a proprietary derivatives trader until 2013. Between 2013 and 2017, Ari served as the portfolio manager and risk manager for the University of Chicago's $8 billion endowment, where he managed a tail hedging strategy via long volatility investments.

John Darsie: (02:14)
In his role, Ari also worked with the Chief Risk Officer in risk management and analytics and performed research on the characteristics of endowment investments and asset classes, including researching cryptocurrency. Ari began his investment in cryptocurrency in 2014, and he's previously invested in exchange, traded crypto assets, initial coin offerings, initial coin offerings and other parts of the crypto and blockchain ecosystem.

John Darsie: (02:39)
Hosting today's talk is Anthony Scaramucci, the Founder and Managing Partner of Skybridge Capital, a global alternative investment firm that recently invested several hundred million dollars into Bitcoin and launched a Bitcoin fund to allow other clients to access the market in a pure play format. Anthony is also the Chairman of SALT. With that, I'll turn it over to Anthony for the interview.

Anthony Scaramucci: (03:01)
Also trade through Galaxy, right?

John Darsie: (03:04)
Yeah. Is that you, Galaxy Digital, Michael Novogratz?

Michael Novogratz: (03:08)
That sure is, me. Thank you for that.

Anthony Scaramucci: (03:10)
I'm going to start with you Novo, because Ari and I are just getting to know each other, but you and I are long lost friends, probably related somewhere, just given the level of flamboyance and fashion and all the other stuff that goes on. You are a legendary macro trader, you're a brilliant investor. You had a great celebrated career at Goldman, and then you went on to Fortress, but you had this aha eureka moment on Bitcoin. When did that happen, Michael? Why did it happen, and when did the light go on for you, where you became where you are in Bitcoin?

Michael Novogratz: (03:48)
Well, listen, I started investing in Bitcoin, call it 2013. Originally, it was a speculative move. Someone called me up and said, "Hey, what do you think about this?" I didn't think anything about it. So, I looked into it, and realized it was a perfect asset for speculative frenzy, for people to get excited about. It was a new technology back then. It played right into the heart of people being frustrated with the government. We had the great financial crisis in '08, the European financial crisis in 2012. We were in the middle of QE, and people didn't trust banks, they didn't trust central banks, they didn't trust authority.

Michael Novogratz: (04:27)
That was this ethos of the Bitcoin community of Satoshis first white paper let's do a currency at that point, store of value now that lives beyond the borders of government. I was like, there are enough libertarians, hyperinflation people, people that want to live off the grid, the cypherpunks, all of these many communities were buying into this and the Chinese were buying. I thought it's a pretty easy thing, it's going to go higher.

Michael Novogratz: (04:57)
I bought a bunch when it was about $100, but really not with a religious zeal, thinking this would be a great speculative trading. Quite frankly, wanted to sell it at $1,000. One of my partners at the time, really didn't want to, and convinced me not to, through coercion. Went back down to $200, I thought, I told you so. I'm happy now at $36,000, $37,000 that I didn't sell. Partly, because when you sell your whole position, it's hard to ever buy the same amount back.

Michael Novogratz: (05:31)
I really got my religion though, when I walked into the offices of a company called Consensus in Brooklyn, in Bushwick, Brooklyn, run by a guy named Joe Lubin who happened to be a college roommate. This was right after I left Fortress, late 2015, and they were just launching Ethereum. Ethereum, the token was trading at about 97 cents, maybe it had been in existence for four or five months. But he was starting this company, Consensus, and I walked in, and I saw this group of people, young and old, plotting out this financial revolution, plotting out, not just the finance revolution, a worldwide revolution.

Michael Novogratz: (06:10)
I realized that there was a religion to this stuff, that people were in it not just for the money, they run it for change, to rebuild the financial system in a more egalitarian way, in a more transparent way, in a fairer way. What we're seeing now called DeFi, they were talking about back then, but they were also talking about it for the music industry, for publishing, for almost every industry you can think about.

Michael Novogratz: (06:33)
That got me really thinking that there's a passion behind these communities that doesn't exist in very normal... Maybe it exists in the Tesla maniacs, but in general, you don't see people with four tattoos, while there are a lot of Bitcoin tattoos. They're purpose driven movements. That got me really excited because it aligned up with my social consciousness, the way I saw the world, and I was like, this is cool to be part of a revolution that wants to do good.

Michael Novogratz: (07:07)
That's when I really plunged in. I bought a ton of Ethereum, it went up that year. 2017 became this amazing speculative bubble, and at that point, I was like, okay, we're going to start a company. We started Galaxy, really in early 2018, right as the bubble was popping. I knew it was a bubble, I talked about it being a bubble, I sold a lot of stuff. But I decided to start a company anyway, because I figured, this won't be a long burst. That the underlying people in this space aren't going to give up, and the underlying technology is real.

Michael Novogratz: (07:42)
Lo and behold, three years later, we're back to what feels like another frenzy. I would say, it's not the same as 2017 at all, just given the breadth of the players coming in and the amount of capital being put into the system and building new architecture. I think this is early innings of the real revolution, with 17 being the first tempest in a teapot, we'll look back on. But that's it. That's a long winded answer. Sorry about that.

Anthony Scaramucci: (08:11)
No, it's cool. That's why I got you on. Ari, I want to ask you the same question, what got you passionate about crypto? Where did the brain click? I can tell you my moment in a second, but where did the brain click... By the way, Novo, I owe you a lot for that moment because you came to the SALT Conference, we're talking about it. I said, okay, if Mike's doing it, I have to do more research on this. But, Ari, go ahead.

Ari Paul: (08:36)
When the financial crisis hit, I was a novice trader at the Susquehanna International Group and very interested in macro, certainly not with Mike's professional experience, but I was reading a lot of... I write people all the time, people like Nouriel Roubini I discovered in 2007. It was clear that the Fed's money printing wouldn't cause inflation right away. We were in such a deflationary world, but I literally thought at the time, in five to 10 years, the tradable lifetime is going to be betting on currency depreciation. That started me searching.

Ari Paul: (09:12)
I'm not the fastest learner in the world, even though I came across Bitcoin in 2011, it didn't click for me that Bitcoin could be that asset. It wasn't until 2014 that things clicked on like okay, insofar as people whether or not we get inflation, whether or not we get extreme currency depreciation, fears of that will increase.

Ari Paul: (09:32)
As an options trader, you can think of it almost like an option where if volatility increases, the option's more valuable, whether or not we end up finishing in the money. What we're seeing today is exactly that. Whether or not we end up getting inflation, people are much more concerned about it today. The idea of us having high single digit inflation in five, six years doesn't sound crazy anymore. I would say the first thing that had me looking... Obviously, I was looking for Bitcoin, I was looking for what is the play when central banks around the world quadrupled the money supply? I recognized it might take five years for that to start trickling in, given the velocity of money fell.

Ari Paul: (10:08)
Bitcoin is so clearly that asset, having a fixed supply, total radical transparency. Well, one thing I'd say is that I don't think Bitcoin is competing as a technology, it really is an analogy, it's closer to something like a Lloyd's of London or JP Morgan in the sense that no one thinks JP Morgan's going to go away because of new competitors says we can undercut them on fees by 10%. It's competing on longevity, on adoption, on network effects. I'll stop there.

Anthony Scaramucci: (10:41)
Novo, the volatility of Bitcoin is a major concern for skeptics. Why is Bitcoin so volatile, when you think about all the convergence of buying right now, and as it's making this transcending moment into the institutional class of investors? Why is it so-

Michael Novogratz: (11:02)
Listen, in 2017, I would have told you that 99% of buying was retail. That number's coming down, but it didn't start coming down really till this year. Crypto was set up as an alternative to institution. It was set up to live outside of institutions. It played into this retail. But more importantly, the real big exchanges where there was great innovation over in Asia. You're talking about places like Binance and Bitfinex and BitMEX and WOBI. If you think about it, they played right into the Asian love of gambling, and set up what I'll call Macau 2.0.

Michael Novogratz: (11:51)
These are really big exchanges that offer up to 100 times leverage. Think about that, Anthony, I'm a rich guy, and when I go to Goldman Sachs or UBS and I want to borrow money to buy equities, maybe they give me two times leverage, and if I want to short something, I get no leverage. That's with a giant balance sheet. We have all these rules about how much leverage we let people take in the equity market, or even in the currency market. But in the crypto market, in all these exchanges, you get 100 to one leverage. That's near insanity.

Michael Novogratz: (12:22)
What you have still is the remnants of this giant gambling class, mostly from Asia, but not all from Asia, this giant gambling class that has used this as an alternative to Macau. We're seeing now this transition from retail, into much deeper institutional hands, that over time, will mute volatility. You can see it, there's a great chart, Ari probably has it, of how fast coins are coming off exchanges.

Michael Novogratz: (12:55)
They're going somewhere, they're going into cold storage, institutional custody places. They're going into lending businesses, but they're moving off exchanges at a rapid pace. That tells me the shift is happening. Right now, Ethereum is trading at 190 vol. I was trying to buy some options last night, I was like, at 190 vol, that's a lot. Bitcoin's at 140, 150 vol. That's unsustainable. We are not going to be in this frenzy forever. There will be a blow off top at one point. You'll consolidate and things will calm down, people will lose some money, people will make some money.

Michael Novogratz: (13:37)
I've never seen markets literally trading in this kind of frenzy. I was going to buy some Ethereum last night, and I got a phone call. I was pricing up some options, the vol was too expensive. I got a phone call, it was a 30 minute phone call, I came back and it was up 7%. I go, "That's great." It's up another 7% since then. When you see price action like this, you know something special is happening, but you also have to be very careful.

Anthony Scaramucci: (14:02)
Ari, you get to look at most of this landscape. Explain to our viewers the supply demand dynamics for Bitcoin today.

Ari Paul: (14:14)
Sure. One thought on volatility, you can't go from being $1 to $30,000 without volatility, almost tautological. When Bitcoin first... An unusual thing, we're used to assets becoming liquid and tradable at a billion dollar market cap or at least 100 million. Bitcoin started trading when it hit a market cap of something like less than $5 million. You can't get from a $5 million market cap to a 300 billion, half trillion dollar market cap without incredible volatility over 11 years.

Ari Paul: (14:47)
As we're in price discovery mode, and that's really what it is. One other angle to think about this, I was at the endowment world where we're constantly saying, man, it's so hard to get out. The world's best fund managers are really happy if they got a few percent points on $10 billion a year. We want to look at asset classes that are inefficient for various reasons. What we've seen, my basic thesis for crypto as a whole being a secular bull run, is it's not a set of market participants that are repricing the asset, it's a growing set of market participants every couple of years, where as the regulatory ambiguity fail falls away, as the operational burdens fall away as you get legitimate and name brand custodians like Fidelity. Basically, as new institution types, as pensions are able to buy the asset, suddenly, the number of market participants increases exponentially.

Ari Paul: (15:39)
We're in this price discovery mode with ripples of new types of market participants gaining access to the asset. It's not going to be a steady 1% every day, because when you're in a bull run, speculators see the 1% daily gains, they start adding leverage, it feels like free money, so then you get over, extended, then you correct.

Ari Paul: (15:57)
The supply demand dynamic today, as Mike noted, we've seen tons of Bitcoin moving off exchange. Every data point we have on this is massive institutional buying. US and quantitative data, things like inflows into Grayscale, which are inflows into the closed end vehicle. That was, I believe, $3.8 billion, in Q4, which was close to everything that had ever flown into Grayscale prior to that.

Ari Paul: (16:26)
Anecdotally, a really interesting data point is we've been talking to a lot of billionaires in the financial world who are... It's such an interesting shift of mindset, they're now thinking defensively. They're thinking enough of their billionaire buddies have 10% of their net worth in Bitcoin, that if they don't, they're thinking, man, if Bitcoin does another 20X, I'm not invited to the parties anymore. I'm not in that rich club. Wherever they are in the hierarchy.

Ari Paul: (16:50)
Now they're thinking, I need a passive allocation, I need to have 10% of my net worth in this just to keep up, just in case. It's not about getting rich, it's now about staying rich. Those are very strong hand buyers, these are people who are looking to buy more on dips. These are people, they're not going to sell with a change in trend. The volatility is not going away. You can't have raging bull runs that take you 10X higher without volatility, the volatility will gradually fall. as it's institutionalized, broader market dissipation, we are seeing volatility gradually fall. But it's going to remain a volatile asset until it reaches maturity. That's still probably pretty far away.

Anthony Scaramucci: (17:34)
I want to ask you guys a few rapid fire. These are yes or no questions. Then I got to turn it over to the millennial. It sucks for me, but it's part of his contract, this agent puts pressure on me, where Darsie has to ask some of these questions. Let's go over a couple of rapid fire questions, and there's short answers. Michael, where's Bitcoin on 12-31-21?

Michael Novogratz: (18:00)
$65,000.

Anthony Scaramucci: (18:02)
Ari, where's Bitcoin on 12-31?

Ari Paul: (18:04)
At $85,000.

Anthony Scaramucci: (18:06)
$85,000, okay.

Michael Novogratz: (18:07)
Like the Price is Right here. All right.

Anthony Scaramucci: (18:09)
Okay. We're going to keep going. Okay, Michael, yes or no, Goldman Sachs will have a Bitcoin fund in the next two years, yes or no?

Michael Novogratz: (18:19)
Yes.

Anthony Scaramucci: (18:20)
Ari?

Ari Paul: (18:21)
Yes.

Anthony Scaramucci: (18:22)
Okay. BlackRock, will BlackRock have a Bitcoin fund?

Michael Novogratz: (18:26)
Yep.

Ari Paul: (18:26)
Yep.

Anthony Scaramucci: (18:28)
Okay. Gary Gensler, somebody we both know, Michael, maybe Ari knows him as well. We had the opportunity to work with him at Goldman, great guy. He's going to be the SEC chairman, is he going to be pro-Bitcoin, medium Bitcoin? Is he going to be the mama bear, baby bear, or papa bear of Bitcoin?

Michael Novogratz: (18:45)
He is very knowledgeable on crypto. So, I think he's going to be a real positive for the space. He's going to be tough on banks. He's progressive. He's in my camp, not your camp. But he'll be very fair and very-

Anthony Scaramucci: (19:01)
I might be in your camp now, no regrets. I know, this guy-

Michael Novogratz: (19:05)
We're moving you over.

Anthony Scaramucci: (19:06)
Yeah, he destroyed one of the major political parties, the Party of Lincoln, the guy took it out, put it in a paper shredder. But this is about Bitcoin, we're going to keep it on Bitcoin, not my political theories. Go ahead, Ari, what do you think of Gary?

Ari Paul: (19:21)
The concern I think for the industry is that Gary views most tokens as likely securities. You have Bitcoin but then you have 300 other meaningful assets, real market cap, real value. The concern is that a lot of those had offerings that may have been unregistered security offerings. Ethereum is a great example of this where the SEC has said, not as an official statement, but they've had representatives say at conferences that they view it as grandfathered in, that they don't intend to go after Ethereum even though the initial offering may have been technically an unregistered security offering.

Ari Paul: (19:53)
Concerned with Gensler, is that he may be much more aggressive on that front with other assets. Probably very pro-Bitcoin. As Mike said, he was a professor of blockchain, I believe at MIT. Very, very knowledgeable, but aggressive on the regulatory side. What the whole crypto world is paying attention to is how... We just had Mnuchin proposed rule out of the Treasury Department, governments are not going to ignore crypto. That's always been true. Satoshi Nakamoto wrote about this about how we want to grow quietly until we're ready to have government attention.

Ari Paul: (20:29)
Cryptocurrency is now a stage where every government around the world is developing policies, every regulator is thinking about how this falls under the purview. The hope is that it's relatively light, sensible regulation. Gensler may be on the aggressive side.

Anthony Scaramucci: (20:43)
Okay, Michael, the date that a crypto, let's say Bitcoin, the date that a Bitcoin ETF is approved?

Michael Novogratz: (20:52)
Within 12 months.

Anthony Scaramucci: (20:53)
Okay, Ari?

Ari Paul: (20:55)
I don't know, but I'm optimistic. I hope Mike's right.

Anthony Scaramucci: (20:59)
Okay. All right.

Ari Paul: (21:01)
I'll say yes if I have to give-

Michael Novogratz: (21:03)
Anthony, let me elaborate a little bit. The SEC's job is to protect the little guy, right? That's the SEC's job, protect the retail investor. They have allowed the Grayscale Trust, which is an amazing piece of business for Barry Silbert, and his team to grow to $25, $30 billion, where investors are paying high fees, they're being arbitraged everyday by hedge funds. Hedge funds put in Bitcoin, retail investors buy it 20%, 25% premium, 18% premium, it changes day to day.

Michael Novogratz: (21:34)
You got retail paying high fees and buying at bad prices, but that was okay, the SEC let that go. But they wouldn't let an ETF go. They were just asked backwards on this whole thing. Chairman Clayton didn't really get it. I think Gary Gensler is far far more attuned to what his role is, and understanding the intricacies of crypto.

Michael Novogratz: (21:57)
We're going to have an ETF. It's going to make the Grayscale premium go from where it is, to probably negative. It's a giant closed end funnel. I wish I owned that closed end funnel. It's going to be there for a long, long time. But most closed end funds trade at a discount to NAV, and I think in time, Grayscale will, too. It will, once there's an ETF. I think that will be the big transition this year.

Anthony Scaramucci: (22:22)
Okay. I got to tell you something, Ari, you got a really cool camera going, it's like you're coming in, you're coming out. I feel like Scorsese is directing the SALT Talk, but at any moment, just don't go into a whole Scarface mode or something like that, God forbid. Okay, go ahead, Darsie, I know you're dying to ask questions [crosstalk 00:22:42] it's been long Bitcoin since before it was invented. Go ahead.

John Darsie: (22:48)
Michael, I want to start with you. You mentioned earlier that the 2017 rally was driven a lot by retail investors. You said, I think 99%, you felt, was retail speculation, and now that percentage is shifting towards institutions. In your view, what is that percentage today, and what type of interests are you fielding from institutions? Whether it be pension endowments, large investment firms, insurance companies? What type of ventures are you fielding in Bitcoin today?

Michael Novogratz: (23:18)
I think if you add high net worth into that bucket, which are many institutions themselves these days, listen, that's all our business because we were set up as an institutional business. I will tell you, Galaxy's mantra was we're going to be the bridge between crypto and institutions. Man, it was kind of lonely for a couple of years. Our business wasn't great until really it all shifted with COVID, and post COVID, we've had these two tailwinds. We've had this macro story because of the money printing, that is a beautiful tailwind for Bitcoin, the story that Ari was telling eloquently earlier.

Michael Novogratz: (23:55)
You've also had the digitalization of everything, that from us doing this on Zoom, to the hyper acceleration of that, and that's really played into the Ethereum community, it's played into stable coins. All of us saying, shit, I wish they could have done the COVID checks directly as opposed to getting them in the mail, we should all have wallets, government should be able to direct payments through a payment system that's wallet based.

Michael Novogratz: (24:25)
We're going to have central bank issued digital currencies. They're coming in every single major country. What form they take, it'll be interesting, but they're coming in every major country. That whole process, I think has shifted the institutional mindset. First, it was all Bitcoin. Next, why I think Ethereum is going to double and I literally didn't think this till yesterday. I was walking, I was like, shit, all the smart hedge funds are going, "What's next? We're going to now look at Ethereum." Then the same thing with the other institutions.

Michael Novogratz: (24:57)
Then it's going to be decentralized finance, which really is the cool stuff. We're in this process now, of more and more smart people with real capital looking, understanding it. Ari and I aren't crazy, but we're not that much smarter than anybody else, we just got in early, and the same conclusions we make most likely are gonna be made by other people looking at it.

Michael Novogratz: (25:17)
I always thought in mercantile thinks 10 smart guys looking at a set of problems usually come up with the same answers. As we get more and more eyeballs on these solutions for things that don't work, you're going to have more people getting interested in investing.

John Darsie: (25:32)
Right. Ari, just to build on that point from Michael, in terms of the interest you're seeing in the crypto world, is it focused on Bitcoin? Is it now include Ethereum, obviously, which has rallied a lot, even in the last week or so, or do you think people are going to continue to go further down the risk curve and look at alt coins, and other sort of venture opportunities in the digital asset space?

Ari Paul: (25:55)
They're definitely going to move along the curve. What we've seen... Most of the money coming into the ecosystem comes into Bitcoin first, and that's always been true. I think we're in the sixth inning of a fairly classic bull cycle, and for the rest of this bull cycle, my prediction is alt coins in general outperform Bitcoin, and it's very similar across any asset class, where after you've had major wealth creation, people move along the risk curve, they want to find that next 10X.

Ari Paul: (26:20)
Bitcoin is up more than 10X since March of last year, nine months up, more than 10X. People see a price tag of $36,000, $37,000, and they say, "Well, it's going to be hard to get another 10X out of that." They look at something like Ethereum, that just in the last 24 hours, actually made an all time high, and they say, "Well, okay, that's a much smaller asset, a few billion dollars going into that and the thing is going to triple." Then they keep moving down the risk curve.

Ari Paul: (26:46)
Basically, new money first goes to Bitcoin. Bitcoin's the safest, the most stable, the easiest to understand. And then as people get into the ecosystem, they learn a little more, they get more comfortable, they look out along the risk curve, and they look also for where they can add active alpha, that alpha for asset selection, alpha through just having other assets to market time.

Ari Paul: (27:05)
I'm in a slightly different seat than Mike, in that we're active managers. We're not pitching gen passive allocation. We're not Grayscale, we're not trying to get people to just put money into Bitcoin. The people we're talking to naturally are interested in the full spectrum of opportunities.

Michael Novogratz: (27:22)
Yeah. Let me clarify, I would say 85% of the new institutional money, 90% of the institutional money that comes into the space this year, is going to come into bitcoin. Be very clear about that. Bitcoin's got a $700 billion market cap. That'll move the market. I actually think Bitcoin, like I said, could close to double from here, it would have been double on the year, from where we started the year. That's a lot of market cap to move, is adding another $700 billion or more. It doesn't take nearly as much money to move Luna Coin, or SushiSwap or YFI, or even Ethereum. Those coins, I think, potentially have more volatility, more upside, also more downside. Bitcoin's been de-risked in a lot of ways.

John Darsie: (28:09)
Yeah, and that's our thesis at Skybridge, Bitcoin is our gateway drug, and for now, it's our exclusive focus, but it's something that, like you said, big institutions are going to look at the bellwether first. I just want to... Ari, if you could elaborate on-

Anthony Scaramucci: (28:23)
You got to say gateway drug, or you're going to get Novogratz all excited when you say that. Gateway drug? That's the best metaphor you can come up with? Keep going.

Michael Novogratz: (28:34)
I'm drinking water out of a sake cup.

Anthony Scaramucci: (28:37)
I know that's vodka hidden in an aquaponic, man. Don't start.

John Darsie: (28:44)
Ari, I want to talk about the thesis behind why Bitcoin has been so strong. There's this macro argument that people are buying into bitcoin, because of money printing and inflation and things like that. But then there's also purely a supply, demand dynamic that exists where there's so much more buying of Bitcoin taking place, and it's a chicken and egg type situation. What do you think is the real biggest [inaudible 00:29:06] behind this massive rally that we've seen over the last several months?

Ari Paul: (29:12)
I would call it billionaire FOMO. The virus, in Q4 in particular, something you could see, it was actually, it's an amazing pattern. If you bought Bitcoin during US business hours, and you sold it during Asia hours, you actually doubled Bitcoin's performance, even though it did a 3X in the quarter. You could see it in the market. It's TWAP, it was time weighted average price scaling in orders largely on Coinbase and other US exchanges.

Ari Paul: (29:39)
These were US institutions and US billionaires establishing large positions through OTC desks. We talked to some of these people, we know it anecdotally, you see sometimes public reports from for example, micro sale or micro strategy. That's what it's been, that was what was driving it, and the psychology was very much these ripples of word of mouth adoption.

Ari Paul: (30:02)
One billionaire is talking to four of his financial buddies, people like Novogratz, and it's yeah, I've now got 10%, 20% of my net worth in it, and I'm super convinced. I think it's going to double this year, it's the best risk adjusted place to have your money. As with all marketing, it's a number of touches. Once you hear that from three of your smartest billionaire friends who you respect, maybe you get converted. We've been seeing that.

Ari Paul: (30:24)
Then what's happened just very recently is finally Asia is getting in the game. That pattern of sell offs during Asia hours, finally stopped about a week ago, there's now a small kimchi premium, which is Bitcoin is trading at a premium in South Korea. This has been the pattern in every crypto bull cycle, by the way, it's basically usually starts off as US more savvy money, smarter money, and then you get US retail and Asia chasing the momentum. We're just now getting into that stage of more retail and Asia driving the rally.

Michael Novogratz: (31:00)
Let me jump in, and chime in here for a second, because I think Ari hit on something that's important, but maybe didn't hit on it as hard as I want to. When you think about what's unique about Bitcoin, it's the first global speculative asset, really, period. We never had an asset as distributed as Bitcoin. But Bitcoin is owned by over 120 million people now. In every village, there's Bitcoiner trying to convince their friends that this is the cool thing.

Michael Novogratz: (31:33)
If you're running Apple, or Tesla, you've got usually one guy out there as the salesman, who's selling this company, and who's telling the story of this company. In Bitcoin, I'm one of 15 people that seem to show up on CNBC, weekly, telling the Bitcoin story. There's podcasts galore, but there's people in every village in the damn world, who are bitcoiners, who feel like it's their job to proselytize, about why.

Michael Novogratz: (32:07)
We have never had an asset that has a retail base in Iran, or retail base in India, retail base in Africa, retail base in Korea, passionate retail basis, all over the world. What we're seeing is this viral effect, this networking effect that's accelerating.

Michael Novogratz: (32:29)
Ari told you about a really important network, The good old billionaire boys club. I was on an early call that a friend of mine set up and we looked around, and I was like, Jesus, there's like 30 of the richest guys I've ever seen on this call. From that call, a lot of them ended up getting involved in the crypto space. Some with us, many not with us.

Michael Novogratz: (32:52)
You have these mini ecosystems, but they're developing everywhere. That's the power of this community and asset, is the power of decentralization. There's not a CEO of Bitcoin. I like to think I am sometimes, but I am absolutely not CEO of Bitcoin. I used to call myself the Forrest Gump of Bitcoin. There isn't a CEO, and there are different people. Michael Saylor has had an amazing effect this year, he's popped up, it's his moment. There's different people at different times that are having influence in different communities.

Michael Novogratz: (33:25)
Michael is doing, I think it's next week, we're participating, a conference for literally 2,000 CFOs and CEOs of companies, to try to convince them to put some of their corporate cash in Bitcoin. Now, he's not going to give it to the majority of them, but he's going to convince some of them. Here's another guy building community. That's happening everywhere in this asset, which is pretty cool.

John Darsie: (33:46)
Are there a lot of still, to use a bad metaphor, again, closeted Bitcoin bulls that haven't come out yet? You have people like Paul Tudor Jones and Stan Druckenmiller and Bill Miller. There was a lot of names that people would say wow, when they realize how invested people are in Bitcoin.

Michael Novogratz: (34:02)
Less than 10% of the people that would be notable names, who have bought it, have bought it publicly, which doesn't make a lot of sense, they should all be public, because it will help drive adoption. But a lot of people revere their privacy. I don't happen to be one of those people. But lots of people. Even in the insurance company, there's one insurance company that's come out and said they bought Bitcoin, but I know of three insurance companies that have.

Michael Novogratz: (34:33)
Listen, one person is a crazy man. He might wear dragon sweatshirts and a funny hat. But by the time you have three or four, it's a movement. We already have a movement in the insurance business, but we just don't know it yet.

John Darsie: (34:47)
Right. Ari, I'm going to play devil's advocate now for a couple of questions here on our video segment, but there's an accusation out there, and I think it's one of the more common and credible accusations, at least at one point it was, that people have dug into the reality of it and there's some skepticism around the accusation. But that Bitcoin has manipulated using Tether and using other stable coins, and really this is a bunch of Bitcoin whales that are trading with each other and helping to manipulate the price higher. What do you say to people who argue that the price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is manipulated? I'll let you answer it too, Michael.

Ari Paul: (35:24)
Yes, two years ago, most Bitcoin volume was on offshore unregulated exchanges that did play a lot of games that the reported volumes were probably 10X the real volumes. What's happened recently is a couple of these [inaudible 00:35:38] things. The US... Which department was it? BitMEX, which was one of the largest exchanges, the principals were indicted by the US government, and that caused a lot of volume to flow away from BitMEX. Also, BitMEX in Black Thursday, when Bitcoin crashed, they mishandled it, so a lot of money flew to regulated US space, very reputable exchanges. CME futures are now... Mike, what's the daily volume on that now? Do you know on CME?

Michael Novogratz: (36:07)
It's a ton.

Ari Paul: (36:08)
I would say it's $4 billion a day on CME futures now, massive. OKX had some principles arrested in China, and that led similarly to a lot of volume flowing into places like Coinbase. We have price discovery happening to the many billions of dollars a day in Bitcoin on regulated exchanges that are CME futures. I think we trust that those are not manipulated any differently than any other CME future, for example. As for the stable coins, for Tether, Tether is a pool right now of about $26 billion, it's relatively opaque, and it historically was the on ramp for Asia to buy bitcoin.

Ari Paul: (36:45)
A lot of these exchanges to avoid really... Basically, if you're an exchange that touches Fiat, you have massive regulatory hurdles. If you don't touch Fiat, you fall under a much lighter regulatory regime. A lot of the highest volume exchanges chose not to touch Fiat. Well, how do you buy bitcoin on those exchanges then? You need a stable coin.

Ari Paul: (37:03)
Tether was the original stable coin. That was how the highest volume exchanges, if you wanted to get money on, you would first buy Tether. Tether's opaque, because basically, the banks that serve Tether don't really want to be public. One is Deltec, but there's a few that don't, because they're afraid it will just put them in regulatory crosshairs, even if they're not doing anything illegal.

Ari Paul: (37:24)
For example, I had a bank account shut down because I transferred money from that bank to Coinbase. Totally legal transaction. Coinbase is a regulated US entity, the bank shut down my account because they just don't want to deal with compliance around crypto. It's easy to see why a lot of banks would not be public, but they're holding $5 billion of Tether's money.

Ari Paul: (37:43)
I think it is a legitimate concern, in the sense that I can't prove that nothing funny is going on, it's too opaque. With that said, all the criticisms that have been circulated are very weak. Most of it is very easy to explain. For example, people point out that Tether transactions happen in round numbers. They batch, like many entities, they just batch transactions daily. People have pointed out a correlation between Tether printing and Bitcoin rising. Well, of course, it's the on ramp. People give $100 million to Tether, they convert the Tether, they send the Tether to other machines and buy Bitcoin. Of course, you would expect there to be a high correlation. Tether printing is generally bullish, because it's an on ramp that people use to buy Bitcoin.

Ari Paul: (38:24)
My best guess at the moment is that Tether is legitimate. I don't think it's manipulating anything. With that said, it is a systemic risk.

John Darsie: (38:33)
Michael, do you have any reaction to that? Or what are other risks in your mind that are real, and maybe-

Michael Novogratz: (38:39)
I think Ari nailed it, and it would be nice if there was an audit on Tether, there really isn't. We looked at it, to be fair, years ago, they had a partner who wanted to get rid of it at one point because it was dragging down Bitfinex. Bitfinex was a very profitable exchange for them. The thought was, sell it to someone in the US who could then bring the regulators in and make sure it was legit and clean. I was very excited about it, I thought it was a cool business. I wish I'd gotten into the stable coin business. I'm jealous.

Michael Novogratz: (39:15)
Of course, he ended up being pushed out of their ownership group and they kept it. Listen, the guys that own Bitfinex, the guys that own Tether are really crafty, aggressive, cowboy businessmen, who have lived outside the grid in some ways. That doesn't give you great confidence. That said, they have so much to lose by screwing this thing up, that you hope that... Listen, there's been quasi audits done. I remember a guy who was an ex head of the FBI, came in and they hired him to do a quasi audit, and he believed that they had the right backing.

Michael Novogratz: (39:56)
But right now, in some ways, it doesn't matter till it matters. People see tether as a legitimate store of value. What would be really fascinating is if you can create something that then drifts away from being backed, that people just trust anyway, then all of a sudden you've got [inaudible 00:40:14] and then you've made a money printing machine. That's the fear, because no one believes that's the case right now. If they're doing that, man, they're good.

Michael Novogratz: (40:25)
It is the one systemic risk in the system, if there was something that blew up. Look, it's only $25 million, but right now, it still provides a lot of the grace for how all these exchanges work. It would be a real win for places like Coinbase and Kraken, and the more established, the regulated places or US places, it would hit bitcoin price temporarily. But things would then I think, just regroup.

John Darsie: (40:52)
Right. Michael, what are you worried about? You talk about Tether being one of the systemic risks with Bitcoin and crypto, what other risks are you worried about, related to that asset class?

Michael Novogratz: (41:02)
Listen, whenever you're trading at 170 vol... Ethereum options are 190 vol offered last night. Whenever things are moving this fast, people make mistakes, mistakes get really costly. There's a lot of leverage in this Grayscale arbitrage, where people borrow coins, put them on Grayscale, wait six months and then sell them to the retail buyer. There's a tremendous amount of leverage in that space. If there was an ETF announced tomorrow, ETF announced tomorrow, which is not going to happen, but if it was, theoretically, that premium collapses, there are hedge funds and other businesses, that would be shit out of luck.

Michael Novogratz: (41:47)
Again, that's bad for the overall system when somebody notable blows up, it always scares people, what else could happen? Some of that's going to happen, because we're trading at 190 vol, that's just the way the world works. You keep your fingers close to the keyboard, and you keep your radar on. We're in a hyper bull market right now, and it's always hard to ride the bull.

John Darsie: (42:16)
Yep. How about you, Ari, what are you concerned about?

Ari Paul: (42:25)
I have a risk manager background. I always have a long, long list of concerns. I'd say at the moment though, I think Mike and I are in the same page of our analysis of you have money flowing in that is strong hands that are buying for the long term that are looking at dips as opportunities. I agree, I think if Tether were to collapse tomorrow, basically in any hyper vol bull runs, you get big pullbacks, you get 30% pullbacks on the way, and those are always terrifying. Those always happen because of a headline and the headline's usually real, it's usually something actually happens that's scary, you fall 30%, and then everyone remembers, wait, we think this thing's higher in two years, so why wouldn't we be buying the step?

Ari Paul: (43:06)
I would say, Tether is up there. You have a lot of smaller scale risks. In DeFi, for example, there's constant hacks and exploits of the smart contracts. If you're in DeFi, if you own assets, that could be systemically dangerous to Ethereum, if you've had a much larger scale, if you have billion dollars taken out of DeFi, for example.

Ari Paul: (43:27)
Other than that, I don't think there's anything imminent on the regulatory front. But I am a little bit concerned that now we have Democrats controlling Congress. We have seen some legislation that's pretty adverse coming from the AOC crowd. So far, it's fringe, it doesn't look like it has congressional support. But as this bull market plays out, under a Democratic administration, Democratic Congress, I think we're likely to face some onerous regulation that may prove challenging, may create some of those dips that are then a good trading opportunities for people like Mike and I.

Ari Paul: (44:00)
I don't really have existential concerns, currently. I'll say this though, every time crypto has gone up 10X, it becomes much scarier to a new level of sovereign entity. 2013 was, well, Bitcoin is being used on Silk Road, the FBI cares about it being used to buy drugs. Then 2017, it was wow, ICOs are bigger than seatstay financing and traditional finance. Now, the SEC cares. Well, this bull market, we're getting to a scale that central banks care, that saw the Treasury Department's care. I think at least in some parts of the world, we will see more meaningful pushback, and it's hard to predict how that will play out, and I think that's probably at least six months away, it's probably another 100% rally in Bitcoin, first. But at some point, that'll be a risk.

John Darsie: (44:43)
I'm going to ask-

Michael Novogratz: (44:43)
Let me ask one thing. One thing that's driven me crazy is and I wouldn't call myself a progressive or certainly center left, is that the progressive, you have this legislation that Rashida Tlaib put out. Bitcoin and crypto at its core, the reason I got in it is that it's progressive. The banking system has not been progressive, the banking system charges huge fees to people with no money and smaller fees and gives great access to people with money. The way the whole IPO game is played is, the richer you are, the more you make free on the IPO game.

Michael Novogratz: (45:23)
In some ways, that group of politicians have it backwards. I've made it my mission this year, at one point to sit down with AOC and, and some of the other dams and try to help them understand that, we're on their side. I got into this, basically for that reason. It's some way bizarre.

Michael Novogratz: (45:44)
Now, listen, part of it is, it would help if there was more diversity in crypto, both gender diversity and racial diversity, and I'm gonna try to do my own side of it there. Crypto felt like it's a bros club. If you looked at my Twitter, it was 85% male. That needs to change the setting, to win over some of the progressives, but also just it needs to change because if you really want to rebuild things in a more equitable way, you can't just have white males as the only guys participating, at least within the US context.

John Darsie: (46:20)
Yeah. It's interesting, you're starting to see some athletes become aware of crypto and there's a couple, Russell Okung, who is a left tackle for the Carolina Panthers getting paid in Bitcoin. Spencer Dinwiddie is trying to tokenize himself, he's a guard for the Brooklyn Nets. It is exciting to see a broader coalition of people getting into the space.

John Darsie: (46:39)
The final question I want to ask you both about is central bank digital currency. We had Marty Chavez, former Goldman CTO and Chief Information Officer on here, talking very expansively about the potential benefits of central bank digital currencies. Could you explain that to our audience, who's less familiar? Mike, I'll go with you first, and what does that mean, if we do get central bank digital currencies, what does it mean for Bitcoin, which is a truly distributed, globalist digital currency?

Michael Novogratz: (47:07)
A central bank digital currency basically is just a digital rendition of the dollar, or the Euro, or what's coming first is the Chinese Renminbi. How those systems are set up, can vary immensely. If you're in China, it's going to be completely centralized, the Chinese are going to control the blockchain, which means they're going to control and understand every bit of data. It helps them with understanding the macro, real time data in their country, but it also is an unbelievable invasion of privacy, how every penny is spent.

Michael Novogratz: (47:45)
If you want to control your population, a good way to control them is understanding where their money goes. There are other systems. What's unique about blockchain is it's distributed, no one owns the database, but everybody shares it. A lot of the ones that in the West are being built on the Ethereum blockchain, which is decentralized. You can have, in a perfect world, just a much more efficient payment system without giving up all your privacy.

Michael Novogratz: (48:17)
Right now, for me to send you money, I have Venmo, I can Venmo you money up to 1,500 bucks, I think it's the limit. That's kind of like a crypto, but it's a centralized, closed system, I can't send Venmo overseas, I can't send you $100,000 on Venmo or $10,000, on Venmo. Venmo will be replaced, most likely by a system and it might be on the Facebook system, setting their version of a dollar stable coin back and forth to people. But it's crazy that I can send you a photo of me, dressed in a wig with high heels on, and I can set up on one of 19 different apps, with privacy, with anything I want, but I can't send you $10 if you're living in Europe. That's all going to change.

John Darsie: (49:06)
Ari, can you talk about your views on the DeFi movement and where that's going?

Ari Paul: (49:11)
Yeah. central bank digital currencies are going to conquer the world by storm, because they're attracted to basically everyone and everything. The IRS loves it because you get perfect tax compliance, Treasury Department loves it because you get real time economic information. FBI loves it, for obvious reasons. I think it very clearly dramatically increases demand for decentralized alternatives. Because if I tell you that everything that you do with Fiat is now going to be completely transparent to your government, as well as we now know foreign governments. We know that the SolarWinds hack, basically anything you give to the US government, you have to assume is public, is going to be on the dark net for anyone to buy.

Ari Paul: (49:48)
If I tell you that, all of your financial transactions you do with Fiat are going to be completely transparent to basically anyone who wants it. Isn't your next step to say, oh, man, what else can I do? What's the alternative to that?

Ari Paul: (50:02)
We're going to see central bank digital currencies rolled out worldwide, and I think it's going to largely replace the current system, and simultaneously, we're going to see a huge growth in demand for decentralized alternatives. I think that will be both Bitcoin, possibly privacy coins, coins that are optimized around maintaining privacy, as well as on the more complex financial transaction side. That's where DeFi comes in.

Ari Paul: (50:26)
Just like people want financial privacy on their monetary moves, they also want that on their stock trades, they also want that on the real estate transactions, and DeFi is more efficient, removes a lot of middlemen. As Mike said, it's much more egalitarian. You don't have the gatekeepers. You don't have the punitive fees to get paid that the crazy bank overdraft games banks play with their low income customers. All of that gets removed. You have total transparency and you have privacy.

Ari Paul: (50:57)
The rollout of central bank digital currencies is, I think, the catalyst that makes cryptocurrency mainstream as currency.

Michael Novogratz: (51:03)
Yep. I agree with Ari.

John Darsie: (51:06)
China had that aha moment where they went from thinking about banning cryptocurrency, thinking, wow, this could actually be a really powerful tool for us to achieve our goals, as you mentioned, Mike, in authoritarian ways.

Michael Novogratz: (51:19)
[crosstalk 00:51:19] This is where the big debate has to happen, because crypto in a centralized fashion is a dystopian nightmare. Think about it, everyone's expanding data, which China already has. Everything that's spent on; Alipay, or [inaudible 00:51:39] goes to a central clearing house. I know you're pregnant before you know you're pregnant by what you're shopping for. I know, you're gay, I know whatever I want to know, I can know, by your shopping patterns.

Michael Novogratz: (51:52)
If I decide I don't like gay people like the president of Brazil, who's been very vocal about his anti-gay stance. In a centralized digital cryptocurrency, you can hit a button and just make the money go away, it's programmable money. It's a really dangerous line on where that privacy, where that data gets held, who holds it, how long it lasts.

Michael Novogratz: (52:19)
Literally, the data collected from the central bank digital currencies, that's really where the smart regulation and thought process has to come on how these things get set up, or we're headed to a world that I don't want to be a part of.

Ari Paul: (52:31)
That's so key, I want to emphasize it, that it's not just transparency, but it's control. China, with a... Currently, if basically any government wants to financially censor citizens, they have to do it manually. It's like, let's create a list, let's give that list to different banks [inaudible 00:52:47] But imagine if an algorithm could say, you posted something unpatriotic to social media, all of your assets are frozen, and it's done algorithmically, and you have no recourse and it was effortless for some bureaucrat in China to save 10 million people, all of their assets are frozen.

Ari Paul: (53:04)
That's the world we're headed to, in at least many parts of the world, and I think very clear how that's going to increase demand for alternatives.

John Darsie: (53:11)
Right. I think it's one reason why Bitcoin continues to be the big winner, Bitcoin and other truly distributed global digital currencies continue to be the big winner in this movement. Thank you so much, Michael Novogratz from Galaxy Digital, and Ari Paul from BlockTower, two of the leading players in the space. Thank you so much for joining us on SALT Talks. We look to have you both with us at future SALT conferences in person, which I know Mike has been to many times and a great contributor to SALT, and we hope to have you, Ari, as well.

Michael Novogratz: (53:41)
Ari, good seeing you.

Ari Paul: (53:41)
Thanks for the invitation.

Michael Novogratz: (53:43)
Be well. Thanks, guys.

John Darsie: (53:44)
Thanks, Mike, and thank you to everybody who tuned in to today's SALT Talk, the latest in our series on digital assets and cryptocurrency. We look forward to having very regular conversations about these topics, which I think are on the vanguard of the type of innovation that we'd like to cover here on SALT Talks. But just a reminder, if you missed any of this talk, or you want to watch any of our previous talks with people like Michael Saylor who was referenced earlier, in this SALT Talk, you can go to salt.org\talks\archive, and view our entire archive of previous episodes of SALT Talks.

John Darsie: (54:15)
You can sign up for all of our future webinars at salt.org\talks. Please spread the word about SALT Talks. We love growing our community and we've gotten a great chance to do it digitally. During the pandemic, we had to cancel our conferences, but these SALT Talks have allowed us to build a global audience. We've been very excited about that. So, please spread the word, and please follow us on social media. We're on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram.

John Darsie: (54:39)
On behalf of the entire SALT team, this is John Darsie, signing off for today from SALT Talks. We'll see you back here again tomorrow.

Lyn Alden: Bitcoin vs. Inflation | SALT Talks #142

“2020 was the perfect storm for Bitcoin… The macro environment couldn’t be more attractive. We saw broad money supply increase 25% year-over-year.”

Lyn Alden is founder of Lyn Alden Investment Strategy where she provides investors with research, information, and tools to help them build wealth.

Initially, there were concerns around Bitcoin that made it too risky to feel confident in. Over a few years, concerns over potential competitors and vulnerabilities were addressed, greatly de-risking the asset. To cap a strong 2-3 year run, 2020 presented an ideal environment for Bitcoin to make a big jump. “2020 was the perfect storm for Bitcoin… The macro environment couldn’t be more attractive. We saw broad money supply increase 25% year-over-year.”

Bitcoin follows Metcalfe’s Law which means that as the number of users increase, the cryptocurrency’s value grows exponentially- this is often known as the network effect. In addition, due to the verification process, Bitcoin becomes more secure as the price goes up.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Lyn Alden.jpeg

Lyn Alden

Founder

Lyn Alden Investment Strategy

MODERATOR

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:07)
Hello everyone and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darcy. I'm the Managing Director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators and thinkers.

John Darcy: (00:26)
What we're trying to do on these SALT Talks like we try to do at our SALT conferences, which we're going to hopefully resume the second half of 2021, is provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future. In our view, there are few bigger ideas out there today than the digital assets and Bitcoin space.

John Darcy: (00:47)
We're thrilled today to welcome Lyn Alden, one of the leading commentators and experts on the digital assets and Bitcoin space to SALT Talks. Lyn Alden's background lies at the intersection of engineering and finance. She has a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering and a master's degree in engineering management, with the focus on engineering economics and financial modeling. She oversees the finances and the day-to-day operations of an engineering facility.

John Darcy: (01:13)
Lyn has been performing investment research for over 15 years in various public and private capacities. Her work has been editorially featured or cited on Business Insider, MarketWatch Times Money Magazine, The Daily Telegraph, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Street, CNBC, U.S. News & World Report, Kiplinger and The Huffington Post. In addition, she's appeared on Kitco, Real Vision, The Investor's Podcast Network, the Rebel Capitalist Show, Macro Voices, the Macro Huddle, What Bitcoin Did and many other podcasts and we're now proud to say today, she has appeared on SALTs. Hopefully that will make it in her bio as well. She's also a regular contributor to seeking Alpha Fed Week and Elliot Wave Trader.

John Darcy: (01:56)
Hosting today's talk is Brett Messing, the President and Chief Operating Officer of SkyBridge Capital, a global alternative investment firm that recently at the beginning of this year, launched a Bitcoin fund, and SkyBridge also made a substantial investment into Bitcoin via our flagship funds. With that, no further ado, I'll turn it over to Brett to conduct the interview.

Brett Messing: (02:19)
Well, Lyn welcome. Glad you could join us.

Lyn Alden: (02:22)
Thanks for having me.

Brett Messing: (02:24)
As I told you, before we went on the air. I'm a Lyn Alden fan and you actually helped me by extension us on our journey to investing in Bitcoin in our fund. We presently have, I think about $400 million invested in Bitcoin. We're not messing around. We even have hats that say Bitcoin.

Lyn Alden: (02:41)
Congratulations on your fund by the way.

Brett Messing: (02:44)
Thank you. We're super excited about it. You start off, can you just talk about your journey to going from Bitcoin is interesting too, this is a legitimate investible asset. Then next one, I want to talk about your report to take on it right now, which of course we share. But I'd like to understand that preliminary step.

Lyn Alden: (03:07)
Absolutely. I first heard of Bitcoin back in 2010, 2011. But I thought it was neat, I understood the basics of the technology, but I didn't really have a way to price it or a way to think that it would get very big, and so I didn't really go into that space. I didn't really keep to close tabs on it.

Lyn Alden: (03:23)
But then of course, when he had that giant run-up in 2017, I started getting more and more emails from my investment clients. Asked me what my thoughts are on it. Do I think it's a good opportunity. Of course, there's nothing like price to change public sentiment on it. For example, whatever is doing well at a time, I tend to get emails from clients about that particular thing because we had the pot stock bubble, we had the gold stock spike, we had Bitcoin go up into...

Lyn Alden: (03:46)
All these different years have a different theme. Right now a lot of interest in electrical vehicles stocks, for example. But during that 2017 run-up I said, okay, I need to do a deeper dive on this. I need to have a price model here. I need to understand some of the risks and opportunities. I did a long form research piece on it.

Lyn Alden: (04:04)
My conclusion at the time was that it is really interesting. It is really useful technology and that I'm not exactly bearish on it but that I can't bring myself to be bullish on it either. I had that neutral to slightly bear's outlook on and I took no position. I had a couple of key concerns at the time.

Lyn Alden: (04:22)
One was that sure, that Bitcoin is scarce but then now that Satoshi Nakamoto published how to do it, all these other cryptocurrencies can come in its wake, and so my concern was that potentially that the market would become very diluted. For example, even if a trillion dollars of capital pours in, what if it just goes into all these different alt coins and there's no one dominant network effect.

Lyn Alden: (04:45)
The second concern I had was that Bitcoin had recently split. I had the Bitcoin cash hard fork because there was a difference of opinion among the developer committee about whether to maximize the ease of running a full node versus try to increase transaction throughput on the base layer so that you had that kind of disagreement, and they went in two different directions.

Lyn Alden: (05:06)
My concern at the time was okay, we just had a massive price run up. I see some of these dilution risks, and so I sat out. That was around 7,000 a coin. Then of course we had the blow off top a couple months later, then we had the massive correction. We had this multi-year consolidation, and so it did actually underperform any other assets for awhile.

Lyn Alden: (05:24)
But then I started to pay attention to it again in late 2019 because by then, a lot of my initial concerns were addressed. Bitcoin won out over its hard fork in terms of hash rate and price, so it retained a very dominant market share. One of their hard forks had another hard fork into Bitcoin's Toshi vision, and those are less than one to 2% of Bitcoin's market capitalization and hash rate. They never really became sizeable competitors from a store value perspective.

Brett Messing: (05:56)
You can call them shit coins. We're fine with that. We're not on the broadcast networks here.

Lyn Alden: (06:01)
Because they never took off, they never took Bitcoin's market share, Bitcoin regained some degree of Bitcoin dominance, meaning a percentage of market cap of the total digital asset space, and so I started paying attention to it. Then of course in early 2020, when we had that big liquidation event in March, pretty much every asset class across the board was going down in price rapidly because we had liquidity issues and the global banking system.

Lyn Alden: (06:28)
I saw that Bitcoin behaved a lot like gold and silver did, and so when it was starting to come back up in April, I bought into Bitcoin. Ironically it was roughly the same price. It was just under seven 7,000 that I analyze it back in 2017. However, I viewed as significantly de-risked. And forced its scarcity by making sure that some of these hard forks couldn't take market share from it. Basically, it retained a lot of its key principles.

Lyn Alden: (06:56)
Then when you look forward about where it is in it's four-year having cycle, it's in a much more favorable place relative to the cycle that it goes through. I had a high conviction on it that I wasn't sure it would take off. But I figured that that the risk to award ratio was some of the best I've seen in any asset class, so I had to have a position.

Brett Messing: (07:16)
Can you just take a moment and explain the halving? I think for some of our audience that would be helpful.

Lyn Alden: (07:23)
Absolutely. The way Bitcoin is programmed, roughly every 10 minutes there's a new block added to the blockchain. It does an automatic network difficulty adjustment to ensure that that rate stays that about every 10 minutes. After, I believe it's 210,000 blocks, which is roughly four years, there's a halving. Basically, every time there's a new block generated, the minor that creates that block gets to create a number of Bitcoins for themselves.

Lyn Alden: (07:51)
In the first four years, that was 50 Bitcoin generated per block. Then after four years, the algorithm is pre-programmed to cut that in half, and so that went down to 25 new Bitcoins per block. Then four years later, it's 12 and a half Bitcoins per block. And so every four years, the new supply of Bitcoin generated per unit of time it gets cut in half.

Lyn Alden: (08:15)
The pattern we tend to see is that if you look at what Bitcoin did in the launch cycle for the first year, so it didn't even have a price history, and then it went up pretty dramatically. Then it had this blow off top and then it reaches consolidation, and it finally had this balance between supply and demand.

Lyn Alden: (08:31)
When it got that balance, we had a supply shock. The amount of supply got cut in half, demand was still pretty persistent and that drove the price up again. Then of course, you get momentum traders, jump on board. You bring it up to a new high, you have another blow off top and it crashed a correction. Then it finds another equilibrium base at a higher price level. Right when it does that, there's another halving. The supply gets cut in half again, and it has another four-year run. That's the cycle we've seen play out about three times.

Brett Messing: (08:59)
Okay, that's great. You had a terrific piece of summary which I sent to a lot of people. The three reasons that you're bullish on Bitcoin. You mentioned the halving cycle, the network effect which I think everyone's familiar with. That's all the value that's been created in Google information network. Amazon or retail network has come from just this collection of people all on the same system. Then the third obviously is the macro environment. You're an economist. Can you just speak to that a little bit?

Lyn Alden: (09:29)
Basically, this know 2020 was the perfect storm for Bitcoin. Because in addition to being in a good place in its own halving cycle and in addition to having one over some of those four competitors, the macro environment couldn't be more attractive. The narrative for why you'd want to buy Bitcoin is some of the best around.

Lyn Alden: (09:47)
For example, we saw broad money supply in the United States increased by about 25% year over year over the past 12 months. That's of course because we had very large fiscal deficits. Then we had a significant degree of monetization where the central bank was basically forced to buy a significant percentage of the treasuries issue to do all this fiscal deficits.

Lyn Alden: (10:09)
We see that in countries around the world to different degrees, so in many countries you see money supply growth growing over 10% year over year. The United States was actually one of the largest with over 25% year over year money supply increase. When you have that massive increase in money supply, if it doesn't show up in say price inflation, it can show up more easily in asset price inflation. You've seen a reflation and anything that's scare. Real estate, commodities, most equities, things like that.

Brett Messing: (10:40)
That's perfect. I'll talk a little bit the value, how to value Bitcoin. Bill Miller was on CNBC last week and he said that as Bitcoin goes up in value, it actually becomes more valuable and less risky as it shucks more money into it. I'm going to put a pin on that for a second. There are two other ways that I think are common way to value Bitcoin.

Brett Messing: (11:05)
One is Metcalf's law, which is by looking at the number of users on the network. I've seen some research where if you track the price against the number of people that are believed to own Bitcoin, attracts at about a 96% correlation. Then the third methodology is the stock to flow model. Which looks at the amount of outstanding Bitcoin as the numerator, and the amount is being mined as the denominator.

Brett Messing: (11:31)
As you discussed earlier with the halving cycle, as that fraction becomes more favorable, it drives the price. I'd like your thoughts on just generally how you value Bitcoin. Probably starting first with Bill Miller's comment and then how these three in your mind work together or don't.

Lyn Alden: (11:52)
Absolutely. Basically what Bill Miller points out is correct. As Bitcoin's price goes up, what we generally see is that the hash rate goes up. That's the amount of computing power that goes into verifying the network. If you look at some of the alt coins, they have very low hash rate.

Lyn Alden: (12:09)
Meaning that if you were to try 51% attack on the network, meaning if you were to somehow get enough mining capacity or processing power to be able to be a majority miner in that network, then you can change the blockchain in your favor. You can basically cheat the system and give yourself more coins. You basically can break the network.

Lyn Alden: (12:28)
With some of those, very cheap coins, low market capitalization, low hash rate, it's not that expensive to either either buy hardware or rent computing power or whatever their algorithm needs, and go ahead and attack that network and basically profit from that.

Lyn Alden: (12:44)
Bitcoin is unique in the sense that it has by far the most hash rate of any digital asset out there. Because it was the first, it's been this 12-year history of ever increasing hash rate. As the price goes up, it enables more and more mining capacity to come online and verify the network. Because most of their money comes from mining Bitcoin, generating block.

Lyn Alden: (13:09)
They also generate fees for verifying transactions, and so the higher overall market capitalization of the system, the more fees go into mining and the more expensive it would be to try to do a 51% attack. Basically as it gets more expensive, it also gets more secure in that sense.

Lyn Alden: (13:25)
Then you look at other ways of modeling it. I do think Metcalf's law is a key way to look at it. You've seen Bitcoin, and then we've also seen the theory, for example, play along those kinds of network effects. Whereas more and more people jump on, you generally have the price go up. But of course as you have these four-year halving cycles, you can undershoot or overshoot that trendline.

Lyn Alden: (13:48)
For example, if you look at the stock to flow ratio, which is a supply only model, it doesn't take into account demand. You generally see that they have pretty steady levels of where they expect the price to be at any given time based on the four year halving cycle we talked about. But you generally see that during the end of that bull run, you'll massively overshoot the model, and then you'll fall back below the model, and then you'll come to an equilibrium, and that's because demand is a variable that can fluctuate over time.

Lyn Alden: (14:15)
When you bring in another class of investors, that can push briefly way above the model until momentum phase and it dies back down. Then use it to the next halving cycled that triggers another bull run.

Brett Messing: (14:28)
I don't want to touch on the network effect for a second. Because again, I think people make this analogy which has work right between social networks and Bitcoin is a monetary network. But it seems to me that on Facebook, almost everyone is created equal. In the context of a monetary network, I don't think that's the case.

Brett Messing: (14:50)
Michael Saylor is way more than my daughter who joined the network. But for the purpose of calculating the way the model works, it doesn't account for the fact that you have players that have vastly different value to the overall network. How would you think about that? Is that just Metcalfe's law plus or does that make Metcalfe's law less relevant here?

Lyn Alden: (15:17)
Each type of network has different characteristics. For example, if you look at a phone system, every note on the phone system is pretty much equal. Whereas if you look at something like E-bay, you have two different types of nodes. You have buyers and sellers, and you need to attract a bunch of both in order to make it work. You don't have this equal distribution. You have more buyers than sellers.

Lyn Alden: (15:37)
With Bitcoin, there's a couple of different ways to measure the network. One is just hash rate, for example. The sheer amount of hash rate and security that the system has. Another way to look at it is the number of nodes, which are separate from miners. Whereas mining is a very expensive capital intensive operation, a full node can be run by anybody with a basic laptop.

Lyn Alden: (15:59)
Bitcoin has far more full nodes verifying the network from enthusiasts and all people around the world. And as far more globally distributed, whereas mining tends to be concentrated in China. Bitcoin does verification in the network. Then of course, because it's the leading brand and it has the most security, and it has a ton of liquidity, that's the one that people go to when they want to get into the space.

Lyn Alden: (16:26)
For example, SkyBridge didn't buy into light coin, as far as I know. It's Bitcoin. You basically buy the one, the blue chip of the space. As it has that large and larger network effect, that's the one that people go into when they want that security, the one that they know is going to have really useful value, and it pretty much can be in some ways accepted around the world.

Lyn Alden: (16:47)
We see in addition, once a network effect takes off, then the surrounding ecosystem gets stronger. For example, now there are Bitcoin-only hardware wallets. In the beginning, we had these hardware wallets that you could hold a bunch of digital assets. But then as the Bitcoin community diverge a little bit from the other crypto assets, we see things like Bitcoin-only hardware wallets that dedicate to Bitcoin.

Lyn Alden: (17:12)
Same thing with security companies like Casa that focus on multisignature solutions. It started to get more and more development in the surrounding ecosystem or apps that run on Bitcoin. Or you see rewards cards that pay you in Bitcoin. Whereas you see a lot less of that in some of the smaller coins because they haven't hit the critical mass to have that better and better ecosystem.

Lyn Alden: (17:35)
Then of course, once one of the protocols reaches that high level and get that better ecosystem, that gives more access points for people to invest in it, more money pours into it and then that can make the surrounding ecosystem even better.

Brett Messing: (17:49)
Thank you. That's helpful and interesting. Let's talk about volatility. Because Bitcoin went up 100% in three weeks and down about 28% in two days. JPMorgan has issued a note over the last couple of weeks. We're really thrilled that JPMorgan is writing about Bitcoin. Although I have to say, I don't agree with much of what they write.

Brett Messing: (18:10)
For example, they wrote last week that a Bitcoin ETF would be bad for Bitcoin, which I violently disagree with. But they also wrote the week before interestingly, that if you look at Bitcoin on a volatility adjusted basis, that essentially it's fairly valued. Particularly in comparison to gold. If you look at market cap in comparison to volatility. Do you have any thoughts on that?

Lyn Alden: (18:36)
Yeah. I view, there's often that narrative of Bitcoin as a store of value, and of course you have to push back to say, how can you call it a store of value if you can literally wake up and the next day your Bitcoin's down by like a third. That's because I'd classify it as an emergent store value. It's basically a whole new asset class and it's currently in the price discovery phase whereas the whole world kind of discovers what is this thing worth?

Lyn Alden: (18:59)
It's first decade of its existence, it was mostly retail investors. The past couple of years, especially 2020, we've seen it at more institutional interest. If you look at that classic, S-curve of adoption, where you have that initial early adopters and then you have that mass adoption phase and then the maturity phase. Where something like gold is of course. It's a fully mature store of value. It's been around for thousands of years and so we have a lot less volatility.

Lyn Alden: (19:23)
Whereas Bitcoin is still in that earlier phase of its of its adoption cycle. It has more risk, it has more volatility, but then people that are investing in it are basically expecting that it over time, it'll become more widely distributed, more broadly owned, and that its volatility will go down over time. There are a couple of different ways to measure volatility.

Lyn Alden: (19:42)
One of the simplest ways just to look at, say, draw downs from all time highs. The problem there is that because Bitcoin has these illiquidity events. For example, if look back in late 2017, we hit that really high level, but there's actually very little volume at that super high level. Whereas I think one of the best ways to measure volatility is to look at the market capitalization compared to the realized capitalization. Which is basically, the realized cap is basically, it's like a cost basis for Bitcoin, is basically looking at the price.

Lyn Alden: (20:17)
The weighted average of looking at the blockchain is seeing when coins last moved and looking at the price at which they moved, and you can come with a cost basis of when the system last moved. Then compare that to market cap and of course those are both rolling numbers. If you look at it like that, Bitcoin volatility has reduced in every four-year cycle.

Lyn Alden: (20:38)
That's basically that that the actual cost basis where people bought their coins has generally become a little bit more stable each time, although it still is significantly volatile because if you were to listen to the Bitcoin bowls, it's still fairly early on in its adoption cycle, and that it could become several, several times larger before the volatility would go down and perhaps resemble more like gold or silver.

Brett Messing: (21:03)
Speaking of the Bitcoin bowls, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss wrote a piece earlier in the year, $500,000 target for Bitcoin, basically that it will equal the price target, which means the market cap of gold? What's your reaction to that?

Lyn Alden: (21:18)
I think it's possible. I try to avoid specific price targets especially within a given cycle because I can have a high conviction that it's going to do well in the cycle. But then the question is how high. For example, my base case early this summer is if you look at the price performance of Bitcoin each four-year halving cycle, each one was obviously explosive, but each one was a smaller gain percentage-wise in the cycle before it.

Lyn Alden: (21:45)
That makes sense because as you go from a micro cap to a small cap to a medium cap to a large cap, you should expect smaller percent gains. Now this cycle so far was surprising me to the upside because it's actually tried to do better so far compared to where we are from the halving compared to the previous four-year cycle. Maybe that's because we've had institutional interest, so we've had an extra kick of big money coming in.

Lyn Alden: (22:08)
There could be a variety of maybe it's the macro environment. There could be a variety of reasons. My price target was significantly know if there was but without trying to give it a firm conviction. I said, I would expect at least a trillion dollar market capitalization in this cycle. I think four to equal gold, I think that's a real possibility. I would actually break it down a little bit though into the different types of gold.

Lyn Alden: (22:31)
For example if you look at gold as something like a $10 trillion market capitalization. But that of course consists of central banks owning it, that consists of a very large stock pile of jewelry around the world, and also consists of outright investment demand in the form of ETFs or gold bars and things like that.

Lyn Alden: (22:50)
I think the first step is to overtake or match gold investment demand. Which would be a subset that might be... I don't have the numbers on me but it might be something like two trillion, maybe three trillion, and then from there we'll see where it goes to overtake say the jewelry amount, the Central Bank amount. That's a whole separate use case. But over time, I do think that that Bitcoin could potentially rival gold if it continues to be seen and have this four-year halving cycle keep playing out in the way that it has.

Brett Messing: (23:21)
Do you think Bitcoin could de-monetize other asset classes? For example, art is a store of value. Most art doesn't sit on people's walls. It sits in these big storage facilities where people aren't owning it to enjoy it. There are three out in Manhattan right now. Lots of foreign people own apartments here that they never visit. They're treating New York real estate is just a store of value. Could you see a scenario where Bitcoin takes a big chunk of those other alternative asset class? Are we which are we thinking too narrowly by focusing on gold?

Lyn Alden: (23:56)
Yeah, that's the most bullish case overall, and so I think it's helpful to actually think of it in terms of layers. You can basically say, what if Bitcoin overtakes the investment case for gold? Then it's what if Bitcoin overtakes all of gold? Then it's, what if Bitcoin becomes such a broad store of value that it begins demonetizing, those other stores of value?

Lyn Alden: (24:15)
In that case, you can get the tens of trillions of dollars in market capitalization because you're taking away from all those different areas. I think that's a possibility. I think my focus is to emphasize one four-year halving cycle at a time, and let's see where we get in this cycle, then from there we'll have more information to judge what the next four-year cycle might look like.

Lyn Alden: (24:37)
Whereas I try not to speculate too far in advance, but I do think that those situations are possible. I agree with you. Basically the world has a store of value problem. That's actually, I think one of the reasons why the core Bitcoin software took off and not some of these other derivatives of it that tried to emphasize higher throughput. Because the world has all sorts of payment technologies. It's pretty easy for most people to pay.

Lyn Alden: (25:01)
Now, there are some edge cases and for example, a lot of people sending small international money. It's actually a lot of people that have that issue, and so for them, they have a particular issue. But if you look at where big pools of capital are, they primarily have a store of value problem. Because banks are paying a level of interest that doesn't keep up with inflation. Same thing for most sovereign bonds around the world. All these investors have this store value problem.

Lyn Alden: (25:27)
We see things being bid up like fine wine, fine art, beachfront property, all these different things. A lot of them, obviously they don't generate cash flow. For example, you point out that apartments in New York are empty. I like to go to beaches where they just have these $30 million homes and no one's there. They only go there maybe two weeks out of the year, and then the whole beach is yours. Because they're primarily just using that at beach front property as stores of value. I do think that over time, Bitcoin can chip away at some of those. I don't know if it will displace them, but it certainly gives an alternative that is more fungible, more liquid.

Brett Messing: (26:04)
I would add Malibu to your list of beaches with beautiful houses to go visit where there aren't many people there. Where do we go wrong, Lyn? What do you worry about? If we're all wrong... Of course the thing I worry about the most is, Dick Cheney's unknown unknowns. I'm less worried about the things in front of me, but of the things that we have the imagination to contemplate, what are the one or two or three things that you worry about and we should be worrying about?

Lyn Alden: (26:34)
One would be obviously a big bug in the software. Some of these protocols had bugs in their early days. For example, Bitcoin had an inflation bug back in 2010. It was fixed within hours. Ethereum had a big bug in its early period. But now, Bitcoin's an open source software. There's tons of people scrutinizing every line of code. It's in the phase where to finish product now. It undergos security updates, privacy updates, but it's not radically changing.

Lyn Alden: (27:04)
But that is a tail risk if something were to go wrong, technically. Besides that, I think we still have a big regulation hurdle to get through. For example, a lot of people are concerned that a Bitcoin gets too big, it faces more regulatory scrutiny and it risks being banned. Whereas I've argued somewhat the opposite that the bigger it gets, the harder it is to outright ban. Then instead, the key risk is regulation.

Lyn Alden: (27:30)
They want to know who's buying it, they want to build a track it for tax purposes. They want to do all sorts of things like that. They want to have know-your-customer regulations at the gateways. But the probability of it being banned by major capital markets goes down pretty significantly once it becomes a multi-hundred billion dollar or trillion dollar market capitalization. And once you have a lot of institutional investors in it. I think that that's being de-risked but you still have to take into account any headlines that could come out, things like that.

Lyn Alden: (27:59)
I think the last point is that so far, Bitcoin has done very well on every halving cycle. I think it'd be pretty bearish if you were to see a halving cycle where Bitcoin does not reach new all time highs. Because that kills the long-term structural momentum and its adoption cycle. I think that's a key thing to monitor for the health of how Bitcoin is adopting.

Lyn Alden: (28:21)
You can also monitor things like how many new addresses are being used. You can also look at things like development of the lightning network, that potentially make Bitcoin better as a medium of exchange. Because right now the base layer is optimized as store value. You can monitor the ecosystem around it. Some of these other apps, some of these hardware solutions, some of these increased throughput solutions. You can see basically, what is the health of that system? Is it deteriorating or does it continue to do pretty well?

Brett Messing: (28:49)
I absolutely agree with you particularly on the regulation point. I think what Bill Miller was talking about, I've actually had the privilege to speak to him, is yes the network is getting stronger, but also it gets de-risked from a regulatory standpoint, the bigger it gets. So that we want more people, particularly institutions to own it. The government then again, has to build a regulatory infrastructure around, but it just becomes something that exists.

Brett Messing: (29:19)
Just a quick one or two, I'm going to throw it over to John. Yesterday Anchorage Digital Bank was made the first nationally chartered digital bank in the country. We have two state charter banks and digital banks in Wyoming. What do you think the significance of that is, if any?

Lyn Alden: (29:39)
Well, I think it's good. Over the past several months seen increasing news like this. For example, we've seen that they approve the fact that banks can custody digital assets. A while ago that was a broader statement. We've seen also statements about banks being able to use stable coins or other blockchain technology, and of course now we have this nuisance.

Lyn Alden: (30:01)
I think this is just a further compounding of the adoption curve of the network effect of regulatory de-risking. I think that that all continues to support the story of Bitcoin. We've also seen, for example Singapore's largest bank, DBS is getting into custody and trading for credit and institutional investors.

Lyn Alden: (30:24)
Around the world, you see these other entities popping up. They want to be like Fidelity, they want to be like Gemini, they want to have these exposure to that industry. You're seeing it in all of these different markets around the world, and I think it's a good thing.

Brett Messing: (30:40)
Gary Gensler, buy, sell, hold.

Lyn Alden: (30:45)
I think overall, it's fine for Bitcoin. I'd be more worried if I was in some of those coin spaces, some of the scammier things. But I don't see it as a key issue for Bitcoin.

Brett Messing: (31:00)
Right. There are some people that believe it will probably accelerate in ETF. Vanek filed one in December. I think we'll see but he seemed too... he was teaching a class on blockchain at MIT. I guess if we're chilly reading, that's pretty good.

Lyn Alden: (31:19)
I think so.

Brett Messing: (31:21)
John, I'm going to throw it over to you.

John Darcy: (31:23)
All right. Well, I'm going to sneak in a few questions here before we let you go, Lyn. For everybody watching this, I would encourage you to go to Lyn's website, which is lynalden.com. It's a tremendous resource for very thoughtful analysis on the Bitcoin space. A lot of times you speak to people who are in this space who are somewhat one-sided. They're big time believers in Bitcoin and they don't take a balanced look necessarily at the issues.

John Darcy: (31:45)
I think when you do a tremendous job, both on this SALT Talk here today and in general about having a sober analysis of all the different factors that go into Bitcoin and have a few questions based on reading that I've done on your website. The first one is, you've done a thoughtful analysis of different ways to buy Bitcoin and the pluses and minuses to using each one.

John Darcy: (32:06)
Whether that be buying direct and owning on your own flashdrive or buying through an exchange or buying using a fund structure. Could you talk through the pluses and minuses in your mind as the people potentially that are watching this SALT Talk are evaluating, okay, I'm bought into the story, but how do I gain exposure in a way that's comfortable and safe for me?

Lyn Alden: (32:24)
It really depends on-

Brett Messing: (32:26)
Remember, we have a fund. I'm just kidding. Please speak freely.

Lyn Alden: (32:32)
I was going to say, it depends on the use case of the institution or the person, as well as how much money they want to put in. For a lot of people, the first step is to go on an exchange or to go... Now there's even places that do dollar cost averaging, for example, like Swan Bitcoin. But whatever the case may be, there's these retail portals that people can go through, and they can just get exposure to it directly. It's one of the more cost-effective ways to do it.

Lyn Alden: (32:58)
Then from there, if they want to increase their security, they can self custody of the coins. You can transfer coins from most of those platforms to yourself custody. But of course there's learning curve there. So if you don't know what you're doing, you actually have lower security because you have a higher chance of doing something wrong and losing your coins. But if you learn how to do it, that is actually one of the safest ways to hold it, is to have self custody or multisignature self custody.

Lyn Alden: (33:23)
Then from there we have a lot of vehicles around for. Of course we have the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust that people can use if they want a proxy. The thing I point out there is that for retail investors or institutions who just want to hold it on the market, it does often trade at a premium to nav. You're buying into a Bitcoin fund but you're not getting your dollar per dollar worth of Bitcoin usually.

Lyn Alden: (33:48)
I would just monitor that premium to make sure that you're not buying in at a level that is too high. Some degree of premium is fine because there's no Bitcoin ETF yet, and people can also hold that, and things like their retirement account so that those tax advantages can chip away at the premium, but it's something to watch. I think your fund does actually, that gives another access point.

Lyn Alden: (34:13)
I saw that the fees quite reasonable it's pretty low. That actually I think for funds. Because they can have regulatory issues around self custody. I've talked to some firms. They say that their regulators did not let them self custody. Of course they're reliant on these custody solutions like fidelity, like your fund, things like that that they can put a pretty big money into and have a cost effective way to hold it without worrying about a lot of the technical details.

John Darcy: (34:40)
Going more into depth on GBTC, there is that premium that you mentioned and really they're a victim of their own success. I think last week they bought two and a half times the number of Bitcoin that were even mined, and Grayscale has obviously done a ton to help institutionalize and broaden the adoption of Bitcoin. How concerned are you about that premium long-term if we do see a Bitcoin ETF, that potential of that premium could evaporate or even the fund could trade at a discount.

Lyn Alden: (35:07)
I would expect to see the premium go down to near zero, if you were to get an ETF, just because the reason for that would be not much less. Now you have a pretty good arbitrage opportunity with GBTC because people can accredit investors can buy into it at nav. Then later you have a lock up period and then of course the whole dynamics of it normally trading at a premium.

Lyn Alden: (35:30)
But if you were to have a Bitcoin ETF, that limits that arbitrage opportunity. I do think that over time, investors will have more access points and that those funds will probably be less critical. It also presents somewhat of a central allocation risk. For example, that's a lot of Bitcoins held in one custody area. That's something to monitor as well, is that you have to make sure that your custody solution's rock solid if you're using one big custody solution for your Bitcoin holding.

John Darcy: (36:06)
Switching gears a little bit, we've had Michael Saylor on SALT Talks and he talks about how he believes that a Bitcoin is really a thermodynamic wave that's revolutionizing the monetary system, and that inherently, the technology has some level of intrinsic value. But the common criticism that you hear from older people, baby boomers, Brett is an enlightened a boomer.

John Darcy: (36:28)
But you hear a lot of criticism from older people who say, well, Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. It's just a piece of code that was invented out of thin air. How do you respond to people who say that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value? How do you help them conceptualize what you believe to be some level of intrinsic value?

Lyn Alden: (36:46)
We talked before about some of these stores of value have been monetized. Things like beach front property or fine art, fine wine, they do have utility in the course of what they do, but they're also valued for their scarcity and their kind of monetary premium. Bitcoin is so far the same thing. It has real-world utility, in the sense that you can perform permissionless payments internationally, and that there's no third party that can just stop you from doing it. That has a massive amount of utility.

Lyn Alden: (37:16)
It's also extremely mobile. Imagine, for example, trying to transport gold if you were to want to move from say, one country to another country, imagine trying to get gold across borders, or trying to navigate through the banking system. Especially if there's some crisis or some issue. Because tons of different countries in the world there are going through different things at different times.

Lyn Alden: (37:43)
Whereas Bitcoin, you can literally transport your funds across borders just by remembering a 12-word zip phrase. That level of self custody or self sovereignty gives that a higher mobility of funds than most other stores value or transfers of value. We're also starting to see some payment networks that are beginning to use it. For example, you have Bitcoin which is the base layer.

Lyn Alden: (38:05)
Then you have lightening which is a secondary layer that can increase transaction throughput and decrease fees per transaction. We're starting to see apps that make use of that for fee to fee payments. It'll basically take your money, convert it to Bitcoin. A split second later, converts it from Bitcoin to another currency in another part of the world. And you basically do an international payment for almost free using that inherent liquidity on the lightning network.

Lyn Alden: (38:32)
I think over time, you'll see more and more utility like that, and when you combine that with the fact that there's a really wide network effect, there's a very high level of security backing up Bitcoin's network compared to other alt coins, that overall gives it a similar store value property. We have that utility combined with a monetary premium.

John Darcy: (38:52)
We had somebody recently ask us about Bitcoin cash and how these forks work, and you've had a great write-up again on lynalden.com, your website about this issue. Why do these forks happen? Specifically, you can talk about Bitcoin cash and why part of the Bitcoin movement decided to fork it. Are those forks in any way, a threat to the future of Bitcoin?

Lyn Alden: (39:13)
I would say no. We've seen that play out in terms of the market. They've decreased substantially in terms of hash rate and price relative to Bitcoin so that they're a small fraction of what Bitcoin is. But basically going back to the fork wars and why they happened if you look at Satoshi Nakamoto's original white paper, people often try to divine, what was his intention? Based on the white paper, based on his forum posts, what did he want to accomplish?

Lyn Alden: (39:38)
He called it E-cash. He envisioned basically being able to use Bitcoins as this permission-less cash. He also talked about how to keep the node really small so that you can compress the size of the blockchain so that the blockchain doesn't get very big and you need high storage capacity to hold it, so that you basically keep it, so that a normal computer can run it.

Lyn Alden: (40:00)
Over time we've seen some of a trade-off occur. If you want to keep the blockchain easy for say, a typical computer to be able to run, have that full node, you have to have transaction throughput in terms of the number of transactions per second to be pretty low. That doesn't limit how much value can be transacted because there's no limit to the size of those transactions. But there's a limit to the number of transactions that can occur.

Lyn Alden: (40:27)
On the other hand, if you want to increase the number of transactions on that base layer, you need to increase the block size, you need to make basically nodes much harder to run, which means that the average user can't necessarily run a full node and verify and audit the monetary supply of the network. Which is one of the key things that that Bitcoin can do is that you don't trust, you verify. You can monitor the entire money supply with your laptop.

Lyn Alden: (40:52)
We've had that trade-off, that big argument among developers happened in 2017. It's split and Bitcoin cash, they increase the block size. It's hard to run a full node but you can do more transactions per second on the base layer. Core Bitcoin, their solution instead is to say, okay, the base layer is like a settlement layer. You can settle any amount of value even though you're limited to the number of transactions.

Lyn Alden: (41:16)
However, we can build secondary layers like the lightning network that can increase the amount of transactions per unit time and settle them in a batch on the network. Actually for example, if you look at something like credit card companies and all these, or PayPal, things that do high volume payments, they're settling in batches later.

Lyn Alden: (41:38)
Bitcoin would basically operate the same way, where these other layers can handle high transaction throughput. Whereas the base layer can handle large key settlements. That's been the design trade-off. So far, the market has vastly appreciated, that high hash rate, the widely distributed node network that settlement aspect of Bitcoin.

John Darcy: (42:03)
Well Lyn, it's been a pleasure to have you on SALT Talks. Again, I would encourage everybody who's watching this talk, if you want to learn more and get more of Lyn's thoughtful analysis on the space, lynalden.com. She has a great newsletter and great investment research. But it's a pleasure to have you on. Brett, do you have any final words for Lyn before we let her go?

Brett Messing: (42:19)
I just wanted to Lyn to know that we run a full-noded SkyBridge. We are doing all we can, we want to be part of the community. We figured it's good karma.

Lyn Alden: (42:27)
Nice. You're helping to verify the network.

John Darcy: (42:32)
All right. Well, thank you again, Lyn, and thank you for everybody who joined us on today's SALT talk. Just a reminder. If you missed any part of this talk or you want to access our SALT Talks with Michael Saylor, other people in the crypto space or across finance tech and public policy, our three main verticals, you can see our entire archive at salt.org\talks\archive. And you can sign up for all of our upcoming talks at salt.org\talks.

John Darcy: (42:56)
Please follow us on YouTube as well. We broadcast a lot of these talks on YouTube. We have a fast growing audience there and are continuing to build out our digital assets vertical there, so please follow us on YouTube. Please follow us on all social media outlets. We're on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn. But on behalf of the entire SALT team, this is John Darcy signing off for today. We'll see you back here again tomorrow on SALT Talks.

Michael Saylor: The Importance of Bitcoin | SALT Talks #141

“If God designed gold with no imperfections, he would’ve created Bitcoin.”

Michael Saylor is a technologist, entrepreneur, business executive, philanthropist, and best-selling author. He currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Office of MicroStrategy, Inc.

Companies like Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple represent the big winners in the technology space. The last ten years were marked by investments in these giants. Now, it is harder to see such high returns through retail investing. With a massive expansion of the money supply, the biggest opportunity now lies with Bitcoin. Bitcoin acts as a digital gold guarding against inflation caused by government stimulus. “If you’re going to make money the 21st century way, you’ve got to do it virtually… Bitcoin has the potential to be digital gold… thermodynamically perfect.”

Bitcoin is now moving mainstream and major financial institutions are getting on board. These companies are putting Bitcoin on their balance sheet as an institutional safe-haven asset. This growth in adoption will drive an exponential increase in value. “Bitcoin is the one asset that as the price goes up, it becomes more attractive to an investor.”

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Michael Saylor

Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer

MicroStrategy

MODERATOR

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:07)
Hello Everyone. And welcome back to SALT Talk's. My name is John Darsie. I'm the managing director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance technology and public policy. SALT Talk's are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators and thinkers. And our goal on SALT Talk's is the same as our goal at our global conference series. The SALT Conference, which is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future. And there's no bigger idea in our view right now at SkyBridge, that's shaping the future, than the digital asset space, the decentralized finance movement, and in particular Bitcoin. So we're thrilled to welcome the great Michael Saylor back for his second appearance on SALT Talk. He's a man who needs no introduction, especially to those who have been following the Bitcoin movement over the last year or so, but I'll read you a little bit of his background anyway.

John Darsie: (01:07)
Michael Saylor is a technologist, an entrepreneur, a business executive, a philanthropist as well as being a bestselling author. He currently serves as the chairman of the board of directors and the chief executive officer at MicroStrategy. Since co-founding the company at the age of 24, Michael has built MicroStrategy into a global leader in business intelligence, mobile software and cloud-based services. In 2012, he authored a great book called The Mobile Wave, how mobile intelligence will change everything, which earned a spot on the New York times bestsellers list. Michael attended MIT receiving an SB in aeronautics and astronautics and an SB in science technology and society. And again, as you may know, he has recently become a whale in the crypto space. He initially allocated a $425 million, I believe was his initial investment into Bitcoin from the corporate treasury balance sheet of MicroStrategy.

John Darsie: (02:05)
He subsequently issued more convertible bonds and bought more Bitcoin. And I believe his stack now numbers in the multiple billions in terms of his Bitcoin ownership. Hosting today's Talk is Anthony Scaramucci, the founder and managing partner of SkyBridge capital, a global alternative investment firm, SkyBridge, as you may have seen as well recently invested several hundred million dollars into Bitcoin, as well as launching a Bitcoin fund to provide a direct play for investors to gain pure access to Bitcoin. Anthony is also the chairman of SALT and with no further ado, I'll turn it over to Anthony for round two with Michael Saylor.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:41)
Michael, thanks again for joining us. It's been quite a journey for us, as I know it's been for you. And you go from Bitcoin skeptic to Bitcoin believer and then there's this seismic Eureka moment where all of a sudden, you to yourself, "Wait a minute. I understand what this is now. I understand why I need to be invested and why I'm at the front of a early stage project. I'm at the frontier of something." Can you take us through that Odyssey that you went through from Bitcoin skeptic to Bitcoin believer, but then also putting your money where your mouth is?

Michael Saylor: (03:23)
Well, I think over the last decade we had progressive monetary expansion and the level of 5% a year which was significant to people that were sensitive to it. But for people in the tech industry or people that were busy with some other part of their life, we could live with 5% monetary expansion and still go about our jobs. And so I was a big tech enthusiasts and I was really, really occupied by my business until we got to 2020. And that context, everything I knew about Bitcoin for the first decade was like noise. Like I know it's something interesting and there's some people that care a lot about it, but it's noise. And I'm really more concerned about what the next iPhone is going to be or what Facebook is going to do, or the implications of Amazon rolling over 15,000 retail companies.

Michael Saylor: (04:22)
And those were all very exciting stories for a decade. And then I think we got the 2020, we got the K-Shaped recovery main street locked down wall street had a V-shaped recovery. The monetary expansion jumped from 5% to 20 or 25%. Now you couldn't ignore the fact that the money supply was expanding. Now, all of the interesting stories of the last decade, the Amazon story is over. We know how that ends, right? They win the Google story, the Apple story, the Facebook story, they're all over. We know how they end, right? It's pretty clear. They're going to go on to another stage, but it's not a technology play. Now it becomes about politics and society. And so now we all have a problem in 2020, the problem is the money supplies expanding. And then you realize if you're trying to make money doing it the 20th century way, it's just really hard.

Michael Saylor: (05:23)
And if you're trying to make money, the 21st century way, you got to do it virtually the virtual wave hit us. And so I would say, I became really interested in Bitcoin the second quarter of this year. And I realized that this had the potential to be digital gold. It felt like digital gold that no institutions had quite embraced, but a lot of early adopters had embraced. And everybody wants in a expansionary economy where the money supply is expanding. You all want sound money. And previous sound money for 5,000 years was gold, mostly sound expanding to 3% a year. Bitcoin is digital gold thermodynamically, perfectly sound money in theory, on a sheet of paper of God designed gold with no imperfections, he would've designed Bitcoin. So it's like, well, this is too good to be true. You just got to figure out, is going to be hacked? Is it going to be banned? Is anybody else going to buy into it?

Michael Saylor: (06:23)
What's the problem because it looks perfect. And we got involved not because it was elective. If I had a 5% problem each year, I could have ignored it. But when it became a 20% problem, I couldn't ignore it. We were forced, after March of 2020 to embrace the issue. So we got into it and we embraced it, not because we thought Bitcoin was risk-free. Bitcoin was nine, $10,000 a coin. There's a lot of controversy in April, May, June, even July, August, but we figured the certainty of losing half your purchasing power over four years was enough compensation to justify taking the risk of doing something new, right? A guarantee, and that's why we got into it the next six months.

Michael Saylor: (07:19)
You're going to see this story, which is maybe it's digital gold. Maybe the institutions need this thing to, well, I guess some needed to more of them need it. And then it goes to 20,000, 30,000 and 40,000. And I think as we enter 2021, people's perception is rotated to, I guess it is digital gold, and it's the newest institutional Safe-haven asset. And by the way, it looks to me like monetary expansion is continuing. Everybody's got an asset inflation problem. It's top of mind for every investor, what are we going to do about it? And so that's how we kick off the year as I speak to you.

Anthony Scaramucci: (08:05)
I was with a group of people, we've obviously launched our fund in good part, thanks to your help and your intellectual gravitas and helping us get around to this. My Eureka moment alongside of yours was understanding something you said last time we were together about it being a digital network, a digital platform for money, similar to an Amazon for retail, or say a Google for search and advertising or Facebook for social networking. But I was with what I would call the rat poison crew. It was a group of men and women, but mostly men in their seventies and eighties that were buying into the Warren Buffet idea that Bitcoin is rat poison.

Anthony Scaramucci: (08:50)
Now, Bill Miller said, "Well, it may be rat poison, but the rat might Fiat currency." So Bill is a believer like you and I but one thing that keeps coming up repetitively, Michael, I have my take, but I really want to hear yours is what the hell is it? It's just encrypted code, there's 21 million of them. Okay. So I get the scarcity, but why would that be worth anything? If all it is a code in the ether, and this is from the rat poison crew. And so your response to that would be, how did you get over that hurdle?

Michael Saylor: (09:29)
It's digital gold. Anybody could design code for digital gold, but is digital gold on the dominant monetary network in the world. So if I had an idea for Twitter and I thought I was going to launch a speech network, anybody could copy it. But at the point that everybody in our joined Twitter and they all looked at Twitter for half an hour, an hour a day, you got 400 million people pouring 400 million hours of bandwidth per day into Twitter. Then it's not the software anymore. Then it's a digital speech network. It's the dominant digital speech network for public speech. I think in the last decade you saw dominant networks form for speech on Twitter. You saw dominant video network on YouTube. You saw dominant mobile network for Apple. You saw dominant social network. You saw dominant retail network in Amazon. Each of these things gathered the commitment of a billion people and Warren buffet talks about brand, Warren Buffett would understand Coke.

Michael Saylor: (10:41)
The power of the brand of Coca Cola is. If I obliterated every Coca-Cola plant and every bottle of Coke everywhere on earth, I couldn't get it out of the minds of seven billion people, seven billion people know that what a Coca-Cola is. And so the brand of having that idea stuck in the minds of billions of people is very powerful. So Bitcoin is the brand of digital gold stuck in the minds of a billion people, but more importantly, it's gathered hundreds of billions and now getting close to what is it? $700 billion worth of monetary energy. As that energy flows on that network, that's an incredible dominant network effect. And on the other side of the network with the minors, you have billions and billions of dollars invested in special purpose hardware, mining rigs, decentralized everywhere in the world that has no purpose other than to run the digital gold network that is Bitcoin.

Michael Saylor: (11:51)
And so you have massive hundreds of billions, of dollars of monetary energy sunk onto a monetary network that is the brand. And so in that regard, it has the same dominant inertial effect that the Twitter or Facebook or YouTube or Google have in order to replace it with a copy of the code, you have to displace the $700 billion of monetary energy. But then again, what would be the motive for the $700 billion to move to Bitcoin version 2? I mean, there really isn't one, so it takes on a life of its own. And as the price goes up, this is not just driven by Metcalfe's laws. Metcalfe's law says that the power of the network is the square of the number of people, the number of nodes on the network. That would be true if everybody on earth had the same amount of money, if everybody had $10, then Metcalfe's law would be the rule.

Michael Saylor: (13:01)
But this is driven by Newtonian laws of physics that is some people have a billion dollars, some people have $10 billion. So if people weighed 10 billion pounds or a trillion pounds, they'd have a gravitational pull that is more than the person that weighs a hundred pounds. And so the laws of gravity are flowing on this network. And as the price goes up, it's kind of like all the mass is collapsing into a planetary body. The gravitational attraction is increasing therefore everything that comes in the orbit of the planetary body is being sucked into the planet and it's getting stronger and stronger as that price goes up. Bitcoin is the one asset that as its price goes up, it is more attractive to investors, which is the opposite of a stock price. Whereas the price goes up, it looks more risky and less attractive to an investor. And it's a very subtle impact of a monetary network that's worth understanding and dwelling on.

Anthony Scaramucci: (14:10)
Well, it's interesting because it'd people talking to me about it. I'm more comfortable with Bitcoin at 35000, 40,000 a coin than it was in 2014 at $400 a coin because it didn't hit that escape velocity point that you're describing. It didn't get the full embrace, a bed network and the capitalization. And then of course, we've got places to store this now beyond the USB, whether it's a place like a fidelity digital assets or other homes for Bitcoin. So you know, it's now, in my opinion, gotten to that escape velocity akin to Twitter and Google, but you said something that has never left me, I'm going to repeat or hopefully paraphrase what you've said. You said the first Bitcoin is the hardest one to buy. Once you own it, you realize that you don't own enough. Do you remember saying that I want you to take us through that thought pattern?

Michael Saylor: (15:11)
Well, I mean, first you have to a problem. If you embrace the idea, you have a store of value problem because of a macro economic sensitivity that leads you on a quest for what's your store of value. Then you realize that the theoretical best answer is a crypto asset network. That's decentralized that duplicates gold that is deflationary, and that is Bitcoin. Then you have to get over all of your concerns about forking and hacking and banning. And is it legal? And what's the tax treatment and the like, once you get past all those and you decide, "Yeah, Bitcoin is digital gold. It is the best safe Haven assets for the 21st century." Then the issue is, "Well, how do I buy it?" You can't buy it from traditional banks and wirehouses. You can pick up the phone and buy a hundred million dollars worth of gold ETF in 10 seconds, 30 seconds, but buying a hundred million dollars worth of a Bitcoin ETF while there is none.

Michael Saylor: (16:20)
I hear rumors people say, well, there are a lot of banks wherever you try to buy, like GBTC or something. They either make you sign a disclaimer, they make you sign a form, or they tell you they won't sell it to you. So there's a lot of people, I guess what? 90, as we enter the year 2021, you might know better than me, but I'm guessing 95% to 99% of investors. They don't have an easy on-ramp to buy this, it's a struggle for them. So you have to actually go through a search and look for an institutional grade brokerage and you either got to find a fund you trust, and you either buy into it as a fund, or you got to decide, you're going to find an exchange you trust, and you bind the underlying asset. And there are pros and cons to either of those.

Michael Saylor: (17:17)
Once you find that if you're going to buy the underlying asset, you've got to work through the issue of custody and who do I trust and will I self custody? And will I Multisig self custody with the 24 phrase seed key or will I use an institutional grade custodian. And of course that is to a certain extent, the beauty of Bitcoin is the crypto and our kids could literally buy a hundred million dollars, a Bitcoin, put it on a hardware wallet or memorize it in their head and walk around with it. That's one extreme. And that keeps everybody honest because knowing that you could take custody of this stuff means that if you're a bank or a custodian, you can't abuse your customer. No one's going to take delivery of a hundred million dollars of gold and carry that around in their head.

Michael Saylor: (18:10)
So it's a nice theoretical benefit. But as a practical matter, 99% of the people don't want to self custody, a hundred million dollars worth of this stuff. They don't trust themselves as much as they trusted institution. So that means they have to go through this exercise of, do I buy it and custody it with an institution, or do I buy a fund, right? And a fund kind of solves the problem because I don't have to trade it. I don't have to buy it. I don't have to custody it. I don't have to worry about all these headaches. I just wire my money to a fund. They buy it for me, and then I get the economic interest in it. One way or the other, I think it probably took me four weeks of screaming and begging and pleading to get through the AML KYC paperwork process with my first custodian and broker. And it took me another four weeks, so it took me eight weeks for the next one. And I won't talk about who it is because it doesn't really matter, it's a four to eight week journey.

Anthony Scaramucci: (19:16)
Right.

Michael Saylor: (19:17)
And it's getting easier now, but my thought throughout the entire process was, "Wow, God designed gold in cyberspace. And that's exactly what I need. I need digital perfect gold in cyberspace." And then I thought, "Gee, it's really hard to buy this stuff." And I was all right, and then I thought, this is great because it's so hard to buy this stuff. It must be undervalued because everybody else that comes behind me is going to pay more for this. So I'm just going to go ahead and rush through, go through, jump through the hoops, get the accounts and I'm going to buy this stuff.

Michael Saylor: (19:57)
And I remember I was buying it when it was like $9,400 a coin. And was thinking, "Oh, I got to finish buying everything. I'm going to buy because when I wake up tomorrow morning, maybe other intelligent investors are going to realize that this is God's gift to the investor in the year 2020, and they're all going to buy it. They're going to double the price." And I really literally, I went to bed with anxiety, worried that when I woke up the price was going to shoot through the roof because people were going to realize that this is the perfect safe haven engineered store of value. And when they did, they were all going to buy it. And luckily I had a bit of time, but you know, the truth is once people started to realize it happened pretty fast, right?

Anthony Scaramucci: (20:47)
Yeah.

Michael Saylor: (20:48)
They started figuring it out.

Anthony Scaramucci: (20:49)
Yeah, it's happening. And obviously we both think we're at the exponential front of a frontiers clearly, if it gets to be the market capitalization of gold, the opportunities here, despite the volatility everyone will look quite precious if we're correct in our assessment of that. The regulators and particularly the bank of the ECB, the European Central Bank, Christine Lagarde about a day ago, made some comments. Uh, she basically said that quote unquote, "Funny business and some interesting and totally reprehensible money laundering activity has taken place with Bitcoin."

Anthony Scaramucci: (21:33)
The federal reserve, the treasury department, Fiat currency producers for many obvious reasons. Michael do not like Bitcoin. And so obviously Mike Novogratz responded and said, "Well, the banks have paid more in fines, a hundred plus billion dollars of fines in the last decade than anything that's happened on the Bitcoin network." But what's your reaction to regulators resistance, the speed bumps that could be ahead of Bitcoin related to the old guard, if you will, or the old monetary system and its regulators rejecting what would you and I would think of as a more perfect monetary system?

Michael Saylor: (22:12)
I think everybody should calm down and not overreact to this. I think that in the crypto community there's a lot of ideologues, I lovably refer this crypto anarchist. There are libertarians and they're sure they don't like inflation, but they don't really like taxation much either. And the idea that they don't like regulation and they're ready for, if all banks disappeared and all governments disappeared, they're ready for that too and they'd be fine with that. I actually think, and I've seen him sift through you know, the media overreacts to this. I think some of the critics over reacted this, I've seen him sift through like the writings of one politician and say, like eight years ago for like one minute and in a hearing, they said three sentences that looked kind of negative toward Bitcoin and we hate them.

Michael Saylor: (23:26)
Well, my reaction to this is like everybody's buying Bitcoin on regulated exchanges, you know what it's like to get a New York regulated license to sell Bitcoin. They all have to comply with KYC. They all have to comply with AML, anti-money laundering regulations, Know Your Customer regulations. And when she says, well, we're concerned about it from a money laundering point of view, the implication is you're going to see large banks and brokerages that are already complying with AML and KYC regulations that will continue to comply with those things. And all of the money that's currently sitting in Apple stock and Amazon and sovereign debt and cash accounts and real estate indexes that is subject to AML and KYC regulations will continue to be subject to it. And it's going to float into some digital gold and should the central regulators decide that banks have to comply with AML and KYC regulations with regard to a crypto asset in the same way that they would comply with those with regard to a stock asset, a real estate asset, a bond asset, or a commodity asset?

Michael Saylor: (24:48)
I don't think it's earth shattering. I don't think it's going to be negative for the industry. In fact, I think it's the opposite, which is for example, until we saw exchanges like Fidelity, like Coinbase get proper licenses from US regulators, neither you nor I would be buying Bitcoin. None of the institutions are buying Bitcoin through unregulated exchanges when a regulator says we should make sure it's properly regulated, I think that people can overreact to that. I think that every bank in the world holding all the money well, all the money in the United States is in regulated brokerages and exchanges. And it's just fine. And I don't think Bitcoin needs to be unregulated to be successful.

Michael Saylor: (25:47)
I think Bitcoin just needs to be better than gold to be successful, right? If you pick up the phone and called your bank and said, I want you to ship a hundred million dollars worth of gold on a pallet to a dark private wallet in Sub-Saharan Africa. And I want you to do it in the next 30 minutes and they'll report it to the government. I don't think that would be happening either, right? So I think people are very sensitive and they don't need to be, I think it's all going to work itself out just fine. And to the extent that we have regulated entities that are dealing in Bitcoin, I think it's just going to accelerate the stampede of institutional money into Bitcoin.

Anthony Scaramucci: (26:34)
Well, I think you make a brilliant case of Anchorage Digital Bank was recently approved as the first federally regulated digital asset bank. Michael, what do you think the impact of that news is?

Michael Saylor: (26:48)
I think it's going to be catalytic to other banks. I think what's going on right now is every bank, all of the major banks that don't handle Bitcoin they're, they won't let you buy it. They don't have a fund. They don't have an on-ramp. They don't have a custody relationship. I think they're all looking at this saying, "We're falling behind." They're going to be massive outflows of capital from traditional banks into crypto banks and Bitcoin friendly banks. It's already happening. It's going to accelerate. It's going to get to the CEO level of all the major banks on wall street. They probably got committees looking at this right now. They'll move at a institutional speed and some will move faster than others, but the writing is on the wall. And these are kind of more warning shots and sparks that tell you the world is changing. And people that want to keep up they're going to have to change with it.

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:59)
Well, I know Gary Gensler pretty well. It's being reported that he's the new SEC chairman. He taught a course on the blockchain at MIT, your Alma mater. Do you know Gary whether you do or you don't, but what is your regulatory outlook in the United States coming from the SEC? Do you have a view there one way or the other?

Michael Saylor: (28:25)
I don't know him. So I suppose his appointment is auspicious for Bitcoin in general. I'm a big fan of MIT professors. I did my thesis at the MIT School of Management so we have that relationship. I'm a big supporter of MITs DCI, Digital Currency Initiative and their security initiatives and they think highly of him so those are all good. My view on regulation, the most important thing could be boiled down to one sentence. Bitcoin is deemed as property by the SEC period, that's the single most important understanding. Bitcoin is property by the SEC, the IRS deems it as property. If you understand how it's going to be taxed, long-term, short-term capital gains. If you understand how it's going to be regulated in this particular case, being property versus security is a very bright line.

Michael Saylor: (29:36)
And it means that it is not regulated right per the securities laws. I think those two things are critical and by the designation of property by the IRS means Bitcoin is not going to be a day-to-day currency in a medium of exchange. It makes no sense to do a million transactions a day with something that generates a million capital gains tax bills. You know, it'd break every accounting system. It would break every taxes system. So, that decision by the IRS was critical. And the decision by the SEC to make it property means that it is appropriate to serve as a thermodynamically sound money or thermodynamically sound monetary index, an asset class. If it was a security, it would not be an asset class, it couldn't be.

Michael Saylor: (30:32)
But with Bitcoin as property, there's no reason why it shouldn't take its place next to the Dow, the S&P 500, the NASDAQ and other monetary indexes as an asset class. It transcends the limitations of a company or corporate security and that is the single most important thing that we could have on our mind, right? It's the thing that allows a senator to educate Congress on Bitcoin. That's the thing that allows you to have a congressional caucus that supports Bitcoin. It's the thing that allows someone in media to have an opinion on it. You can't imagine a Senator good at getting elected and saying, "I really think that XX stock is a better store value than the dollar." And I'm going to explain to Congress why the stock is a better store value than the dollar, right?

Michael Saylor: (31:30)
You could never say that because that's a security and it's a thousand times less powerful. And ultimately, by the way, the designation of Bitcoin as property while they're silent on the next 6,000 cryptos is incredibly important, right? One of the reasons Bitcoin has a network effect is because for you to actually have a digital, safe haven asset, it needs to be global property. It can't be a global security. There's no way that any company or any publicly traded company, no matter how big and powerful will ever have the same gravitas and the same prospects as Bitcoin as digital property. And it's always going to be a question looming over every other crypto, right? Like you can see the challenges of Ripple, right? If another crypto is deemed as a security, it completely is devastating to its prospects as the base layer of a monitoring network. And that's really important for investors.

Anthony Scaramucci: (32:39)
I think that is the genius of the design. Are you worried that the Satoshi Nakamoto or the group that created Bitcoin, or if there is this, a Satoshi is sitting on a tremendous amount of coins that could potentially flood the market? Is that something that you worry about that comes up in a lot of question and answer sessions with me?

Michael Saylor: (33:02)
No, I'm not worried. I think that Bitcoin is an ideally designed monetary network with a lot of rational incentives, right? And first of all, I don't think Satoshi is coming back ever. I don't think we're going to hear anything from a Satoshi for the rest of our lifetime. But second, there's a lot of FID and the crypto industry. And a lot of times it comes from other crypto assets, other digital assets where people are just throwing this out maybe Satoshi will dump, people will actually post on Twitter that maybe I'm going to dump all of my crypto and tank the market. And I read, I think, who are these people? Like you think Jeff Bezos is going to dump all of his Amazon to destroy the Amazon stock and whoever did an irrational thing just to like spite someone.

Michael Saylor: (34:07)
I think there's a lot of that, that goes around and you see your fair share of Satoshi will come back and destroy the market. You know, Dr. Evil will get a quantum computer and destroy the market. Someone's going to print a trillion dollars of Tether and destroy the market. And none of these things make any sense to me, but one of the dynamics is, in an unregulated environment, people seem to think they can get away with injecting those rumors. And so you get a lot more of those rumors get injected. I just think it's irrelevant, barbaric. Let me make one more point. You could sell a billion dollars worth of Bitcoin over the course of a week without moving the market.

Anthony Scaramucci: (34:54)
Yeah. It's deeply liquid. So yeah, we've got a few more moments with you. I'm going to turn it over to the millennial who thinks he has better hair than me, Michael, which he obviously doesn't just take a look. You can see that he doesn't have better hair than me. of what we're going to turn it over to John Dorsey to take some of these outside questions that we've got coming in. Go ahead, John.

John Darsie: (35:15)
All right. The big difference between your and my hair is that I didn't put shoe polish in mine this morning, so.

Anthony Scaramucci: (35:21)
Well, someday you will. Okay. So don't be, so self-righteous about it.

John Darsie: (35:24)
Ouch!

Anthony Scaramucci: (35:26)
We'll see what you look like when you're 150 years old, like me. Yeah. So it'd be, but go ahead, fire away.

John Darsie: (35:32)
And Michael, it's great to have you back on SALT Talk's. So we get a lot of questions about your decision and strategy to invest your corporate balance sheet into Bitcoin, Square did the same thing. Have you talked, without naming the companies, have you talked to other corporate treasurers who have looked at what you've done and said, "Wow, could you show me the playbook to how you got that done?"

Michael Saylor: (35:52)
I think entrance from companies, ever since we came out publicly and started talking in like September, I've had nonstop set of conversations with corporations and executives and large investors on this subject. And I think interest keeps building. And I've noticed that it built in September and October for a bit, and then it ramped up in December and now it's ramped up much more in January. I say tongue-in-cheek to Anthony, and honestly, as the price goes up, the asset becomes more attractive and the risk goes away. I think I'll say one more point on that, John. I think it's becoming increasingly clear to people that if you're a company carrying cash on your balance sheet, it's a liability. And if Bitcoin is an asset and to be clear by that, I mean, cash instruments, sovereign debt, anything that's cash or cash like it's not going to appreciate in purchasing power by 15% per year.

Michael Saylor: (37:05)
So if you expect a 15% asset inflation rate, then none of these cash like instruments will keep up. And you got to assume that over 10 years, you're going to lose 75% of your purchasing power. So a hundred billion dollars in cash is going to be $75 billion of shareholder value destroyed with a conventional Fiat based treasury strategy. On the other hand, if you convert that cash into Bitcoin, Bitcoin is, we debate, is it going up 15% a year or 100%? You know, when we had the three-day crash of this week and everybody declared Bitcoin dead, I pointed out facetiously, well, all that proves is that Bitcoin is not going to go up and an annualized rate of 1500% per year for more than one month at a time, right?

Michael Saylor: (38:01)
It was going up at 15X per year for that month. So it's clear, it's appreciating versus cash and whether it's appreciating a 10%, 20%, 50%, 100, 200, 300 it doesn't really matter because the number is positive and the number is likely going to beat the cost of capital. So I think the trend you're going to see this year is you're going to see more and more corporate cash rotate into Bitcoin. And that's...

John Darsie: (38:37)
An interesting comment that I see some from some crypto influencers on social media, is that, you think about Bitcoin, not as a currency. You can think about it sort of as an asset, but really it's a savings account. It's a way for you to park your cash in an asset or a commodity that has a little bit more long-term bullish prospects than something like the US dollar, which macro policies are pushing down upon. I want to talk about this virtual conference you have coming up February 3rd and 4th, you're hosting a virtual conference called Bitcoin for corporations to build on what you were talking about before. Why did you decide to host this event and what type of interest are you seeing in people that are looking to learn more?

Michael Saylor: (39:20)
You know, we have thousands of corporate customers and ever since we announced our Bitcoin strategy, we've had unsolicited people asking us, how do you do this? And they've got issues. Tell us about the legal issues. Tell us about the accounting issues. Tell us how we buy this stuff. How do we store it safely? And after getting so many requests, we decided we should as host a conference, which will be an accelerated two day crash course. And how corporations can plug their balance sheet or their P&L into Bitcoin. You know, Bitcoin's a monitoring network, so you can grow your company with it like Square and PayPal are obviously doing that. But I mean, so as SkyBridge, right? You can offer funds, you can offer mobile apps. You can offer insurance policies, you can build indexes. So one thing you can do is grow your company and improve your products and services.

Michael Saylor: (40:16)
The other thing you can do is plug your treasury into it and rotate cash which is a liability into Bitcoin as an asset. And that's a way to either create or preserve shareholder value. I don't think it was on the top of people's minds in February of 2020 and March of 2020, the world changed then we all sorted through this issue. Now, as we look at February, 2021, every corporation on earth is starting to be sensitive to this store of value problem. Their cash is a shareholder liability, not a shareholder asset. They've got a fiduciary challenge, but it's a scary new thing. So we need to get some education. And Bitcoin for corporations is a quick, easy way for people to get educated. You know, we've curated a bunch of content. We're going to put all of our proprietary content into the public domain and give it away to people that show up to the conference and that's million dollars plus millions of dollars of legal accounting, due diligence, jumping through hoops, took us two months to do it all.

Michael Saylor: (41:30)
And we figured it's stack thousands of pages. You ever see a 82 page board memo to explain the store of value due diligence, search and breakdown, silver versus gold versus real estate versus bond and exit versus stock indexes versus every crypto versus Bitcoin. And in such a fashion that everyone could get comfortable they considered the risks. That's the kind of memo that maybe you don't want to have your lawyer rate at $500 an hour or a thousand dollars an hour. So we figured we'd just give it away to the world as a public service. And I'm very impressed at the surge of interest, I think it's going to be a pretty big conference and hopefully we'll help a thousand companies or more come up to speed on this and figure out what to do next.

John Darsie: (42:20)
Well as a dedicated cyber hornet and in the spirit of Bitcoin's open source origins, that's great that you're sharing all that information in an open source way, really valuable information. We're going to leave it there. Michael, we're going to do more of these talks with you, hopefully in the future. We would encourage if you are an executive at a corporation, and you're watching this SALT's Talk, which we have a lot of corporate executives do watch, we would encourage you to participate in that conference with Michael on February 3rd and 4th, Bitcoin for corporations.

John Darsie: (42:48)
You know, the way we see it, the retail market got involved in Bitcoin years ago, and now you're seeing people like yourself, corporate treasuries, you're seeing hedge funds like SkyBridge and other entities starting to get involved in the space. I think you could start to see sovereigns start to get more involved in the space and you're seeing insurance companies. So it's just a wave of bigger and bigger players that are getting involved in the space that are, that are helping with that to accelerate Metcalfe's law, as you talked about earlier, but Michael, thanks so much for joining us. Anthony, do you have a final word for Michael before we let him go?

Anthony Scaramucci: (43:19)
Well, of course, we want to get you back, Michael. As you know, we're building our Bitcoin position. We're closing in, as I said, on $400 million, our fund is off to a very strong start. Just to remind our people, it's 75 basis points. We think that's a very attractive price as Michael was mentioning about the storage and the ease of use and having Ursa Young audit or positions and so forth. We just think it's an interesting delivery mechanism for high net worth individuals. So you can go to the skybridgebitcoin.com website for more details there, and we'll certainly be helping you any way that we can, Michael, to evangelize the story to other CEOs, corporate CEOs, corporate CFOs, et cetera. And thank you so much again for joining SALT. And I look forward to seeing you soon.

Michael Saylor: (44:11)
Thanks for having me always a pleasure.

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:13)
Well if you need any hair dye, Michael, I have a stash in my house according to the John Darcy. So just keep that in mind.

Michael Saylor: (44:21)
You got it.

John Darsie: (44:21)
You just have to get my digs in, but thank you everybody for tuning in to today's SALT Talks. It's been great to grow our community to include more people that are interested in digital assets, whether they're invested in Bitcoin today, or crypto curious as we like to say. We've enjoyed diving into that community and obviously our Bitcoin investments came at a very interesting time, we'll say, in the market. So thank you for joining us. Just a reminder. We're going to have a whole series of crypto and digital asset and Bitcoin SALT Talk's in 2021. It'll be a regular feature within the broader SALT Talk's brand. So you can sign up for all of those future SALT Talk's at salt.org/talks, and you can sign up for our entire archive of SALT Talk's at salt.org/talks/archive. Including our first conversation with the great Michael Saylor.

John Darsie: (45:11)
Please follow our YouTube channel. We're up to almost 10,000 subscribers. It's something we started during the pandemic. You know, we are known for our in-person conferences, but the opportunity during the pandemic to do these digital webinar type of events has been extremely gratifying for us. And we're starting to build up our digital presence. So we have great resources there on our YouTube channel, and you can watch all the episodes there. Please follow us on social media as well. We broadcast a lot of these talks on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn. So please follow us there and please tell your friends about SALT Talk's, we love growing our community, and we hope to see many of you at our in-person conferences, which we'll have an announcement on that in the next couple of weeks about our next in-person conference, which should be very exciting. I think everybody is chomping at the bit to get some in-person interaction after what we've all gone through with the pandemic. But on behalf of the entire SALT team, this is John Darcy signing off for today. We'll see you back here again. Next week on SALT Talk's.

Ric Edelman: Is Bitcoin a Mainstream Institutional Investment? | SALT Talks #129

“[Independent RIA’s] are the future… the brokerage environment is a dinosaur and it's not going to exist in the future.”

Ric Edelman is the founder of the nation’s largest independent RIA, with 350 advisors in 170 offices nationwide, managing $230 billion for 1.2 million individuals and households. The firm is also the nation’s largest independent provider of advice to 401(k) plans, serving thousands of companies, including 150 of the Fortune 500.

Independent RIA’s always appeared superior to the more traditional models like a wirehouse or big-box brokerage firm. These traditional models are beset with bad incentives where, in some cases, firms limit the products its brokers can sell in order to maximize the firm’s profit, at the client’s expense. Independent RIA’s release advisors from any pressures that might disincentivize the best financial decisions. “The autonomy allows you to serve your client's best interest, it allows the clients to do better, and oh, by the way, it's financially better for the advisor as well because you've cut out the middle-man.”

Advisors are obligated to look into the future for opportunities and challenges. This now includes the emergence of digital asset classes, including Bitcoin. Bitcoin has been the top performing asset class of the last 1-, 5- and 10-year period, but due to its newness, skepticism is understandable. RIA Digital Assets was set up to help advisors and consumers become more comfortable about this revolutionary technology. Ultimately, a 1% asset allocation of Bitcoin is recommended.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Ric Edelman.jpeg

Ric Edelman

Founder

RIA Digital Assets Council

MODERATOR

anthony_scaramucci.jpeg

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:08)
Hello, everyone. Welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the managing director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology, and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators, and thinkers, and our goal with these SALT Talks is really to replicate the experience that we provide in our global conferences, the SALT Conference, which we hold twice a year, once in the United States and once internationally. At our conferences and on these SALT Talks, our goal is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future.

John Darsie: (00:49)
We're very excited today to welcome Ric Edelman to SALT Talks. Ric is the founder of the nation's largest independent RIA, now Edelman Financial Engines with 350 advisors in 170 offices nationwide managing $230 billion for 1.2 million individuals and households. Ric was on this independent RIA trend before being an independent RIA was cool, so we congratulate him on being early on this megatrend. The firm is also the nation's largest independent provider of advice to 401(k) plans, serving thousands of companies, including 150 of the Fortune 500. Ric serves on its board and remains actively engaged in the firm's investment management and financial planning strategies. Ric also founded the Funding Our Future Coalition with the Bipartisan Policy Center, now the largest coalition ever formed that focuses on attaining financial security for all Americans. Ric was behind the creation of the first Exponential Technologies ETF and has been awarded two patents for inventing a product that allows newborns to save for retirement.

John Darsie: (01:57)
Ric is a leading financial educator and champion of improving financial literacy for all Americans. He's produced award-winning specials for public television and he's a number one New York Times bestselling author of 10 books on personal finance, including a best-selling children's book on money as well. Ric taught personal finance for nine years at Georgetown University and currently is a distinguished lecturer at his alma mater, Rowan University, which awarded Ric an honorary doctorate in 1999. Just a reminder, if you have any questions for Ric during today's SALT Talk, you can enter them in the Q&A box at the bottom of your video screen on Zoom. I'm going to be hosting at least the beginning of today's talk with Ric, so we'll get right into it.

John Darsie: (02:41)
As well, Ric, in addition to becoming the largest independent RIA in the country also recently founded an organization called the RIA Digital Asset Coalition, and so he's doing a lot of different things to educate people on traditional finance as well as a new wave in finance, if you will, with digital assets and cryptocurrencies. But before we get into the Digital Asset Council, Ric, could you talk about the independent RIA megatrend that I mentioned? You were an early pioneer in that space and we've seen an explosion in both individual advisors moving to an independent model as well as the aggregation of independent RIAs. Why are advisors and clients gravitating so heavily towards that independent model?

Ric Edelman: (03:23)
It's a better model. John, great to be with you. Thanks for having me. It's a better model. When I first started in the business back in 1986, when my wife and I decided that we were going to enter this business, it never occurred to us to go join a wirehouse, to go sign up with any of the big-box brokerage firms, because we didn't want to engage in the sales process, which is essentially what those folks do. Many of these firms have quotas that they impose on their brokers. They limit the product that they want you to sell. They tell you to sell the product that their management team feels that they want you to provide to clients often because the firm makes more money selling certain products than others and the story goes on and on and on.

Ric Edelman: (04:12)
That's not why we became financial advisors. We did this because we were wronged as consumers. We went to a financial advisor. We were looking for advice on how to buy a house and we needed advice on mortgages and this guy actually told us to lie on our mortgage application, told us to commit a felony, and we were aghast. That shock and anger was what propelled us to say, "We're going to learn how to do this ourselves and we're going to teach others how to do it, too, and show them what we've learned." We could only do that as an independent advisor where we didn't have a boss, we didn't have some corporate titan telling us what we would do, how we would do it, who we would do it for, and so on, so the independent route was all that there ever was for us. This was back in the 1980s. You're right, John. That was uncommon, unheard of, especially for someone brand new in the business who didn't have a book of business, didn't have a bunch of clients, wasn't managing any assets at the time.

Ric Edelman: (05:10)
How did I at age 28 persuade people to hire me when I had no track record personally? The early days were a bit of a challenge for us, but as we look back on it, 35 years later, we now see that you're right, what we were doing was the future, and pretty much now everybody gets it, and so the movement toward independence away from the brokerage firms and the big-box BDs, yeah, it's really where it's at. The autonomy allows you to serve your client's best interest, it allows the clients to do better, and oh, by the way, it's financially better for the advisor as well because you've cut out the middleman. It's just between you and your client. You're not sharing any of that revenue, so we could charge our clients less while still earning more. Ain't America great?

John Darsie: (06:01)
Right. It aligns everyone's incentives, for sure. As we were talking about in the open, I spent a year working at Hightower analyzing these trends. Where do you think the industry will look like in, say, 10 years? We're still maybe in the early days of this move into independence, but what do you think the financial advice industry looks like in a decade?

Ric Edelman: (06:20)
Oh, it is the future. I've been saying this for quite some time now, that the old traditional model, which is still dominant, the brokerage environment, is a dinosaur and it's not going to exist in the future. It's simply because there's a new better way and that is the independent model, a fee-based environment, as opposed to a commission-based sales process. The reason that we haven't seen even greater adoption of it yet is simply because the commission-based business is so profitable for the brokerage environment and because of inertia, because the average advisor in this country is over 60 years old. They've been doing this for over 30 years, so there's not a lot of motivation. Their clients aren't clamoring for it yet to a big enough degree. They're making a good amount of money. It's painless, it's easy, it's traditional, and why upset the cart when there's no need?

Ric Edelman: (07:14)
As those folks age out and they retire, their successors are not going to operate their business the way that they did. As their clients age out, meaning die, those clients' children and grandchildren are not going to manage the money the way that their parents and grandparents did, and so we'll continue to see this metamorphosis going from a commission model to a fee-based model, away from a corporate environment to an independence model, and it'll get to the point where the independence are going to be massive. We will see a trillion-dollar RIA before too long.

John Darsie: (07:51)
We might be looking at him right now, just saying. I know you guys are, I think, bigger than the next nine largest independent RIAs combined, if I have that correct.

Ric Edelman: (08:01)
We're a fifth of the way there already at Edelman Financial Engines.

John Darsie: (08:03)
There you go. You guys will be there before you know it. As you know very well, being a financial advisor is much more than just shooting out an allocation of ETFs or stocks into somebody's portfolio. You're also have an important psychological relationship with your clients. We'd like to talk about, we've talked to a lot of independent RIAs and financial advisors on SALT Talks since March, but what did you learn or what was reinforced to you about the importance of a good, rock-solid asset allocation, and as well as having really important conversations and a strong communication relationship with your clients during times of distress?

Ric Edelman: (08:41)
Yeah, you've said the two keywords, John, relationship and communication. It is not about the product sale. That's what a lot of Wall Street still doesn't get. They think that if they sell a nifty, whizzbang product, that that's the key to success and that's not true. Well, it may be in the short term and maybe for them, but it's not the key to the client. What really matters is to focus on what the client cares about and what the client cares about is attaining their personal financial goals.

Ric Edelman: (09:14)
Most investors in this country are what I would refer to as "reluctant investors." They're not buying stocks and bonds because they want to, they're not buying mutual funds or ETFs or non-traded REITs or annuities, or you pick the fund or investment you want, they're not buying this stuff out of joy. They're buying it out of desperation. They're buying it because they don't have a choice. They realize that they've got to save for their future and that it's really up to them. They can't rely on the government. They can't rely on their employer and they certainly can't rely on rich grandparents, so it's really up to them for their financial security, and so we become, grudgingly, participants in the financial services sector, and so we need someone who will do two things for us. One is to explain all this. The world of personal finance has gotten extraordinarily complicated, 15,000 mutual funds alone from which to pick from, and that's just mutual funds. Forget about ETFs and forget about all the other stuff that's out there. 7,000 stocks, hundreds of thousands of bonds, of all flavors, sorts, issuers, maturities, on and-

John Darsie: (10:22)
There's more ETFs than there are stocks now, it almost feels like.

Ric Edelman: (10:25)
... Absolutely right, and that's just the US. What about the foreign markets and so on? Then there's the technological elements that have changed dramatically. The regulatory ones, the competitive ones, and of course, the treacherous nature of scams and frauds from Bernie Madoff on down, so it's a dicey environment. Explain this, communicate effectively to me, help me understand. These clients, these investors, they're smart, intelligent, educated people. They just need to understand because we don't get education on money in America, K through 12, not a single class on money. Most college grads never took a class on money. Employers don't do much and parents generally do nothing, so we're financially illiterate. That's not the same as dumb. It's not the same as stupid. It just means we're not educated, so communicate. Explain to me how this stuff works. That's number one.

Ric Edelman: (11:17)
Number two: The relationship. Don't do this one and done. I want to be in this for the long-term. I'm dealing with this from now through the rest of my life and I want you to be with me for the rest of my life. It's the relationship we want with our physicians and our attorneys and our accountants, heck, with our barbers and hairstylists. We want a long-term relationship, not a simple transaction. The firms that get that, that recognize that the advice I'm giving you today, I am going to be accountable for I'm going to have to answer for it in the future and I'm going to have to help you deal with the changes in life, changes in the economy, changes in the law, changes in the marketplace. We will get there together. It's not about today's product sale, which is all too often what still happens in the insurance industry and the brokerage industry and the credit card industry and the banking industry. They still treat it like a one-and-done product sale and that's not what consumers want. That's not how you maintain long-term lifetime value of a client.

John Darsie: (12:22)
Speaking of education, you recently started the RIA Digital Assets Council. You're one of the more forward-thinking independent wealth advisors, financial advisors, whatever you want to call it, both in terms of your move to independence and now also in the digital asset space. It's an area that viewers on SALT Talks know that we've become very interested in this space from both a SALT and a SkyBridge perspective, but before we get into asset allocation and things like that, why did you start the RIA Digital Assets Council? What is it and what has your journey been like in terms of understanding digital assets?

Ric Edelman: (12:57)
Well, my view is that as a financial advisor, my obligation to my clients is to constantly look ahead. We are planners, after all, so where is the world going? What are the investment opportunities? What are the pitfalls and challenges that we might encounter so that we can protect and guide our clients in that journey? I've always been looking forward: What's coming next? Back in 2012, I had the opportunity to meet Ray Kurzweil, who many people consider the Thomas Edison of our age, one of the smartest men on the planet.

John Darsie: (13:30)
Yep. He's brilliant.

Ric Edelman: (13:30)
He's the director of engineering at Google, is on the Harvard faculty, and holder of hundreds and hundreds of patents. Co-founder at Singularity University. I interviewed Ray on my TV show on public television and Ray encouraged me to attend Singularity University's executive program, and with his encouragement, I did so in 2012. That's where I was introduced to exponential technologies broadly and Bitcoin specifically. I'm talking about big data, robotics, AI, nanotech, biotech, bioinformatics, 3D printing, all these incredible technologies.

Ric Edelman: (14:04)
As a result of all of this, I began to get an awareness and understanding of what is coming next and I asked all these scientists, technologists, physicists, physicians, astronauts, "What is it that all of this means for personal finance?" While they could tell me what it meant from a tech perspective, they couldn't tell me what it meant for the average investor or the average American homeowner and that set me on my path for due diligence and I spent a lot of time researching it. It culminated in my book over my shoulder, The Truth About Your Future, The New York Times bestseller that explains what all these technologies mean for every aspect of our lives.

Ric Edelman: (14:42)
I began to look closely at Bitcoin, so I began investing in Bitcoin in 2014, and I be quickly began to realize two things. Number one: Bitcoin is revolutionary. The underlying technology of blockchain and digital ledger technology and DeFi, decentralized finance, are the most revolutionary technological innovation since the Internet itself and they are going to revolutionize commerce on a global scale in incredible ways. That's the first thing I realized.

Ric Edelman: (15:15)
Number two: The second thing I realized is that most financial advisors don't know this. They don't understand it. They don't get it. If you look at Bitcoin superficially, it looks like tulip bulbs or Beanie Babies. It looks like if it's not a fad, it's a fraud, and it seems to violate all the stuff we're taught from an investment management perspective, and in fact, the more education, the more background, the more college degrees you have in this field, the more that Bitcoin makes no sense because it violates everything we've all been taught, everything we've all experienced over the last 40 years.

Ric Edelman: (15:54)
I created the Digital Assets Council to create a bridge from the crypto community that's developing all this nifty whizzbang cool stuff and the RIA community, which needs to understand it so that they can effectively give their clients the advice the clients need, and so we provide a certification program for financial advisors where you can get a certificate in blockchain and digital assets, so that we teach you how this all works, how to explain it to clients, how to figure out whether or not you should recommend it. If so, how much you should be putting clients into. How do you build a portfolio using Bitcoin and digital assets? How do you deal with the taxes and regulatory environment? How do you communicate to clients about it and so on? There's no organization like it because we're not selling anything. We're not manufacturing products, we're not selling services. We're just an educational resource to help financial advisors understand this brand new asset class.

John Darsie: (16:51)
Why should financial advisors specifically be taking a look at making an allocation of Bitcoin or other digital assets as part of their asset allocation mix? How do you arrive at the correct waiting for such a nascent early technology that a lot of people don't understand?

Ric Edelman: (17:09)
Due to the nature of its newness, it's now over 10 years old, but still incredibly new in the scheme of things, the upside potential remains very, very big for Bitcoin. It is the outsized potential of returns. The stock market makes 10% in a year. Bitcoin routinely moves up or down 10% in a day, and so it is the potential for outsized returns. It is the number one performing asset class in the last one, three, five, and 10-year periods and since inception and many people believe it's still in its infancy, so there's a tremendous opportunity for that.

Ric Edelman: (17:44)
The more important issue, though, and the number one reason that advisors say they are interested in this is the fact that Bitcoin is uncorrelated. It's price movements have nothing to do with anything else, not the stock market, the bond market, interest rates, inflation rates, economic policy, fed action, nothing, and if you truly believe in diversification, you want uncorrelated and even better non-correlated assets in your portfolio. You can help reduce client volatility overall while improving returns by adding digital assets to the portfolio.

Ric Edelman: (18:19)
The big question, as you said, John, becomes, "Well, how much do I do?" My personal view, I'm the guy who introduced the concept a few years ago of a 1% asset allocation. That's it. That is because a lot of advisors are scared to put five or 10 or 20% of a client's assets into Bitcoin and I don't blame them. This is so new, it's so uncertain. Anything can happen. This could be a Betamax and go blow up. It could be Lotus 1-2-3, wiped out by Excel. It could be regulated away by governments fearful that their fiat currencies are at risk. I mean, who knows what's going to happen? A 1% allocation won't hurt you if you're wrong. It'll be annoying, but not devastating. But if you're right, that 1% allocation can have a material impact on the improvement of your client's returns, so it is something very much worthwhile learning about to determine if what I've just said is valid. That's all I'm asking. I'm not saying you have to like it. I'm saying as an advisor, you have an obligation to learn about it.

Ric Edelman: (19:28)
Look, I'll give you an illustration, John. Everybody knows how I feel about annuities. I'm not a fan. In several of my books, I talk about why annuities are really bad for consumers. In fact, the title of one of my books is called The Lies About Money and annuities play a big role there, so I'm not a fan of annuities. But you know what? I'm an expert in annuities. I know all about them and I can tell you in great detail why I don't like them, so that's my challenge to you as a financial advisor: If you don't like Bitcoin, explain to me why. Don't just dismiss it as a fad or a fraud, don't just dismiss it as too volatile, because that means you don't know what you're talking about. Now, I challenge you to learn about Bitcoin and then conclude whether or not you like it or not and you'll be right either way for the benefit of your clients.

John Darsie: (20:16)
Do you consider Bitcoin from an asset class perspective the digital gold? That's a lot of the, you know, marketing and the talking points that are provided by Bitcoin fanatics who have been early advocates for the digital asset community. Do you think that it serves the same purpose in your portfolio in terms of just having a potential inflation hedge and a hedge against things going wrong in the world?

Ric Edelman: (20:39)
No, I don't. I think it's a misguided argument and it's creating a lot of noise that is interfering in the effort for advisors to understand Bitcoin. I don't know where this argument of Bitcoin is the new digital gold came from, but it's silly. Let me tell you why. Yes, we all know that digital... Strike that. We all know that gold is a hedge against inflation, except that that's not true. If you look at the long-term history of gold, it doesn't always go up with interest rates and inflation rates, it sometimes goes down, so even if that was true, it's irrelevant.

Ric Edelman: (21:12)
This isn't an argument of whether Bitcoin is better than gold. That's a wrong argument. If you believe in diversification, you should have gold in your portfolio and you should have Bitcoin in your portfolio. It's not a question of which one. You should have both. The two are uncorrelated. One has nothing to do with the other, so yes, you should have Bitcoin because of its potential for increase in value because of its lack of correlation, because it is a new and different asset that aids in the portfolio construction and you could say very many of the same things about gold.

John Darsie: (21:51)
We were talking a little bit in the open about this story is really one about supply and demand and what you see now is you've seen a lot of big names in the investment world come out in support of Bitcoin, Paul Tudor Jones, Stan Druckenmiller, Bill Miller, who's a classic value investor. You had Mass Mutual last week come out and invested a hundred million dollars into Bitcoin. You see other large investment institutions from JP Morgan to Morgan Stanley writing favorably about Bitcoin in the financial media or investment letters that they're sending out. Do you think the career risk in the last, say, three years, we saw Bitcoin surge to almost $20,000, about three years ago, and then it fell all the way down into the three thousands, but now the rally feels a little bit different and I'm going to editorialize a little bit and say that the career risk of investing in Bitcoin and the stigma around Bitcoin seems to have gone away a little bit. Do you agree with that? How do you think that'll affect price and volatility moving forward?

Ric Edelman: (22:50)
Yes, I do agree with it and I think we're going to see much more to come. The conversation is shifting from you're conspicuous if you own it to your conspicuous if you don't and I think that that trend is going to continue even further. Now that you can buy Bitcoin at PayPal and you have MicroStrategy, for example, investing almost over half a billion, and they've just announced they're going to double it over the next several months.

John Darsie: (23:14)
It's now a Bitcoin ETF, yeah.

Ric Edelman: (23:18)
We are clearly in an environment where Bitcoin is now mainstream and this legitimizes the asset, and there's going to be a continued snowball effect of this where people will begin to realize it's routine, just as a gold ETF made gold a routine asset for a portfolio diversification. The first two weeks of that ETF, it raised a billion dollars, so yes, I do believe we will continue to see broad diversification and greater mainstreaming by institutions, endowments, pension funds, insurance companies, and so on.

Ric Edelman: (23:52)
Here's the thing: We know that there are only 21 million Bitcoins that will ever be produced. That's a technological fact and that 18 million have already been produced with some, maybe four million lost forever, we're not totally sure, so it's a mere question of supply and demand. As the demand grows, the supply is going to have to respond by virtue of increased prices. You also have a technological element known as "the halving," which has occurred four times so far. It occurs roughly every four years, which effectively cuts the price of Bitcoin in half, meaning you've got to work twice as hard to mine a single Bitcoin. Every time the halving comes about, it causes a doubling in the value of Bitcoin because you only get half as many for each one you mine.

Ric Edelman: (24:42)
Technological jargon I just threw at you, but the bottom line is these two technological facts conspire to increase the price of Bitcoin, so this is one reason why you see so much bullishness from very serious Wall Streeters who are now paying attention for the first time. Now that they realize Bitcoin is not likely to go away, they're now beginning to recognize that it does have significant potential as an investment opportunity. Now, having said that, there still remain massive risks, technological risks, regulatory risks. Governments could get very upset with all of this. We don't know where it's going to go, so we want to keep our heads about us, not overinvest, not subject ourselves to portfolio risks that would harm our personal finances, but having said all the above, you do need to recognize that, yeah, there's a there there. You're right, John, that it will become more and more conspicuous that you are not investing as opposed to the fact that you are.

John Darsie: (25:39)
Ric, I'll say we've had so many people on SALT Talks who were such enthusiastic supporters of Bitcoin. It's great to have someone like you on who thinks about things from a risk management perspective. You're eager to talk about the risk before you even talk about the potential upside, which I think is important for people to get comfortable about it. We have people now like yourself that are talking about this that are not just fringe people in the technology industry. We have people that are really thinking about it from an asset allocation and a risk perspective. When you talk about volatility, this goes back to my earlier question about the importance of communication and a relationship with advisors, communicating through volatility. We've seen heavy volatility over the last 15 years at multiple instances in the equities industry. We've seen the stock market fluctuate and we obviously see high volatility in the digital asset space. How do you get both underlying clients and advisors comfortable with the fact that you're going to have to pay for some volatility with Bitcoin, but the ultimate upside is worth that volatility?

Ric Edelman: (26:43)
Yeah. Well, again, we have to apply a totally different lens to Bitcoin. We cannot use our typical approach of investment management with diversification and so on because Bitcoin is just a different beast. We are talking about Bitcoin here, but that's an easy shortcut for all of the digital assets. There's many other coins that are worth talking about, such as Ethereum, but the bottom line is that the volatility, I believe, works to your advantage. If you're the kind of an advisor who provides diversification and rebalancing, you love volatility because volatility is your friend when you rebalance a portfolio. If you're the kind of person who encourages clients to dollar cost average, you got to love Bitcoin because the volatility works to your advantage. Instead of fearing it, you ought to embrace it from those notions.

Ric Edelman: (27:34)
We need to recognize that volatility is simply an inherent nature of this asset, and oh, by the way, if you look at the early years of Microsoft, of Amazon, of any tech stock, you'll see similar levels of volatility. You'll see similar, massive increases followed by huge crashes. This is nothing new. In fact, in 2020, 145 of the S&P 500 were more volatile than Bitcoin this year, so don't talk to me about volatility as a reason not to invest in Bitcoin. It's just an inherent part of what it is.

Ric Edelman: (28:10)
What we tell our clients at Edelman Financial Engines, because we're not advising that they buy Bitcoin, because in our firm, we like to use ETFs and mutual funds, so that's what we're waiting for. We tell them, "If you're going to invest, 1% of assets. Expect massive volatility and don't be surprised if you lose the whole thing." It's all about risk management. People don't want to get rich quick. They're not trying to win the lottery. They're trying to secure their financial future, so let's talk about it in that way. While I can appreciate that there are some pundits who are thoroughly immersed and they love this and they think it's going to go to $500,000 in value, let's keep our heads about us, because I think that can scare people as equally as it can entice them.

John Darsie: (28:51)
Yeah, I totally agree. Again, going back to my prior point, it's made me a lot more comfortable with it to have sober people like yourself who think about things in terms of risk management talking about it in language that makes sense to me. In terms of asset allocation, now I want to talk about on a macro level, the 60/40 portfolio, I think, seems to be challenged right now with where interest rates are in traditional fixed income. You have emerging asset classes like digital assets. Let's take a hypothetical client, say, somebody who's worth $50 million who's looking to create a diversified portfolio made up of stocks, traditional fixed income, alternative investments, whether that be hedge fund, real estate, private equity, and then some allocation to hedges like gold and Bitcoin. What do you think in broad terms that type of portfolio should look like today for a client, obviously keeping in mind that every individual client's situation is different?

Ric Edelman: (29:46)
For sure. You can certainly argue that that individual with 50 million in assets should have all of their money in 30-day T-bills, call it a day. I mean, why take any investment risk at all, right? If you've got the lifestyle you want and you're able to secure your family intergenerational financial planning and estate planning in place, why do anything other than a 30-day T-bill? Even if it doesn't grow in value and it's eroded by inflation, so what? You'll be dead before you're broke.

Ric Edelman: (30:09)
But assuming that you do want to grow the portfolio and you want to continue to earn market-based returns, for that kind of an individual, I would, again, say, "A 1% allocation is plenty." Due to your net worth, in your case, at 50 million, you can afford to go to 5% of a diversified digital assets and blockchain portfolio, a combination of coins, a combination of VC, hedge funds, and private investment opportunities that you can diversify the investing strategies, long/short funds, timing funds, trading funds, as well as passive index funds, like the Bitwise top 10 crypto index, the BITW, et cetera, so you can do a variety of things at 50 million that you wouldn't be able to do at 5 million, let alone 500,000. Any or all the above would be perfectly fine in my view.

John Darsie: (31:01)
You talked about how at Edelman Financial Engines, you like to invest through ETFs and mutual funds because of the diversification and security it offers both from an asset perspective and from a structure perspective. When do you expect in your view regulation to catch up to all the progress we're seeing in the digital asset space and for us to see some type of ETF-type product that the average mainstream investor can feel comfortable from a security, custody, and structure perspective?

Ric Edelman: (31:28)
Well, I believe, John, that we're going to see a Bitcoin ETF within the next 18 months and I've been saying that for five years, so I have no idea. We do know that the SEC has at this point two major objections to a Bitcoin ETF: custody and volatility mixed with price transparency and validity. The custody issue, I think, is a done deal. We have solved the custody problem in the crypto industry. There are now very major players dealing with custody the exact way I believe the SEC would want to see it, so I'm not sure that's really an issue anymore. As for price volatility, well, the SEC can't control the price of gold or the price of oil. If they're willing to allow a 3x inverse ETF, I don't know why they won't allow a Bitcoin ETF, but that's just me. We'll eventually see one.

Ric Edelman: (32:17)
But I'll take it a step further: At this point, I'm not so sure it really matters so much. You've got Grayscale with their Bitcoin and Ethereum products, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and the Ethereum Trust, and now you have the Bitwise Top 10 Crypto Trust, BITW. Between GBTH and ETHE and BITW, I'm not so sure that it really matters all that much that we don't have any ETF. It'd be better because it'd be a lot cheaper than those products and you wouldn't have the premiums that those products have, so it would be in the client's best interest, the consumer's best interest, and having the SEC as a regulator of oversight would provide a much better level of safety, security, and confidence in the marketplace, helping to reduce the risk of scam and fraud and abuse. All of that is why we should have one. But in terms of investor ability to participate anymore, I'm not so sure it's as big a deal as it was three years ago.

John Darsie: (33:17)
We have a question from a member of our audience. Sharon asks, "You mentioned that you think custody has been solved and those questions have been answered from a regulatory perspective." We've done a lot of work on this, and I agree with you, but could you share with her and the rest of our audience the progress that has been made on custody and why you think those issues have been solved?

Ric Edelman: (33:37)
Well, you've got major players engaged here. Fidelity, first and foremost, Fidelity Digital Assets, they're providing these services for the institutional marketplace. They will eventually roll it out for the retail marketplace. You've got companies like Kingdom Trust, which manages $19 billion in assets that's a qualified custodian. You can actually use them to buy Bitcoin in your IRA, so you have a number of players that are providing custody services, including major firms like Coinbase, which has five times as many accounts as Schwab, Gemini, founded by the Winklevoss twins, and a variety of other firms, significant companies, massive funding and financials underlying their businesses, serious people running serious companies, not the fly-by-night folks that you had eight and 10 years ago, so I think that the technological environment and the competitive landscape are getting real serious players on Wall Street to pay attention. If Fidelity is getting involved, you know that the rest of them are not going to be able to stay away for long, if only due to market competition.

John Darsie: (34:44)
Right. We have another comment from another viewer who mentions that the SEC is actually taking up in the first quarter questions about the custody model for crypto, so certainly, based on public comments and rulings that are on the horizon, it feels like they're getting more comfortable with the idea of digital assets and we're moving in the right direction. You talked about the Bitwise Trust. Grayscale, as you mentioned, has an Ethereum Trust, they have, excuse me, a Bitcoin Trust, and Bitwise, they take an approach. They have a product that's features the top 10, I believe, digital assets in a trust format. Do you think that diversification across digital assets is the best approach, or if an investor is dipping their toe in the space, they should focus on Bitcoin?

Ric Edelman: (35:31)
Well, I'm a big fan of diversification. That's what we build our practice on at Edelman Financial Engines, so yeah. Especially given the uncertainties of this space, yeah, I think it does make sense. Let's remember that there's a reason that these different coins exist. We're not talking about Coke versus Pepsi. What we're talking about here are fundamental technological differences. We're talking about the fact that you have lots of different pairs of shoes in your closet. You have shoes for going to the opera and shoes for going to the gym. Different vehicles for different purposes. That's the difference between Bitcoin and Ethereum, for example. This is why Litecoin exists and others.

Ric Edelman: (36:12)
We do have to recognize that there are different purposes behind the technology that solve different needs in the marketplace. Currencies, assets, trends, middle functions, fiat functions, and so on, and they are all designed to accomplish different things, so yeah, I believe if you're just starting out, you might as well start with Bitcoin. It's the simplest and easiest, best-known route. It's about 75% of the total digital asset marketplace. You can do it as easily as you want on PayPal, for goodness sakes, let alone at any of the major exchanges.

Ric Edelman: (36:48)
If you want to then go further through your education and experimentation, you certainly can do that. If you like the idea of diversification, the Bitwise Top 10 Crypto Index is the only real play that there is. It's as you mentioned, the top 10 coins on a cap-weighted basis, so instead of owning just Bitcoin, about 75% is in Bitcoin. Ethereum is number two and so on. They rebalance it monthly. It's passively managed, so that is an excellent way to go. Disclosure: I'm not only someone who owns that fund, my wife and I invest in it, we're also investors in Bitwise itself, so we are in the equity play because we're really big fans of Hunter Horsley and Matt Hogan at Bitwise.

John Darsie: (37:32)
Right. Before we let you go, the RIA Digital Assets Council, how can people engage with that organization? Do you have any events coming up? How can they further their education on this space? I know every time we do a digital assets SALT Talk, my parents watch these SALT Talks and they FaceTime me, shaking their heads, saying they still don't understand what's going on. How can they engage with the RIA Digital Assets Council to understand it? Do you have any events coming up that you would recommend?

Ric Edelman: (37:58)
We do. You can go to R-I-A-D-A-C, riadac.com, and get all of our info there. You can sign up for our certification program, which is a 10-module online course. Take it at your own pace so that you can get the knowledge you need, not only about Bitcoin, but also how to incorporate it into your practice management as an advisor. We have a variety of webinars coming up. There's one on Tuesday, December 15, an hour-long webinar talking about the very basics of Bitcoin, what it is, how it works, how to incorporate it into your practice, and so on. We have other events coming up in January and February and a major summit coming up March 4th. You can get all the details about these events and register online at riadac.com.

John Darsie: (38:47)
Well, there you have it, riadac.com, R-I-A-D-A-C dot com. Thank you so much, Ric, for creating this movement and spearheading this movement into the independent RIA model, as well as educating people about asset allocation, about risk management, diversification, and true diversification now in the age of digital assets. It's been a pleasure to have you on.

Ric Edelman: (39:08)
Thank you so much, John. It's been a treat for me.

Saifedean Ammous: “The Bitcoin Standard” | SALT Talks #127

“Bitcoin is the hardest money that we have ever discovered or invented.”

Dr. Saifedean Ammous is the author of The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking, the best-selling groundbreaking study of the economics of bitcoin. The book was a pioneer in explaining bitcoin's value proposition, and the implications of its unique properties.

As a peer-to-peer software for operating payment network, Bitcoin acts as the native currency. Bitcoin is totally protected from inflation because Bitcoin’s source code makes it mathematically impossible to exceed 21 million Bitcoins- a fixed monetary supply. The entire world was effectively on the gold standard, because it was the hardest money at the time, but more gold can continually be introduced into the supply. “Anything that gets held as a form of money, the value of it rises, and because the value rises, it gives people an incentive to make more of it.”

Bitcoin offers a way to remove the third-party intermediaries in the financial transaction. The decentralized nature of the blockchain, on which Bitcoin exists, creates security via transparency. There is no one single point of failure in the way that a third-party financial institution, entrusted with money, must secure itself from hackers or thieves.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Dr. Saifedean Ammous.jpeg

Saifedean Ammous

Author

The Bitcoin Standard

MODERATOR

anthony_scaramucci.jpeg

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:08)
Hello, everyone, and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the managing director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series where we talk to leading investors, creators and thinkers. And our goal on these SALT Talks is really to replicate the experience that we provide at our global conferences, the SALT Conference, which we host twice a year. One in the United States, one internationally. Obviously this year we were unable to host our conferences, but we look forward to hopefully resuming our in-person events starting again in 2021.

John Darsie: (00:47)
What we're trying to do at our conferences and on these SALT Talks is provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future. And we're very excited today to bring you the latest installment of our digital asset series with our guest today Dr. Saifedean Ammous. Dr. Ammous is the author of The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking, which is a bestselling, ground breaking study of the economics of Bitcoin. And for people who are looking to get introduced to the space, we thought this was a great place to start.

John Darsie: (01:22)
When I was going through my personal Bitcoin education one of the first books that was recommended to me was The Bitcoin Standard. So we're very excited to have Saif with us today on SALT Talks. The book was a pioneer in explaining bitcoin's value proposition and the implications of its unique properties. Bitcoin's supply is completely irresponsive to demand, making it the hardest money ever discovered, and making hard money available to everyone worldwide.

John Darsie: (01:48)
Saif has been at the forefront of the study of the economic implications of this new technology. And he teaches and researches the economics of Bitcoin on his online learning platform Saifedean.com. Dr. Ammous holds a PhD in sustainable development from Columbia University, where his doctoral thesis studied the economics of biofuels and alternative energy sources. He also holds a Master's in development management from the London School of Economics, and a Bachelor of Engineering from the American University of Beirut.

John Darsie: (02:20)
Just a reminder, if you have any questions for Dr. Ammous. During today's talk, you can enter them in the Q&A box at the bottom of your video screen on Zoom. And in terms of today's format, we're going to do something a little bit different with Dr. Ammous. He's a fantastic presenter and has fantastic materials that sort of take you even if you're a Bitcoin novice, you can start to understand some of the economics and the value proposition of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. So we're going to have Dr. Ammous, give a presentation and share his screen for the first 25 to 30 minutes of today's talk. And then I'm going to come in and moderate audience Q&A and ask some follow up questions from my end as well. So with that, I'm going to turn it over to Dr. Ammous to give his presentation.

Saifedean Ammous: (03:01)
Thank you very much, John, thank you for having me. And for your very kind introduction. It's a pleasure to be here. Can everybody see my slides?

John Darsie: (03:11)
I think so. I can see them.

Saifedean Ammous: (03:13)
Okay, cool. So, in today's talk, I'm going to go over some of the main concepts in my book, The Bitcoin Standard. And I'm going to begin with explaining what is Bitcoin, the definition that I came up with for Bitcoin. And then we bitcoins monetary uniqueness? What is it about Bitcoin that makes us so unique? What is Bitcoin good for? And what are some of the implications of the use of Bitcoin? So my definition of Bitcoin is that Bitcoin is a peer to peer software for operating a payment network with its own native currency that is protected from unexpected inflation, without having to rely on any trusted third parties.

Saifedean Ammous: (03:53)
I think this really captures the essence of what we have here. It's a form of software that is peer to peer in that it's distributed over the Internet, and anybody can download it and use it and any member of the network is a peer with other members. So it's perfectly voluntary. And what that software does is that it operates a payment network between participants on the network. And that payment network runs with its own native currency, which is digital, and whose supply is protected from unexpected inflation, there's no way for anybody to make more of that money, which I think is the most important economic property of Bitcoin.

Saifedean Ammous: (04:32)
And all of that is done without having to rely on any single trusted third party, there aren't intermediaries that you need to rely on in the transactions that take place on the Bitcoin network. The significance of Bitcoin, in my mind, lies in two main properties. The first one is that it is the hardest money that we have ever discovered or invented. And I'm going to discuss this in a little bit more detail now. And second is that it is the only working alternative to central banks for international payments settlement.

Saifedean Ammous: (05:02)
So first of all, when we think about the hardness, if you think about it, anything can be used as money, there's no reason why anything can't be used as money, anybody who decides to hold something, not for the sake of consuming it, but for the sake of exchanging it for something else later on, is choosing to hold that thing as a form of money.

Saifedean Ammous: (05:26)
But anything that gets held as a form of money, the value of it rises, and because the value rises, that it gives people an incentive to make more of it. So anything that is easy to make ends up being a lousy money, because people can make more of it and the value of it will drop. And so if you look historically, you find that the things that have been used as money, historically, are usually things that are hard to make. And in fact, you find that whatever is used as money is whatever is the hardest to make at any particular point in time. And so, there are these examples, which I discuss in more detail in my book. But if you look at the beginning of the 20th century, you see the entire world effectively was on a gold standard, or the vast majority of the world was on a gold standard. Because at that time, gold was the hardest money that we had ever had.

Saifedean Ammous: (06:19)
And for a very long time we know that gold supply is only increasing at around one or 2%. This has been the case for about a century, we look at global gold production, we see that every year it goes up at around 1.5%. And that is, in my mind, what makes gold the most likely monetary asset, the most popular monetary asset in the market all over the world at the beginning of the 20th century, because it is the hardest money. And even the supply continues to grow at a very low rate. So there's no way for anybody to make increasingly large quantities of gold and to bring them onto the market.

Saifedean Ammous: (07:00)
Now, why is this important? Because if you look, today, you see that Bitcoin is basically the hardest money ever. Bitcoin's supply grows, but flattens out, it stops growing at around 21 million Bitcoin. There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin. And that's it, there'll never be more and so the supply growth rate starts off quick starts off high, but then begins to drop as the already existing supply increases, and the new supply becomes less and less significant.

Saifedean Ammous: (07:36)
So the current annual growth rate is around 2% to 3% for Bitcoin, and over the next two, three years, it's going to be a little less than 2%. And then in 2025, it'll drop again to under 1%. And then it'll continue to drop under 1% until effectively it reaches zero sometime in the next century. So, this is quite unique. And this I think makes Bitcoin quite interesting as a monetary technology, because it is the first money that we have whose supply is completely irresponsive to demand.

Saifedean Ammous: (08:12)
In other words, with everything else, if they get if something gets chosen as money, more people will be trying to produce more of it, and so the supply will increase. But with Bitcoin, there is no way of producing more of it because of something called the difficulty adjustment. When you try and make more Bitcoin, you don't make more Bitcoin, you just end up expanding more processing power and electricity on making Bitcoin more secure.

Saifedean Ammous: (08:39)
And so the way that I like to present this, is if you look at it with every other form of money that we've ever known, if people use it as a store of value, the price will rise, there will be more profit to be made from mining it. And that leads to an increase in the supply, which then leads to a drop in the price. But with Bitcoin, on the other hand, this process is a cycle. And the reason for that is that we have the first same three steps, the store of value demand increases, it causes the price to rise, it causes mining to become more profitable. But in the case of Bitcoin, if you start mining more Bitcoin, you're not able to increase the supply, there's no way of increasing the supply of Bitcoin.

Saifedean Ammous: (09:26)
So instead, what ends up happening is that more hashing power goes to mining, so more people are spending more resources on mining, and mining becomes harder, and the supply of coins stays the same. That's how the difficulty adjustment works. Instead of the reward for mining rising, the reward stays the same, but mining becomes harder. And so no matter how many people are using Bitcoin and how many people are trying to mine Bitcoin, we're only going to get a certain number of Bitcoin produced every day, around these days, it's around 900 coins, and for the next three and a half years, it's going to be 900 coins a day, regardless of how many people are trying to mine Bitcoin.

Saifedean Ammous: (10:09)
The 900 coins a day is a set reward, and the difficulty of mining adjusts in order to make sure that we continue to average around 900 coins a day. And that's how this has been working. So in other words, when mining becomes more profitable, more hashing power is going toward mining, but the supply does not increase, instead more hashing power is effectively protecting the network. So the network becomes harder to attack, it becomes more expensive to attack the Bitcoin network becomes more expensive to make the Bitcoin network unusable. And that gives Bitcoin the ability to survive longer, which makes it more attractive as a store of value which attracts more store of value demand.

Saifedean Ammous: (10:55)
And this in my mind is the only way that we can explain and understand the incredible rise in the price of bitcoin that we've seen over the last 10 years. Bitcoin has basically gone up... Well 11 years now. Bitcoin has gone up about one and a half to two billion percent in 11 years, and nothing has ever gone up like that. Ever. And I think this is really the only way to understand it, because bitcoin's supply is completely irresponsive to demand with anything else. If there's more supply, if there's more demand, we can always make more. We're always able to make more of anything else. But with Bitcoin, there's a strict fixed limit on how much we can make from it.

Saifedean Ammous: (11:38)
Because of this thing that we call difficulty adjustment, so the difficulty adjustment really is the most amazing technology in Bitcoin in my mind, it's the magic sauce that makes Bitcoin work. Because it protects the network from inflation. And it ensures the supply is auditable, and verifiable by all network members. And it converts people's inevitable incentive to increase bitcoins supply into network security. So it makes the network more secure. And it does that by using the incentive of people to increase the supply of the currency.

Saifedean Ammous: (12:11)
So it's the reason why I like to call Bitcoin and all conquering juggernaut of economic incentives. Whereas everybody competes to inflate all other monies. Whereas everybody's competing to increase the supply of every other currency that is out there, people compete to secure Bitcoin, not to inflate it. So people compete to make Bitcoin more secure, which ends up making it more attractive. So Bitcoin really solved the inflation problem in the most neat way imaginable, because instead of providing people with an incentive to increase the supply, it provides them with an incentive to make the network more secure.

Saifedean Ammous: (12:49)
And how secure is Bitcoin? Bitcoin has no single point of failure, it has no single piece of critical hardware or infrastructure, no single critical individual or organization, it basically can't be stopped. It's a protocol that is always open to anyone who wants it at any point in time, around every 10 minutes, a new block of transactions is released. And this has basically never failed in the 10 or 11 years that has been going on. And it's never confirmed a fraudulent transaction. So far, nobody has managed to spend money they don't have on the Bitcoin network.

Saifedean Ammous: (13:22)
So the hardest money that's ever been invented is basically available worldwide for anyone who can receive two megabytes of data every 10 minutes. You don't even need a computer or an internet connection. There are ways to get around that to use Bitcoin. It's purely voluntary. It does not read regulation enforcement or the police. And it's chosen and valued freely on the market. It's sound money. It's money that gets its value, because the market gives it value, not because anybody forces its value. So what is Bitcoin good for then?

Saifedean Ammous: (13:53)
Well, for me, I think the most important use case of Bitcoin is that it is a store of value. And it's an obvious use case, because it's the first strictly scarce liquid asset that we've ever had. And in fact, if you think about it, one of my favorite books is a book called The Ultimate Resource, written by economist Julian Simon. And in this book, Julian Simon explains that the ultimate resource in the world really is human time, because with human time we're able to make more of any other resource. The limit on how much we have of oil, or silver, or gold, or copper, or nickel or zinc. The limit on how much we have of all of these metals is simply how much time we dedicate toward mining and producing them. The amount of them that exists in the crust of the earth is far beyond our capability to process and consume.

Saifedean Ammous: (14:54)
And the limiting factor really is just the time that we are able to dedicate to producing those goods versus other goods, we could always make more of anything. And that's why we never run out of these metals. No matter how much we find, no matter how much we consume, we keep digging and we keep finding more. Because the limit is not how much exists on Earth, because that's so far larger than we can even ever imagine or calculate, the earth is enormous. The limit is how much time we have for other things. The limit is the opportunity cost in terms of our time, in terms of other things.

Saifedean Ammous: (15:29)
And so, before Bitcoin, anything that we chose, as a store of value in this world, had the imperfection that its supply will increase in response to it being chosen as money. But Bitcoin doesn't have that. So naturally it ends up working out really well as a store of value. And so ultimately, the only thing that is scarce is time. And Bitcoin is the second thing that is truly scarce. And so, for me that's a natural match between the two, if you want to store the value of your time in money, you would want to store it in the money that is scarce like your time.

Saifedean Ammous: (16:02)
So this is why I like to call Bitcoin the most advanced technology for transferring the value of time into the future. The second thing that Bitcoin I think is good for is that it is the decentralized free market alternative to central banking. Until the year 2009 if you wanted to send money from one country to the other, the only way that you could do it was you had to go through financial institutions that are operated by central banks. So central banks have a national monopoly on this process in every country. And they're able to monopolize the market for sending money in and out of the country. And it's had terrible consequences in many places for many people. And in many of those places, and many of those times people didn't have an alternative, because where do you go? How do you trade with people outside your country, if you can't have a bank? You can send physical gold in reliable ways that are cheap and economical.

Saifedean Ammous: (17:08)
And there was no alternative. So you have to have your savings always with the local banking system, which was also lending to the government and likely to witness significant devaluation. Bitcoin offers us the first alternative to that. It really is the first working alternative to international payment settlement. It's digital and yet it does not require the supervision and the control of national central banks.

Saifedean Ammous: (17:41)
And one important aspect that I get into detail in my book, is the issue of how Bitcoin grows and how Bitcoin scales. There is, I think, a common misconception that Bitcoin is a payment network that you can think of Bitcoin and compare it to PayPal. But in my mind I try and explain the idea that Bitcoin is actually more... Is better understood as being a settlement network, it's a network for a small number of high value transactions. And this is the way in which the network has been evolving over the past few years, it's growing in this direction, where the number of transactions conducted on Bitcoin every day has been roughly constant for maybe five, six years now at around 300,000 to 500,000 transactions a day. But the value of that is transacted continues to increase significantly. More and more value is being sent on the Bitcoin network, even though the number of transactions is the same.

Saifedean Ammous: (18:37)
So in that sense, Bitcoin is growing as a settlement network. And I think, in this regard, we're going to see it grow more in this capacity. And I think you see more and more of the businesses that are being built around Bitcoin, at this point, are focusing on this kind of use case. And an important part to this is the fact that we see it with corporations now looking into using Bitcoin as a cash settlement... As a part of their cash reserve assets, rather than thinking of using Bitcoin for payments.

Saifedean Ammous: (19:24)
So a few years ago, a lot of people used to think that when is Starbucks going to adopt Bitcoin? When is McDonald's going to adopt Bitcoin? In their mind ideals, you would be able to pay for your coffee or your burger with Bitcoin. But I think what we're seeing is that we're going to be witnessing Bitcoin transactions being performed... Bitcoin coming into those companies from the balance sheet, not from the... They're going to hold it as cash rather than accepted for small payments. And I think eventually, we will see small payments being built on Bitcoin eventually, but for now, I think that the compelling use case is to hold it and use it for large amounts of settlement rather than for daily small transactions.

Saifedean Ammous: (20:12)
So this is why in my book, I analogize Bitcoin to gold because similarly with gold, the trade was happening with a gold certificate. So we'll see second layer solutions built on Bitcoin, similar to second layer solutions built on gold, I think, and the interesting security question then for Bitcoin is whether it can resist being centralized, like gold was in central banks.

Saifedean Ammous: (20:41)
Some implications for Bitcoin I discuss in the book. One that I find extremely important is the issue of time preference. I think a problem of easy money is that it loses value and so it makes the future less certain for people. And because it makes the future less certain, it raises the cost of providing for the future. And therefore it makes it less likely for people to save for the future. And that reflects on all manner of decisions and outlooks on life which gives people more of a present focused orientation rather than a future focused orientation. I think we see the same... We see the opposite happen under hard money.

Saifedean Ammous: (21:25)
So if you think of the 19th century to today, people used to save much more in the 19th century. And if you look at what has happened as western economies went off the gold standard, you see that savings rates declined, continues to decline. The one country that continues to have higher savings rates was the last country to go off the gold standard, and that is Switzerland. So I think there's something there that suggests if we do move to a Bitcoin standard, effectively, the world would have far less debt and far more saving is the way that I would see it if you move to a hard assets.

Saifedean Ammous: (22:00)
Don't have much time to explain this in detail. But if you're familiar with the Austrian School theory of the business cycle, from that perspective, effectively easy money and the ability of governments to manipulate and central banks to extend credit, unbacked by real savings, effectively manipulating interest rate downward and increasing the money supply, that is effectively the cause of the business cycle, and inflation and recessions. And for me, this is my favorite chart to illustrate this again, look at Switzerland, up until the 1970s when they went on the gold standard, they basically had no unemployment, there were no recessions, there was really no unemployment. And then that started happening as they went off gold and started having a more conventional 20th century monetary policy.

Saifedean Ammous: (22:52)
One other important application in my mind is that it will end the... Having Bitcoin could offer us the way out of the Tower of Babel, that is the foreign exchange market. Which is trading something roughly in the sea of the size of 25 multiples of GDP, in terms of volume. All of it essentially, because we've unsolved the problem of money in the 20th century by going off gold, which was one universal international apolitical money and going to many different political monies, which effectively create the system of international partial barter around the world.

Saifedean Ammous: (23:34)
So in conclusion, I think Bitcoin, if I were to summarize what Bitcoin is, I would say Bitcoin is a technological and apolitical solution to two problems. The first is international value transfer. And the second is saving, or transferring value to the future. Bitcoin offers us essentially a technological solution for those things, it makes those things, the use of them similar to using a computer, you're able to store your value in computer in a way that is much more reliable and predictable and auditable than the traditional solutions that we have.

Saifedean Ammous: (24:12)
And I think the intriguing possibility of Bitcoin is that it offers us the prospect of a real free market in money savings, capital, and investments. That is all for the presentation. Thank you very much for inviting me. My website to saifedean.com. The Bitcoin Standard, my book is available in 24 languages now. You can find them all listed on my website. And you can also sign up to receive chapters from my two forthcoming books that I'm working on right now the Fiat Standard, which is the sequel to The Bitcoin Standard, and also a textbook in economics, Principles of Economics. Thank you very much.

John Darsie: (24:50)
Well, Saif. Thank you so much for that presentation. We already have a few questions in the queue. But I want to remind anybody who's watching, if you have any questions for the remaining 15 to 20 minutes of today's SALT Talk, if you're on Zoom with us, you can enter them in the Q&A box at the bottom of your video screen. If you're watching on Periscope on LinkedIn, or on our YouTube channel, you can email any questions you have to info@salt.org and we will try to get those in before we let Saif leave us.

John Darsie: (25:19)
The first question that's being asked and one of the reasons why we did this with you Saif is that we had some people in our community who are crypto curious but have yet to really dive in educate themselves completely about what Bitcoin is and the long term implications of cryptocurrency. So we have just a very basic follow up question from Victoria, who asks, "How is Bitcoin mined? And what's the process going to be for mining the rest of Bitcoin over the next decade and into infinity?" As we know, Bitcoin, halving works. But could you just explain what the process for mining Bitcoin is?

Saifedean Ammous: (25:53)
Yeah, the way you think of mining Bitcoin is it's almost Bitcoins are handed out, kind of like medals or trophies in a sports competition, in that they're handed out at a specific period of time. So let's say every four years, there's going to be a gold medal for the 100 meter dash. And it doesn't matter how many people compete for it all over the world. There are only going to be one metal, no matter how many people try and get it. So you can't control the supply through mining more or less. And the way that works is that the reward for mining is pre-programmed and constant. And then if more people try and compete for the reward, then all the people that are competing end up getting less and less out of the reward.

Saifedean Ammous: (26:41)
So the way that it works is that you use a computing power, you get a machine, initially you could do it on your own computer with any basic personal computer, but now it's become more sophisticated and complex, and it needs its own computer to be done economically. So you'll get this machine, which will try and solve mathematical problems to effectively win that reward.

Saifedean Ammous: (27:12)
So all these machines all over the world are mining Bitcoin by trying to find the solution to a mathematical problem. And then whoever provides the correct solution ends up winning a reward. So those rewards are handed out at a rate of six and a quarter, plus a little bit for transaction fees every 10 minutes. So there's six bitcoins being handed out every 10 minutes, roughly six to seven bitcoins more or less every 10 minutes. And that adds up to around 900 bitcoins a day, today.

Saifedean Ammous: (27:44)
So these will be handed out to people who use their computing power and their electricity to solve these mathematical problems. And the more computing power you direct towards the problem, the more likely you are to find those solutions, the more likely you are to have a profit, to make a profit. So what this leads to is that mining ends up being just a very competitive market were only the people who are the most efficient, who have the lowest cost of power, and who can secure the best hardware are able to continue to mine profitably, because it's competitive.

Saifedean Ammous: (28:22)
So the people who have the lowest electricity prices are the only ones who are going to be able to turn out profit because everybody else, they won't be making that award because it won't be economical for them. If your electricity is expensive, then that award that you make will not be worthwhile. So the point behind it is to make it so that the supply of Bitcoin is regulated by the mining process, so that it doesn't increase beyond what it is meant to be increasing at.

Saifedean Ammous: (28:53)
So the schedule right now, the schedule brings us to 21 million in around 100 years from now. We're already at 18.5 million roughly today. So we already have 18.5 million bitcoins that have already been mined. So there's only two and a half million bitcoins to be mined over the next 100 years. And the growth rate is just going to continue to decline over time.

John Darsie: (29:18)
All right, fantastic. What do you say to critics who talk about energy efficiency as it relates to mining and computing power to run the Bitcoin network? That's one criticism that's leveled at Bitcoin is that it's very energy inefficient.

Saifedean Ammous: (29:32)
I think Bitcoin is extremely energy efficient in that it is constantly punishing anybody who has expensive energy. So if you're trying to mine Bitcoin with grid power, you're not going to mine Bitcoin profitably. There are no grids that are basically competitive with a Bitcoin network, because the people that are able to be turning a profit in Bitcoin mining are those who have power that is essentially stranded, that is oversupply at places where it's not easy to move in.

Saifedean Ammous: (30:04)
And power is not easy to transport the capital power a lot. So Bitcoin is essentially a buyer of last resort of power from people who have excess power that don't know what to do with it. And that's why it's mainly mined in hydroelectric dams where they have a lot of spare capacity. And in methane fields, I think is another one where it's going to start growing, it's not now, but I think the potential for that one is enormous, because methane fields, they flare a lot... Sorry, in oil fields, they flare a lot of methane that is not economical to ship, because methane isn't very energy dense, and so it's not really economical.

Saifedean Ammous: (30:40)
And so usually they just burn it, but if you use it to mine Bitcoin, you can recover a lot of your costs. So I think Bitcoin is efficient, is highly energy efficient, uses extremely cheap energy, and it encourages innovations in finding cheaper and cheaper electricity. However, there's no denying that Bitcoin does consume a lot of energy. But I think here I find this question strange.

Saifedean Ammous: (31:04)
It's very common for people to think that consuming a lot of energy is a bad thing. But if you think that consuming a lot of energy is a bad thing, then why would you buy a washing machine? Why wouldn't you wash your clothes with your own hand? Why would you get into a car? A car consumes more energy than a bicycle and an airplane consumes more energy than both.

Saifedean Ammous: (31:23)
And we use those things precisely because they use more energy because burning energy is an extremely cost efficient way to get things done, much more cost efficient than using human input. And so for the same reason, I think that we got rid of telephone operators and we use automated telephones, Bitcoin essentially automates monetary policy and gets rid of discretionary monetary policy and automates international settlement clearance. And I can't think of a better use of electricity.

John Darsie: (32:04)
So we have a few questions around this theme of Bitcoin being digital gold, or an alternative store of value. And some people enjoyed your last slide comparing the total value of the FX market. What do you think the ultimate market cap for Bitcoin could climb to? Is it capped at basically, taking some market cap from gold, and those two assets being your two main alternative stores of value? Or how large of a market cap Do you think Bitcoin could eventually have? And what's the path to getting there?

Saifedean Ammous: (32:39)
Really, it's a scary question to consider, because you try and draw the line on where demand can stop and you keep struggling. So you could say gold, I think de-monetizing gold is a realistic goal and turning golden into an industrial metal, that can happen. So Bitcoin can eat that market. It won't mean gold will go to zero, obviously, it'll become just a expensive industrial metal.

Saifedean Ammous: (33:06)
But you have to also remember that a lot more of global markets are essentially just looking for a store of value, or they're not looking for investment that yields returns. There's a lot of money that is just looking for a store of value. And so a lot of real estate, a lot of people buy homes that they don't really need, because that beats inflation. And a lot of people invest in all kinds of things like bonds, for instance.

Saifedean Ammous: (33:38)
So Bitcoin could eat into the market for real estate, could eat into market for bonds. And so these things could lose a significant amount of the demand that comes to them. Because people don't have a solid store of value that can just offer them... That can be the base of your portfolio that you don't take risks with. And Bitcoin, if it grows into this kind of digital gold, it can offer people that. And so you can imagine, then it would reduce the demand for other markets. And then really, the sky's the limit, I guess.

John Darsie: (34:18)
So we have a few questions about Satoshi Nakamoto, who is the anonymous figure that basically created Bitcoin, there's been speculation about it being an individual or a group of people. But to this day, the identity of the people who started Bitcoin remains a question mark. And we've had a few questions like this on other digital assets, SALT Talks we've done about whether you think ultimately we'll find out who created Bitcoin, and whether you think that would enhance confidence in the system. And who you think, Satoshi Nakamoto is.

Saifedean Ammous: (34:55)
I don't know who it is. And a lot of people have spent a lot of time digging into it. And I don't think there's any satisfactory answer. I think it's hard to explain who he is or what happened. But what we know... In my mind, I think, the disappearance and there's the fact that the person who created this left is probably an essential part of what makes Bitcoin work. I think, if Bitcoin had continued... And I don't know if he did it deliberately, because he didn't indicate whether he wanted to do that. Maybe he did it deliberately, or maybe something happened.

Saifedean Ammous: (35:32)
But I think the fact that there was nobody in charge, and the project continued to survive, is what makes it extremely tough, because it's what makes the monetary policy set in stone. It's what gives it digital value. Because this is a network that is out of control of anybody. There's nobody out there who can take over this network and change the money supply.

Saifedean Ammous: (35:55)
And potentially, I think, if the owner of the guy who started it was still around, they might have had this power and they have this power, they'd set the precedent of doing something like this at an early stage. The whole thing would have become much more political. And in my mind, it would not have this value proposition. It would be far more of like an interesting startup. More than this neutral protocol, which is what Bitcoin is right now. So I think the disappearance of the creator was an enormously important factor in the growth of Bitcoin in a way in which it had become neutral and controlled by nobody.

John Darsie: (36:42)
Correct me if I'm wrong on this, but my understanding is that Satoshi whether that's a person or a group of people still owns a substantial part of the Bitcoin float that exists out in the marketplace. And in general, Bitcoin ownership is very concentrated among a small group of people who are early evangelists of the cryptocurrency. What do you say to people who level the accusation that those groups of people are simply talking their own book and trying to hype up Bitcoin as a way to enrich themselves, and maybe staying anonymous as a way to avoid accusations of conflict of interest as they try to drive Bitcoin higher?

Saifedean Ammous: (37:21)
Well, I mean, part of the mystery is that we don't know who the person is, and they haven't touched their coins. So while we don't really know whether they are his coins to begin with. But given the current value is probably something in the range of, I think, $10, $20 billion, or something like that. It's a lot of money for somebody to be sitting on. I think they probably would have wanted to cash on it earlier. So it's-

John Darsie: (37:51)
They've had a pretty nice return.

Saifedean Ammous: (37:53)
Yes, but they haven't cashed out. So that is quite mystifying but I think in terms of the early adopters, in a sense, yes. But you have to remember that as the thing goes up, as the price goes up, as demand increases, the early adopters sell, because the prices go up in ways that become life changing, and so they sell significant chunks of their assets.

Saifedean Ammous: (38:23)
Now the fact that it's insiders that are promoting it. I guess you could say that about anything but the key difference with Bitcoin. And the reason why I think it's completely meaningless to call it a Ponzi scheme, is that none of the insiders have the way of creating more liabilities to draw on the wealth, or backed by the wealth that is parked in the network.

Saifedean Ammous: (38:49)
So in a Ponzi scheme, people would bring in money into it, and then you're getting new money from new people, and you're using that to pay off the old people. So the same money is being given as liabilities out to several people, and then the whole thing comes crashing down, but nobody can do that in Bitcoin. You are the only one who can own your own keys, and nobody can generate more liabilities, nobody can make more Bitcoins.

Saifedean Ammous: (39:15)
So the rules of the game are open and transparent for everybody. And in a sense, this sounds little more than just sour grapes, like yes, some people took a risk early when you were mocking it and laughing at it and saying it was stupid. And the market found out that maybe it wasn't very stupid. So it seems to me that it is a little bit unfair to be turning around now and saying that it's unfair that the people who took the risk that you derided it and didn't take, took the reward for it.

John Darsie: (39:48)
So your book is called The Bitcoin Standard. Obviously, you're very enthusiastic about Bitcoin. Are you a Bitcoin maximalist? Meaning you think it's going to be a winner take all type scenario in the digital asset space where Bitcoin is going to be the overwhelming winner, and you're going to have maybe a few other coins out there that lag well behind Bitcoin? Do you think this is a space that's going to develop as a mature asset class, and you're going to have other coins and cryptocurrencies and digital assets that have tremendous value as well?

Saifedean Ammous: (40:17)
No, I think it's really it's Bitcoin or bust. There's really only one protocol, one neutral protocol here, and there's only neutral protocols. But I think the use case, ultimately, of the tokens that underlie value transfer, it has to be one protocol. And the only one that can make a claim for being a neutral protocol that is controlled by nobody, that isn't controlled by anybody, is Bitcoin. And that's really ultimately... It's what I see as the value proposition that... It's the guarantee that this thing should have value. The reason these digital bits of data are able to have economic value is because there's a guarantee that nobody can go and change the supply, which is trivial in my mind with all the other digital assets.

Saifedean Ammous: (41:05)
So none of them can demonstrate to me that they have anything like the resilience that Bitcoin has. Because we saw with Bitcoin in 2017, some of the most influential Bitcoin companies and some of the most influential Bitcoin developers and some of the bigger investors in Bitcoin all I tried to change one simple metric and parameter in the Bitcoin network and failed. But you don't see that happening with any of the other currencies, which are to be frank, after Bitcoin, if any of these has made a name where people have heard about it, it only made that name because it had a group of people behind it, working in a concerted effort.

Saifedean Ammous: (41:43)
And for those people, changing the supply and controlling the supply is more or less a bit of a trivial problem. And we've seen with some of the bigger ones that they've... That they don't even know what their supply is going to be like. So for me, I think the value proposition is just not there, in having any of these digital tokens attain the scarcity that is necessary for them to have reliable market value in the long run. And that's why you see that a lot of these copycat coins come into the Bitcoin space. There's a lot of hype initially, but then eventually, they crash. And essentially, they all flatline and head towards zero next to Bitcoin.

Saifedean Ammous: (42:28)
It's happened with thousands of them. And I think we're still at a point where in terms of market cap, which is a very flawed measure, Bitcoin is about 70% of the market. But in terms of real world liquidity, the real world liquidity for the other currencies, it's more likely than Bitcoin is about 90% of the total real liquidity, not just the kind of market cap, which can be easily spoofed.

Saifedean Ammous: (42:58)
So if we're talking about a world in which the market has for 11 years, after 11 years of all these thousands of competitors coming in, and they still can't get to more than 10% of the liquidity of Bitcoin, I think it's time to consider this is not Pepsi and Coca Cola. This is not different providers of different software packages. This is a neutral protocol versus really proprietary currencies. And it's more like there's the internet. And then there are other people trying to sell their own local work network as being the other internet. But there's only really one protocol for the web itself.

John Darsie: (43:44)
So you're a believer in the Austrian School of Economics. And you think that our current Keynesian, fiat monetary system is inevitably flawed and eventually going to implode as we try to inflate our way out of our problems. What do you think the ultimate path for Bitcoin is? Do you think it's something that the United States government and other global governments are going to eventually acquiesce and come up with regulation that allows it to coexist with something like the US dollar? Do you think if the system starts to collapse a little bit that they'll start to crack down on cryptocurrency with capital controls and try to prosecute people that use cryptocurrencies? What do you think the ultimate path to acceptance and mainstream use for Bitcoin is over the coming decades?

Saifedean Ammous: (44:30)
I have to say, I don't really necessarily think that this current system has to crash, it's been going around 50 years and for all I know, it could go for another 50, maybe even more. And in my mind, I don't really have much of the idea that Bitcoin is... It could be that Bitcoin is the savior from hyperinflation and it certainly was my savior from hyperinflation in Lebanon, where I used to live until recently and the currency collapsed. So I think if hyperinflation does happen, Bitcoin is a great thing to have.

Saifedean Ammous: (45:05)
However, I don't think that Bitcoin needs a hyperinflation scenario, in order for it to rise. I think this is a point that I keep trying to communicate, which is that we need to stop thinking about it, in terms of this system is going to collapse in Bitcoin is the only answer. I think we need to just think this is just a better technology, this is just a more advanced system. And it's likely to take over just because apolitical settlement that is accessible and verifiable, for anybody, anywhere around the world, at a very low cost is just a much more powerful proposition than having to go through political institutions every time you want to send and receive money. And having to go through political institutions that have a monopoly that can devalue the currency.

Saifedean Ammous: (45:53)
So I think, by being harder money and by offering international clearance independently, Bitcoin is just a new ecosystem. And in my mind, I don't see that it is necessary for the Fiat system to collapse for Bitcoin to grow. I think the two can continue to coexist for a long period of time, while Bitcoin grows. And it's not implausible in my mind that just Bitcoin continues to grow peacefully next to a relatively shrinking Fiat economy, and then effectively we upgrade to a scenario where we're using more Bitcoin.

Saifedean Ammous: (46:30)
And I think the use case, ultimately, in my mind, I like to compare it to dynamite. When dynamite comes up it changes... Or gunpowder, it changes the dynamics of power. And if you have an army of soldiers who have swords, you don't like gunpowder. So what do you do? Do you ban gunpowder? Banning gunpowder is not going to be effective, because the people who are going to fight your soldiers are not going to-

John Darsie: (46:58)
Good luck with that.

Saifedean Ammous: (47:00)
Exactly. You're just bending your own soldiers from having gunpowder. So for me, I think individuals, corporations, and governments will start just understanding the massive potential for Bitcoin as effectively digital dynamite gold. And see that their own interest is better served by using Bitcoin rather than fighting Bitcoin.

John Darsie: (47:25)
So in your view, what are the biggest risks to Bitcoin becoming this major store of value that we're talking about as a digital gold, and an alternative to other stores of value that you've described?

Saifedean Ammous: (47:37)
I think the main risk to keep an eye on is the decentralization of the network. If the number of nodes, and that's really the key metric to keep an eye on, if the number of nodes in the Bitcoin network declined significantly, then there's... Or if the cost of running a node rises significantly, then you expect that the number of nodes would decline. And as a result, you would have a smaller number of nodes. And then that becomes more concerning because it becomes more plausible that they could collude with one another, to change the supply.

Saifedean Ammous: (48:10)
So if you have a situation where there develops an asymmetry between the people using Bitcoin and the people who are able to validate the blocks, and are able to validate the consensus rules of the network, if that split becomes too big, and the number of the nodes becomes too small and concentrated, then in my mind that really compromises the value proposition, because it makes it likely that you could get some kind of collusion or it's more likely at least that you could get some kind of collusion that could alter the monetary policy. So this for me is the main risk, the decentralization.

John Darsie: (48:50)
For people who are interested in owning Bitcoin what do you think is the optimal path to buying Bitcoin that's currently available in the marketplace today? So you have some over the counter investment products that have started to emerge, but you have yet to have a SEC approved and registered ETF. For example, you have exchanges like Coinbase, Gemini, and others that you can buy and sell Bitcoin, in your view what's the most secure, safest method for buying Bitcoin today?

Saifedean Ammous: (49:20)
I mean, it's not an easy question, because it depends on who's asking it and how they want to do it. Obviously, there are many commercial options for individuals and for institutions. For my personal, I work with a company called the NYDIG, the New York digital Investment Group, and they offer a full suite of solutions, institutional grade solutions fully regulated, and they have the BitLicense.

Saifedean Ammous: (49:49)
So that would be the kind of solution that I would recommend for institutions. With individuals, I recommend, the most important thing is that you hold your own keys of Bitcoin. If you don't hold your own private keys of Bitcoin, for your Bitcoin, then these are not your bitcoins. And I recommend personally, individually holding your own Bitcoin for yourself. But obviously, that might not be feasible with institutional money, which might require more elaborate custody arrangements. And for that there's NYDIG. But yeah, I think that it's difficult to recommend something too specific, just because there are too many options. And it depends on what the person prefers. And for their own security, the best solution is the one that makes sense for you, that you're likely to stick to safely.

John Darsie: (50:45)
There you go. That's responsible advice. Dr. Ammous, Saif, it's been a pleasure to have you on, we look forward to hopefully having you at one of our in person SALT conferences here in the future, as we talked about before we started and as you can see, by all the episodes of SALT Talks that have covered digital assets, we have a growing enthusiasm and interest in the space. So we look forward to continuing our journey, both academically and potentially in practice in the future. But thanks so much for joining us, and we'll look forward to seeing you soon.

Saifedean Ammous: (51:15)
Thank you very much for having me. This was a lot of fun.

PlanB: Modeling Bitcoin’s Value with Scarcity | SALT Talks #126

“Doing nothing, you put [Bitcoin] under the mattress, that particular combination would have outperformed the S&P 500 over the last 10 years, not only in return but also in risk.”

PlanB is a Dutch institutional investor with a legal and quantitative finance background. He created the Bitcoin Stock-to-Flow (S2F) model where he uses scarcity to quantify Bitcoin value. PlanB is currently working as an investment manager in a team managing a multi-billion-dollar balance sheet.

Bitcoin has been the best performing asset of the last one, five and ten years. It represents a very asymmetrical bet, meaning the return is much higher than its volatility. The Bitcoin white paper written by the cryptocurrency’s anonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto served as the “Aha” moment, laying out the revolutionary technology in simple terms. “I liked the white paper so much. It's a very simple description, nine pages, very elegant, not that mathematical… from there you start your journey.”

It’s common among anyone considering Bitcoin to feel like they are late in getting involved. In reality, Bitcoin is still in the early innings. The asymmetric nature of Bitcoin and its growth potential could see its price go above $300k by the end of 2021.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

PlanB.jpeg

PlanB

Institutional Investor

MODERATOR

anthony_scaramucci.jpeg

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:07)
Hello everyone and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the Managing Director of SALT which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series with leading investors, creators and thinkers that we launched during this work from home period. And what we're trying to do on the SALT Talks is replicate the experience that we provide at our global conferences, the SALT Conference, which we host twice a year in a normal environment once in the United States and once internationally, most recently in Abu Dhabi in 2019. We're looking forward to getting back to a normal event calendar hopefully in the second half of 2021.

John Darsie: (00:50)
But what we try to do at our conferences and what we're trying to do on these talks is provide our community a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future. And we're breaking ground today on today's SALT Talk. It'll be a first for us here at SALT. We have an anonymous faceless speaker joining us on SALT Talks today, and that anonymous faceless speaker is PlanB.

John Darsie: (01:16)
Welcome to SALT Talks PlanB. PlanB is a Dutch institutional investor who goes by the name @100trillionUSD on Twitter. He has a legal and quantitative finance background but chooses to remain anonymous in the public sphere. He created the bitcoin stock-to-flow model for valuing the price of bitcoin where he uses scarcity to quantify what he thinks is bitcoin's real value. The stock-to-flow model is not only applicable to bitcoin but also to gold, silver, and any other type of asset. PlanB is currently working as an investment manager in a team managing a multi-billion dollar balance sheet.

John Darsie: (01:54)
So why does he call himself PlanB? PlanB refers to an alternative plan for quantitative easing, AKA printing money by central banks, negative interest rates and currency debasement in general. 100trillionUSD is a reference to the Zimbabwe 100 trillion US dollar note that came about during the 2008 period of hyperinflation.

John Darsie: (02:18)
A reminder. If you have any questions for PlanB during today's SALT Talk except questions about who his real identity is because he's not going to give that up, he's probably Satoshi and doesn't want to tell us, but if you have any other questions for PlanB during today's SALT Talk, you can enter them in the Q&A box at the bottom of your video screen on Zoom. And hosting today's talk is Anthony Scaramucci, the founder and managing partner of SkyBridge Capital, a global alternative investment firm. Anthony is also the chairman of SALT. And with that, I'll turn it over to Anthony for the interview.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:49)
Well PlanB, thanks for joining us. Usually I ask people about their backgrounds, but because you like being anonymous, I'm going to jump right into my questions about your life and what you're doing now. John's accusing you of being Satoshi. Who do you think Satoshi is PlanB?

PlanB: (03:09)
Yeah. Well, first of all, thanks for having me Anthony. I'm really thrilled to be on your show. Let me get that out of the way immediately. I'm not Satoshi, and I don't wish I were because, yeah, what he did is remarkable. The invention of bitcoin and the invention of digital scarcity. I don't know who he is or she or they. Nobody knows. And I think the people that know, that will keep him anonymous and not dox him because the anonymity is very important to bitcoin.

Anthony Scaramucci: (03:50)
And let's take that a little further. I actually think that he or she or that group has already figured out a way to encrypt the way bitcoin is secure. I think that anonymity will stay secure. Just my personal opinion.

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:07)
But let's talk about bitcoin for the neo fight. Let's talk about, wow, I'm reading about bitcoin. I haven't read the bitcoin standard. I haven't read articles related to the blockchain or I haven't been to a symposium, but something is going on in bitcoin where it went to 20,000 or 19 or so thousand in 2017. It crashed down to earth at 3,000 a few years later and now it's back in that sort of let's call it 17 to 20,000 zone, I guess currently at around 18,000. Why should I get involved? Why should I take my intellectual curiosity and be drawn to bitcoin?

PlanB: (04:50)
Yeah, that's simple. Bitcoin is the best performing asset this year, the last five year and last 10 years. And not only on a return-only basis, but also on a risk-adjusted basis. So bitcoin is a very asymmetrical bet. It has the largest sharp ratio that I have ever seen in my entire 25-year career. So it has a sharp ratio of by 2.5. So return is much higher than its volatility. And I know it has extreme volatility, right? It can go 70% or 80% down in a year. It did that three times last 10 years. So it's extremely volatile. It's not for the weak hands like we call them, but it has enormous upside as well and the upside cancels the volatility out. The sharp ratio is very high. So yeah.

PlanB: (05:54)
I think the question for investors to ask is not why should I, not why should I be in bitcoin. It's rather why should I not be in bitcoin from my perspective.

Anthony Scaramucci: (06:07)
And is there a reason why someone shouldn't be in bitcoin PlanB?

PlanB: (06:11)
No. I don't think there is actually. I've heard a lot of reasons also within my company which manages a big pension balance sheet, a bank balance sheet and a life insurance balance sheet. And that is the most difficult decision for them to make of course because it's other people's money. We have legislators, regulators, central banks looking over our shoulder. But for a normal investor or a fund investor I don't think there is any good reason not to invest because the volatility is mentioned as a big risk. It is by definition risk. But it's always mentioned as something that is a reason for not investing in bitcoin.

PlanB: (06:58)
But we as investors know of course that you can manage volatility. You can size your investment. You can as a matter of fact, if you put 1% of your total investment in bitcoin and 99 in cash doing nothing, you put it under the mattress, that particular combination would outperform, would have outperformed the S&P500 over the last 10 years, not only in return but also in risk. So that's, yeah.

Anthony Scaramucci: (07:29)
Listen. It's very compelling. But when did you have your bitcoin aha moment? So I guess it's a two-part question. When did you discover bitcoin, start to do your research and analysis on it? And then when did you have your aha moment?

PlanB: (07:46)
Yeah. I like that question because it seems like everybody goes through a sort of process that takes some time and that journey for me started in 2013, early 2013. I read the white paper because it was mentioned in, I think Zero Hatch or some website. But bitcoin was mentioned, the white paper was mentioned, so I read it. And right there right then was my aha moment because I liked the white paper so much. It's a very simple description, nine pages, very elegant, not that mathematical, just in words what Satoshi did with bitcoin and I recommend everybody to read the white paper before anything else because it's the source. It leads you to all the other people and articles that are mentioned in that white paper. And from there you start your journey.

PlanB: (08:44)
So I started reading books, listening to podcasts. And I wasn't ready to invest until 2015, 2016. But in 2013 when I first saw it, it was $100 and then a couple months later in 2013 it was $1000. So I thought, "Wow. Okay. I missed it. I'm too late." And that feeling by the way never goes away. I still feel I'm too late.

PlanB: (09:12)
But yeah, that took me to the investing part, investing decision was mainly driven at that time, so 2015, 16 when I didn't have a model yet or hadn't quantified it. But it was mainly driven by the notion of scarcity, that the invention that Satoshi Nakamoto did is digital scarcity which is, yeah, sort of an impossible thing. Something can be digital but then it can be copied, so how can it be scarce? How does that work?

PlanB: (09:43)
So it's really a discovery process and it leads into very exotic worlds like cryptography, peer-to-peer networks, mining, proof of work, hashing, those kinds of terms are really, yeah, basic, really essential to get, to learn about. But then, once you start investing, you start feeling the effect of volatility of course but also of the enormous uptrend that's in the asset.

PlanB: (10:17)
So the scarcity, the 21 million is what got me in there. But it was not until 2019 that I really had the desire to have something more, more like a fundamental model that I use in investing professionally as well where I could say a little bit more mathematically about the price and the path for the next couple of years.

Anthony Scaramucci: (10:50)
You're saying something interesting. You're saying that you're too late. But are you too late though or is this the beginning really? Or are we still in the first innings of bitcoin? Yes, I know 2014 bitcoin traded at $154 per coin and it's now 18,000 and so that looks late. But when you think about the potential for bitcoin, are we still in the early innings?

PlanB: (11:15)
We are, definitely. We're not late. But it's more the feeling that everybody who goes in has the feeling that he's late. I had that feeling at, well, around 400 because I missed the hundred part and before me of course there were people entering at 10 or one or even below a dollar, right?

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:35)
Of course.

PlanB: (11:36)
But yeah, now we're very early. I think in the adoption terminology we would be in the innovator stage, not even the early adopter phase. There's not even 2.5% invested in bitcoin, so we're very, very early. And that's also what my models show because this upside is immense. Yeah, no. It's always scary to enter. You always have the feeling you're late, but you're not.

Anthony Scaramucci: (12:07)
All right. Well, it's a good point. The 21 million, I have to confess you I have not read the white paper but I will now go and read the white paper. But is there a reason for that number? Is that number arbitrary? Or I know they were trying to create scarcity. But why did they pick 21 million or does nobody know that answer?

PlanB: (12:25)
Nobody really knows. And I think it is ... It could be arbitrary. I think it is by the way. So like no. There's no good reason why it shouldn't be any other number.

Anthony Scaramucci: (12:36)
Okay. Your macro view, when you think about price trajectory for bitcoin over the next five years, what do you think it is and why are you so bullish?

PlanB: (12:47)
Yeah. My macro view is also a quant view because my background is very quantitative. I have to have numbers. That's why I made this stock-to-flow model that got me my name. And what that model shows it's based on scarcity on the 21 million and it compares to scarcity. It quantifies it to gold, real estate, silver, diamonds, et cetera, et cetera. If you look at that trajectory, what we had last 10 years, where it could go to the levels of gold and real estate, then I expect bitcoin to do another 10x or 20x.

PlanB: (13:31)
So it will go to well north of 100,000, maybe north of 300,000 before Christmas next year. And that sounds really bullish. That sounds maybe ridiculous to some people, but we've done that three times before and it's this very asymmetric return. Years of nothing, some big crashes and then an enormous bull year that I think that will happen next year and it's typically after halvings.

PlanB: (14:05)
I know you talked about this before in one of the other podcasts, but the supply of bitcoin is halved every four year. And imagine that the gold mining supply would halve. Imagine what that would do to price. That's what you see.

Anthony Scaramucci: (14:21)
So let's go into it. It's being had because this stuff is being taken out of supply. It's basically like a Van Gogh. It can't be replicated and so there's a finite supply of it and it's being taken out of supply which is increasing price. Is that fair to say?

PlanB: (14:38)
Yeah, that's right. Bitcoins are made every 10 minutes in a block. Every 10 minutes all the transactions are put together in a block and the miners make that block. And the miners that found the hash that make the block valid, they get the new bitcoins. It's 6.25 bitcoins at the moment every 10 minutes. That was 12.5. Four years before that it was 25, and it started in January 2009 when Satoshi mined the first block with 50 bitcoins every 10 minutes. So we're now at 6.25. And that will halve for the next 100 years. So yeah, supply will be taken out. If you want bitcoin, you will have to convince somebody else to give it up, to sell it to you. And of course that does something with the price.

PlanB: (15:34)
But fundamentally, from a first principle point of view, scarce assets are worth more than abundant assets. And bitcoin is the first absolute scarce asset. You cannot alter the supply, change the supply. Even when price rises, you cannot increase the supply because it's mathematically in the protocol. And that's very unique because even with gold, if there is a lot of demand, if the price rises and gold price goes let's say 2x, for sure, the mining will increase and miners will do everything to mine more gold, to print more gold if you will. Bitcoin, that cannot happen.

Anthony Scaramucci: (16:21)
You've talked about this stock-to-flow cross asset model for valuing bitcoin. You've invented it. How does that work? Describe it to a lay person.

PlanB: (16:33)
Yeah. So when I read the white paper and later also Saifedean's book, The Bitcoin Standard, I think you had him on the show yesterday.

Anthony Scaramucci: (16:42)
Yes.

PlanB: (16:44)
Beautiful book. Must read. He talks about stock-to-flow as a measure for scarcity. So there you have the two combined. Bitcoin is scarce. How do you measure scarcity? You can do it with stock-to-flow. I knew stock-to-flow from the gold community. Gold investors use stock-to-flow to measure the scarcity of gold and silver and platinum, et cetera. My insight was to relate that to the market values of gold and bitcoin and diamonds and real estate.

PlanB: (17:14)
So I plotted the stock-to-flow, the scarcity on the y-axis or the x-axis and the market value of the total market, bitcoin market, diamond market, real estate market on the y-axis, and also the historical path of bitcoin. And what you see is that there is almost perfect linear relationship between those assets and between bitcoin's path towards the scarcity of gold and real estate. So that's very interesting and mathematically very hard to deny. So yeah, it's a relation between scarcity and value, and you can exploit that.

Anthony Scaramucci: (18:02)
We have some pretty well known people, Stan Druckenmiller, Paul Tudor Jones, Bill Miller, all three are money managers that became billionaires due to their investment acumen. And now even Ray Dalio is starting to warm to crypto. We're starting to see legacy institutions like JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley write positively about bitcoin. The career risk factor seems to have faded away from supporting bitcoin at institutions. But when do you think that fade, if you will, will turn into an asset allocation recommendation for their investors? Obviously Paul Tudor Jones is already in there. So is Stan Druckenmiller and Bill Miller. But when do you think that crossover happens and it becomes more mainstream?

PlanB: (18:54)
I think it goes gradually and it has gone gradually of the last couple of years. Bitcoin is a bit exotic. It's new. So you can't ... Well, most people don't know it, but once you see it and once you get it, once you read the white paper, you get what bitcoin is, then you cannot go back. Once you've seen, you cannot unsee is what I say. And especially if you have a quantitative background. So I guess especially hedge fund guys who are used to spotting opportunities and using quantitative analysis and maybe algos to trade and invest, these investor groups are specifically open to recognizing asymmetric bets like bitcoin. So once they see it, they will go in. It's just too yummy not to.

PlanB: (19:50)
Yeah. So I think it will grow gradually. Also, the gold investors. Gold investors are of course very much into the bitcoin vision of sound money, scarcity. The only problem there is that it's a lot of older guys that don't have IT or programming or necessarily quant background. So you see the gold community divided in two groups, the old ones that want to touch the gold and feel it and want to have it physical, and the newer generation that believes in sound money, shares this view with bitcoin and actually understands what peer-to-peer is and elliptic curve encryption and all those things. So yeah, I think that's how it goes. It goes automatically and it's a momentum that cannot be stopped.

Anthony Scaramucci: (20:47)
You mentioned earlier in our conversation gold as a store of value, real estate as a store of value. The one slightly different thing about these two, and again, gold I think there are some commercial uses and use in jewelry and real estate obviously you can earn rent from real estate or you can get the pleasure of sitting in the home, et cetera. Why do you think bitcoin will rise to that level? Because it doesn't, and again, I'm just playing devil's advocate here for a second, because it doesn't have any of those two components that I just described. So why are you still comfortable with it?

PlanB: (21:33)
Yeah, I like the question. Bitcoin is much more like gold of course because it has no cash flow. It's a commodity. It has no cash flow. You cannot use cash flow models to value it like real estate. With the rent you can actually evaluate it the classic way. But what you see especially right now and in the micro environment with especially since 2008 which by the way is no coincidence that the bitcoin white paper was written in 2008 and published in 2008, that was the height of the global financial crisis of course. And since 2008 we have seen quantitative easing, massive amounts of money printing, stimulus of, well, first to save banks, now with COVID to save the economy. And all that money has to go somewhere. Of course, central banks buy bonds, they buy mortgages and interest rates go down, especially here in Europe where interest rates are negative even in countries that are, well, close to default or actually already over that line, even if those have negative interest rates.

PlanB: (22:54)
So a lot of people have and also companies, hedge funds, but also normal companies we've seen that recently have a big problem what to do with your cash. There is no yield to be made. And we have that too as an institutional investor, investing pension money. Where is the yield? Where can you earn money? There is not much places. So a lot of people go to real estate. Some people go to gold. So I guess a lot of this rise in prices of all these scarce assets, gold, real estate, diamond, silver, bitcoin also has to do with the quantitative easing, the debasement, the printing. You can actually see it in the models as well.

PlanB: (23:44)
So yeah. I think there is even in real estate where there's a lot of utility value of course because you can live in a house, even in real estate there is a big monetary premium at the moment because investors use it as a store of value for it. And you can see it for example in Amsterdam right now. I won't mention names but there is huge asset investors, billion, trillion dollar balance sheets that buy everything in Amsterdam, all the houses, just because there's nothing else where you can put your money in.

Anthony Scaramucci: (24:26)
Yeah. And to your point, if you're inflating the currency or creating more currency, well, those houses will be worth more in those currencies. And there's scarcity to it. I got a couple of more questions. I'm going to turn it over to John Darsie, my colleague here, who's got ... We've got a ton of audience participation today. But before we go to those questions, just two quick questions. Are you a bitcoin maximalist or do you like other digital currencies? Do you think there are other digital currencies that will rise to the level of bitcoin or perhaps compete with it? Or is that over? Obviously Michael Saylor was on, and he sort of felt that that was over. What's your opinion PlanB?

PlanB: (25:11)
Yeah. I'm absolutely a bitcoin maximalist. I think it's winner takes all game, and I think a lot of the confusion there comes from the fact that some people see bitcoin and other coins as products or companies. And you can have multiple products and some product will win and the other product will lose or multiple companies can coexist together which is a very logical view. But bitcoin in my view is not a company. It's a protocol. It's more like TCP/IP. It's more like POP IMAP or HTTP. It's a protocol. And of course you can only have one protocol, especially a money protocol. Why? In my eyes it doesn't make sense to have ... to still have in 2020 and beyond multiple currencies like we have today where it's much, much more efficient to have one monetary protocol which is bitcoin. And yeah. I'm what they call a maximalist, but I don't like the term by the way.

Anthony Scaramucci: (26:21)
Tell me why.

PlanB: (26:23)
I don't know. It was invented by Vitalik Buterin, the inventor of Ethereum coin. It was meant in a bad way. Maximalists sounds like terrorists. It doesn't sound very good. So I'm ...

Anthony Scaramucci: (26:45)
I'll have to start switching my vernacular. I appreciate you giving me some of that etymology of the name. My last question. Then I'm going to turn it over to John. Do you think there'll be a bitcoin ETF in our future?

PlanB: (27:00)
Yeah, we already have one. It's called MicroStrategy.

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:03)
Right, yeah, amen.

PlanB: (27:05)
It's defacto ETF, right? It's listed and it has a big chunk of bitcoin in there. But no. Yeah. I don't know. We should have a bitcoin ETF. It's very strange we don't have one. And once we get it, maybe in a couple of years, but they're stalling it. I don't know for what reason. So there's all kinds of other products, exchange-headed notes, exchange-traded commodities but no exchange traded fund yet. I'm sure we'll get there, but maybe it takes some years to ... Yeah, for some reason they don't allow it yet.

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:47)
John, I'm going to let you take over. I love the name. I got to get one of these hats PlanB. So when this is over, I got to send you my home address, okay? I got to be walking around my town with this hat on so people will have to ask me what that means.

PlanB: (28:03)
I'll get you one.

Anthony Scaramucci: (28:04)
All right. That's a deal. All right, go ahead John. I know you got tons of questions.

John Darsie: (28:08)
Yep. All right PlanB. So Anthony referred earlier to the fact that a lot of big names in the investment management industry are now espousing the virtues of bitcoin and in many cases buying it either in their hedge fund portfolios or in their personal portfolios. How do you think the evolution of the base of asset owners for bitcoin that now includes so many strong hands like a Paul Tudor Jones or a Bill Miller or a Stan Druckenmiller, how do you think that affects the way bitcoin will trade and ultimately could potentially suppress volatility as it experiences its next bull run?

PlanB: (28:42)
Yeah, great question. Two questions actually. I'll start with how it will progress. I think it will progress and it has progressed in a way that the easier it is for an investor to decide, the earlier he goes in. So if you're a high net worth individual that can decide over your own money and don't need some shareholders or employees or accountants to convince, you just do it with a little bit. You start small and you grow into it. And if you have a fund for participants, you can do it and you can start selling that and there's people that want to go into the fund. If it would be an exchange traded fund, you would have a huge crowd. But look at Grayscale which is a trust entity, right? It's interest structure. Huge demand, over 10 billion in cryptocurrencies under management.

PlanB: (29:44)
And lately you see for example Michael Saylor's company, MicroStrategy. I know you had him on your show. But he is a listed company, has of course a lot of accountants, legal questions and shareholders to deal with and his board. So it's very natural that he comes later into the game because he has to convince all those people.

PlanB: (30:11)
The last group of investors that will enter in my opinion will be, well, like my employer, the institutional investors that manage bank balance sheets, life insurance balance sheets, and pension balance sheets because they have the regulators, the central banks that have to okay the new type of investment. And that will be a long and very, yeah, tedious process. So yeah.

PlanB: (30:42)
And then the second part of your question, what will do that with price? Of course if adoption grows, if adoption increases and demand increases while at the same time supply decreases because of the halving and the scarcity, stock-to-flow goes up, price will go up. It has to go. So yeah, very interesting times.

John Darsie: (31:11)
You did a recent poll on Twitter about basically crowdsourcing answers on what people think are the biggest risks to bitcoin. Could you tell us the results of that poll and also what you think personally are the biggest risks to bitcoin?

PlanB: (31:26)
Yes. I like Twitter very much because especially when you have a large following, you can very easily gouge the market for questions and sentiments. So I did the poll two days ago. It was answered by more than 13,000 people. The biggest risk that people see is government ban or regulation. That's 34% of the people think that's the biggest risk to bitcoin. And I tend to agree because governments have been against bitcoin and openly, but also trying to ... especially trying to kill the predecessors of bitcoin. Bitcoin was not the first digital currency. It was the fourth or fifth of even the sixth. All the others were shut down by government because it was not peer-to-peer or the inventor was not anonymous so they just shut them down. Well, look what they did to Libra from Facebook, Facebook's coin.

PlanB: (32:37)
So in a way bitcoin was especially designed for this risk to ... It's quite impossible to ban or to kill bitcoin by a government because if a government does it, it will just go on in another country. Of course, governments can make it very, very difficult with tax laws, with know your customer and anti-money laundering laws. And that's what they're doing at the moment. It's a bit. But they do that with every invention, every technological improvement. When the cars were invented, there was this rule that if you had a car, you also had to employ a person that walked in front of the car with a red flag because otherwise there would be danger for the pedestrians and the cyclists.

PlanB: (33:25)
So every new technology brings its own suite of stupid regulation, but in the end that regulation will improve, be more reasonable, be more just better for the general population and also countries will of course be different than that. There will be countries that want to be the next Silicon Valley, crypto valley if you will. Singapore is there. Switzerland is there, et cetera, et cetera. And there's companies that are less ... Yeah, that don't have much with protecting property rights. It's more the socialists, the countries, yeah, that will have more problems with this.

John Darsie: (34:12)
As a quick follow-up to that, one of our viewers is asking and they're saying that in the past gold has been made illegal to hold by the public. In that type of scenario where a country comes out and says it's illegal for our citizens to own bitcoin, obviously there's going to be plenty of citizens that do own it, have you studied what a similar outcome would be if people declared it illegal to hold bitcoin if we went through a period of legal prohibition?

PlanB: (34:37)
Yes. Yeah. So the United States made it illegal for US citizens to have gold. That was I think in 1933, just before they did the Bretton Woods and gold was of course increased in price a lot. So yeah. Normally what you see if something is forbidden, is made illegal, there'll be black markets and the price of it will go up. So it's much better to legalize it. You see it with other things as well. It's much better to legalize it, to control it, to take a little bit of tax and profits from it than to make it illegal because it will transform into something you don't want as a government. It will be stronger because of the ban.

PlanB: (35:34)
And of course, if you ban it as a company, then the businesses will go away. In a way you see that in the Netherlands at the moment. They're making it very ... So there is a legal guy head of finance at the moment in the Netherlands, and he has no technical background. So he doesn't really get bitcoin and he's completely into anti-money laundering and know your customer. That's his thing. So he has made that so strict. And I think it's the strictest in the world where you have to even make a copy of your wallet so your own wallet where you want to receive the bitcoin. What that means is all the companies that are in a country go away. For example Daily Bid, the biggest option in exchange, and that's a Dutch company, moved to Panama with all the profit, with all the employment.

PlanB: (36:31)
So there will be a very interesting game, theoretical game there of countries that ban it and others that welcome it. That's how the new world will be shaped.

John Darsie: (36:43)
So you talked about how MicroStrategy is effectively now a bitcoin ETF and they're sort of a pioneer in terms of taking corporate treasury money and investing it into bitcoin as an alternative to cash or other corporate treasury type of investments. Do you expect to see other corporates follow suit?

John Darsie: (37:00)
I think about all these countries in the United States for example that have millions upon hundreds of millions of dollars in cash on their balance sheets that are domiciled in foreign countries that aren't really accomplishing much for the firm. Do you expect to see those types of companies especially in the tech arena where I think bitcoin has a little bit higher adoption rate? Do you expect to see more of those companies start to follow suit?

PlanB: (37:25)
Yes, absolutely. I think we're seeing it already. And it's even easier for non-listed companies. So if you're a private company, you can put your excess cash in bitcoin or whatever asset you like without dealing too much with all the things the listed company has to deal with. But even listed companies now that Michael Saylor shows the way that it can be done.

John Darsie: (37:53)
And you talk about career risk. People were scared to be the first mover, but now somebody's done it effectively and it's reduced some of the stigma around it I think.

PlanB: (38:02)
Yeah, yeah. I mean MicroStrategy is a small company, right? It was. Before they invested in bitcoin, it was 1.5 billion dollar market cap. I don't know what it is today. It will be much higher. But that's small compared to the real cash rich companies that you mentioned as well, Google, Apple, Facebook, et cetera. So yeah, they all ... We all have to put the same problem, what to do with your money in an environment that money is debased basically by quantitative easing. So yeah.

John Darsie: (38:36)
We have two questions that came in within a minute of each other and I'll combine them from JJ and from Josephine. And they're asking are you fully convinced that bitcoin supply is indeed capped at 21 million, and what stops bitcoin's core developers, the miners, the node validators from all agreeing to increase the circulated supply of bitcoin? They're questioning whether in Satoshi's white paper explicitly says that the bitcoin supply is immutable.

PlanB: (39:03)
Yes. I'm actually glad that question is asked because it's still out there. Let me first say you can only ask that question if you don't get bitcoin yet. If you have not read the white paper or did not fully understand the white paper because it's an essential thing of bitcoin that it cannot be increased, unless everybody agrees with it. But changing the monetary parameters of bitcoin protocol, the 21 million, is technically very easy. You can just copy the code. Right? It's on GitHub, it's open source like Linux and all the other open source software. So it's very easy to copy the software and change the parameter of 21 million to 42 or whatever number. But you cannot copy the network around it. So the miners, the users, the node operators, the developers, the investors, all the exchanges.

PlanB: (40:08)
So in other words, if you copy the code, change that number or make a totally ... an entirely new bitcoin. If you do that, that would be like changing the rules of chess. You can do it but you would be playing alone.

John Darsie: (40:29)
Right. Talk about quantum computing, if you will, for a second. We asked Raoul Pal who you may know and we had on a SALT Talk a few months ago about. In his view one of the real legitimate threats to bitcoin and he mentioned quantum computing. Is that a risk in your mind, and what are bitcoin developers and the bitcoin network doing to create quantum computing basically firewalls that could potentially disrupt the network?

PlanB: (40:56)
Yeah. Quantum computing was mentioned as the second risk in that poll we talked about earlier. 21% of the people think that is a big risk after government banning. So yeah, I'm not an expert on quantum computing. I know what it is. I read a lot of papers about it, so I have some view. My view is that first of all we're not there yet. So most papers quote a time range of 2025 to 2035 for the first quantum computer to do something that is useful, some small thing, let alone cracking the private keys that are used in bitcoin and a lot of other security applications of course.

PlanB: (41:49)
So yeah. I think it's ... But the risk is there of course. A lot of teams trying to build a quantum computer. We saw a lot of news lately about Chinese scientists that have made a breakthrough in quantum computing. Actually I talked to some guys that own companies that make quantum computers to get a better understanding of this, and I talked to the cryptographers that are very close to bitcoin core development about what the risks are and what I see is two worlds. It's the world of the investors in those companies that make quantum computing and the researchers that are very bullish, that are very optimistic. They'll be able to do it one day.

PlanB: (42:36)
And there's the cryptographic guys, especially the bitcoin guys that say, "Okay, it's far away." And even if they can do it, then there are all sorts of other things that they'll crack first because all the banking systems will crack before bitcoin because their security is much lower than bitcoin.

John Darsie: (42:57)
Yeah. There are a lot of issues that will arise if we reach full quantum computing capability from a national security or a global anti-proliferation standpoint as well.

PlanB: (43:08)
Yeah, exactly, exactly. So yeah. And even that, right, if it's there, you can change the algorithm. You could go to stronger encryption. It's already there.

John Darsie: (43:20)
Right.

PlanB: (43:21)
Military grade strong. But you can make it even stronger.

John Darsie: (43:26)
Well, Elon Musk will have us living on Mars by then so I'm not quite as concerned. How would you react to accusations-

Anthony Scaramucci: (43:34)
We'd be living on Mars with the Martians, you know that right, because we ... The Israeli scientists said that there are aliens living there already.

John Darsie: (43:40)
Yeah, I'll tell you a story PlanB. Anthony, he goes to work in the government. He only was there for 11 days, but on the first day what do you think Anthony Scaramucci did when he got in government? He wanted to find out about the aliens.

PlanB: (43:52)
Of course.

John Darsie: (43:53)
And there's nothing there. So does that tell you that there's no aliens?

Anthony Scaramucci: (43:57)
PlanB, that's confidential, okay? Don't listen to this nonsense.

PlanB: (44:00)
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay.

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:00)
Don't listen to this nonsense.

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:03)
All right. So thank you so much for joining us. You're terrific. I appreciate the opportunity to spend time with you. I'm going to take you up. I'm going to come with a PlanA hat. I'm going to meet you at an Amsterdam restaurant with your PlanB hat. This way I know who you are. You wear the PlanB hat. I'll be able to identify it, and we'll have dinner one night.

PlanB: (44:21)
Great. Thanks for having me guys.

John Darsie: (44:23)
Thanks so much for joining us PlanB.

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:25)
Terrific.

Cameron & Tyler Winklevoss: Why Bitcoin Is Superior to Gold | SALT Talks #118

“Bitcoin is the only asset in the galaxy that actually has a fixed supply and no technological breakthrough will change that.”

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss co-founded Gemini, a cryptocurrency exchange and custodian, to empower the individual through crypto. Gemini is a New York Trust company that allows customers to buy, sell, and store cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin, Bitcoin cash, Ether, Zcash, and Litecoin.

While being identical twins, Cameron is left-handed and Tyler is right-handed. This seemingly creates a complementary skillset between the two. Utilizing the unique partnership has led to a life full of start-ups that always seek to solve for a problem. This started with the creation of the high school rowing team, then with roles coming up with the idea for Facebook, and ultimately forays in the crypto asset space. Predicting global currency inflation caused by money printing and stimulus spending, investors will need to find protection. Gold was historically the best way to guard against inflation, but Bitcoin offers an even better solution. “Bitcoin is basically the expression of gold in that digital sense. When you line up all the properties, it's not really a fair fight. Bitcoin is far superior to gold across the board.”

The growth of Bitcoin is inevitable as it lives on the Internet and is accessible wherever someone has a connection. Bitcoin will be able to coexist alongside existing government-backed currencies and will ultimately see its mainstream acceptance. Gemini serves as a crypto platform where individuals can more easily access this new alternative asset class.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKERS

Joint+Headshot+-+Winklevoss,+Cameron+&+Tyler.jpeg

Cameron Winklevoss

Co-Founder

Gemini

Joint+Headshot+-+Winklevoss,+Cameron+&+Tyler.jpeg

Tyler Winklevoss

Co-Founder

Gemini

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:07)
Hello everyone, and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the Managing Director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology, and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series that we launched during this work-from-home period with leading investors, creators, and thinkers.

John Darsie: (00:29)
What we're trying to do during these SALT Talks is replicate the experience that we provide at our Global SALT Conferences, which we host annually, one in the United States and one abroad. Obviously, this year has been a little bit challenging for the conference industry, so we've been doing these SALT Talks instead. They've been a lot of fun and a massive success. Thank you, for everybody who's been tuning into the talks. What we're trying to do on these talks and at our conferences is to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future. And perhaps there's no idea bigger right now that's sweeping into the mainstream than Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.

John Darsie: (01:08)
So we're very excited today, on a day when Bitcoin is crossing its previous all-time high, to welcome Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss onto SALT Talks. Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss co-founded Gemini, which is cryptocurrency exchange and custodian to empower the individual through crypto. Gemini is a New York Trust company that allows customers to buy, sell, and store crypto such as Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ether, Zcash, and Litecoin.

John Darsie: (01:36)
They graduated from Harvard University with degrees in economics in 2004, and earned their MBAs from Oxford University in 2010. Together, they represented the United States at the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, in China, placing sixth in men's pair events. Cameron and Tyler have been angel investors and entrepreneurs in emerging technologies since 2003. Most of you probably know the backstory about their involvement in the founding of Facebook, which we maybe will get into a little bit during today's talk as well. They began investing in Bitcoin in 2012, and launched Gemini in 2015. So they were early on in this Bitcoin wave that we're seeing today.

John Darsie: (02:18)
Just a reminder, if you have any questions for Cameron or Tyler during today's SALT Talk, you can enter them in the Q and A box at the bottom of your video screen on Zoom. Hosting today's talk is Anthony Scaramucci, the founder and managing partner of SkyBridge Capital, a global alternative investment firm. Anthony is also the chairman of SALT. And with that, I will turn it over to Anthony for the interview.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:39)
Guys, I appreciate you greatly being on. It's fun to get to know the two of you. I can tell you have our combined sense of humor, which is very dangerous, I might add.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:50)
I usually ask the question of, what do we need to know about you guys that's not on the internet, what do we find about you on Wikipedia? What's something that your mom would tell us about you that she hasn't told anybody? You want to start, Tyler?

Tyler Winklevoss: (03:13)
Sure. You might be able to find this on the internet, but I'll start with this anyway. I am a righty, Cameron's a lefty. We're mirror image twins, we use different sides of our brains. I think that's why we've been such a good team for a long time. We grew up playing piano. Cameron now plays electric guitar. I continue to play piano, so that's sort of a difference. For better or worse, a lot about us and our life is actually out there on the internet. It's very public.

Anthony Scaramucci: (03:45)
That's interesting. You're identical twins, but you're powered up on different sides of the brains. Pretty interesting, I haven't heard that before about twins. But that obviously gives you complementary skillsets.

Anthony Scaramucci: (03:58)
If you had to describe... Let's say this was a job interview, Tyler, not that you guys need real job, God forbid. You've had two of the more amazing careers in America. But let's say this was a job interview and you are both coming in at the same time. What are your skillsets? What's Tyler Winklevoss's skillset as opposed to Cameron's?

Tyler Winklevoss: (04:19)
I probably gravitate to more strategy vision type stuff, so a little bit more higher altitude. And Cameron sort of gravitates towards more operational stuff, a little bit lower altitude. But to be frank, we definitely go back and forth and trade place on where we're flying. But I would say I'm a little bit more, I guess left-brained, because I'm right-handed. I tend to maybe be a little bit more organized, a little bit more OCD, like shirt tucked in. And Cameron traditionally has been a little bit more of the goofier twin and a little less shirt tucked in.

Anthony Scaramucci: (05:02)
I can tell that just by the way the bed is made behind you. I know that's a hotel room, but Cameron told me off-air that you made the bed yourself without the maid.

Tyler Winklevoss: (05:10)
I wish. If I could, I would. Yeah.

Cameron Winklevoss: (05:14)
I categorically disagree with all of that. No, I'm kidding. I think Tyler captured it pretty well. We're both flying at slightly different altitudes, but relatively pretty close. If Tyler's at 30, I'm at 25, and vice-versa. But I think we, because of the differences, we do tend to complement each other pretty well. So we don't find ourselves just ratifying each other and coming to the same conclusion. If we do come to the same conclusion, it's maybe from different angles or different paths. It makes it pretty interesting and a good sort of discourse in debate, and keeps things lively, for sure.

Anthony Scaramucci: (05:55)
Well, you've been in two pretty famous books and one reasonably famous movie. Ben Mezrich, who I think you guys know, has spoken at the SALT Conference. A few years ago, he handed me his book, Bitcoin Billionaires and insisted that I read it. You guys were kind enough to come to the SALT Conference. I like Bitcoin Billionaires better than the first book. I think all of us would probably agree on that. What is it about the two of you that you were able to see the future, both in terms of Facebook and where we are right now with the cryptocurrencies?

Cameron Winklevoss: (06:33)
I think it often comes down to looking at something and then being dissatisfied with the answer, or frustrated. We actually sort of joke. Our first startup was in high school. We wanted to try the sport of rowing, but there was no rowing team at our high school. So we looked around and found a club. We grew up in Greenwich, Connecticut, but we found a rowing club in Westport, Connecticut about 45 minutes away. We just started to learn how to row there. And then we went to the headmaster and asked if we could start the rowing team, and we did. Today, I think there's probably at least 500 or more kids in that area who row every afternoon. Every high school in the area has a rowing team. We simply asked this question, "Hey, why isn't there a rowing team?" There wasn't really a good answer for it. There's a lot of rowers in Greenwich, or former rowers. But I think a lot of times people just went to boarding school or did whatever, and just assumed the status quo, that was it. We sort of didn't accept that answer.

Cameron Winklevoss: (07:37)
Fast forward to when we got to Harvard. We were juniors and basically found ourselves almost done with college and barely scratching the surface in terms of meeting people and all the amazing things that you set out to when you first get to an amazing place like Harvard, and then you find it's almost already done. Harvard is in Cambridge. There's many schools and all these people, but you never really cross paths. You sort of get stuck in your lane. So we said, "Is there a way to create a technical solution where our fingers can do the walking and we can basically solve for time and geography and create a social network?" That really came out of an authentic frustration or problem local to us or true to us, that then had scale well beyond.

Anthony Scaramucci: (08:34)
I'm an old-timer, unfortunately. We've had two or three Bitcoin maximalists on the air with us, and I'm starting to believe in Bitcoin. But I have still levels of skepticism that I think old-timers have with Bitcoin. I'm not the Ray Dalio level of skepticism, but I'm not a Bitcoin maximalist because I don't understand it. I want you to explain it to me because you've got incredible audience participation. I might add that this could be the highest rated SALT Talk that we've had, so congratulations to both of you.

Cameron Winklevoss: (09:11)
Cool.

Tyler Winklevoss: (09:11)
Wow.

Anthony Scaramucci: (09:11)
You've got a ton of people on. Some of them know about Bitcoin, some of them don't know, and some of them are not sure. Take it from the top, guys. Why is it such an important asset, and why is it the asset or one of the big assets of the future?

Tyler Winklevoss: (09:29)
Sure. Well, we think of Bitcoin as gold 2.0. If you look at the characteristics that make gold valuable, the fact that it's scarce, that it's portable, divisible, all of the money characteristics of gold... and then you place Bitcoin against it side by side, Bitcoin either matches or does better. The supply is actually known and it's fixed. You can send it around the world. You can send an email. It's the first form of money that was purposely built for the internet, so it's internet gold. We think that that's a super big idea. And in the backdrop of all the money printing, the stimulus spending, the debt accumulation of governments in fiat regimes around the world, inflation's coming. I think everyone agrees with that, very high inflation. And so, what is your best protection? If it was the 1970s, like Paul Tudor Jones said, he would buy and did buy gold. That was before the invention of the personal computer and the internet.

Tyler Winklevoss: (10:34)
Today, we have Bitcoin. It's actually better than gold. The supply of gold is actually increasing. Two-thirds of gold has been mined since the 1950s. As technology increases, similar to what fracking did for oil and natural gas, the same can actually happen to gold. It's still precious, but it's not fixed. Bitcoin is the only asset in the galaxy that actually has a fixed supply and no technological breakthrough will change that, and it works on the internet like your email. When we came across that, we're like, "That's a really big deal." Money is the greatest social network of all time. The idea of a gold 2.0, Bitcoin being gold 2.0, seemed like a huge idea.

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:23)
The skeptics would say that it's a code on the internet, it's a blockchain, it's a mathematical code. It's not backed by a government. It's not backed by an army. It's not tied to somebody's sovereign nation. And obviously, I know all the travails and potential tragedies of fiat currency. So then why is it valuable as a device? Is it the ledger aspect of it? What creates the value in your mind?

Cameron Winklevoss: (12:00)
Well, that's an interesting point. Bitcoin is not actually forced upon anybody. There's no legal requirement, unlike fiat currencies which I think makes Bitcoin's growth over the past decade even more impressive. Because there's nobody saying, "Hey, you need to pay your taxes in Bitcoin. You need to use Bitcoin in commerce." People are buying it for the properties that Tyler outlined.

Cameron Winklevoss: (12:27)
In terms of backing the currency, the Bitcoin mining network is the strongest computer network in the world. And they basically audit and verify transactions, and act as sort of the referees in the Bitcoin ecosystem. So it's a very powerful computer group or army, if you will, that's not to be underestimated. But if you look at the ability, it's basically programmable money, and everything's going digital and streaming. The idea that people would want a piece of hardware like gold today or even in the future, seems really antiquated. Everybody's looking to get software and money that moves like email. Bitcoin is basically the expression of gold in that digital sense. When you line up all the properties, it's not really a fair fight. Bitcoin is far superior to gold just across the board.

John Darsie: (13:27)
It's the Netflix to gold blockbuster.

Cameron Winklevoss: (13:30)
Exactly.

Tyler Winklevoss: (13:30)
There you go.

Anthony Scaramucci: (13:31)
No, no. I like that. I want to keep going on this if you guys don't mind, because I'm hoping that by the end of this conversation, we're going to convert more people to where you guys are. I think I need to confess to you that I'm probably less of a skeptic on Bitcoin than I'm leading on right now, but I just want to play devil's advocate for the purposes of the beginning part of our conversation.

Anthony Scaramucci: (13:54)
Let's talk about regulation and the potential specter of regulation for Bitcoin. Some countries have said, "Okay, no Bitcoin in our country." Other countries are worried about Bitcoin taking over their ability to... let's use the word manipulate their currency. Or in the case of fiat currencies and the production of money and money supply, Bitcoin coming up against that could disrupt governmental policy in certain countries. And so, are you worried about any of that? Are you worried that somebody could say be decree, "We ban Bitcoin in our country."?

Cameron Winklevoss: (14:35)
I think some regimes are definitely going to try and stop Bitcoin. But to stop Bitcoin, you really have to stop the internet. I think that's a losing proposition. I think that it's really an alternative. Bitcoin's not trying to really disrupt, it's just offering this other system. Bitcoin didn't force the federal government to run deficits over the past decade, or run a debt to GDP ratio of 135%. That's the US mismanagement, our own doing. At least now we have a hard money alternative like Bitcoin. Previously it was of course, gold. Bitcoin's different because it has the emerging properties and it could overtake gold which gives it just a much bigger asymmetric payoff over the next decade than gold. Gold wouldn't be a bad investment, it's just not going to be anything close to what Bitcoin is.

Cameron Winklevoss: (15:31)
A lot of people, at least the early days, there's a lot of rhetoric around disrupt the banksters and all that stuff. At Gemini, we're a New York Trust company. We're regulated by the New York State Department of Financial Services. We also have licenses and approvals in all the other states. So we work actively with the government and regulators. We're a financial institution and we're engaging. We also partner with banks like JPMorgan. We really want to work with banks. We're not trying to be a bank, we're just a crypto platform. That's kind of our viewpoint, but sometimes the rhetoric makes it like us versus them and this fight that I don't think is there.

Tyler Winklevoss: (16:14)
The risk of trying to clamp or quash Bitcoin is too great, as Cameron mentioned. You have to become like North Korea and basically cut yourself off from the internet. Bitcoin even can permeate the great firewall of China. Because it's so decentralized, it works on the internet. And to shut the internet off, you'd shut so many drivers of the economy like big tech, that it's just to risky. So regulators decided, at least in the US and a lot of other jurisdictions, it's better to work with it and work with companies who want to get compliant like Gemini, and do things the right way.

Anthony Scaramucci: (16:51)
My product development team wanted me to tell you that at SkyBridge, we're operating Node. Apparently, that makes us very cool. So I just thought I would mention that to you guys.

Cameron Winklevoss: (17:03)
That's awesome.

Anthony Scaramucci: (17:04)
I'm not exactly sure what it means.

John Darsie: (17:07)
We're part of that army defending the network that Tyler was talking about.

Cameron Winklevoss: (17:11)
You guys are contributing to the Bitcoin ecosystem by running a node. That's really cool.

Anthony Scaramucci: (17:17)
All right. We're out there with our Node. I want to keep going on this line of thought for a second. Peter Thiel... there was a book I read 25 years ago called The Sovereign Individual. It was written by James Davidson and Walter Rees-Mogg. Peter Thiel repurposed the book recently. It's in paperback, you can buy it on Amazon. He wrote in the preface that AI to him is about hegemony and it's about totalitarianism and control, where you can actually see the facial cues of your citizens and then you can socially score them... and Bitcoin is about liberty and libertarianism and decentralization. Do you agree with that? What are your thoughts on that?

Cameron Winklevoss: (18:06)
I agree. Bitcoin, the technology, is obviously apolitical. But we believe that it empowers individuals and gives them greater independence, choice and opportunity. That's a big part of Gemini's mission, is helping people get into crypto so they have more opportunity.

Cameron Winklevoss: (18:24)
There's a place in crypto called decentralized finance, which is trying to build permissionless pieces of the financial system like lending, borrowing, trading. It's really exciting. It's obviously quite new. But it's really about decentralizing and creating permissionless and trustless financial services, unlike the current system which is centralized and you basically are dealing with a lot of gatekeepers and there's access problems. If you want to invest, you have to be an accredited investor to invest in a lot of interesting deals. There's plenty of people who are sophisticated who don't have $1 million to their name that I'm sure would like to invest, but they don't have access to capital markets in that way, whereas crypto doesn't have that access problem.

Cameron Winklevoss: (19:12)
It's very liberating and it's very much a movement as much as a technology. Obviously, there's elements of it that appeal to libertarians. There's elements I'm sure that appeal to other groups. But in general, this is a movement about the individual and decentralizing what are traditionally centralized stacks in the financial sector.

Anthony Scaramucci: (19:39)
People, as of right now... I mean, some people would say, "Well, gold, you can make into jewelry." Or there are some manufacturing aspects to gold. It doesn't seem to be the case for Bitcoin. I'm not sure if that's a big deal one way or another, you could address that.

Anthony Scaramucci: (19:57)
But the secondary issue in addition to that, that I think people are worried about is it's not really accepted yet. Maybe you can buy a Tesla with Bitcoin, but I can't pay my utility bill with Bitcoin, at least not here in New York right now. One is, the usability of the currency as another alternative. Maybe you can pushback and say, "Well, dollars can't be used for anything else." And then secondarily, when do you think it becomes more available to be used as a tradable mechanism, which is ideally what currency's about?

Tyler Winklevoss: (20:42)
I don't think it necessarily needs to be. If it's gold 2.0 and it's going to disrupt the gold, right? The market cap of above ground gold is nine trillion. Right now, Bitcoin's market cap is somewhere above 300 billion. So if it just disrupts gold alone, there's a 25 to 30 X from here conservatively appreciation.

Tyler Winklevoss: (21:06)
Gold's not really being used as a currency right now. It basically sits under vaults under the Thames River in mostly ETFs. I think even if it disrupts gold, it doesn't have to be spent to have a lot of value and to appreciate from here from now. Because I don't buy a cup of coffee or go to McDonald's with a bar of gold. You can, but you don't. It's a sort of value. You want to spend things that are more like currencies that lose their value over time. The dollar has lost a lot of purchasing power since the '70s, like 90% of its purchasing power. You want to spend dollars because they're becoming less valuable. You don't necessarily want to sell your share of Amazon stock because it probably will go up, or Google. And the same is true with Bitcoin.

Tyler Winklevoss: (21:57)
It's an emergent sort of value, so it's appreciating or holding value. So you want to preserve your wealth in stores of value, and you want to spend things like currencies that lose their value. It's very hard to be both ends of the spectrum with money. It's sort of like LeBron James is an amazing athlete, Nadia Comaneci is an amazing gymnast. They both would be pretty terrible at each other's sports. I think if you pick one part of the problem space and you really excel, I think that's enough. And the Bitcoin gold 2.0 story is definitely enough, I think.

Cameron Winklevoss: (22:37)
Nothing highlights that better than the Bitcoin pizza, which was the... I think it was two Bitcoin pizzas. Basically, it's the first Bitcoin transaction where somebody traded two Papa John's pizzas for 10,000 Bitcoin. At today's prices, I think those are $200 million pizzas, if I'm doing my math correctly. They must have been really good slices of pizza. But that really underscores why you don't really want to use Bitcoin as a currency and spend it. You want to hold it, or hodle is the parlance that Bitcoiners use and people in crypto to say, "Hey, I'm hodling my Bitcoin."

Anthony Scaramucci: (23:15)
Well first off, I want to compliment both of you on you decorum and your gentlemanliness. If I was on a SALT Talk with my brother, I'd be karate chopping him at the Adam's apple and interrupting him every five seconds, but you guys are in perfect syncopation. I feel like I'm in the rowing boat with the two of you. You don't even interrupt each other, which is-

Tyler Winklevoss: (23:35)
You're like the coxswain.

Anthony Scaramucci: (23:37)
Yeah, exactly.

Cameron Winklevoss: (23:37)
Yeah.

Anthony Scaramucci: (23:39)
I say that as an Italian who interrupts everybody. All right, so you're winning me over. You're winning me over now. I'm now thinking I need to own some of this, and so now I want you to tell me about Gemini. I want you to tell me about the value proposition at Gemini. And you've got many thousands of people that are listening to you. So tell us how we do business with Gemini. Who are your clients? Who should be your clients? Let's say that I'm a potential prospect. Pitch me as a prospect.

Cameron Winklevoss: (24:11)
Okay. The easiest way to get to Gemini is gemini.com. We have a mobile app as well as a web interface. We really cater to the entire spectrum of customers. We're trying to make it simple, reliable, and safe to buy Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as well as store. We're a platform where you can buy, sell, as well as store. That's sort of the essence of it.

Cameron Winklevoss: (24:36)
We've been operational for about five-plus years, and we're a New York Trust company. Most of our staff is located in Manhattan, or was pre-COVID. Obviously, we're a little more remote posture now. We're also open in Europe, the UK, Singapore and other parts of Asia. That's the core of the business, is building this sort of regulated on-ramp into Bitcoin and cryptocurrency. Because I think a lot of people, they sort of learn about Bitcoin and say, "Hey, look. I get it. I believe in this. I understand what's happening to the dollar. I understand the mismanagement. There is going to be a debt reckoning. I want to protect my value, but I don't know how to do it."

Cameron Winklevoss: (25:17)
There's no Bitcoin ETF yet. And we're trying to create basically a very easy experience like opening up a bank account online or a brokerage account. It's just that simple. You come, you onboard, and you're ready to go. We also have a lot of audits, SOC 2 and SOC 1, so that we can have conversations with institutions and get them comfortable with the necessary compliance requirements and things like that.

Anthony Scaramucci: (25:46)
Okay. So it's an easy solution for somebody to plug into your website, figure out a way to get a long Bitcoin, and they can store it with you guys very safely. Is that fair to say?

Cameron Winklevoss: (25:58)
That's right. It's as easy as going to your brokerage account. You sign up, you place your trade. We also have an execution desk, so we can execute the trade for you, give you that kind of experience. And then we have a cold storage system. If you say, "Hey, I want to go long $10 million worth of Bitcoin and I'm not going to really touch it for a couple of years, I want it in offline storage so it's not internet connected." Literally, a hacker can't even access it. These computer are called HSMs, hardware security modules. They literally never touch the internet. Those store the private keys, which is like your password to your Bitcoin. We have a custodial service where you can basically put your Bitcoin into cold storage and hold it there very securely.

Anthony Scaramucci: (26:50)
Let's say I want to send my Bitcoins to John Darsie. This is obviously a ridiculous hypothetical. Because I just want you to know, John Darsie, I would never send you my Bitcoins.

John Darsie: (27:01)
I'm looking forward to Cameron and Tyler expounding on the idea of you being the coxswain in the back of their rowboat. I want them to explain what that person does and what that person generally looks like.

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:13)
Let me tell you, at my weight after Thanksgiving, we'd be hydroplaning. These poor guys, despite their arms, they wouldn't be able to reach with the level of hydroplaning we'd be doing. But let's get back to the conversation, Darsie. Okay, put yourself back on mute for one more second, okay?

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:29)
Is it traceable? I'm sending my Bitcoin out. I want to pay somebody in Bitcoin. Let's say I want to pay somebody and I don't want people to know about it, is it something that's traceable?

Cameron Winklevoss: (27:40)
The Bitcoin blockchain is an open ledger, and it's very much traceable. We do have to follow the blockchain for compliance requirements and stuff. There was a false narrative for a while around Bitcoin being truly anonymous and only used for illicit activity. I think that scared a lot of people off, but it was really not true at all. That is potentially one of the things about Bitcoin is it's actually very open. It's not a good place if you're trying to squirrel away money or commit bad activity. I mean, there are privacy coins like Zcash that offer commercial privacy and things like that. Bitcoin is very much an open ledger system.

Tyler Winklevoss: (28:26)
Right, but there is one detail there that... let's say you had a Gemini account and you sent it to John, the world would see it leaving Gemini because they know addresses associated with Gemini. But they may not know John's address, so it would just see Bitcoin moving from one address to the other. That's why we call it pseudonymous. Everyone sees the flow of funds, but people don't necessarily whose names are associated with which Bitcoin addresses.

Anthony Scaramucci: (28:52)
It's an important thing to bring up to everybody, because I want to dispel that notion that this is just a funky way for charlatans and money launderers to transact around the world.

Cameron Winklevoss: (29:08)
Yeah. Another point... sorry.

Tyler Winklevoss: (29:11)
Paul Tudor Jones, Stan Druckenmiller, they obviously see something in Bitcoin beyond the illicit activity narrative.

Cameron Winklevoss: (29:18)
I think it's really important to note that the legal classification of Bitcoin, there was an order in 2015 called the Coinflip Order. It was an enforcement order that the CFTC filed against a company called Coinflip. A judge in the Southern District... Eastern or Southern, one of the two in New York, confirmed that order that Bitcoin is legally a commodity under the CEA Commodities Exchange Act. That is the federal legal characterization of Bitcoin, and that was established five years ago. A lot of people still don't know that.

Cameron Winklevoss: (29:57)
I recently read a Twitter stream by Ray Dalio where he listed out a couple of the things that he had issues with, with Bitcoin. One of which that he didn't think it would make a very good currency, which we've addressed a few minutes ago. We don't think it actually needs to be, just like gold doesn't need to be a good currency. He also worried about the legal classification. And as I mentioned, Bitcoin has been legal in the US on a federal level and it's treated as money transmission on the state level, for many years now. We legally operate in all 50 states, as well as many other major Western places in Europe and jurisdictions in Asia. But a lot of people I think just don't know that.

Cameron Winklevoss: (30:43)
So one of the biggest challenges we face is simply, education. When I saw that, I tweeted back at him. I was like, "Hey, here's... Let me address these points here." Because people like Ray Dalio, he understands gold. He understands inflation far better than most people on the planet. If you listen to his talking points, he basically stops just short of Bitcoin. Hopefully, we can get him over the hump if anybody listening, let's just tweet at Ray and get him excited about Bitcoin.

Anthony Scaramucci: (31:17)
That's going to be my last question, and then I'm going to turn it over to John because we've got an amazing stack of audience participation questions here. What do we say to the guys? You mentioned a little bit on Ray Dalio, Nouriel Roubini. What do you say to the people who can't get their arms around this at this moment? And by the way, there were probably people like that guys, related to Facebook or Amazon. I was there when Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy and Gil Amelio was trying to recruit a gentleman by the name of Steve Jobs back to Apple Computer. What do you say to the doubters? What's the overarching thing that you would say?

Cameron Winklevoss: (32:02)
There are some doubters like Nouriel who we call no-coiners. They don't have any Bitcoin, and I think that's what sort of biases them against it. The same with Peter Schiff, he is obviously long gold. They're just very stubborn and not really willing to hear the merits. But for everybody else who's willing and open to have that conversation, I think a lot of the talking points really are what we've laid out in this conversation, which is that Bitcoin is gold 2.0. If you believe in gold and you like gold, you're long gold, you invest in gold, then you should have Bitcoin in your portfolio because it is gold for the internet.

Cameron Winklevoss: (32:43)
I think we have literally be saying these talking points since 2012. We gave a presentation at the Value Investors Congress or Conference. Was that in 2013, Tyler, or 2014? All I know is the price was $132 when we gave the presentation that day. That room was filled with buy-side experts, some of the greatest investing minds in the world. Obviously, we know what the price today is. It hit $20,000. It's the same thesis, the same talking points. We just keep kind of repeating them in different ways, and that really hasn't changed. I think people just sort of have to...

Cameron Winklevoss: (33:31)
I think the aha moment for a lot of people was the pandemic. They saw the stimulus spending. They saw the money printing. And they see the deficit and they're like, "This is going down a path and it's now accelerated down a path. How do we get back out?" The election, it doesn't matter with respect to money printing because both parties can agree that they're addicted to the money printer and they're both going to try and print their way out of the next problem. We've basically used and abused all of the tools at our disposal, and I think that has been a big aha moment for a lot of people.

Tyler Winklevoss: (34:11)
I have yet to hear a convincing criticism that's credible. It's always ad hominems. It's like, "Oh, it's too lapsed, it's rat poison. It's a fraud. It's a Ponzi scheme." But that's not really convincing to me. If I hear an argument that's convincing, I'll let you know. But we've been at this for eight years-

Anthony Scaramucci: (34:31)
Cameron, what's the most convincing argument that you've heard, and what's your dispelling of it? What's the most convincing?

Cameron Winklevoss: (34:39)
The easy criticism to lobby against Bitcoin is that it's volatile. And it's volatile because it's an emerging store of value. It's literally 10, 11 years old. When you put it side by side with gold, which is basically 3,000 plus multi-millennia track record, it obviously doesn't have that track record and it obviously is going to have volatility because it is a nascent store of value. However, it's gone from literally white paper in 2008, to close to $400 billion in market cap in that short period of time.

Cameron Winklevoss: (35:18)
Technology adoption curves are only accelerating. If you look at the number of smartphones and devices, there's more of those on this planet than people. And so if you don't think that Bitcoin adoption is going to continue and accelerate, you're probably mistaken. If you talk to any Gen Zer, they don't want gold. They don't say, "Oh, it's shiny. It's this cool object that I saw in movies and I grew up with and I'm familiar with." They're not familiar with that. They live online.

Anthony Scaramucci: (35:48)
Don't pick on us old people, okay? Don't pick on us old people. It's harder to change the old habits.

John Darsie: (35:56)
It's Anthony's nap time. Anthony, you can go have your dinner and then take your nap.

Anthony Scaramucci: (36:01)
The dude's relentless. You know why he's so relentless? I have buried this guy on about 50 other SALT Talk. Okay, go ahead, Darsie. I know you'll finally ask these questions. Now Darsie, I know you're trying to shine with all your Bitcoin acumen and everything. Go ahead, you got the stage.

John Darsie: (36:19)
Yeah, I just wish they'd had called me in 2014 when Bitcoin was at $132 and evangelized it to me then. But I guess at $20,000, it's still in the early stages. I'll forgive you guys for that.

Tyler Winklevoss: (36:31)
Yeah. Our prediction is that Bitcoin conservatively will be worth $500,000 a Bitcoin. At $20,000, it's still super early.

Anthony Scaramucci: (36:42)
Your timeframe on something like that is what, over the next decade?

Tyler Winklevoss: (36:46)
Yeah. It could be sooner, next five years. Like Cameron said, the technology adoption curves are just so fast. What Bitcoin's achieved in ten years, the next five years. We say that Bitcoin or crypto is like dog years. A day is like a week, a week's a month. It moves so fast.

Anthony Scaramucci: (37:07)
Both Michael Saylor and Ron Paul, who we've interviewed them both, said those numbers. That would get you to the market cap of gold more or less, right? Is that what you're thinking about?

Tyler Winklevoss: (37:19)
That's how we back into it, yeah.

Anthony Scaramucci: (37:20)
Go ahead, John. I know you got-

John Darsie: (37:23)
Yeah. Would you guys consider yourselves... I think I know the answer, but I'd like you talk about it a little bit more. Bitcoin maximalist, meaning that you think there's going to be a winner takes all type of environment in the world of cryptocurrencies. Just like you see gold as the dominant player as a store of value among other precious metals, although silver obviously has a large market cap as well. Do you think Bitcoin is going to be the dominant player? Do you think there's other currencies, digital assets out there that could potentially usurp Bitcoin or at least live alongside Bitcoin as these dominant store of values?

Cameron Winklevoss: (37:59)
I think for the store of value piece of the puzzle, I think if Bitcoin's to lose, there may be a silver to Bitcoin's gold. But I don't think that there's generally multiple stores of value. But we're definitely not maximalist in the sense that we only believe in and love Bitcoin. Obviously, we hold a lot of Bitcoin, we want Bitcoin to work, we hope it works.

Cameron Winklevoss: (38:24)
We also hold Ether and other cryptocurrencies. And we're very bullish on Ethereum and the DeFi projects that have been built on top of Ethereum and much of what's going on there. We're long to space. Obviously, there are some projects that don't have a lot of merit, but there's definitely a few that have already shown a tremendous amount of promise. Bitcoin being one of them, Ethereum being another. Sort of like the world's digital computer, Ethereum or Ether, the currency. Think of it as digital oil that powers this super computer where you can run applications and all kinds of cool programming, smart contracts. And then Filecoin's a new coin that just launched and it's a decentralized data storage network. Think of Amazon S3 centralized storage bucket or Microsoft Azure. Filecoin is basically unbundling, decentralizing that. Just like Ethereum is a decentralized operating system in the cloud and Bitcoin's obviously decentralized digital gold.

John Darsie: (39:32)
Right. You guys have a stable coin called the Gemini coin. I want to talk about stable coins for a second for people who are less informed about it. What's the purpose of the existence of stable coins? How is your coin unique to other stable coins that are out there, including something like the Libra project that Facebook is working on?

Tyler Winklevoss: (39:51)
Yeah. The idea with the stable coin is to bring dollars under the blockchain. If you open a Gemini account, wire cash in, you can withdraw that cash to the Ethereum blockchain to any address, we wrap it. It's called the Gemini dollar, and it gives you a way to spend dollars on the blockchain. We're regulated by the New York Department of Financial Services. We issue it through them, we're licensed to do that. But it's a centralized stable coin, and that's kind of the one on one. We bank the cap, the dollars, are held at State Street in Goldman Sachs. We've gotten security audits. We built a constellation of trust around this. There are definitely other stable coins like Tether that are apparently not fully backed by dollars or are not regulated.

Tyler Winklevoss: (40:41)
Gemini dollar is basically the institutional grade version of the stable coin that's regulated, that's compliant, that's issued by Gemini. But essentially, we want to bring dollars onto the blockchain, or give dollars cryptocurrency characteristics. Right now, your dollars work on banking hours. So if you want to send money to London on a Friday night from New York, you've got to wait til Monday. If it's a bank holiday, it gets there Tuesday. The fastest way to do that is actually to take a bag of cash, hop on a plane at JFK and take the red-eye. That's kind of crazy because we know money is basically information.

Tyler Winklevoss: (41:19)
We know how email works 24/7/365, yet your dollars don't work like that. And that's trying to get from New York to London. Try and get from New York to Sri Lanka. When's it getting there? What's it cost? What's the friction? Maybe it's a 10% fee. Money really doesn't work. We kind of wish it worked like email worked like our money because we'd get some more free time back. But that's the essence of the Gemini dollar.

John Darsie: (41:50)
You guys have said that you think every major tech company will eventually launch their own crypto-like offering. What purpose would that serve, and what exactly would that look like?

Cameron Winklevoss: (42:02)
I think if you look at airline miles, those are effectively closed loop currency systems. You have American miles, you sort of have a currency on their platform. I don't believe you can trade those miles for other miles, but I think that there's ways where you can build incentives and loyalty.

Cameron Winklevoss: (42:24)
Another interesting place is eGaming. A lot of the items that you win or own in the virtual world are in walled gardens, if you will. You can't take that shield or item that you've worked really hard and side one game to another. We think there will be interoperability between gaming. You have communities like Fortnite where there's like 200 million people around the world playing against each other. They are going to want to interact at some point. How do you collect funds from all these different people, and what is that digital native currency that powers those worlds? We think cryptocurrency is really technology, the only technology that can do that in the current system. We think there's intersections in a couple of different areas.

John Darsie: (43:15)
Tyler, do you have anything to add? Or we'll move onto the next question.

Tyler Winklevoss: (43:18)
Yeah. No, we can move on.

John Darsie: (43:20)
All right. In terms of security, going back to devil's advocate type of questions... People talk about the security issue, that Mt. Gox was a famous case of millions of dollars of Bitcoins being stolen. How far have we come in five years in terms of institutional grade custody and also, institutional grade security around owning Bitcoins on a major exchange like a Gemini or a Coinbase?

Tyler Winklevoss: (43:48)
I think we've come really far. And ultimately, we actually built Gemini because of our experience at Mt. Gox. To be clear, Mt. Gox is a company problem, right? It's not a Bitcoin problem. There's never been a Bitcoin hack, but the companies that hold your Bitcoins, similar to a bank that holds your dollars, can have issues. Gemini has never had an issue. Coinbase has never had an issue. Kraken has never had an issue as far as I know. There's a lot of great names and players that have been around for years that have never had any incidence of merit.

Tyler Winklevoss: (44:23)
There are Wild West operations and some people can try their hands there, but I think no one's surprised when those go under. There's no regulation, there's not best practice of security. They don't do the SOC 1, the SOC 2 audits. They don't do security pen testing. All the things that our regulators make sure we do when we say we do it. They come into our office for a month, five or six examiners. They sit there and they kick the tires and they make sure we're actually doing what we say we do. We do it anyway, but it's great to have them doing it. And you can hear from them, not just take it from us. I think we've come a long way, but there are the Wild West operations. You've just got to be aware of who you're dealing with.

John Darsie: (45:09)
Are you guys Satoshi?

Cameron Winklevoss: (45:12)
No comment.

John Darsie: (45:14)
All right. We have a question from an audience member though about your opinion on whether we'll ever know who created Bitcoin and whether doing so would add any level of confidence to mainstream investors who are looking to invest in the space.

Tyler Winklevoss: (45:29)
I know-

Cameron Winklevoss: (45:29)
I think that's-

Tyler Winklevoss: (45:29)
Go ahead.

Cameron Winklevoss: (45:29)
Go ahead.

Tyler Winklevoss: (45:29)
You first.

Cameron Winklevoss: (45:35)
All right. I think that's really the beauty and the strength of Bitcoin. When you first learn that we don't know who the trader is, you're like, "That doesn't make any sense. That's kind of crazy." And then you realize it's all about the source code. There's no inside baseball. Anybody in the world can look at the source code or the ledger and understand what Bitcoin is and what it does and how it transacts.

Cameron Winklevoss: (45:59)
Therefore, you don't have this founder or person that people are looking towards or this Jesus-like figure. You don't have the Fed chairman or a group of people making decisions behind closed doors and then presenting it to the public. It is not that kind of system, and that is really I think the elegance in what attracts so many people to it. It's this open system. Everybody knows the rule set. You know where the goalposts are, and you can opt in or you can opt out.

John Darsie: (46:31)
I ask this question, Tyler, of everybody who comes on to talk about cryptocurrencies, but about the idea of central bank digital currencies. You guys are not Bitcoin maximalists. You believe distributed finance is a movement that's here to stay.

John Darsie: (46:50)
What do you think the impact of central bank digital currencies is going to be on an asset like Bitcoin? Do you think it's additive or do you think if government starts stepping in and launching their own digital currencies, that it might detract from something like Bitcoin which is fully independent?

Tyler Winklevoss: (47:06)
I think it's additive, because it's still fiat currency as far as I understand it. The money printing that's going on is basically turning cash into toilet paper. Right? Cash is trash. Whether it's digital or it's paper, it's still the same thing. It's the perfect foil for Bitcoin because Bitcoin's hard money, the supply is fixed. The more fiat regimes print or whatever, whether or not they make it digital or paper or whatever, I think it's semantics. Maybe it's a little bit more functional toilet paper that works like your email. But ultimately at the end of the day, it's still toilet paper and Bitcoin's digital gold.

Cameron Winklevoss: (47:46)
The real question is, when a central bank is going to buy Bitcoin. We're already seeing it with corporate treasuries. You guys, I think you had Michael Saylor on. He's obviously brilliant. I think he's made one of the brilliant trade of the next decade. That trade still exists, it's out in the open for others to take at $20,000 Bitcoin. We saw this three years ago and we're back here again with so much more maturity in the ecosystem. And now we're seeing treasuries, corporate treasuries, putting money towards Bitcoin to protect the value. It soon will be irresponsible not to have some of your treasury out of dollars or out of fiat, into something like Bitcoin.

Cameron Winklevoss: (48:29)
And then the question is, when is the first central bank going to take that lead? If you look at the gold buying among central banks, I think they bought more in the last two years than they have since the '60s. They see what's going on, they know what's going on. Don't listen to them. Watch what they do. And they're buying gold, because that's all they know how to do. That's what they've been doing since inception. Right? That's their muscle memory. But somebody is going to dip their toe into Bitcoin. Some really smart central banker and group is going to say, "Well gee, if we accumulate our position before every other country, we're in a really good spot." They're going to quietly silently build their position and then talk their book. You just want to make sure you're not the person when the music turns off and you don't have a seat on the Bitcoin network, and the way you buy a seat is by buying Bitcoin.

John Darsie: (49:24)
For people out there who are kicking themselves for not buying Bitcoin at $5,000 per coin when it dipped a few years ago after its initial basic rise into the mainstream, it's not too late.

Cameron Winklevoss: (49:38)
Do you know, that's-

Anthony Scaramucci: (49:39)
Ask why it dipped, though. Because I think it's important, guys. Why did it dip?

John Darsie: (49:42)
Yeah, why is it different now? Why did it have such a... It lost 80% of its value then.

Cameron Winklevoss: (49:47)
Right.

John Darsie: (49:48)
Thanksgiving this year, it lost 10%. But it seems like the dip is being bought and it's much more durable.

Cameron Winklevoss: (49:54)
I think that this time it's different, it's a different fact set. In 2017, it was very much a retail phenomenon. People got super excited, and a lot of people ploughed in. But the institutions really weren't there in a big way yet. Some were, and partners and founders at hedge funds and things were quietly getting in. This time around, you have people like Paul Tudor Jones and people like Michael Saylor who are buying. And they're not buying millions, they're buying tens and hundreds of millions. This has been happening quietly at least over the past six months during the pandemic.

Cameron Winklevoss: (50:32)
We anecdotally have these conversations all day long, conversations that even two years ago wouldn't happen. Or the person would like to learn about Bitcoin, but wasn't really sincere about putting on that position quite yet. So you have stronger hands right now, that's a big part of it. You have a much more mature ecosystem. Regulations are a little bit clearer. And the macro picture has gotten so much worse. It's horrible. I think Mnuchin's saying that, "Oh, we think that the deficit at whatever, 20-plus, 28 trillion, is manageable." What's manageable about that? How do you manage that? The math... the interest payments just will compound and it just won't work.

John Darsie: (51:19)
Well, Cameron and Tyler, we could go on for a lot longer I'm sure, but we'll leave it there for today. We hope to have on hopefully in the next few months. You were actually at our SALT Conference as Anthony mentioned, what, five or so years ago. Again, very early in the Bitcoin story. People had chances to jump on, and as you allude to it, could still be early.

Cameron Winklevoss: (51:39)
Yeah. Just to point a further point on it in closing... When we spoke at SALT, I believe the market cap for Ethereum was $1 billion. And today I think it's, I don't know, it's 50 X. I don't know. It would be interesting to see, to time stamp this conversation and see where the prices are next time we talk.

Anthony Scaramucci: (52:03)
I'm hoping that we're a good luck charm for you guys. I hope that's what that implies.

Tyler Winklevoss: (52:07)
You really are.

Cameron Winklevoss: (52:07)
I think, absolutely. I mean, we went on Squawk earlier today and Bitcoin was at $18.5, and an hour or two later it hit an all-time high. So let's see what happens in the next hour.

Anthony Scaramucci: (52:22)
As long as it's going up, guys, we're taking full credit. If it's going down, I'm blaming it on Joe Curran. I just want to make sure everybody knows that.

Cameron Winklevoss: (52:29)
Deal. Deal.

Anthony Scaramucci: (52:30)
I did learn something from my old boss, by the way. Just so you know, about where you put the blame on thing on things. Just kidding. But in all seriousness guys, thanks so much for joining us. We'd love to get you back on. And I'm looking forward to the opportunity for SkyBridge to do business with you guys sometime in the near future.

Cameron Winklevoss: (52:50)
Great, really looking forward to it.

Tyler Winklevoss: (52:52)
Likewise. Thanks for having us on, guys.

Michael Saylor: “Bitcoin is a Dominant Monetary Network” | SALT Talks #109

“Google is an information network. Facebook is a social network. Bitcoin is a monetary network.”

Michael Saylor is a technologist, entrepreneur, business executive, philanthropist, and best-selling author. He currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Office of MicroStrategy, Inc.

As we approached 2010, companies like Apple, Facebook and Amazon were poised to transform the world. The analog world we once lived in would soon fit in the palm of a hand. Apple was replacing Canon; Facebook and Instagram were replacing Kodak; Amazon was replacing retail stores. In the process these companies became exponentially more valuable than the ones they eliminated. “Software networks are dematerializing everything in the world.”

Bitcoin represents a similar transformation in the financial space. Similar to the likes of Amazon, Apple and Facebook, Bitcoin has proven itself the winner in the crypto asset space and will continue its inevitable climb. Institutions and major players in the financial space are already coming around to Bitcoin which will accelerate its adoption and growth.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Michael Saylor.jpeg

Michael Saylor

Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer

MicroStrategy

MODERATOR

anthony_scaramucci.jpeg

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:06)
Hello, everyone. Welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie, the Managing Director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum and networking platform at the intersection of finance, technology, and public policy. What we're trying to do during these SALT Talks is provide interviews with leading investors, creators, and thinkers. It's trying to replicate the experience we provide to our global conference series, the SALT Conference, which provides a platform for ideas that we think are shaping the future and a window into the mind of subject matter experts. We're very excited today to welcome Michael Saylor to SALT Talks.

John Darsie: (00:43)
Michael is a technologist, an entrepreneur, a business executive, and a philanthropist, as well as being a best-selling author. He currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors and as the Chief Executive Officer for MicroStrategy. Since co-founding the company at the age of 24, Michael has built MicroStrategy into a global leader in business intelligence, mobile software, and cloud-based services. In 2012, he authored the book The Mobile Wave: How Mobile Intelligence Will Change Everything, which earned a spot on The New York Times Best Seller list.

John Darsie: (01:14)
Michael attended MIT receiving an SB in Aeronautics and Astronautics and an SB in Science, Technology and Society. Just a reminder, if you have any questions for Michael during today's SALT Talk, you can enter them in the Q&A box at the bottom of your video screen. Hosting today's talk is Anthony Scaramucci, the Founder and Managing Partner of SkyBridge Capital, which is a global alternative investment firm. Anthony is also the Chairman of SALT. With that, I'll turn it over to Anthony for the interview.

Anthony Scaramucci: (01:43)
Well, John, thank you. Mike, I got to tell you, I was so pleased when you accepted our invitation. Thank you. Welcome to SALT, and welcome to SALT Talks. Hopefully, we'll get you to one of our live events one day when we can get back away from the pandemic. But before we get started, you got this beautiful ship in the background. You're crushing John Darsie, who prides himself in his room ratings. So, I'm very happy that you're here with this beautiful room rating. But tell us about your background. Tell us about your family's background. I know you come from a military family. Give us some sense for your upbringing and what got you on the arc of your professional journey.

Michael Saylor: (02:22)
My father was a career noncommissioned officer in the Air Force. We spent 30 years. He rose from the beginning to be Chief Master Sergeant. We lived on military bases, air force bases everywhere in the world. Then he spent 10 years as a government servant working on the F-16 program. So, I come substantially from an Air Force background. I grew up in Dayton, Ohio, and in high school, where they invented the airplane. I became very enamored with science fiction. I read every science fiction author, Robert Heinlein, Arthur C. Clarke, Isaac Asimov.

Michael Saylor: (03:04)
By the time I graduated, every self-respecting individual, every dude of my generation either wanted to be a rock star, astronaut, fighter pilot, maybe professor, or CEO. So, I went to MIT on an Air Force scholarship. I studied aeronautical engineering and spaceship design. I learned to fly in the Air Force, Lackland Air Force Base. My senior year, I ran into two flukes, the United States won the Cold War, Reagan drew down the military. I was diagnosed mistakenly with benign heart murmur.

Michael Saylor: (03:48)
The result of that is I didn't go into the Air Force to fly jets and become the astronaut, which was one of my career paths. I ended up going out into the business world. I thought I'd get a PhD. I took a job. The job blew up. I got another job. When I was about to go back to college, the people I was working for gave me the chance to start MicroStrategy. They financed the entire business. So, I started a company at 24. I thought when it fails, I'll get a PhD. It never failed. I'm still stuck here. So, that's how I got to be in the software business. It wasn't of my own doing. I really wanted to be an astronaut.

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:28)
Do you think you'll ever take a trip into space, Mike?

Michael Saylor: (04:33)
We'll see. I'm holding out hope. Go SpaceX!

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:39)
I see his base. Yeah, we're investors in SpaceX, because we love that company. We're obviously cheerleaders for what's going to happen this weekend with their launch and cheerleaders for Elon's company. Talk us through The Mobile Wave and how mobile intelligence has changed the world, a fascinating book. What's interesting about your book, even though it was written eight years ago, it is still very current. So, I would recommend everybody on this SALT Talk to read the book, very compelling stuff. But tell us a little bit about how it's changed the world, mobile intelligence.

Michael Saylor: (05:17)
In 2007, Apple came for with the iPhone, but it was a toy. There was no cut and paste. There is no App Store. By 2009, the iPhone 3 was not a toy anymore. It was a business tool. I became enamored with the idea of software leaping off of a computer onto a handset. I thought when software goes from solid state to vapor state and now it's around us and with us and we sleep with it 24/7/365, maybe it means something different.

Michael Saylor: (05:48)
So, when I wrote The Mobile Wave, the observation was software networks are dematerializing everything in the world. They're dematerializing money and identity and everything you hold in your hand, the photograph and the camera and the recorder and the video. If software dematerializes everything, then I can take a map from Rand McNally and make it a magic map. Google Maps is a magic map that tells you where to drive, how to drive, whether you should go there, the directions to take. It's in the palm of your hand. It even talks to you. Rand McNally was a simple 20th century map. Rand McNally is worth 50 million bucks. Google Maps is worth $50 billion.

Michael Saylor: (06:36)
Apple dematerialized Kodak, maybe Instagram did. You went from taking photos on a Canon camera and storing them in a shoe box or a photo album to Facebook and Instagram and the iPhone. It wasn't worth the same. It wasn't worth 10 times as much. It was worth 1,000 times as much. So, the conclusion of the mobile way was the world's going to change the network. Google's an information network. Facebook's a social network. Apple's a mobile network. Amazon's a retail network. They're going to eat the world. They're going to destroy 15,000 other companies that are competing with them, because Apple is able to ship a better camera to a billion people overnight for a nickel.

Michael Saylor: (07:21)
Nobody in the history of the world could ever upgrade or ship a product for no variable cost to the entire planet for a nickel. Yet, that's what Google does. That's what Facebook does. That's what Apple does. The part of Amazon that works well is that dematerialization of the retail storefront to a billion people for a nickel. Well, the conclusion is buy Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google. I wrote the book. Anthony, nobody read the book. I mean, some people read the book. I got 50 people-

Anthony Scaramucci: (07:51)
What do you mean? Darsie and I read it, because we're get ready for you, man. I knew I was going to be out punched in terms of IQ and brain powers. I had to read the damn thing.

Michael Saylor: (08:01)
Eight years later. When I wrote the book, probably 50,000 or 100,000 people read the book. I made 50,000 in royalties from the book. I didn't invest my company into Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google. I took $50 million of my own money. I bought it. I bought it when everybody said, "You're forced to own Apple. You should diversify into all the other computer companies. What is this Facebook thing? You're foolish to own that. What is this Google thing? It's overvalued. It's overpriced." Well, I converted the $50 million into $500 million. Anybody could have done it. If you had bought any of those companies in the past decade, you couldn't lose money.

Michael Saylor: (08:41)
So, it made me conclude a couple of things. One thing, if you want to make money in the tech era, you find the dominant digital network, the one that's worth $100 billion that's crushed everybody. You can't buy MySpace. You might hit BlackBerry or MySpace or Yahoo or something like that. If you buy too soon, you might miss it. But after it's $100 billion dollars and the market has decided Apple's the winner, Google's the winner, Facebook's the winner, Amazon's the winner.

Michael Saylor: (09:15)
I know it's pretty obvious Amazon was the winner in 2013 when it was trading at 300 bucks, Anthony. Everybody on Wall Street said, "What is this stupid company? They don't make any money. We don't buy into it." They would sell you Amazon for 300 bucks, but you could have bought it. You could buy all those things. You would have got a 10X, 20X gain on it. You just wait until the 99% of the world that disagrees with you, that cynical and skeptical and ignorant and they don't understand it and they're afraid of it.

Michael Saylor: (09:45)
As it gradually dawns on them that Google's an information network, Facebook's a social network, Apple's a mobile network, Amazon's a retail network, Microsoft's an enterprise software network, when you finally figure it out, you're like, "Oh, these guys can serve up a billion people for a nickel. Their variable cost is zero. They've got overwhelming crushing advantages."

Michael Saylor: (10:12)
So, summary of The Mobile Wave, I had that experience. It made me very successful as a personal investor. My company didn't invest in it. 2020 came and I swore to myself, if I ever saw this again, I wasn't going to write a book. I was going to buy as much of that thing as I could personally, as much of that thing as I could corporately, and then I was just going to tweet about it. So, that's basically the tie in or what leads us up to the virtual wave and my interest in Bitcoin.

Anthony Scaramucci: (10:48)
So, let's talk about that, because you started out as a Bitcoin skeptic. I've listened to a lot of your interviews. There was a tweet in 2012, where you likened it to a form of online gambling. And then you had the slow conversion into becoming what I would say one of the more exceptional Bitcoin evangelist. I mean, I would describe you be like that based on a lot of the stuff that you've said. But now you're putting your money alongside of your ideas and your mouth, you've announced a $425 million investment in Bitcoin from the MicroStrategy cash reserve. So, could you take us through your personal odyssey from skeptic, "This is online gambling," to "Okay, wait a minute. This is a lot like Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon"?

Michael Saylor: (11:36)
Sure, I mean, in the early days of Bitcoin, Bitcoin's like an open source project. There's no company behind it. It's an emergent phenomenon in cyberspace. As it emerged, the early days, it was very uncertain and scary and complicated. So, how will the IRS tax it? Will the government ban it? Will it be illegal to hold it? The early exchanges were failing. Mt. Gox failed. The early use cases were Silk Road. The early question of, "Is it a security or not?" Right? You went through all of these tests for Bitcoin. It could have been destroyed, because it was banned. It could have been destroyed, because it was hijacked by bad exchanges. It could have been destroyed, because it was forked. Everybody said, "Well, either someone else is going to copy it or the government will ban it."

Michael Saylor: (12:41)
Over the last eight years, what happened is it was copied 6,500 times, Anthony. It's the winner of the crypto war. So, how do you get comfortable with it? Well, after it's been attacked 6,500 times by clones, and they've all failed. When it emerged to be 95% of all of the proof of work networks... 95% of all the monetary energy in the crypto asset space is on the Bitcoin network. ... then you know it's Facebook, it's not MySpace. So, we had to watch it get to a point of maturity, where it's season. We had to watch all of these bad exchanges failed and all the bad actors failed. We had to watch the development of a regulatory apparatus.

Michael Saylor: (13:28)
So, now you have KYC regulation on the exchanges in the US. You have clarity with regard to how it's taxed. You have clarity with regard to what it is and isn't. I think people are starting to understand it's not a currency. It's not a payment network. It's a bank in cyberspace that allows billions of people to store their money. It gives them a simple, straightforward, affordable, secure savings account for people that can't set up their own hedge fund and don't know and can't get into a hedge fund. They just want to put their money in a bank.

Michael Saylor: (14:11)
The politicians and the country has destroyed the savings account over the past 30 years. When I was a kid, you put your money in a savings account, get 5% interest, and everybody believed that the money was going to be more valuable in the future. You wouldn't lose your money. That option's been deprived. So, Bitcoin has emerged from casino gambling scary to the savings account or savings and loan at the end of the universe. That's the journey of the 10 years, and that's why I could get excited about it in the year 2020.

Anthony Scaramucci: (14:49)
You tweeted a lot about that this morning, which I shared with my team. I guess the question I have is and you said it, but I want to hear it again. You had MySpace. You had Yahoo. They got hopped over by Facebook and Google. There's not a coin out there that could hop Bitcoin. Is it or no?

Michael Saylor: (15:13)
They tried 6,500 times, Anthony, over a decade. Everybody and their brother thought, "Man, could I copy this?" The problem is Bitcoin's the only one with the immaculate conception. It's truly decentralized. It's the money. It's the crypto asset of the people, right? There's not an example of a digital network that hit 100 billion dollars in market cap that was vanquished subsequently. Lots of billion dollar things failed, lots of $2 billion things fail. But once you get to $100 billion dollars, I think the market has spoken.

Anthony Scaramucci: (15:55)
Right. I think it's well said. There was a book 20 years ago, James Dale Davidson and a guy named... I think it was William Rees-Mogg. His son is now in the parliament in the UK. I'd have to get the exact title of his last name, but the book was called The Sovereign Individual. I read the book 20 years ago. Peter Thiel decided that that was a big book for him. So, he's repurposed it and helped to get published again in a paperback form.

Anthony Scaramucci: (16:28)
So, I went [inaudible 00:16:29]. I hadn't read it in 20 years. Let me go back and read it. I bought it. Thiel writes in the foreword, something that I want to ask you about. He says that "AI, you think of the CCP AI. It helps people score you socially. It helps people identify your facial tics. AI is about centralization and command and control. But Bitcoin and the asset associated with digital currency is a libertarian ideal. It is about personal and individual freedom. That's how he started the book, The Sovereign Individual. I'm wondering about your reaction to that. Do you agree with him?

Michael Saylor: (17:09)
I do agree with him. I think that the thing that makes people that own and invest in Bitcoin passionate about it is because it really does enforce the concept of freedom and truth and liberty and sovereignty for the individual. Let's just take one interesting example. You're an investor, you have a bunch of money, you want to leave it for your granddaughter 30 years from now. Your choices are gold or Bitcoin. Oh, this is the real problem, $10 trillion in gold, hundreds of billions of dollars in Bitcoin. Well, if you actually choose gold, you have to put your gold in a bank and trust the counterparty to take care of that gold. No, are you going to bury it under your mattress?

Anthony Scaramucci: (18:00)
It's stored somewhere. That's that shoe box. That's that Kodak's shoe box that you were referring to earlier.

Michael Saylor: (18:07)
Yeah, pretty much, you're putting it in a bank vault. Now, you've surrendered all your monetary energy. Money is monetary energy. You've surrendered your life energy to a bank, a counterparty trustee. In the last hundred years, they all fail. Every bank fails. You're trusting a company or you're trusting a country. 95% of the cities in the world, the banks failed over 100 years. But the countries and the regimes fail too, so you're trusting in a country or a company and a counterparty. On the other hand, if you actually buy Bitcoin, you have the option, not the obligation, but you have the option to take custody of those keys. That's advantages for you in two reasons.

Michael Saylor: (18:59)
One, you can switch custodians quickly. In half an hour, you can move your money from one bank to another bank, one country to another country. That keeps everybody honest. It's useful in a capitalist world if you have options and no one's holding you over a barrel. The second is, I can hold a gun to your head, pull the trigger, kill you, and take your gold. But if I hold the gun to your head and pull the trigger, I can't get your Bitcoin. I could just kill you.

Michael Saylor: (19:29)
There's a very important subtlety there, which is at the end of the day, you control your life force. It shifts the balance of power back to the individual versus the bank, the custodian, the country, anybody that would coerce you and steal your life force from you. In that way, it's a libertarian idea, but it's also a capitalistic idea. It's also just a matter of decency to the individual and sovereignty to the individual.

Anthony Scaramucci: (20:05)
I'm sure you thought about this, I'm just interested to get your iteration process in making that large of an investment. You had to be thinking, "Okay, what could go wrong? What's the risk management?" Tell us what you think could have gone wrong, and then tell us how you intellectually and cognitively overcame what you thought the issues could be for something like Bitcoin,

Michael Saylor: (20:26)
Anthony, I think this gets at the big issue. The number one problem every investor in the world is facing right now... There's $250 trillion or more worth of this problem. ... is I have monetary energy. Where's my store of value? How am I going to conserve my monetary energy in the current macroeconomic climate? As long as the central banks are expanding the broad money supply and to expanded by 5.5% a year for 10 years. This year, it expanded by 24%. If the monetary supply expands by 10 to 15% a year for the next three to four years, the banks are sucking the oxygen out of the room. They're sucking 10 to 15% of the purchasing power from all of your investments.

Michael Saylor: (21:18)
I mean, if I'm holding cash and I have 500 million in cash and I'm looking at losing 15% of the purchasing power every year for five years, the risk was I'm going to lose 75% if I do nothing, okay? It made it easy for me to take another decision, because I expected that doing nothing with money, with cash is losing half to 75% of your purchasing power. It's not a problem if the money supply is not expanding, right? The expansion of the monetary supply is like I'm sucking 5% of the option out of your room every year or every month. How long will it be before you leave?

Michael Saylor: (21:55)
Now, what do I do with that? Well, I got to find a store of value. A bond is only a store of value if the coupon is higher than the rate of monetary expansion, unless I have expectation that the interest rate will fall. So, a 5% bond can work as long as you keep cranking down the interest rates. But when interest rates get to zero, unless you go negative, bonds don't hold value. Everybody in the bond market has figured this out. Either interest rates go negative or you got to exit.

Michael Saylor: (22:26)
Now, how about stocks? Stock can hold value if the cash flow per share grows faster than the rate of monetary expansion. Google Amazon, Facebook, they work in the last decade, because they're growing 20% and the money supply is expanding 5%. But if the money supply expands by 15%, how many equities are going to expand cash flow per share by 20%? By the way, how do you do that if you're not? You have to leverage up, right? So, if I'm growing 5% a year cash flows, I have to borrow money. I go short the dollar. I borrow billions. I buy my stock back. My cash flow per share goes above the hurdle rates, and I can hold value.

Michael Saylor: (23:09)
What happens when you're fully leveraged up, Anthony? Everybody's at the end of the line. I've leveraged up as far as I can go. Interest rates are as low as they can go. How many companies are going to grow their cash flow greater than the rate of monetary expansion? Well, you crank in your estimate for money supply. Bonds are a problem. Stocks are a problem. Cash is a problem. Now you got to go to precious metals. Am I going to buy gold? The miners are going to create 2, 3% more gold every year. The gold supply as centralized. There's counterparty risks. The central bankers hypothecated and create gold derivatives. There's no scarcity with gold. Under the best case in 100 years, you're going to lose 85% of your money when they just print 2% more gold a year.

Michael Saylor: (23:58)
Under the worst case, you're going to lose it all from a counterparty risk. In the mid case, you're going to lose 90%, 95%, because people keep generating gold derivatives. This is why gold is breaking down against the Fed balance sheet. You can see it breaking down on the charts this year. It's not working. If gold goes through $100,000 an ounce, gold miners are going to frack gold like there's no tomorrow. It's a commodity. Commodities make awful money, because human beings can create more. So, you work your way through bonds, stocks, and gold. What's left? Crypto, find a digital asset you can't print more of.

Michael Saylor: (24:37)
Well, they're 6,500 choices. There's one that's the winner. It turns out that the winner is the one that no company controls, no country controls. It's capped at 21 million. Because it's 21 million, what do you have here, Anthony? You have a software network engineered to collect, store, and channel monetary energy without power loss. It's like Facebook for money or eBay for money, but here's the difference.

Michael Saylor: (25:07)
It takes you 30 years to buy everything you're ever going to buy on eBay. The reason eBay works is because it has all the liquidity of stuff you might buy, but it takes you 30 years to buy it. Bitcoin is a savings network. It's a monitoring network. If you're a billionaire, you put a billion dollars on the network, you put it on the network in a week. I bought $600 million worth of this stuff in a quarter, Anthony.

Michael Saylor: (25:35)
I put 20 years of earnings into the network upfront, because as soon as you figure it out, you realize that it's going to be the highest real return versus all the alternatives. Do I want to have my money sitting in a Fiat instrument, which is a bond or a stock that's going to be debased by expansion of the money supply; or do I want to put it into an absolutely scarce digital asset, which is going to float with the expansion, the monetary supply?

Anthony Scaramucci: (26:06)
Are you worried about the volatility, because it has experienced some volatility over the years?

Michael Saylor: (26:11)
LeBron James started playing basketball like age eight or nine. The first 10 years, he was brilliant. Everybody knew he is brilliant, but he was a little bit volatile. He was a little bit erratic. From age 18, to 28, he crushed everything and everybody in his past. Great superstar athletes have a volatile first decade. It was volatile. There were crooked exchanges that were hacked.

Anthony Scaramucci: (26:32)
They couldn't have evolved until three decades. I mean, there are some superstars that evolved. I just want to give that as a disclaimer on the side.

Michael Saylor: (26:40)
There are some, but my point really is looking backwards at the first decade of a superstar's life and then extrapolating forward to the next decade isn't necessarily the most rational thing. For example, Apple computer was a totally different stock from 1998 to 2007. And then from 2010 to 2020, it was a bit different. If you look at what's happening now, institutions are discovering Bitcoin and there are adults in the room. When they're buying, they're not buying 100,000 at a time and they're not being manipulated on these early exchanges. You're talking about people putting $100 million.

Michael Saylor: (27:27)
For example, for me to buy $600 million, it took me 14 days trading every three seconds, Anthony. I was sitting there ready to buy everything you would sell me for 14 days straight every second for two weeks, me, one guy, one actor. Now, what happens when there's 100 actors like me in the Bitcoin market?

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:51)
Yeah, I think you're making a very compelling case. I appreciate you taking all my questions, because there's a lot of people on this SALT conversation that are coming up the learning curve. They appreciate all the work that you've done. In fact, frankly, they're able to leverage all of the genius that you've put into this. I'm going to turn it over to John Darsie who has a series of questions from our audience. We got a tremendous amount of audience participation, Michael. So, I'm going to let him ask a few questions here.

Michael Saylor: (28:24)
All right, bring it on.

John Darsie: (28:26)
All right. So, you have a very interesting concept, Michael, about Bitcoin being a store of energy in a thermodynamic type of sense. Could you walk us through that metaphor, what you mean by that?

Michael Saylor: (28:39)
Okay, look, it's totally strange to have a financial instrument, which is scarce and capped, because you can print more tech stocks, you can print more bonds, you can mine more gold, you can issue more fiat currency. On the other hand, in the engineering world, when you're designing pneumatic systems or hydraulic systems, nobody ever built a pneumatic system with a leak, a hydraulic system with a leak. Your swimming pool doesn't even work with a leak, right? Everybody knows if there's a leak in the fuselage of the airplane, it's not going to fly, it's going to explode. So, you don't have a leak in a nuclear reactor. Do you ever try to go across the ocean and a ship with a leak?

Michael Saylor: (29:21)
Okay, the idea of a closed system is basic to every freshman in engineering. I'm an MIT engineer. We talk about something called adiabatic lapse. An adiabatic system is no leak. A closed system is when you have mass in the system that can either leave or can be added, and all you can do is inject energy. So, Bitcoin is the classic textbook closed system. There's 21 million coins, virtual bars of gold in the system. You can't remove any, you can't add any. There's no inflation.

Michael Saylor: (29:58)
On the other hand, what you can do is you can heat it up. If you're buying Bitcoin above the 4-year or the 200-week moving average, you're heating up the system. If you're buying it below the 200-week moving average, you're cooling down the system. The entire thing's like a massive monetary battery, a capacitor. It's storing energy. What we've done is created a system where I can take $100 million of monetary energy, I can put it into the Bitcoin network. It'll sit there for as long as you can imagine, and there's no power loss. That's the genius of it.

Michael Saylor: (30:37)
If I told you I was going to inject another million Bitcoin or two or three million Bitcoin, I'm bleeding off, I'm diluting the energy. So, when I describe it as a closed system, what I'm saying is for the first time in the history of man, we created a monetary energy network that will store the energy over time with no power loss. We've never had a money. We've never had a thing that could do that. Gold didn't do that. Copper, silver doesn't do that. Fiat doesn't do that. Stocks and bonds don't do that. So, it's really an engineering breakthrough.

John Darsie: (31:17)
So, you have this degree in aeronautics that we mentioned earlier, but you also have a degree in the history of science. You've talked about how you've studied different technological leaps throughout history. Do you think Bitcoin is a technological leap and the blockchain technology that underlies Bitcoin is a technological leap akin to the start of the internet, akin to the start of the automobile? What does that mean for the banking system as a whole? You've talked about how this isn't a store of value or a currency. It's a bank that lives in cyberspace. Do you think Bitcoin, blockchain technology is ultimately going to swallow the entire banking system?

Michael Saylor: (31:58)
What I think is that Bitcoin is an elemental force similar to steel or electricity or oil. John D. Rockefeller found a way to channel chemical energy via oil, created standard oil, changed the world, drove down the cost of energy by three orders of magnitude, and everything changed. Take away steel, right? Andrew Carnegie came up with steel. There's no New York City without steel. Build the building more than four floors, there is nothing without steel. It created the entire modern civil engineering era.

Michael Saylor: (32:33)
Andrew Mellon brought forth aluminum. That's why he became rich, aluminum. Try to build an airplane without aluminum. There is no aviation industry without aluminum. Electricity, think about the world without electricity. The Romans had aqueducts. The city of 500,000 people shrinks to 25,000 people if you turn the aqueduct off. It's channeling hydraulic energy.

Michael Saylor: (33:00)
Bitcoin is pure monetary energy. For the first time in the history of the world, we figured out how to create a software network that will store and channel monetary energy with no power loss. That's a million times better than a gold network. I bet it's better than electrical network. If I want to hold $500 million of electricity and I put in the battery, I lose 2% a month. There's a 24% inflation rate on electric battery. You can only move electricity 500 miles and you lose 6% in the first transaction. Try to move $500 million of electricity from New York to Tokyo. Here's how you do it. You take the $500 million converted to Bitcoin, send a Bitcoin to Tokyo for three bucks, convert it back into electricity.

Michael Saylor: (33:53)
By the way, the magic is not just that I did the transfer for $3, instead of $300,000 with gold. It would take you a month and 300 grand to do it in gold. The magic is I can put the $500 million 30 years into the future and not lose a nickel of the energy, right? That's the beauty of this entire network. It's a network to channel monetary energy, which is the apex energy. Monetary energy is the sum of kinetic energy, potential energy, chemical energy, electrical energy, nuclear energy. All energies flow to monetary energy. We have a software network or a technology network for monetary energy.

Michael Saylor: (34:40)
One last point, Google's an information network. It's worth a trillion dollars, because it channels information and video. Facebook's a social network. It's worth nearly a trillion dollars, because it channels social energy. People couldn't conceive of it. Bitcoin is a monetary network. It collects and channels monetary energy. It's a little bit more valuable than collecting all your photographs from a shoe box. It's a little bit more valuable than posting photos to your friends and family on the holidays. We're talking about tens of thousands of billion dollar entities. They've all got a problem. Their monetary energy is being debased by 10 to 20% a year by the expansion of the monetary supply. They're all stampeding toward a solution. Is that going to be derivatives or equities or bonds? What is the solution?

Michael Saylor: (35:42)
Bitcoin is the first perfected crypto asset that serves as a long term store of monetary energy. That's what's going on here. It's an invention. John D. Rockefeller became the richest man in the world, because he collected, stored, and channeled chemical energy. It's a simple idea. 99% of the world doesn't understand it. They're new to it. It's inconceivable, because Facebook was an inconceivable idea a decade ago. So, that's where we are with this, something exciting, new, powerful. It's the elemental structure of a totally new set of financial systems. Yes.

John Darsie: (36:35)
So, building upon that, just before we came live, the Federal Reserve Chairman Jay Powell responded to a question about a central bank digital currency, which has gotten a lot of buzz lately. We asked Raoul Pal about this last Friday. He had an interesting answer. We talked to Marty Chavez, the former Chief Information Officer at Goldman Sachs, who's thought a lot about what you could do if you did create a central bank digital currency. You could relate it to something like modern monetary theory or stimulus packages.

John Darsie: (37:04)
If you gave everyone a central bank digital wallet, you could instantly transfer government money into their bank account and target individual people based on who you need to send money to and how you want that money to circulate through the economy. Do you think central bank digital currencies have a future? What is the future of Bitcoin living alongside potential central bank digital currencies?

Michael Saylor: (37:28)
I wrote about money as software in The Mobile Wave in 2012. You could see it coming. Today, you see Apple Pay, PayPal, Square Cash, Alipay. Big tech companies are moving money around. It's clear that governments are going to at some point grapple with it. I listened to the same interview. What I heard Christine Lagarde say was, "We'll make a decision in January, February. If we do something, it's two to four years." So, we're talking four years out for the EU. I heard Jay Powell say, "We got to study it, make sure we get it right." That felt to me like more than four years.

Michael Saylor: (38:09)
So, my view is everybody knows that digital technology matters. They know they can't ignore it. The government's aren't going to move as fast as the big tech companies. China's going to move fastest. Big tech will move second fast. The governments will be 5 to 10 years out. I wouldn't be holding my breath in the next 36 months.

Michael Saylor: (38:31)
Now, how it relates to Bitcoin. Bitcoin is not a currency. It's not a payment network, right? Currency is the province of the government, always has been, always will be. The IRS set the tax code for currency. You can't use Bitcoin as a currency, because the tax code is hostile to it. It would generate 100,000 accounting entries and tax obligations for no reason whatsoever. So, there's no point in Bitcoin being thought of that. Bitcoin is not a payment network. Apple Pay and Square Cash and PayPal and Alipay are payment networks. They work well. They work a billion times better than Bitcoin or any crypto will ever work.

Michael Saylor: (39:13)
So, crypto's inappropriate as a currency, even though people call it cryptocurrency. It's a wrong choice of words. We should move it out of the lexicon. We should refer to as crypto asset. Crypto is an awesome technology for creating a scarce asset as a store of value. The $250 trillion problem is store my value, I just want to put my money in a piggy bank in cyberspace and have nobody take it. It's a very simple idea. Then if I want to spend money, I'm going to convert 5% of it to Apple Pay or Square Cash or PayPal or Alipay. I'm going to move it around and fiat currency on those rails in a responsible, legal, efficient, fun fashion.

Michael Saylor: (40:04)
Let the governments be the governments. Let the big tech companies do what they do best. Bitcoin is going to solve this last very simple issue, which is I just need pharmaceutical grade, synthetic, safe haven asset, synthetic gold with none of the hangover of gold, none of the bad problems, none of the problems with mining and hypothecation and centralization and corruption, but all of the good parts of it. I put my money in there. A decade from now, I've still got it and it hasn't been inflated away.

John Darsie: (40:41)
You didn't even touch on flying to asteroids and mining gold on asteroids, which they think potentially is going to be possible in the next decade. There's an asteroid out there they think is worth $10 quintillion, trillion, bajillion worth of gold.

Michael Saylor: (40:56)
Yeah, you just bring us back to the fundamental issue. In the finance world, it's very rare to be able to buy anything you can't print more of. But in the engineering world, it's very rare to find a machine that works unless you plugged all the leaks, unless it respects conservation of energy, the first law of thermodynamics, and it's a closed system. By the way, Bitcoin is the singularity, where engineering, science and technology smashes into finance. For the first time, we can finally apply Isaac Newton's laws and the laws of thermodynamics to protecting our money. Who wouldn't like to have a monetary system that works?

John Darsie: (41:43)
So, a less charitable characterization of your recent Bitcoin evangelism would be that you've now put $425 million worth of MicroStrategy reserves into bitcoin. You've personally bought Bitcoin. You're now talking your book. You realize that if Michael Saylor and Paul Tudor Jones and Alan Howard and all these other really wealthy, influential, smart people are talking up this asset, ultimately, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy and it goes higher.

John Darsie: (42:13)
Your cost basis, I believe, is somewhere around 10,000, 11,000 in Bitcoin. Do you think you'll continue as a company and as an individual to continue to buy Bitcoin at higher prices as you generate more cash from your business? Do you expect other Fortune 1,000 companies to follow your lead?

Michael Saylor: (42:31)
Well, I would answer the question by pointing out that I think it's important that people of character and conviction articulate the benefits of Bitcoin to the masses. There are billions of people on this planet that are living in a regime where the currency is collapsing, one billion that we just saw last month. For them, this is a lifeboat against the currency collapse. If you're living in Argentina or Venezuela or Turkey or Lebanon or most of Africa, if you don't have this, then what choice do you have? I mean, they don't have the option to put their money with a hedge fund in Connecticut, right? They don't have an option to hire some professional money manager and convert it to dollars.

Michael Saylor: (43:18)
So, as Jack Dorsey said, this is an instrument of economic empowerment. There are billions of people on the planet who have been deprived of a savings account where they won't lose all their stuff. So, we're going through a transition where people aren't sure what this is. I think it's a moral imperative to stand up and say to people, "It's a good thing. It's a thing that's going to make the world better for billions of people that don't have a choice."

Michael Saylor: (43:47)
If you're going to criticize Bitcoin, what are you going to do to solve the problems of everybody on the planet that doesn't have liquid wealth and hedge funds in the United States with options? Because it's morally incumbent upon you to give them something to cling to in the event of a currency flood. So, the reason we're talking about it is because it's the right thing to do for the world.

Michael Saylor: (44:11)
As for what I think going forward, I think that if your choice is invest your money in bonds that are going to yield 2% while the monetary supply expands by 15%, you're looking at -13% real yield if you're calculating asset inflation, right? So that doesn't make any sense. If I'm going to put my money into equities, I'm going to gamble, I've got to rebalance my equity portfolio every quarter based upon performance and competition and a million moving parts. That doesn't make sense. If I leave my money in cash fiat currency and I know that all the banks are going to print 10 or 20% more every year, that doesn't make sense.

Michael Saylor: (44:59)
So, the only idea of adopting the Bitcoin standard is very simple. I'm going to sweep my excess cash flows into a savings bank in cyberspace that's run by incorruptible software that has no agenda other than to just store my value for 100 years. There's no CEO of Bitcoin. No one can print more Bitcoin. No one can use Bitcoin to do an acquisition or a dilutive acquisition. No one can be based to Bitcoin. It's a very simple idea.

Michael Saylor: (45:32)
Take your monetary energy, encrypt it into a cyberspace bank that's going to hold it in a vacuum, where the power won't bleed off, and then wait. Because in a world where everybody's dissipating energy, John, the rational strategy is preserve your energy. Everybody else is dissipating energy either by trading around or by holding bonds that can't keep up with the real rate of monetary expansion or by taking risks. What am I going to do, buy $500 million worth of liquid arts indexes? Scarce art index?

John Darsie: (46:18)
Baseball cards.

Michael Saylor: (46:20)
Put yourself in the place of someone that drives a truck for a living. What advice are you going to give them, right? My 82-year-old father, he can't be a hedge fund guy. He can't be picking stocks to buy and sell in a balanced portfolio with exposure to developing countries and with currency hedges on. It's going to short the 30-year bond and it'll play the yield. It's too complicated. There's billions and billions of people, they just have money, and they want to not lose their money. So, that's our strategy.

Michael Saylor: (46:58)
We're just going to try to preserve our money. We're going to do it by betting on the only obvious thing we can find in the world that is not correlate. Everything else is for the most part a fiat instrument. If the monetary supply expands, it's going to be diluted. So, you either got to buy the only Picasso, you got to buy scarce art or things that cannot be produced; or you buy bitcoin, because Bitcoin is that scarce crypto asset that's got hundreds of millions of dollars behind it.

John Darsie: (47:35)
Well, I'm going to play devil's advocate again on behalf of a couple of members of our audience who might not be as bought into Bitcoin. You described Bitcoin as the cryptocurrency or the asset class of the people, but what about people in third world countries who don't have access to the internet or the computing power or people who say that it takes a tremendous amount of energy to mine Bitcoin and run the Bitcoin network? What do you say to those people as detractors of Bitcoin?

Michael Saylor: (48:03)
Okay, well, first of all, I think just more people have access to a mobile phone than have access to running water on this planet. You can actually buy and sell and utilize Bitcoin from a mobile phone that costs 50 bucks. It's the most egalitarian thing in the world. People in Africa can't go and invest in hedge funds on Wall Street, but what they can do is they can get their hands on Bitcoin. Bitcoin trades 24/7/365 in every currency at every language on Earth. There's never been an asset in the history of the world that's harder working. Apple stock works 35 hours a week. Bitcoin works 168 hours a week. So, it truly is a global asset, an egalitarian asset running on mobile networks that reach everybody.

Michael Saylor: (48:56)
With regard to the energy issue, it consumes 1/10th of the energy that gold miners consume. It consumes like 1/1,000th of the energy that the financial establishment consumes. The only energy that gets used in Bitcoin mining is the marginal energy at the edge of the network that otherwise would have been thrown away. People that are flaring natural gas, people that have shot in fossil fuels, people that have hydraulic or hydroelectric power that otherwise would go to waste.

Michael Saylor: (49:29)
So, I think that the energy argument is silly fraud, because at the end of the day, Bitcoin is something like a million times more efficient from an energy point of view than moving your money around in gold or by trying to store it in Fort Knox. If you look at all the inefficiencies of all of the other traditional financial approaches, none of them are so efficient as to what Bitcoin does.

John Darsie: (50:02)
So, let's close. I want to talk about something completely different, which is Saylor Academy. You basically put all of your philanthropic efforts towards the cause of education. You believe that there's unequal access to education in the country, in the world. You've put a lot of money towards building a free educational platform, Saylor Academy. Could you talk about why you think access to education is so important and why you've put so much effort towards building Saylor Academy?

Michael Saylor: (50:30)
Well, look, when I went to MIT, my entire family's life savings for 200 years were depleted in the first four weeks of class. That was before education started getting really expensive. It's actually gone up from there. But my recollection is getting a good education cost more money than a middle class family could come up with.

Michael Saylor: (50:52)
On the other hand, I sat in physics classes and I learned stuff that Isaac Newton wrote about Principia Mathematica in the 18th century. So, it occurs to me that in a world where most of the math and calculus and science is out there and has been around for quite a while, it's in the public domain. Why is it you have to impoverish yourself to learn? Why isn't it free? I mean, why can't we upload it via open source and give it away to the world? Because there's about 10 million people with PhDs in the world, but if you really want to solve the problems of the world, you need to get Master's Degrees and PhDs and you need to teach people how to cure cancer and how to create rocket propulsion. That's not going to happen without education getting to be orders of magnitude cheaper.

Michael Saylor: (51:41)
So, given the fact that algebra and geometry got invented 2,000 years ago, why is it that we spend so much money manually teaching people algebra and calculus? Because we could have one automated professor, upload them to Google or upload them to YouTube and let it run and educate a billion people for a nickel. Wouldn't it be great if we had a billion people on the planet that had a PhD? I mean, it'll cost about $1 million a person. So, we need to come up with a million times a billion in order to do it. It's not going to happen the conventional way.

Michael Saylor: (52:21)
So, my passion around Saylor Academy is you can give away science, technology, engineering, mathematics, education for free to the entire world if you want to, if you have a will to do it. So, we decided we're going to do that. I think we signed up 80,000 students last quarter. Boy, it's not easy to give away stuff for free. So, if you can tell everybody that wants a free college education just to go to saylor.org and they'll see it there, then please do.

Michael Saylor: (52:57)
There's not a lot of things that I'm sure of in life, but I feel like making education free for everybody forever is a good thing. John, I don't have any heirs. I don't have any children. When I die, all my money goes into a foundation. The foundation's mission is simple. It's like giveaway education to everybody forever, right? What? How about the education necessary to go to Mars or fly faster than light or cure cancer or make the world a better place?

Anthony Scaramucci: (53:29)
Darsie, Darsie, don't even try. You have no chance of being adopted by Saylor, okay? So, don't even try.

John Darsie: (53:33)
Yeah, that's where I was going with this.

Anthony Scaramucci: (53:35)
I know you were thinking that. Let him give the money away to these people that need it, okay? Don't be greedy.

John Darsie: (53:40)
You sound a lot like Sal Khan. We had Sal Khan, Khan Academy on an early SALT Talk. He's been to several of our conferences. He talks about the same thing where he could go out and he could make a lot of money from this platform that he's built, but it's much more important to him to provide greater access to the educational tools that he's helped build. You and him have a very noble cause. You're helping a lot of people. So, we're very grateful for that.

Michael Saylor: (54:07)
Thanks.

John Darsie: (54:07)
Do you have any words from Michael before we let him go? We went into SALT Talks over time here, because there was too much-

Anthony Scaramucci: (54:12)
No, listen, it's a fascinating conversation, Michael. I hope that we get a chance to see you in person soon. I appreciate you coming on. There's a lot of exciting things ahead for you and MicroStrategy, but also for the world as we continue to exponentially innovate and make things faster, more efficient, smaller. The dematerialization of the world, I think, is so fascinating. I got my entire library on my iPhone, Michael. Who would have thought that when we were growing up?

Michael Saylor: (54:40)
Yeah, it's a wonderful world we live in if we can harness technology to be a force of good. I think Bitcoin is harnessing technology to be a force of good. For the first time in the history of the world, we've got a monetary network that doesn't bleed power, right? That's incredibly empowering to the billions and billions of years that are looking for technology to make their life better. That's the wonder of the year 2020.

Anthony Scaramucci: (55:06)
Well, I'm looking forward to be a part of that future with you. I think we said this, but we've got a note established at SkyBridge to keep up that effort to keep the light shining. So, thank you again for everything. Hope we get a chance to see you soon, Michael. God bless.

Michael Saylor: (55:24)
Thanks for having me, Anthony. Thanks for having me, John.

Changpeng Zhao: Why Crypto Matters for Freedom | SALT Talks #107

“Our mission is really just to increase the freedom of money.”

Changpeng Zhao, known as CZ, is a serial entrepreneur with an impressive track record of successful startups. He launched Binance in July 2017 and within 180 days grew Binance into the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world. An expert in blockchain and trading systems, CZ has built Binance into the leading blockchain ecosystem, comprised of Binance Exchange, Labs, Launchpad, Info, Academy, Research, Trust Wallet and Charity Foundation.

Moving all around the world, living in different major cities prevented a lack of connection or reliance on any one government-backed currency. This set the stage for a life dedicated to cryptocurrency and Bitcoin, and ultimately led to the creation of Binance, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world. Bitcoin has taken on only greater importance as governments issue more currency. “We're witnessing probably the largest amount of quantitative easing by governments all around the world. And when governments do that, everybody becomes poor because there's more currencies being printed, and you're not given much of that directly. Bitcoin is limited supply, 21 million of them ever [get made]… You know that's mathematically guaranteed. No one can change it.”

Binance aims to use its company to further build the foundation of crypto and grow its adoption. The goal is to use cryptocurrency to deliver freedom of money in the same way we view freedom of speech.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Changpeng Zhao.jpeg

Changpeng Zhao “CZ”

Founder & Chief Executive Officer

Binance

MODERATOR

anthony_scaramucci.jpeg

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

Rachel Pether: (00:07)
Hi everyone, and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is Rachel Pether and I'm a senior advisor to SkyBridge Capital based in Abu Dhabi, as well as being the emcee for SALT, a thought leadership forum and networking platform that encompasses business, technology and politics.

Rachel Pether: (00:24)
Now, as many of you know, SALT Talks is a series of digital interviews with some of the world's foremost investors, creators and thinkers. And just as we do at our global SALT conference series, we aim to provide our audience a window into the minds of subject matter experts.

Rachel Pether: (00:42)
Today's focus will be on digital assets. And I can't think of anyone better to speak to on this topic than CZ, the founder of Binance, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world. CZ is a serial entrepreneur who launched Binance in July, 2017 and within six months grew Binance into the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange.

Rachel Pether: (01:07)
CZ has a really great story. He's a Chinese-Canadian coder who spent his youth flipping burgers, before studying at McGill University in Montreal. He then spent time in Tokyo and New York, first building systems for matching trade orders, then developing software for Bloomberg's futures trading on Wall Street. In 2005 CZ quit his role as head at the Bloomberg Tradebook Futures Research and Development team, and moved to Shanghai to start his first company.

Rachel Pether: (01:36)
Hosting today's talk will be our very own Anthony Scaramucci, the founder and managing partner of SkyBridge capital, and also the chairman of SALT. And with that, I'll turn it over to you Anthony, for the interview.

Anthony Scaramucci: (01:49)
Rachel, thank you so much. CZ, thank you so much for joining us. We were talking just before we went live here about your background. I was hoping that you could share that with our delegation. Tell us where you grew up. Tell us what got you into cryptocurrency, and tell us a little bit about that story.

Changpeng Zhao: (02:09)
Sure. Yeah. Anthony, Rachel, thanks for having me here. It's a pleasure.

Changpeng Zhao: (02:14)
And yeah, so I grew up in China before I was 12. So I moved in between a few different cities in China. When I was 12, I moved to Canada with my parents. And in Canada, I studied in Vancouver for six years for high school, and then moved to Montreal for college. And before I graduated, I took an internship job in Tokyo for a software outsource company that's working for Tokyo Stock Exchange. So we're writing order matching software for the Tokyo Stock Exchange. So I got exposed to financial software at a relatively early stage. Yeah, before that, as Rachel mentioned, when I was 15, I was flipping burgers in McDonald's in Vancouver. So that was also a pretty interesting experience. I also worked at a gas station after that. The gas station paid a lot better because I was working the night shift.

Changpeng Zhao: (03:06)
But anyway, so after graduation, I worked in Tokyo, New York, Singapore, Shanghai, a bit of Hong Kong. So kind of back and forth between North America and Asia. So given the fact that I was living different places, so I never really got married to one currency, one country, et cetera.

Changpeng Zhao: (03:28)
So in 2013, when I was in Shanghai, I was playing poker with Bobby Lee, who's the ex CEO of BTCChina, at the time one of the earliest cryptocurrency exchanges. And he introduced me to Bitcoin. He says, "CZ, you should think about converting 10% of your net worth into Bitcoin. And there's a small chance it will go to zero, then you lose 10%. There's a higher chance it will go 10X, then you double." So given that, I seriously looked into Bitcoin. I read the white paper, met a bunch of people in the crypto industry. And then by end of 2013, I decided to leave my previous startup and to jump into cryptocurrency, and back then it was really called the Bitcoin industry, full time. So that's kind of how I got started into crypto.

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:20)
Fantastic. So I am embarrassingly getting old, okay. And I don't like admitting that to anybody, but I know I'm old when my 28 year old son tells me, "Dad, you got to start buying Bitcoin." And he's explaining it to me, and I feel like I'm explaining to my great grandfather how to use a typewriter. So I need help, okay. Let's start at the beginning. Tell me why I should own cryptocurrency, and which cryptocurrencies do you like? And where is the future of crypto?

Changpeng Zhao: (04:52)
Sure. I think there's a couple of different things. I think the first thing is really... Let's just talk about Bitcoin. I believe Bitcoin is just a better form of money. Our current money currency systems have a lot of flaws. Right now we're witnessing probably the largest amount of quantitative easing by governments all around the world. And when governments do that, everybody becomes poor because there's more currencies being printed, and you're not given much of that directly. The majority, the bulk of it is going to be given to like Wall Street banks, and to bail out other companies, et cetera. And we don't know where it goes. But we do know that whatever bank account numbers you have, or whatever salary you're getting is getting diluted. Even though the numbers don't change, but the purchasing power would decrease. So that's one aspect of it. Bitcoin is limited supply, 21 million of them ever. And you can't cheat that. You know that's mathematically guaranteed. No one can change it.

Anthony Scaramucci: (05:52)
Okay. So I want to stop you there. So I just want to emphasize that for everybody that knows as much about cryptocurrency as I do. There's no disruption in the supply table of Bitcoin, is that correct?

Changpeng Zhao: (06:07)
Yes. Absolutely.

Anthony Scaramucci: (06:08)
There's a finite amount. Now how do we know that? How do we know that Mr. Satoshi or Mrs. Satoshi, can't figure out a way to create more Bitcoin once everybody's sucked into Bitcoin?

Changpeng Zhao: (06:21)
Sure. So Bitcoin is not centrally issued. It's issued by network computers, which follows the Bitcoin protocol. And if one computer does not follow it, it will be rejected from the network. So it's mathematically guaranteed that every four years, the new coins being issued decreases by half. And by 2040-ish, all 21 million of Bitcoins will be minted.

Changpeng Zhao: (06:46)
So right now I think around 18 to 19 million Bitcoins already minted. So the new supplies coming up is quite decreased. So this is guaranteed by software. And this is guaranteed by thousands, or probably tens of thousands of nodes running a Bitcoin mining software. So this is something that even the founder, the creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, or his wife, or his friends, they can't change it. So this is mathematically guaranteed. So this is the first time humans are able to guarantee this type of issuance of currencies using the blockchain technology, which is a core invention, of course, by Satoshi Nakamoto.

Anthony Scaramucci: (07:30)
Okay. Now I've got to ask you another big question. Everybody must ask you this. But no government is backing it. There's no army backing it. There's no balance sheet at the government. The US government, as an example, owns 28% of the land in the United States. So there's probably $60 to $100 trillion of assets under that land. So when we're sitting on a $30 trillion deficit, we probably have a good asset mix. What is the backing of Bitcoin, other than that computer code?

Changpeng Zhao: (08:00)
Sure. So Bitcoin is backed by utility. So the more people who use it, the more value it will have. So you could say, for example, Facebook is not backed by anything per se, just have a large number of users who use it. And if something's used by a large number of users, then you have value. So Bitcoin has utility. It has many use cases where the current currency system does not work well. So the quantitative easing is one aspect of it.

Changpeng Zhao: (08:31)
If you think about transferring value from one country to another, let's say from US to China or vice versa, there's usually a lot of difficulties in doing that. So Bitcoin is a way for people to potentially transfer a wealth or value across the globe from anywhere to anywhere on their own, following the protocol. So it has a lot of other use cases where today's currencies are not able to do. So, given the high amount of utility, it has value. So the value is generated that way.

Anthony Scaramucci: (09:09)
Okay, but the federal government of the United States, the treasury department and the federal reserve, what is to stop them from digitizing a currency and making it a massive competitor of something like Bitcoin and bigfooting it. Or China's digitizing the renminbi. Tell us why we should still like Bitcoin.

Changpeng Zhao: (09:28)
Sure. So any government, or the feds or any authority can issue a digital currency, even using the blockchain technology. But there's a few other properties that are quite important here. You can use the blockchain technology to issue a currency that's still on limited supply, so is the supply of the currency limited, guaranteed by the protocol? Most central bank issued currencies will have unlimited supply. So we have the old problem of more and more quantitative easing and more and more of those currency will be minted. And the previous holders of those currencies will get diluted in value. So if governments are willing to issue a fixed supply currency, that they will no longer dilute that with no future quantitative easing, then you will match up on that advantage of Bitcoin.

Changpeng Zhao: (10:24)
The second thing is would governments still block you from doing certain transfers? For example, if you want to send your cousin or your friend, I don't know, in the Philippines... Say, I don't know, you want to buy a house in the Philippines. It costs, I don't know, a million dollars or something. Can you send that with ease very quickly without too many middlemen intervention, without a lot of approval processes? So how easy that currency is to use. With Bitcoin, there's no intermediary, no one is going to block you. It's guaranteed to work.

Changpeng Zhao: (11:00)
So basically fundamentally still comes down to is it limited supply? Does it have a high degree of freedom of transfer or usage? And is it cheap to do? Is it cheap to use? So for example, if you use banks to send a large amounts of money, the fees are probably going to be pretty high. So it still comes down to those basic properties.

Changpeng Zhao: (11:19)
So governments can issue a digital currency, but if the governments can issue a currency that's limited supply, cheaper to transfer and not so many restrictions on that, then I think you will be able to compete with Bitcoin. But if that's not the case, then Bitcoin, people will evaluate the advantages and disadvantages. So we have to see.

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:42)
Facebook was trying to put out something called Libra, a digital currency. And for some reason they didn't do it. What happened there? The government got in their face, or something, and threatened them? What happened there.

Changpeng Zhao: (11:54)
I think what you described is probably the most common way to describe it. But I think it's still happening. It hasn't happened yet, but it's also not... As far as I understand they didn't cancel the project. It just takes time to roll out a new digital currency. So that's my understanding of it. I don't really know a lot of details, but that's my understanding.

Anthony Scaramucci: (12:18)
Okay. Let me ask you, I mean, obviously I'm very fascinated by this. I hope you don't mind. These are probably basic questions for you, but I think it's important for-

Changpeng Zhao: (12:27)
No worries.

Anthony Scaramucci: (12:27)
... We have so many people that are going to listen to this that don't know a lot about this. So Bitcoin is the Google of digital currency? Or is it the Yahoo of digital currency? Is there going to be another currency that comes up over the top of Bitcoin?

Changpeng Zhao: (12:48)
So, I think today Bitcoin is definitely the most dominant by far cryptocurrency that's available. And it's also the most decentralized. So in the industry, we say Bitcoin is king.

Changpeng Zhao: (13:02)
But to your point, though, anyone can issue any digital currency and there's many innovative people in the industry that's creating new digital currencies. I believe Bitcoin will be leading the way for a very, very long time to come, for the foreseeable future. But in the longer future the possibility of something overtakes Bitcoin, something better that comes along is totally possible. So anything is possible. But I think whatever is going to overtake Bitcoin will have to be better. So in the longer future, I think that's definitely possible.

Anthony Scaramucci: (13:39)
But would that still mean that Bitcoin would still be used? Or that would cause Bitcoin to start devaluing?

Changpeng Zhao: (13:47)
So we don't know. Both scenarios are possible. So for example, if there's Bitcoin 2.0 that's better than Bitcoin 1.0, people may slowly shift from 1.0 to 2.0. And then if there are two different coins, then when one coin would devalue over time, the other coin will increase in value in time. Or it could be something that's, I don't know, some other coin that's like... There's literally millions of other coins on the market. One of them might get really wide adoption and people will shift towards that.

Changpeng Zhao: (14:18)
So the thing with decentralized currencies is that there's a very large community of people around that already. So the shift, you would not go from like, I don't know, $1,500 to $15,000 to zero in one day. The shift will be somewhat gradual. But right now we are still at the very beginning of the Bitcoin journey, I believe. So we're still seeing rapid growth of Bitcoin.

Anthony Scaramucci: (14:42)
What do you think Bitcoin will be worth in US dollars in five years?

Changpeng Zhao: (14:48)
That's a really, really tough... So, I'm not able to make those kinds of predictions. And even if I try, I will be wrong.

Anthony Scaramucci: (14:56)
This is why-

Changpeng Zhao: (14:56)
But I'm very bullish on Bitcoin.

Anthony Scaramucci: (14:57)
... I'm making the big bucks though, CZ, right? I'm paid the big bucks to ask you this. So go ahead. What is it worth in a year? What about a year from now?

Changpeng Zhao: (15:05)
Well, I think right now it's... Right now, it's about $15,000 per Bitcoin. And that's like already five-X compared to like March where it was $3,000. So just in the last, I don't know, eight months it probably quadrupled, close to five-X. So, year time, it's very hard to guess. But when you say a specific time and then predict at that time what the price will be, it's really, really difficult. But over the long run, I'm very bullish on Bitcoin. I think it still has a lot of room to grow.

Changpeng Zhao: (15:42)
Just some small data point. The industry today probably has 50 to a hundred million users. That's probably less than 0.1% of the population. So still probably got a thousand-X to grow, just on that metric. And also a new technology, a new form of currency that's better than the Fiat currencies we have, will have a wider audience. It will have more use cases. It's like Uber has more use cases than taxis. So Uber's market cap is not limited by the taxi market cap. So Bitcoin, in that sense, I believe will be bigger than the currencies combined in the world today. So I'm very, very bullish on it.

Anthony Scaramucci: (16:18)
Okay. So you founded Binance three and a half years ago, June of 2017. And within six months it becomes the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world. And this is a title that you still hold today. So what is the mission of Binance? Tell us about your experience there, and what is your vision?

Changpeng Zhao: (16:37)
Sure. So Binance's mission has never been to run a largest centralized exchange. So that was, yes, one of our goals to try to achieve, but actually it surprised us that we achieved that so quickly. But our mission is really just to increase the freedom of money.

Changpeng Zhao: (16:53)
So today I think we have freedom of speech in certain countries to some extent. We have freedom of data or information, to some extent with the internet in most countries. And we have freedom of press, freedom from slavery. So anytime when our society, when humans are able to increase that freedom without sacrificing other things, our civilization advances. Today, our money is not that free.

Changpeng Zhao: (17:18)
So as I mentioned before, if you want to transfer a large amount of money from here to there, there's a lot of questions to ask and you have to pay a lot of taxes, et cetera. So there's a lot of intermediaries that want to intervene. So I think we can increase the freedom of money today without sacrificing security, safety, ease of use. And in fact, we can increase ease of use. So that's kind of our sort of a grand mission. So anything we can do in this space, we will try to do.

Changpeng Zhao: (17:50)
So with this mission, we kind of just went with a centralized exchange first and somehow users really like our products and the demand was high and it just grow. It just grown really quickly. So, but in the sort of longer term, we do want to build multiple other products that we think will help increase the freedom of money for people all around the world. And I personally think this is the best way that we can help society and help other people

Anthony Scaramucci: (18:23)
You're on to something. Peter Thiel, who I got to know in 2016, said something to me about crypto. He said, "Anthony, crypto is libertarian. Crypto is about freedom. AI, artificial intelligence is about centralization." And he said that governments will use AI to check up on their citizens, and to evaluate them, and to offer them social scores and so forth. But crypto is the diffusion of that sort of power. What do you say to that thought from Peter Thiel?

Changpeng Zhao: (18:57)
Well, I respect Peter Thiel quite a lot, and I would have to agree with that statement probably. I'm not an expert on AI. I don't really have a lot of view. But yes, with AI there's only a few players with lots of data that will win. So some of the bigger players in the internet space will already have those advantages.

Changpeng Zhao: (19:17)
Blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies is really the other... yes, is coming from the grassroot angle where it is much more decentralized and much better for the decentralization of power, decentralization of control. I personally think that that will give us much better future for us to move into. So yeah, I'm not an expert on AI to be very frank. But I would go with Peter Thiel on that one, for sure.

Anthony Scaramucci: (19:50)
You have a venture capital part of your ecosystem. What sort of investments are you looking to make?

Changpeng Zhao: (19:56)
So most of the investments we make are going to be in the crypto space. So 80% of them are going to be in the crypto space, probably today closer to anything that's infrastructure-related for crypto. So anything that helps exchanges, faster blockchains, better wallets, better security infrastructure. So sort of building the foundations of the crypto industry.

Changpeng Zhao: (20:18)
And 20% of them are just out there. We invest in all kinds of random projects as well, kind of moonshots, crazy stuff. Also sometimes even in traditional industries. For example, we even look at banks to see, hey, can we get a bank to work more closely with the crypto industry? Yeah, so we invest mostly in the crypto industry, but still a little bit outside as well.

Anthony Scaramucci: (20:43)
Do you have a feeling about the central banking system and its concern about something like this circumventing their ability to create monetary easing, and their ability to do quantitative easing? And do you think there'll be a backlash, a coordinated central government backlash?

Changpeng Zhao: (21:12)
I think the possibility is definitely there. I don't really know how central banks think, and I'm not really them. But I think the possibility is definitely there. But at the same time, I think cryptocurrency is already relatively widely adopted. Bitcoin, cryptocurrency, is a concept. You can't erase that concept from people's mind.

Changpeng Zhao: (21:36)
So today, if governments don't like the internet, they can try to shut it down together, but there will be internet 2.0, or the next version of it. So once a concept is out, now the collective human population... there's enough people in the human population who understands this now. So it can't be deleted or erased. So there's always going to be some... There may be some pressure, or conflicts, or race between the two.

Changpeng Zhao: (22:04)
But I think instead, I actually think the reverse. The best way for central banks or government to push to sort of slow down this adoption of Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies is to make the current Fiat currencies to do less quantitative easing and to make it cheaper to use, easier to use, less restrictions. So I think that's a better way to compete, rather than say, "Hey, look, if you're a bookstore, you just want to compete with Amazon by holding your fort." That's not going to work. It's much better to adopt the new technology innovations.

Anthony Scaramucci: (22:38)
Okay, I'm going to turn it over to Rachel. I know Rachel has some questions for you.

Rachel Pether: (22:42)
I have so many questions. And that was such a great chat. So thanks so much for that. And I think, CZ your mission to increase the freedom of money is really admirable. You mentioned you've obviously been in the crypto market for quite some time. You mentioned at the end of 2013, you invested 10% into digital currency. I guess back then it wasn't as highly traded as it is now. Did that volatility scare you? Or how did you feel when you made that first investment?

Changpeng Zhao: (23:14)
Yeah, so I do have a pretty interesting story there. So instead of just going in 10%, at the end of 2013, actually at the beginning of 2014, I sold my house, quit my job, put all the proceeds from the house into... well my apartment... so put all of that money into crypto, into Bitcoin. So I went all in. Instead of 10%, I went like basically a hundred percent. And I started looking for a new job as well in the crypto industry.

Changpeng Zhao: (23:42)
And so I found a job pretty quickly, luckily, but then the Bitcoin price, when I got in, it was around $600 US, within about three or four months or so it dropped to about $200 and stayed there for about two years. So I experienced that. So basically I lost two third of a house right away, unrealized loss. I still hold those Bitcoins today.

Changpeng Zhao: (24:05)
So yeah, well, that was my experience with Bitcoin, took a couple of years for it to recover. So yeah, it's definitely not easy and definitely not without thrill.

Rachel Pether: (24:16)
Not many people would have the capacity to stomach that kind of loss, especially given it was so much of your personal wealth at that time. Was it just this kind of belief in the, I guess, what Bitcoin stood for that kept you holding on? I mean, most people would have packed up their bags and left at that point.

Changpeng Zhao: (24:39)
Yeah. So, I mean, I understood Bitcoin pretty well at that point. I knew it's going to be the future. So I had a very strong belief and I was working in the industry already. So I'm fully immersed.

Changpeng Zhao: (24:55)
I also know my risk tolerance. Even though that's my hundred percent of my net worth at the time pretty much. But I had a job and that was paying relatively okay. So my living standard didn't decrease that much. It's just mentally, it is a very pressured moment. My relatives were all like... Oh, my mom wants to smack me on the head saying like, "You stupid kid." So, there's a lot of social pressure from that perspective. But I had the confidence that crypto will be the future. And once it dropped below 50%, to me, it was like, if I sell now, it's not even worth it. I might as well just hold onto it. And I don't have additional money to buy into, like to average down. So I just held onto it.

Changpeng Zhao: (25:45)
But luckily, about a year and a... almost two years, I think by the beginning of 2016, things really started coming back. So end of 2015, started to recover. So, for a year and a half, it was just really dropping. So I did have to go through that period. And so I do understand when people get stressed out on Twitter and being very impolite, et cetera. So I understand that very, very clearly now.

Rachel Pether: (26:12)
Yeah. And now I guess the beauty of hindsight, right? You must be very happy that you held onto those purchased Bitcoins at $600. You also mentioned in your discussion with Anthony, that the supply limit of 21 million was guaranteed almost by the software. But what would happen, I think you said 2040 is when they'll all be mined, is there a risk that computing power could substantially increase in that time and actually more can be mined? Or do you see this as a very firm ceiling for the supply?

Changpeng Zhao: (26:45)
Sure. It's a very, very firm ceiling. So it's not impacted by computing power. When the computing power increases, the difficulty also increases. So the supply is fixed, is mathematically fixed. It may take a little while to explain, but you can take my word for it. This is something that I'm more than willing to pledge for sure. There's only going to be 21 million Bitcoin, no more, no matter what happens. It does not get affected by computing power at all.

Changpeng Zhao: (27:15)
So the computing power has increased quite a lot. The difficulty for mining Bitcoin has also increased proportionately. The difficulty adjusts to the mining power. So it's automatically adjusted or relatively automatically adjusted by the network protocols. And that's the hard cap is very hard. There's never going to be more.

Rachel Pether: (27:34)
Okay. That's interesting. I also want to go back to another point that you were discussing with Anthony and you were talking about Bitcoin being a better form of money, and then also the role that governments can play. And China's obviously pioneering the creation of a central bank digital currency. And I guess this also kind of ties back to what you're saying about Peter Thiel and centralization versus decentralization. How do you think that the central bank digital currency would advance China's interest? And do you see this happening in the short term?

Changpeng Zhao: (28:08)
Yeah, I think in the short term, they definitely will be. I think we're already witnessing the central bank digital race between different countries, and China already have a version of it running. It's already out, they're piloting testing it. But the daily trading volume is 300 million US dollars equivalent, like a couple of days ago. So it's still pretty small for a country. That's a pilot test. But it's not super small from a scale perspective.

Changpeng Zhao: (28:37)
I do believe the first iterations of central bank digital currencies are all going to be relatively centralized. So they're going to be issued by a central party. They probably do have unlimited supply. They probably do have a lot of restrictions on how you can transfer, who you can transfer it to. If you transfer a large amount, there may be a source of wealth, source of funds. There may be like questions being asked. So all the traditional KYC, AML procedures may be applied to the first iterations of central bank digital currencies. I think that would be the most logical thing to expect.

Changpeng Zhao: (29:14)
So in that sense, even though most of them are going to be using blockchain encryption technologies that's very similar to Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, but the fundamental properties of those currencies are going to be very different. So I don't see any government coming out with Bitcoin 2.0 just yet. But I think over time, we'll see... Look, today, given the small penetration of cryptocurrencies, most people still may be more comfortable with a government issued currency, which they grew up using. So that may get some adoption. But over time, I personally really think that the true digital currencies, the true limited supply, decentralized, fewer restriction type of currencies will get the highest adoptions.

Rachel Pether: (30:09)
So if a central bank digital currency is centralized, wouldn't that give the governments more power over data and looking at flows of money? Wouldn't this almost do the opposite to what a true cryptocurrency should be trying to achieve, that decentralization aspect?

Changpeng Zhao: (30:29)
Yes. I agree with that. So with a digital currency, the government actually have much more control, especially like if they forced KYC on every address that you generate, they know exactly who you are, which transactions you have received. Everything's in one place. Whereas today going through different banks, trying to get the record, I mean the government have their ways to get it, but that build a lot of system to do that. But it's actually quite expensive and quite labor intensive to do. Whereas with a digital currency it's actually much easier to do. So that is actually a huge risk for that.

Changpeng Zhao: (31:07)
But at the same time, most people, depending on which country you're in, in a lot of countries, people are able to choose which currencies they wish to use. And so it depends on how much the [inaudible 00:31:23], how much less privacy you get. If those things become bigger problems, people are less likely to use it. So there's the balancing effect of that. So we'll have to see how that works.

Rachel Pether: (31:38)
No, that's really interesting. And I guess if you're looking at sort of countries and digital currency, and then you look at institutional investors, I guess you must have quite a lot of oversight as to trading activity with finance. To what extent are you seeing the institutional investors being involved in the cryptocurrency space? And how have you seen that evolve in the past few years that you've been with Binance?

Changpeng Zhao: (32:03)
Yeah. I think over the last three years at Binance, we've seen a lot of institutional participation now. So initially, in the early days it was more retail driven, but in the last couple of years, we've seen a lot of institutional investors come in. We have not seen a lot of the big names come in, like the top tier investment banks, like the, I don't know, Morgan Stanleys, et cetera. So we have not seen those guys come in. But we have seen a lot of other institutional traders in our space.

Changpeng Zhao: (32:33)
And the Binance users only represent a small portion of the sort of the crypto users, guys who actively trade and guys who want to use a centralized exchange. And there's a very large number of people who don't use centralized exchanges, and we don't really know what they do. But I do think the institutional participation is definitely there already.

Rachel Pether: (32:52)
Hmm. And if you were an institutional investor, how do you think you would view cryptocurrency? If you're looking in asset allocation, would you see it as a currency? Or would you see it as like a venture investment? How do you sort of see that fitting? I guess in your view, it seems to be a currency replacement.

Changpeng Zhao: (33:12)
Yeah. This is one of the difficult parts of classifying what Bitcoin is or what cryptocurrency is into either if it's an asset, if it's a currency, if it's a commodity. So I think my recommendation is we got to classify cryptocurrency into its own asset type, or asset category. It can act as a currency. It can act as a... Sometimes they have... Bitcoin product does not have this, but other cryptocurrencies may have properties that can be associated with securities. Others can be associated with commodities. So Bitcoin could be, or cryptocurrency could be any of those. But it's much better to classify them into a different thing, a brand new category.

Changpeng Zhao: (33:56)
But I think instead of what we call this category is less important than what properties does it have. It does hold value. It can be used as a medium of exchange. And it can be used as a investment asset type that appreciates or actually fluctuates in value. Sometimes it appreciates, sometimes it depreciates. So it does have a combination of those properties. So the smarter sort of investors, they understand this. They don't try to classify Ford into a type of horse. They just say, "Look, it's a transportation system. We can use it. And let's invest in it." So that's kind of what they're doing.

Rachel Pether: (34:39)
That's a great quote. I'm going to use that in future. Ford is not a type of horse.

Rachel Pether: (34:44)
Thank you so much for answering all these questions, and giving Anthony and I a real cryptocurrency 101 training session. Just one final question from my side, I know you mentioned you've lived in all these different places. You seem to be a complete workaholic. It's obviously a 24 hour business. What really motivates you to keep going, day in, day out, for 24 hours?

Changpeng Zhao: (35:08)
Yeah. So like, for me, I think it goes back to our mission. I mean, I could retire. I've reached financial freedom. I could relax on the beach and sip martinis all day, or I could go play golf or do whatever. But I think all of those things will be boring pretty quickly.

Changpeng Zhao: (35:25)
I think I'm actually very fortunate to be in a place where I can actually contribute to increasing the freedom of money for people all around the world. I don't know how much I can contribute to that, but I can contribute as much as I can. And that's the opportunity that's really, really hard to come by. So I really value that opportunity. And I think this is really the most meaningful thing I can do with my life. So I wake up, I'm working, I don't really call it a work, it's just part of life now. So yeah, I'm really lucky that I have this opportunity, and yeah, so I just do what I should do.

Rachel Pether: (36:00)
That's amazing. Well, if you ever do just want to give it all up and sip martinis and play golf, Anthony and I will be more than happy to join in.

Changpeng Zhao: (36:08)
Could do that once in a while.

Rachel Pether: (36:10)
From my [crosstalk 00:36:12]-

Anthony Scaramucci: (36:11)
I was just thinking, maybe the reason why I'm not as successful as you CZ, I was just thinking about how great those martinis taste and how nice that would be on the beach.

Anthony Scaramucci: (36:22)
But in all seriousness, thank you. Thank you so much for explaining your vision and giving people around the world confidence in crypto. And your proselytizing of this currency, I think is very valuable to our global society. So I just want to give you a very big thank you for all that.

Changpeng Zhao: (36:44)
Thank you, Anthony, and thank you, Rachel. Thanks so much for having me and thanks everybody for watching or listening to this show. Yeah. Thanks.

Raoul Pal of Real Vision Finance: ​Is Bitcoin a Hedge Against Inflation? | SALT Talks #102

“I always live in the future, so I'm always aiming for something. You don't know which path you could take, but it increases your probability of getting there.”

A former hedge fund manager who retired at 36, Raoul Pal is a co-founder of Real Vision, a financial media company offering in-depth video interviews and research publications from the world’s best investors.

Bitcoin appeals to three different types of people: Libertarians like its decentralized and anonymous nature; technologists see its potential as an engineering solution to the financial system; early adopter investors identify its value as an uninflatable store of value. Bitcoin serves as hedge against inflation caused by fiat currency. “What's clever is this money can't be devalued. You can't create more of it. There's only 21 million Bitcoins.”

Bitcoin basically amounts to a mathematical formula that guarantees there will never be more than 21 million Bitcoins. The decentralized structure, run on about 10,000 different nodes and recorded on the blockchain, ensures it can never be changed. Bitcoin is the only asset with a completely knowable supply.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKER

Raoul Pal.jpeg

Raoul Pal

Co-Founder

Real Vision

MODERATOR

anthony_scaramucci.jpeg

Anthony Scaramucci

Founder & Managing Partner

SkyBridge

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:07)
Hello, everyone, and welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the Managing Director of SALT, which is a global thought leadership forum at the intersection of finance, technology, and public policy. SALT Talks ... Excuse you, Anthony. SALT Talks are a digital interview series that we launched during this work from home period with leading investors, creators, and thinkers. What we're trying to do on these SALT Talks is replicate the experience that we provide at our global conferences, the SALT Conference, which we host annually in the United States and then an annual event internationally as well, most recently in Abu Dhabi in December of 2019. What we do at those conferences and what we do on these talks is try to provide a window into the mind of subject matter experts, as well as provide a platform for what we think are big ideas that are shaping the future.

John Darsie: (00:55)
Today's talk is going to focus on one of those big ideas largely and also, in the context of discussing that big idea, bitcoin and cryptocurrency, talk about some more of the interesting economic and worldviews of our guest today, who is Raoul Pal. He's a former hedge fund manager who retired at the age of 36, and Raoul's the co-founder of Real Vision, which is a financial media company offering in-depth video interviews and research publications from the world's best investors. He ran a successful global macro hedge fund, co-managed Goldman Sachs' Hedge Funds Sales Business and Equities and Equity Derivatives in Europe, and helped design the BBC TV program Million Dollar Traders, which trained participants in investment and risk management strategies.

John Darsie: (01:40)
Raoul retired from managing client money and now lives in the Cayman Islands. He's currently in Little Cayman, which I think he's figured things out. The rest of us need to follow suit with him. I don't know what we're thinking sitting here in New York as it gets cold. But from the Cayman Islands, he manages Real Vision and he writes his newsletter, the Global Macro Investor, which is a very highly regarded original research service for hedge funds, family offices, sovereign wealth funds, and other elite investors. Just a reminder for anyone on today's talk, if you have any questions for Raoul during today's talk, enter then in the Q&A box at the bottom of your video screen on Zoom. Hosting today's talk is Anthony Scaramucci, the founder and managing partner of SkyBridge Capital, a global alternative investment firm. Anthony's also the chairman of SALT. With that, I'll turn it over to Anthony for the interview.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:29)
Well, it's great to have you on, Raoul. I got to tell you, our careers did overlap for a little while, so I know [Noam 00:02:36], I know Jonathan Green, I know Pierre, all those guys.

Raoul Pal: (02:40)
All the old gang.

Anthony Scaramucci: (02:41)
I know the whole gang. In fact, I'll make you laugh before I get started. Noam taught me how to flip underwritings. I don't know if you remember that whole thing that was going on in the 1990s, but that was a big career move for me. It was quite profitable. We don't have to get into that right now. But I want to go to you for a second and your personal journey, which is extremely impressive. You're growing up where? What did your parents do? How did you end up getting into the business that you ended up in? How did you realize that this was going to be the career journey that you were taking?

Raoul Pal: (03:16)
I grew up in England, but my father was a first generation Indian immigrant. My mother was Dutch. They met on a blind date in Birmingham. So I grew up in England, just outside of London. I grew up in the '80s, and the '80s was all about Porsches, stripey shirts, red braces, champagne.

Anthony Scaramucci: (03:39)
Camden Palace. You said North London, Camden ... I was hanging out at Camden Palace. You and I probably overlapped.

Raoul Pal: (03:45)
And so-

Anthony Scaramucci: (03:46)
I was probably trying to cut your rug in stepping in front of those girls.

Raoul Pal: (03:50)
Exactly.

Anthony Scaramucci: (03:51)
You look like you're a little bit taller than me, so I could've kneed you properly. Okay, so you grew up in the '80s. Go ahead. We're talking Boy George, Camden Palace.

Raoul Pal: (03:59)
Yeah, Boy George and Wham!. I was a big Wham! boy at that point.

Anthony Scaramucci: (04:05)
Of course.

Raoul Pal: (04:10)
But what was at that time, I was at university and I went to a pretty crappy university, the only one that would accept me because I'd discovered girls and cars and pubs. So I got into university, and I was graduating and speaking to a friend of my father. My father was in marketing. He then ran a management consulting firm. But he was international marketing director of Xerox based out of Europe. He wanted me to go into marketing. I saw this flashy world of finance. I had written my dissertation about junk bonds, basically copying the Drexel Burnham Lambert booklet about it.

Raoul Pal: (04:41)
Somebody said to me, a friend of my father's said, "So what do you want to do," and I said, "Well, it's kind of marketing or finance." He said, "Let me give you a bit of advice. You can go and work for Mars in marketing, and they're amazing, and they'll give you free Mars Bars, or you can go work for a bank and get free money." I was like, "Okay, that's what I need to do." It took me a while to get there because I graduated in the recession of 1990. I went to a terrible university, got a decent degree in economics and law but from a bad university. So I hustled my way through and eventually got into a UK prestigious brokering firm called James Capel, part of HSBC.

Anthony Scaramucci: (05:19)
Sure, I remember.

Raoul Pal: (05:19)
I landed on the stock index derivatives desk, knew nothing about futures and options. My baptism by fire was my boss left off six months and I was head of the desk, and that was my career started.

Anthony Scaramucci: (05:30)
I got to ask you this question because I always have to ask myself this question, and so since you're cheaper than my therapist, maybe you can provide some insight here. You're not an establishment guy, I don't think, when I look at your life, your career, the Gas Monkey t-shirt. Yet you're going to Goldman Sachs and places like NatWest, and so what attracted you to them? By the way, I don't see myself as an establishment guy either, so this is why I'm asking. Then how do you go from there to where you are now?

Raoul Pal: (06:01)
Because [crosstalk 00:06:02]-

Anthony Scaramucci: (06:01)
Was that a transitory step and you always had in your mind you were going to do what you're doing? Tell us.

Raoul Pal: (06:07)
Yeah, I always live in the future, so I'm always aiming for something. I have a very clear plan because that's how you get there. You don't know which path you could take, but it increases your probability of getting there. What I identified quickly is that if you go to someone like Goldman Sachs, it's full of the same people wearing the same clothes, who went to the same universities with the same friends, who all worked in investment banks every summer, and that's all they know. So if you come in with character and somebody who's traveled the world or you have a passion for something different, then you stand out. Even my name, right?

Raoul Pal: (06:43)
So I would call up people like Paul Tudor Jones and just call him up, and you'd get to his assistant and you say, "Is Paul there?" They say, "Who's speaking?" You say, "Raoul," because you can't say Raoul Pal because it's a bloody mouthful, so you just say Raoul. She's going to say, "Hey, Paul, it's Raoul on the phone." He thinks he's your best friend already. So all of these little things means that to be an anti-establishment figure within the establishment increases your chance of success.

Anthony Scaramucci: (07:04)
So you make this big, bold move. You discover something called bitcoin. When do you discover bitcoin, and when do you realize that bitcoin is something that you need to make a big part of your life?

Raoul Pal: (07:20)
Yeah, fascinating. I was in Europe in 2012 and 2009. I was living in Spain. In 2012, we almost lost our banking system. We had riots in the streets.

Anthony Scaramucci: (07:30)
Yes, I remember.

Raoul Pal: (07:30)
The whole thing was a mess. I was writing about it for Global Macro Investor. I kind of knew it was going on. We had a round table in Spain with a bunch of Global Macro Investor clients, and one of my clients came along and presented his trade idea, which was bitcoin. It was that moment I was going around with some people that you will know trying to set up the world's safest bank, realizing we had a problem in the financial system and it hadn't been solved. The moment I saw bitcoin by another ex-Goldman guy who ran a hedge fund, I realized that this might be the answer to a lot of the fragilities in the banking system and the store of value and that kind of thing. I was very early into it. I think by 2012, I'd written the first Macro article about how to value bitcoin and basically just brought a load of people with me on that journey of discover because like everybody who comes into the space, you think it understand it, then you realize you know nothing, and then eventually on the other side, you have an understanding of how big this really is.

Anthony Scaramucci: (08:33)
So let's talk about how big it really is. Let's say that I'm a bitcoin skeptic. I'm not, by the way. I see its destiny. Peter Thiel said something to me that I'll share with you. I'd love to get your reaction to it. He said, "While bitcoin is libertarian, bitcoin is freedom and decentralization, AI could be used to track to social norms and to start grading people's lifestyles, and that's more authoritarianism and more centralization of government. But bitcoin is the full expression of political and financial freedom." So, one, I would like to get your reaction to that statement, and then, number two, I'd like you to address bitcoin skeptics, if you don't mind. What don't they see about bitcoin that you do?

Raoul Pal: (09:26)
So there are three kinds of ... Going back to Peter Thiel, there's three kinds of people that make up the bitcoin crowd. Libertarians, because of its decentralized nature and its pseudo-anonymity. It's not totally anonymous, so it's not this drug currency, but what it gives you is some freedom to move around the world because it's owned by nobody, there's no CEO to throw into prison. There's nothing you can do about it. It just exists. The other side were the technologists. They looked at this and, using engineering minds, saw what had happened in 2008 and said, "Maybe we can engineer something to create a better financial system," and they loved the maths behind it. Then there's a bunch of people like me and the early adopters like Dan Morehead, John Burbank, all of these guys from the hedge fund world, who realized that it was the answer to a lot of the problems we had. I think Peter Thiel's right, but that's only part of the story.

Raoul Pal: (10:28)
Why it's so big is because we live in a digital world. Whether we like it or not, everything we do now is pretty much digital. You and I are now talking digitally. This was something that didn't exist five years ago, but we're doing it now. The Internet has never had an ability to have a money layer embedded into it that works in the same function. We have to go via our bank and use a credit card and all of this stuff. Bitcoin gets rid of all of that, as does the whole cryptocurrency revolution. It allows the instant transfer of money. But what's also clever about it is this money can't be devalued. You can't create more of it. There's only 21 million bitcoins.

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:08)
Okay, let me stop you right there, Raoul. Why? Because a lot of people are fearful of that, they don't understand it.

Raoul Pal: (11:14)
Sure.

Anthony Scaramucci: (11:14)
I know the explanation, but you want you to explain in your language why can't Mr. Satoshi or Mrs. Satoshi just say, "I got you all hooked into this thing, here's another 21 million coins?"

Raoul Pal: (11:26)
Yes. So the premise of bitcoin is basically a mathematical formula, a cryptographic formula that is sold by computers. It takes a lot of computing power, and so cleverly, that formula gets more difficult over time. Every time you solve it, you get rewarded, so it's like behavioral economics. You get rewarded a mining token, a bitcoin. The number of those bitcoins are restricted by the formula, which can never be changed. Why can it never be changed? Because it's not centralized, so it can't be Anthony saying, "Well, we're going to change the number today." It's actually run on about 10,000 different nodes and all of these miners, and it's all recorded on this thing called a blockchain. So nobody can change anything. It's set in stone. It's impossible to change the number of coins or the algorithm, and that's what makes it interesting.

Raoul Pal: (12:20)
Unlike gold, for example, where you can get what we've just seen in Russia, this huge find, so suddenly there's a new supply of gold. That's what blew up Spain when they discovered the Americas. They brought all the gold back, they thought they were rich, but they devalued everything because there was an excess supply of gold. You can't do it with bitcoin. It's the only asset where it's completely knowable. We live in a world, you and I, of supply and demand. That's what we understand. Well, there is no change in supply. You've got a fixed supply commodity. It never changes, which is the same with art, and a lot of people watching this will understand, there is only one Monet Lilies or whatever it is, and so that's why they trade at huge premiums. So bitcoin is this. It's like having a Monet that's fractional, so it goes down to eight decimal places, and instantly transferrable and storable. That starts to sound like very interesting money.

Anthony Scaramucci: (13:20)
Okay, so you're a big bull. I listen to your podcast, and so you see this going to a million dollars a coin. Is that fair of me to say that? I don't want to-

Raoul Pal: (13:32)
Yes. No, I mean-

Anthony Scaramucci: (13:34)
... [crosstalk 00:13:34] exaggerate, so-

Raoul Pal: (13:35)
Yes, so, again, let's look at it in the terms of institutional investors. It's currently a 200 billion dollar market cap. It's basically a mid-sized S&P company at this stage. So it's meaningless, really. But if you look at the distribution of price returns and how skewed it's been to the upside, the ability for this to go up 50X is normal. Every time we have the big bull cycles, which are driven by a reduction in supply that's mathematically derived in advance, what we find is bitcoin goes up a lot because the demand remains steady or it goes up and supply falls. So to get to a million dollars, that's pretty straightforward, and you're at about a trillion dollar market cap then or, sorry, 10 trillion dollar market cap. 10 trillion dollar market cap in terms of an asset, that's a reasonable size. It's not huge. Gold alone is an 11 trillion dollar market cap.

Raoul Pal: (14:35)
So if it's a real asset, it's still in price discovery mode. We haven't actually got to what's its real market cap. That's what gives it this ridiculous skewed upside. In addition to it, it also operates on a Metcalfe's Law. Because it's a distributed platform, essentially, the more participants that become in it, the more its worth. It looks like technology and money combined. These kind of things, we've never seen before. We've never dealt with an asset like this, which is why it's been the best performing asset of all time, the best performing asset in 10 years and five years.

Anthony Scaramucci: (15:12)
Well, you had a spill. I think you traded at 20,000 and 3000 in a five-year period of time, and now it's back to 15, I guess, or-

Raoul Pal: (15:22)
Yeah.

Anthony Scaramucci: (15:23)
... [crosstalk 00:15:23]. So what do you think caused that spell?

Raoul Pal: (15:27)
Well, the spill, again, its actually very cyclical. Like all commodities, we understand that commodities tend to be cyclical. So what happens is it's driven by the mathematical formula called the halving, where they halve the mining supply to make it more difficult. As you start getting closer to the 21 million coins, they make it more and more difficult over time for these computers to talk.

Anthony Scaramucci: (15:49)
Where are we right now in terms of mining, the number of coins that have been mined?

Raoul Pal: (15:52)
I'm not sure exactly where we are, but I think we've mined about 19 million. There's very little left, so it becomes incredibly hard to mine the rest. So you need more technology to do it. As we do that, you get this period where you get speculative boom because demand starts bringing more people in. Then, after a while, the demand ... The people turn to sellers, and it's just a cyclical phenomena, and it usually crashes significantly, 90%. You have to have-

Anthony Scaramucci: (16:27)
You think you're going to see another crash, 15 to 3000?

Raoul Pal: (16:30)
No, I don't. I think how the price will evolve this time, we're in the next wave up. The halving happened in May. The chances are we probably hit something like 100 to 200,000 on this wave, which will be probably by the end of 2021, 2022. Then we'll correct somewhat, but there's a difference coming now. Don't forget, this was driven by retail. This is the only asset that's been driven by retail from the ground up, by its very distributed nature. But the next time around, the institutions are going to be in, the investment banks, the asset managers, the RIAs, the hedge funds, and that's going to give much more price stability, so the volatility of bitcoin itself is going to collapse. So we won't get a 90% drawdown. Maybe we'll get a 50%. Well, that's normal in terms of most asset prices when they have a cyclical bear market.

Anthony Scaramucci: (17:20)
So let's talk about something that's conjoined in my mind to bitcoin and perhaps it is in your mind, is massive deficit spending by governments, and concomitant to that massive deficit spending is monetary easing and the expansion of monetary supply and all of that other stuff. So let's overlay that going on at the same time that you have this bitcoin development, and tell me your thoughts on those two subjects.

Raoul Pal: (17:51)
Well, to put it in the simplest form, the central banks are undertaking quantitative easing at an extreme level, as we all know. I'm not telling anybody anything new. Bitcoin is programmed to quantitatively tighten. So you've got two divergent paths. If you want to look at ... We're all used to using gold as an offset to central bank printing and maybe equities as well. So how are they done against the central bank balance sheet? I've looked at this. I took the four largest central bank balance sheets, the ECB, the Fed, the PBOC, and the BOJ. You put those four together and create an index and then divide assets by them. Gold did a pretty good job, but it's basically underperformed by 50%, so the amount of money in supply has outperformed what gold should've done. The equity market has done a bit better but not perfectly. But bitcoin, well, it's massively outperforming central bank balance sheets as well.

Raoul Pal: (18:59)
The reason behind that, it's a store of value but it's also a call option on a future financial system. That's the important function that bitcoin has. It has two roles. If it was just a store of value, it'd look more like gold. But it doesn't because every week they can build on top of it and it's creating a whole ecosystem around it, including the central banks with their central bank digital currencies. So, yes, the point being is the only answer for this massive debt bubble that we've got is more printing, and the only outcome is bitcoin goes higher. It will significantly outperform gold because of the fact that, a., it hasn't achieved its full market cap by it's still in price discovery mode and it's also a very disruptive technology. Gold can't create a payment platform or a store of value or a trusted source of storing things on the blockchain. It can't do any of these, but bitcoin can.

Anthony Scaramucci: (19:50)
Okay, it's fascinating. So we are now in a situation where you had bitcoin, you have this phenomena taking place. Literally, we keep dipping into quantitative easing. I have my own thoughts about it. I mean, I think Haynes is right in so many ways, but when you do all this deficit spending, you weaken the middle class and you weaken the lower class. That's the reason why you're having this systemic rise in populism, because my dad was a crane operator, Raoul. He had an hourly wage, and if you have inflation, guess what happens to that hourly wage? Your real purchasing power goes down.

Anthony Scaramucci: (20:25)
If you have this type of inflation, it's asset inflation. So if I'm a wealthy person, I have a big building, and the dollar amount of the building goes up, I still have that asset. But if you're working a wage, the money in your bank account is going like this, and that is pain in our system. It's causing your old country to Brexit. It's causing this upheaval in my country. So my question to you, which I don't necessarily have the answer to, what happens to equity markets in an environment like this?

Raoul Pal: (21:01)
Well, actually, just before we get into that, really interesting because I'm actually writing a whole article about this with Global Macro Investor breaking the entire medium income down, comparing it to asset pricing, and looking at what happened. Basically, between Bretton Woods, the Baby Boomers entering the labor force all at the same time, so competing for jobs, plus the WTO, plus China entering WTO, and then quantitative easing have basically destroyed wages. They've all deflated except anybody who earned over $200,000 a year. Everybody else has seen wage deflation. So it's a killer, and so you're dead right.

Raoul Pal: (21:40)
Equities in this, the problem is, a., these people don't have much money, so if we're trying to look at the little guy, they don't have savings to invest in equities, and with equities at all-time high valuations, what is the upside? Well, maybe it offsets quantitative easing, but maybe it doesn't. Maybe the economic cycle catches up with equities. So the future expected returns that most people look at for equities, whether it's Grantham, Mayo, or any of these guys, are kind of negative for the next 10 years. That's why crypto has become so powerful amongst retail investors because they see for once they were ahead of the institutions and they have a real chance of actually offsetting some of the losses elsewhere. It has a passionate amount of supporters because of this. They realize it's a chance for them, and that's great.

Anthony Scaramucci: (22:34)
I like it. I think it's very interesting. So it's also tied into my next question, then. John Darsie, who's a ... I don't know if he's a Millennial, a Quintennial, I don't know what the hell he's doing, but he thinks he's a lot better than us because he's in a different generation, Raoul, so we'll get to him in a moment. But he's got a ton of questions because all these guys know more about bitcoin than me, so they like giving it to me, as you ... But before I get to him, the 60/40 portfolio, is that dead?

Raoul Pal: (23:09)
Look, bonds just act like cash. I'm still bullish bonds, and I think they actually had a negative interest rate. I think the US will follow the rest of the world because of the structural issues going on, whether it's demographics, deflation, debt, a number of things. But regardless of that, the real juice in that trade is gone. So, therefore, what offsets volatility? Now, it works like cash, so it does help somewhat, but it doesn't add to the balance sheet when things go wrong. So it is somewhat dead, and people are looking for answers. Gold is one of them, and I think a lot of people are starting to think, "Okay, should I increase my allocation to gold to give me some of that cushion within my portfolio," and others have looked at bitcoin.

Raoul Pal: (23:51)
Adding a 1% allocation to bitcoin makes a dramatically different reward profile for almost any portfolio because it's so uncorrelated. And uncorrelated returns, as you know, not easy in this world. That's why equity longshore hedge funds have had such a tough time. Even macro guys have had such a tough time. Everything's correlated. But this whole world, not only of bitcoin but tokens and other cryptocurrencies, genuinely less correlated, and that means it's higher alpha. That's really interesting. That's why it's attracting so many of the really smart guys from our industry who move across to the crypto industry, because alpha exists.

Anthony Scaramucci: (24:30)
All right, Mr. Darsie, I know you're dying to ask questions, and-

John Darsie: (24:35)
You actually did a decent job today, Anthony.

Anthony Scaramucci: (24:37)
Raoul, I got to just tell you something. Raoul. Raoul, I got to just tell you something. I am so happy that you have a full head of hair because usually we get these bald old guys on this show, and Darsie really tries to go all Rico Suave on them, you know what I'm saying? So just to let you know that. Okay, but go ahead, Darsie, go ahead.

John Darsie: (24:51)
Well, I appreciate it, Anthony. Further to Anthony's question about the 60/40 portfolio, which I think we can all agree is outdated at the very least, I know you're not here to give constructing portfolios. How should they think about building a modern portfolio? Let's say the average investor with about a million dollar in savings, do you think they should be overweight bitcoin in a significant way, or do you think it fits in as just a small part of an asset [crosstalk 00:25:17]-

Raoul Pal: (25:17)
Well, it depends on the age group. If it's you, John, then-

John Darsie: (25:20)
Yeah. How about me?

Raoul Pal: (25:21)
Well, listen, and I've talked a lot about this, and this is really serious, your opportunity to put your money in your 401(k) and buy equities at all-time record valuations is not a good bet. For you to buy property for price gains is not a good bet. Versus your income and versus what's happening to prices, it's very expensive. Now, if you want to buy a house, which I recommend to live in, because lifestyle is the ultimate token that we work for, but outside of that, if we're just talking about investment, your house is not an investment. Property's too expensive. Credit yield, all-time low, yields, all-time low. Okay, what the hell do you do to generate wealth? Sure, you earn income, but how can you compound your income?

Raoul Pal: (26:08)
I can only find crypto. I think VC investing as well, but most young people can't do it. So building a business is one of the most important things I think people should do if they can do it because you can take risk when you're young and hence why you can take bitcoin as a risk when you're young. If you think of the opportunities that the Baby Boomers got given in 1980, 1982 when the bulk of them joined the labor force and started peak earnings, they started hitting their 30s, they got equities at a P of 6, bond deals at 18%, and property had been destroyed after the inflation of the '70s, and there was no debt. They had four aces given to them.

Raoul Pal: (26:53)
You've got all four aces, but they're in the crypto space. That's where you've got 50X [inaudible 00:26:59], bigger than the Baby Boomers ever had because you're getting the nexus of not only an underpriced asset class, but you're also getting the future of technology combined with it. Those things never happen. It's like investing in VC at the same time as buying Russian equities in 1990 when everybody hated them. The magnitude of this is enormous. So that's why I think you should be aggressive as you could be, because maybe I'm wrong, maybe Raoul's a total idiot, and you lose 50% of your savings. It doesn't matter because you've got an income and you've got a future ahead of you. But if you're 70 years old, well, I wouldn't do it.

John Darsie: (27:40)
Like Anthony.

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:43)
Hey, let me tell you something, Raoul. I'm actually 105 years old, and I think I look fantastic, okay, so-

Raoul Pal: (27:49)
I think you don't look a day over 100.

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:51)
I'm taking that as a compliment, okay? Keep going, Darsie.

John Darsie: (27:56)
Yeah, well-

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:56)
Keep going.

John Darsie: (27:56)
Absolutely. And I want to talk to about-

Anthony Scaramucci: (27:58)
And, Raoul, just so you know, we pay his bonus in dollars, okay, and they're cheapening every second of this podcast, so keep going, Darsie, go ahead.

John Darsie: (28:06)
I might start demanding my bonus in bitcoin at this rate.

Raoul Pal: (28:09)
You should, though.

John Darsie: (28:11)
But I want to talk about-

Anthony Scaramucci: (28:11)
Me, too. Me, too.

John Darsie: (28:11)
... bitcoin as a currency. So you talk a lot about fiat currencies and the inherent risks of fiat currencies and how they really historically have a short shelf life. Could you talk a little bit about historically how long fiat currencies generally last and what the future of the US dollar is in your mind?

Raoul Pal: (28:28)
I can't remember the exact numbers, but, essentially, most fiat currency regimes don't last 100 years, many 50, many less. If you look at Brazil, in my lifetime, about three or four of them. What happens is banks and governments are incentivized to destroy their own currency to pay their own debts. Right? That's what quantitative easing is. So they're always incentivized to do it. This perverse incentive means that they always go away. Everybody ends up with too much debt, tries to print their way out of it, and then the currency, eventually people lose faith in it. That's why gold has been around so long, because you can't do that with it. Bitcoin, as I've talked about to Anthony before, you can't do that. So it stops anybody screwing around with it.

Anthony Scaramucci: (29:16)
I got to interrupt for one second. Is there another currency that could hop over bitcoin? Is the bitcoin the Yahoo and there's another currency that could be the Google?

Raoul Pal: (29:23)
Yeah, so looking at the network adoption effects, it's highly unlikely. It is a theorem. Could it become bigger in market cap as people build out a whole financial system, define stuff? Potentially. But as pristine collateral, which bitcoin is, as the reserve asset, I don't think it's going to be displaced. But there are other massive opportunities in this space regardless.

John Darsie: (29:47)
So I want to talk about that a little bit. We had a very interesting guy, Marty Chavez, who you may know, who spent-

Raoul Pal: (29:53)
I know Marty from Goldman.

John Darsie: (29:54)
... many years at Goldman. He was the chief information officer when he left. He's on the board of a few crypto organizations. He offered such a balanced view of the space that I thought it was very fascinating. He talked about the idea of central bank digital currencies and digital currencies that are backed by governments. I thought it was interesting, the way he framed it, talking about, let's say, a stimulus package that the US government wants to pass out to its citizens. Today, they're having to wire money into bank accounts via the IRS, they're mailing checks, there's a lot of waste inherent in that. One, do you think we'll see central bank digital currencies? What do you think the potential is for that? How will they work, and what impact, also, do you think that would have on bitcoin if you had government-backed digital currencies?

Raoul Pal: (30:41)
I've been following this for a long time. The Bank of England, the BIS, the IMF, the ECB, the Fed, the PBOC, the BOJ, Australia, Singapore have all written white papers on it. It's happening, and it's coming, and I think China's just launching as we speak. I think Sweden's got a pilot scheme going. I think Singapore's about to launch. Bermuda's just launched. Look, this is happening, fact. The question is, is how it happens. What does it mean? Well, it's really interesting. Firstly, the IMF two weeks ago had this big debate, Jay Powell was there, everybody's there. They're talking about the new Bretton Woods. So what are you saying?

Raoul Pal: (31:29)
What they're actually saying is that they understand we're in unprecedented times and everybody needs to fiscally stimulate and nobody's got the money to do it. Their proposal, hidden beneath their wording, is, "Okay, let's move to central bank digital currencies, make an agreement amongst all nations, and allow us, let's say, all to print another 50% because then there's no one currency versus another." The idea is you're devaluing everything at the same time, but it doesn't show. Okay, so that's what they're thinking of.

Raoul Pal: (32:02)
But then the bigger revolution, and many of these guys ... Benoir Coeure from the ECB who's now the BIS spends a lot talking about this. Some central banks will just have a digital currency that'll be a means a payment. So I can just flip you a dollar, straightforward, nothing else attached. But the incentive schemes for the government, much like printing money, the actual incentive scheme is to create programmable money. So programmable money gets around the problem of monetary policy, which has now stopped. We've got monetary printing or interest rates negative. That's all we've got left, and neither of them are really working. So monetary and fiscal policy, if you listen to Jay Powell and the ECB, they're screaming every day, "We need fiscal, we need fiscal."

Raoul Pal: (32:52)
Well, this way, it puts fiscal in the hands of the central bank or the central bank in the hands of the government because they can give you a different stimulus to me. They can say, "Raoul, you're an older saver. We're going to penalize you with negative interest rates. But we want to help John out, and we're going to give him a cash payment so he can pay his student loan," both at the same time. So we can use behavioral economics to run economies, which is game-changing. Now, if you understand how behavioral economics has changed the Internet, we all use Google or Facebook or whatever or even Twitter, it's all behavioral economics. So it's all about incentive systems. You can define incentive systems to different people. We're going to see a completely wholesale change in how we run monetary policy, fiscal policy, and the relationship between central banks and governments.

Raoul Pal: (33:45)
All of that fits in with bitcoin because bitcoin is ... As Anthony said at the beginning, it's this libertarian thing. It's the life raft. If you don't agree with your government, you've got somewhere to go, much like people use gold for now. If you're in Brazil and they're printing too much money or they're going to lose control because of the budget deficit, oh, well, I'll buy some gold. But bitcoin links in so perfectly with digital currencies because it's all instantaneous. So in the digital world, they're called on-ramps and off-ramps. This is incredibly constructive. All of the white papers acknowledge bitcoin, how this whole fintech revolution, cryptocurrency revolution, DeFi revolution is all part of where they have to go. So there's no chance of them banning it. They actually want to integrate with it.

John Darsie: (34:35)
Well, that's a good segue to my next question about the risks associated with bitcoin. You talked about, and we talked about before the call went live, about how asymmetric this opportunity set is for people buying bitcoin today. Could it maybe go to zero in certain scenarios? Yes, but it doesn't seem likely. What are the risks or the elements of security that people were concerned about after the Mt. Gox hack and things of that nature? Are those still risks of buying bitcoin, and what do you see as the biggest risk to cryptocurrencies?

Raoul Pal: (35:07)
So if you understand that bitcoin is the network effect in money form, it's extraordinary. But that's what it is. It's Metcalfe's Law in money. So what is that built on? It's built on one thing only, which bitcoin excels at better than any other instrument ever invented. That's trust. Because of its distributed nature, I don't need to take your word from it and we don't need a notary because we've got 10,000 nodes all confirming it. What we know is that anything that's on the blockchain is now 100% trusted.

Raoul Pal: (35:43)
So the trust element takes away the risk of something that is a network effect because, usually, it's because either it doesn't give you a benefit, i.e., the price doesn't go up, or if it's Facebook, you don't find your friends on it, whatever it may be doesn't work. But once you get to a certain point where people trust it, it's very difficult to get rid of it. That's why even after it had these big cycles, because it was still a relatively thin market, it goes down 90%, the trust never went. People still knew it's this pristine asset, this incredible asset that can't be screwed around with. So it just drives trust again, and the more people adopt it, more trust. I don't think there's any risk of zero.

Raoul Pal: (36:25)
The arguments go quantum computing. If they figure out quantum computing, they could break the cryptographic keys. Well, there's too much money in this space, and people are already aware of this, so there's all anti-quantum layers being built, there's a bunch of other stuff. So that's not going to be an issue. The other really weak argument is, well, if they shut down the electricity, there's no bitcoin. Well, we've got other problem if the entire world's Internet or electricity goes down, so I'm not worried about that one. By the way, you can still store it on a piece of paper, your crypto-key. You actually don't need a computer. So that's okay, too.

Raoul Pal: (37:04)
The last one is governments will ban it. Well, first up, explain that the IMF, the BIS, the ECB, the Bank of England, the Fed have all regulated it and said in their white papers, "This is part of the future, this is where it's going." So there is no noise of that coming, but maybe one day, it's a 10 trillion dollar asset class. They're not going to ban a 200 million dollar asset class, not even a trillion dollar asset class. It's still smaller than Google at that point, and Google is much more nefarious than bitcoin is. They own all the world's data. So let's say it gets to 10 trillion dollars, my million dollar price target. How are they going to ban it?

Raoul Pal: (37:44)
Let's go through that, and this is really crucial. So the IMF say, "We don't want to have this currency, it's destabilizing to central bank currencies," and everyone goes, "Okay, fine." They say, "Anybody owning it will be banned. You can't have a wallet." Problem is, is we live in a globalized world and this is on the Internet. There's no borders. There's no gold in a vault. This is borderless, semi-anonymous, and instantaneous. So all it takes is for Brazil ... And we've seen this in healthcare when it came to genetic testing. Brazil and Israel said, "We'll allow it." Guess what? A bunch of scientists go over there, they do it from there. Game theory always suggests that somebody will go against that ban because they can make all the money because we're actually dealing with money here. So it's incredibly lucrative to capture that market share.

Raoul Pal: (38:41)
The other part of this is as the central bank digital currencies come, there are going to be ... And my guess is that in the next two years, we'll see one of the small Latin American nations, maybe one of the Caribbean nations, put bitcoin into their reserves because they're so fed up with having [crosstalk 00:38:58] currency-

John Darsie: (38:57)
Yeah, like MicroStrategy.

Raoul Pal: (38:57)
Like what?

John Darsie: (38:59)
Yeah, like MicroStrategy did, Michael Saylor did with their reserves.

Raoul Pal: (39:03)
That's right. And then one of them will say, "You know what? We're just going to use bitcoin as our currency," as opposed to having a currency board with the dollar like we have in Cayman. They're totally fungible here here, so it's not a peg, so it can't break. But if it was the vagary of the dollar being expensive or weak that they have to deal with, what if you just say, "Okay, bitcoin is the currency we want to peg ourselves against?" You're away from that whole currency system and [crosstalk 00:39:31].

John Darsie: (39:31)
Yeah, I think China's journey as it relates to bitcoin and cryptocurrencies is an interesting and informative one, is that early on in the rise of bitcoin, the way I understand it is that Chinese that were evading capital controls and pulling money out of the country accounted for a significant portion of the trading volume of bitcoin. The Chinese made some noise about wanting to regulate it, but then they realized the power of that type of technology if it's leveraged by the state. So they obviously haven't banned it and are working on their own digital currency.

Raoul Pal: (40:03)
Russia did the same, and we've seen similar things elsewhere, and they looked at banning it and then realized it didn't make sense, and they've all walked away from it. I think the probability of it being banned on a global basis is low. Will Turkey try and ban it? Of course they will because their currency keeps collapsing every day, like they banned gold. But does it work? It's never worked. Capital controls have never, ever worked. India tried to ban it as well. Guess what? It's coming back. India's integrating it with their banking system now. So it's not going away. It's only going to get bigger.

John Darsie: (40:48)
In your view, and you might talk about how you own it and how you store it, what's the best way for a retail investor or an institution to buy, own, and store securely cryptocurrencies and bitcoin today?

Raoul Pal: (41:00)
Yeah, so here's one of the truisms in life. Anything that's slightly hard to do usually has better rewards. Emerging market investing, the more frontier you get, the higher the rewards are. So crypto right now, to do it perfectly, you need to open a brokerage account with an exchange, do your KYC. Well, we're all kind of used to that. Then you go on and buy it. There are some brokers who will do it. So if you're an institution, you're a hedge fund, you can get somebody to do it for you, so that's pretty straightforward. The problem is the custody because it's a bearer asset and we gave up bearer. We used to have bearer bonds and bearer equities. There's a few left. I think Nestle have still got some bearer equities and bearer bonds left, and a few companies do, but there aren't many.

Raoul Pal: (41:44)
So now you're like, "Okay, do I leave it on the exchange?" Well, we've all heard [inaudible 00:41:50]. People can hack exchanges like they can hack banks. So you're like, "Okay, so I need to store it somewhere safe." You can buy a cold wallet or a hard wallet, and that basically is a little unit that has your keys on it. It doesn't actually store your currency. It's not like a USB. But it's basically your codes to unlock it. So to do that, that's a safe way, and then you can put it in a safe. I store mine in a gold vault, in a proper secure gold vault. Then it's safe, I don't have to worry about it, nobody can come to my house and try and get it. I don't have it. But it's as simple as that. You can still check your balances online. It's not like you can't see it. You own it. It's all in your name.

Raoul Pal: (42:38)
Now, let's say you're an institution and you don't want to go to a family office. Well, Fidelity have just set up a whole custody business, so if you don't trust Fidelity, well, you might as well give up. The US have just approved it as a custody asset for a whole group of banks. What does custody asset mean? So any hedge funds listening to this, what that means is prime broking. Prime broking's coming, and it'll be here, my guess, early next year. So prime broking bitcoin, that's coming, too. The whole custody issue goes away. It's actually harder for individuals because you have trust one of the wallet providers, et cetera. But that whole space is getting better and better. You can also buy insurance against it. So all of these things that were hard in the beginning are now actually relatively straightforward.

John Darsie: (43:27)
All right. It's something at SkyBridge and with SALT, we have a growing interest in the space given some of the adoption we're seeing, so we look forward to being in touch with you and other leaders in the space as we figure out exactly how we're going to get involved. But, Raoul, we're going to leave it there. We could probably have a 10-part series and not cover all the interesting topics that we could talk about. We really encourage you to sign up for Real Vision. It's the media entity that Raoul launched that has tons of fascinating things on macroeconomics, financial markets, and bitcoin. So we would definitely encourage all of our community to sign up for Real Vision, and, Raoul, we really appreciate your time.

Raoul Pal: (44:00)
Good talk. Really enjoyed it.

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:02)
Raoul, I just want you to know, I have a mechanism in my computer that's slowing down his Internet service so that he sounds like Godzilla at the end of this thing, okay? It's just something I do to him once in a while, just to be cheeky.

Raoul Pal: (44:14)
Just to bring him down a peg, right?

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:16)
Yeah, I got to bring him down a peg, and-

Raoul Pal: (44:18)
I get it.

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:18)
... just to use a British word I love from Thomas the Tank Engine, just to be a little cheeky, you know what I'm saying? But thank you so much. We really, really enjoyed it. I'd love to get together with you at that bar behind you. I hear you mix one hell of a gin and tonic, so I want to sit at the bar with you someday when the world is safe.

Raoul Pal: (44:38)
I look forward to it, my friend. Take care.

Anthony Scaramucci: (44:40)
Great to see you. Thank you for joining SALT Talks.

Raoul Pal: (44:42)
Really appreciate it.

How Crypto Is Democratizing Finance | SALT Talks #84

“It's just pretty much at this point, generally accepted this asset class is here to stay and everyone's trying to figure out where this fits within their portfolio construction.”

Michael Sonnenshein is the Managing Director at Grayscale Investments, the world’s largest digital currency asset manager with more than $5.9 billion in assets under management across its family of 10 products – all of which provide access and exposure to the digital currency asset class in the form of a traditional security, without the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping digital currencies directly.

Dan Morehead founded Pantera Capital in 2003 – managing a billion dollars in hedge fund strategies. He previously served as Head of Macro Trading and CFO at Tiger Management with Julian Robertson. Dan began his career as a collateralized mortgage obligation trader at Goldman Sachs. Dan graduated magna cum laude from Princeton University with a B.S. in Structural Engineering and received the Carmichael Prize for his thesis.

While many take a Bitcoin maximalist position, there is reason to think multiple digital assets and currencies will ultimately emerge as long-term viable options. Bitcoin has demonstrated itself as the best digital store of value, but there are hundreds of other use cases for which blockchain-based assets can be designed. One digital asset may specialize in cross-border currency or property titles. “I think you're going to see a single digit number of important blockchains 10 years from now, not one and not 500, but it will be a handful.”

Bitcoin represents the launching pad for global financial inclusion. The Internet moves all kinds of data all over the globe and a reliable e-cash system represents the final piece of that puzzle. Financial value can now be moved seamlessly without going through the expensive and obstructive intermediaries.

LISTEN AND SUBSCRIBE

SPEAKERS

Michael Sonnenshein.jpeg

Michael Sonnenshein

Managing Director

Grayscale

Dan Morehead.jpeg

Dan Morehead

Chief Executive Officer

Pantera Capital

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

John Darsie: (00:07)
Hello everyone. Welcome back to SALT Talks. My name is John Darsie. I'm the Managing Director of SALT which is a global thought leadership forum at the intersection of finance, technology, and public policy. SALT Talks are a digital interview series that we launched during the work from home period with leading investors, creators, and thinkers. And what we're really trying to do during SALT Talks is provide the same type of experience we provide at our global conference series, The SALT Conference.

John Darsie: (00:35)
Our two guests today, we're very excited to have them on, have both spoken at our in-person SALT conferences and we're looking forward to having them back at our next in-person SALT conference hopefully in 2021. But what we're trying to do is really provide a window into the minds of subject matter experts, as well as to provide a platform for big ideas that we think are shaping the future. We're very excited today to bring you a SALT Talk focusing on the digital asset space featuring Michael Sonnenshein and Dan Morehead.

John Darsie: (01:04)
Michael Sonnenshein is the Managing Director at Grayscale Investments, the world's largest digital currency asset manager with more than 5.9 billion in assets under management across its family of 10 products. Michael oversees the daily operations and growth of the business, in addition to maintaining many of the firm's key client relationships, including with financial advisors, family offices, hedge funds, and other institutions, as well as managing the development of Grayscale single asset and diversified digital currency products.

John Darsie: (01:34)
Prior to joining Grayscale, Michael was a financial advisor at JP Morgan Securities and prior to that he was an analyst at Barclays Wealth. He earned his bachelor in business administration from the Goizueta School of Business at Emory University which is also my alma mater and his MBA from the Leonard Stern School of Business at New York University.

John Darsie: (01:54)
Dan Morehead our other guest today founded Pantera in 2003 managing a billion dollars in hedge fund strategies, primarily focused on the digital asset space. Pantera is the first institutional investment firm focused exclusively on bitcoin and other digital currencies, as well as companies operating in the blockchain tech ecosystem. Pantera launched the first cryptocurrency fund in the United States when bitcoin was trading at $65 per coin in 2013. And Dan, thank you so much for calling me in 2013 to tip me off about this great new technology called bitcoin. But we'll talk about that offline after the webinar.

John Darsie: (02:32)
The firm Pantera subsequently launched the first exclusively blockchain venture fund and recently concluded raising its third venture fund. In 2017 Pantera was the first firm to offer a pre-auction ICO fund. Pantera's bitcoin fund has returned over 16,000% in seven years and has returned billions of dollars to its investors. Pantera currently manages around 700 million in capital in seven funds and three product groups, including a passive fund, a hedge fund, and a venture capital fund.

John Darsie: (03:05)
A reminder if you have any questions for Michael or Dan during today's SALT Talk. You can enter them in the Q&A box at the bottom of your video screen on Zoom. And hosting today's talk and making his SALT Talks debut is Brett Messing who is the President and Chief Operating Officer at SkyBridge Capital, a global alternative investment firm. And with that, I'll turn it over to Brett for the interview.

Brett Messing: (03:26)
So I'm going to start with you Dan. You and I sort of crossed paths at Goldman Sachs years ago. We're the same age. I'm very new to bitcoin but I have the zeal of the converted. You're sort of a bitcoin OG. So can you tell us how you made the path from Wall Street into bitcoin?

Dan Morehead: (03:45)
Yeah. I spent my career in global macro. Last year I was with Tiger Management where I worked with Julian Robertson looking for interesting disruptions around the world, Russian privatization or Argentine farmland or Tesla Motors. Every three or four years something like that would come up. And in 2011 I got introduced to bitcoin.

Dan Morehead: (04:05)
It took me a year or two to get my head around it because it's a kind of a trippy concept to have non-state sponsored money, but ultimately came to believe it was going to disrupt finance, wealth storage, dozens of different industries in a way that the internet had disrupted everything else but hadn't really touched finance or gold or money. And all those things are the largest markets on earth, and so the opportunity was going to be orders of magnitude bigger than all those previous trades.

Brett Messing: (04:35)
Wow. Well, I'm late but I'm happy to be here. Hey Michael, you're so young that we understand why you're in bitcoin so I have a different question for you which is today Grayscale announced some incredible fundraising numbers. In your digital fund you guys raised a billion dollars this quarter, 2.4 billion this year, which is just fantastic, great for the space.

Michael Sonnenshein: (04:57)
Thank you.

Brett Messing: (04:58)
Can you just talk a little bit about where you're seeing the funds flowing from and what sort of catalyzed that sort of substantial increase?

Michael Sonnenshein: (05:07)
Sure. Yeah, this morning we released our third quarter report which looks at investment activity across our 10 products. This is kind of ... Not kind of. This is our third record-breaking quarter in a row. About 80% of the investment that we're getting is coming from institutions. A lot of that is being done by hedge funds. And I think what's really interesting, particularly for those who attend SALT or who are allocators or who are at funds is that we're realizing and trying to put this message out there that it's not for any one kind of investor which I think a lot of people think that it is. I think the broad swatch of investors engaging in our products getting exposure to digital currency are everywhere from global macro funds to risk arb funds to value, momentum. It's really all across the board.

Michael Sonnenshein: (06:03)
And so I think for us the rate and the pace at which we're seeing investment, not to mention that investors are not only just looking at bitcoin but also diversifying across other digital assets has been really encouraging. And so it's just pretty much at this point generally accepted this asset class is here to stay and everyone's trying to figure out where this fits within their portfolio construction.

Brett Messing: (06:26)
All right. That's a good sort of launching off point. So the name of this talk is Digital Assets, and I'm going to out myself as a bitcoin maximalist. Right. We have one search engine, Google. We have one mobile provider, Apple. We have Amazon. Why do we need anything more than bitcoin? I'm going to go to Dan first and then I'll come back to you Michael on this here.

Dan Morehead: (06:49)
Sure. Yeah, I would say that you just listed a couple of different interesting use cases. There are lots of different use cases in cryptocurrency. There's wealth storage, the digital gold version of it. There's cross-border money movement. There's the property titles on the blockchain. There's hundreds of different use cases. And when a technology is disruptive, they call it a category killer. Blockchain's a serial killer. It's going to go through dozens of different industries.

Dan Morehead: (07:16)
But they don't need to be all the same. Bitcoin's amazing at wealth storage, is digital gold, but it's not very good at smart contracts or other programmable money type of applications. So I think you're going to see a single digit number of important blockchains 10 years from now, not one and not 500, but it will be a handful.

Dan Morehead: (07:35)
And one of my thoughts on that would be it's kind of like in the '90s being a Yahoo maximalist. Yahoo was a good company but there were 20 other really important companies you needed to invest in. The same with bitcoin. Bitcoin is very important, but there's some others that you should have some exposure to.

Brett Messing: (07:51)
Okay.

Michael Sonnenshein: (07:53)
I think that's exactly right. I think Dan has been in the space even longer than I have. I'm coming up on seven years. And I think we both agree that while probably today the killer use case for something like bitcoin may be that digital store of value or digital gold, that there are so many other use cases out there to be developed for bitcoin and other digital assets that we're pretty much probably still at the beginning or maybe bottom of the first inning of kind of where this asset class is going to go.

Michael Sonnenshein: (08:22)
We don't believe that it is a winner take all scenario Brett. I think that as this asset class evolves, there will ultimately be some cohort of digital currencies that exist side by side as a family, the same way you might look at the precious metals family. And each of those assets will likely have different use cases, different adjustable markets, different prices all part of building out a bonafide asset class around digital assets and it's just too early to say who the winners will be, who the losers will be, but certainly I think investors now appreciate that and that's one of the reasons we're seeing a lot of diversification, although for most investors their first foray into the asset class usually still is bitcoin.

Brett Messing: (09:07)
Mm-hmm (affirmative). Okay. What's interesting is a guy as I said I am new to it and buying bitcoin felt like a big deal. My interest in buying anything else at least right now, maybe when I learn more I'll feel differently, and I just, it just seems to me that for the next leg of growth is probably more people to look like me. But I'm new so I'll defer to you guys, but that's just one person's perspective. Can you ...

Brett Messing: (09:34)
One of the things that I think is challenging about bitcoin, we were talking about a little about this before we started or digital currencies just generally is explaining it to someone. I actually taught at UCLA for a while and I used to tell people, "You have to be able to explain something in one or two sentences or you don't understand it." I'd like each of you to give our audience your sort of why bitcoin, why buy it now, your sort of elevator pitch if you don't mind. I think that would be helpful.

Michael Sonnenshein: (10:01)
I'm going to answer that Brett with my kind of aha moment around bitcoin which was that I think that I believe that bitcoin can be the springboard to financial inclusion. I think the fact that the world has gone digital, money by and large has not. Everyone around the world has a phone, whether it's a brand new iPhone 12 or a simple feature phone. All you need is a phone or any kind of connectivity to send and receive bitcoin in much the same way that the advent of the cell phone totally leapfrogged the communications game, especially in the emerging markets where there weren't landlines. Bitcoin in a digital form of money that's global and borderless and basically lets you move value instantaneously and for free should be one of the catalysts that creates financial inclusion globally.

Dan Morehead: (10:57)
And Brett, I'd say that the way I think it's easier for people to get their head around it is, it's essentially the final piece of the protocol puzzle that is the internet. The internet has all these protocols like TCP IP that move all kinds of data around. And in the '90s Milton Friedman said the only thing missing was a reliable e-cash system. And that's essentially what bitcoin is and what these other blockchains are. It's a way to move financial value around without the very expensive intermediaries. Those intermediaries really haven't changed. If you think about how much the internet changed everything else in our lives, shopping, social, all these things are completely different. But banks, remittance companies, credit card companies, they're pretty much the same as they were in the '60s. A credit card is a piece of plastic with some eight-track tape glued to the back of it and very expensive. So it really hasn't been hit by the internet and that's basically what blockchain is.

Dan Morehead: (11:52)
And the analog I like to use is it's going to do to finance what VoIP did to the telecoms monopolies. Back in the day when we were in college it was really expensive to make an international phone call because every American had to use AT&T and every Brit had to use British Telecom. When we realized you could route Voice over the Internet, VoIP rates went down to essentially zero. It's free to stream Netflix on your iPhone now, and the quantity of calls went up so much that we don't even have enough copper on earth to run the internet if we were still running on copper. And that's basically what bitcoin and blockchain will do, it's going to route money over the internet, so money over IP.

Michael Sonnenshein: (12:28)
And Dan, I think you bring up a really good point which is that this whole system we have today around moving value, it's all based on mistrust. I don't trust you. You don't trust me. That's why there's a bank in the middle or that's why we have a credit card processor or whoever it is in the middle of everything we do. And bitcoin completely democratizes that and allows totally unknown parties to transact with each other in a way that is trusted. So it can really eliminate a lot of those frictions and time and money that go into moving value.

Dan Morehead: (13:02)
It is. It's not just between you and I who live in developed economies-

Michael Sonnenshein: (13:07)
Oh sure-

Dan Morehead: (13:07)
... with great financial services. I like your point about financial inclusion. There's three and a half billion people on earth that have a smartphone and only one billion of those have banks like you and I would recognize, those types of accounts. So there's several billion people that a lot of people call unbanked. But in my mind that word itself is an anachronism. It's like calling them unlandlined. They never got a landline. They went straight to mobile phones. They're not going to get a bank. They're going straight to mobile money. And bitcoin is the solution.

Brett Messing: (13:41)
There's been a lot discussed about the use case for countries where the currency is collapsing. I guess bitcoin is at an all-time high against the Turkish lira, it's in an all-time high against the Argentine peso. Is there any evidence that there are flows coming from these countries, in other words, or is it just like an academic concept that will this [crosstalk 00:14:03] for them?

Michael Sonnenshein: (14:05)
There's empirical data there. I mean, I think the analog that Dan and I are talking about is only made worse in geographies where governments are inflating their currencies or manipulating their currencies. I mean, a lot of people in these areas of the world wake up and whatever value they had yesterday, they wake up today and it's worth 20% less and nothing really happened that they were in control of that caused that to be the case. So those types of folks in those parts of the world are looking for really any way to protect their purchasing power and they have a serious mistrust of their government and their government's ability to regulate and administer their currency.

Michael Sonnenshein: (14:50)
Our parent company, Digital Currency Group has investments in digital currency exchanges all over the world, including in parts of South America, Southeast Asia, et cetera, and the volumes continue to just demonstrate in all of these companies how much growing interest in their user base and people actually using bitcoin in a lot of these different geographies. So it is really happening.

Brett Messing: (15:14)
Part of the reason why I asked, Michael, you and I talked about this, is as I said, I just bought bitcoin and we talked about this being sort of this trust, system of trust. It's weird to buy it in terms of it's on my phone. I got two-factor authentication. Now I got a security key. I've never bought anything that I've had to spend so much time thinking about protecting and I finally have it in place that I think is protected. Can we discuss what you see in terms of when Grayscale has done this, but it feels like we need easier on-ramps and I'm sitting here in Manhattan and that's why I wonder if I was in Turkey what's my on-ramp look like and are they, again, because it feels like I've invested in a DraftKing's account and there are too many zeros there for a DraftKing's account. So do you have any reaction to that?

Michael Sonnenshein: (16:06)
Yeah, I mean every day that goes by it is becoming orders of magnitude easier for folks to buy, transfer, hold, and safe keep digital currencies. Dan's business, my business, we're trying to eliminate a lot of those frictions and open up access to folks so they don't have to navigate some of that. But pretty much every geography you can think of around the world, there is an exchange or exchanges or order books where individuals can buy and sell digital currencies against their local fiat money.

Michael Sonnenshein: (16:42)
And you're totally right. Digital currencies are not for the faint of heart. There are complexities around them that make them more challenging for a lot of folks than handling cash or handling a stock or handling a bond because they are a bearer instrument. So I think one of the things that we're excited about and monitoring very closely is how all that infrastructure is being built to make it more foolproof and user-friendly for folks to handle digital currencies as seamlessly as they might handle airline miles, their Apple Pay, or even just SMS-ing bitcoin from one user to another if you don't live in the developed world and you're just using a simple feature phone. So a lot of that is being built out, but it's again, still early days and that exact experience you're having is evidence again of how early we are in the cycle of where everything is probably headed.

Brett Messing: (17:37)
And Dan, do you think we'll get larger, either more regulatory relief coming with a new administration or will I be able to buy this in a Schwab account? What do you see in terms of the regulatory and on-ramping landscape if you will?

Dan Morehead: (17:55)
Yeah. It's obviously a really important issue for institutional investors what's happening on the regulatory front. I think we have to be conscious that the US government has been pretty far ahead of this curve, and even in 2013 made a lot of rulings that are very positive for bitcoin and blockchain. The IRS ruled in 2013 that if you hold it for more than a year you get capital gains tax treatment which is way better than you get with holding gold which is a collectible, and normal currencies, fiat currencies are always ordinary income. If you held the euro for 20 years and sold it at a profit, you have to pay ordinary income tax on that. So most of the regulatory bodies have ruled.

Dan Morehead: (18:33)
The last one released, the SEC it hasn't been completely clear on when things are securities and when things are not securities. But the last big announcement is the OCC has given permission to any nationally chartered bank to custody crypto. That's wild. Like your issue with, yeah, you got all these two-factor authentication things you have to deal with. Going forward you're going to be able to discuss your bitcoin at your nationally chartered bank and then the kind of the brain friction you were just talking about goes away because it's just going to be like any other account you have at your nationally chartered bank. So most of that regulatory stuff is really behind us.

Michael Sonnenshein: (19:09)
Yeah. And Brett, I don't even think most people even know what the OCC is, or maybe at least didn't before this announcement came out, the Office of the Controller of the Currency. And I think for folks like Dan and his team and folks like my team and others around us, this is a very, very meaningful announcement from the OCC. When you think about regulatory clarity or lack thereof, we're not hearing that from investors anymore as it being a gating item to them deploying capital into this asset class. They actually feel that there is quite a bit of regulatory clarity, and that's not what may hold them up from investing.

Michael Sonnenshein: (19:48)
But thinking about holding digital assets at a nationally chartered bank is also causing all of the banks who I think for a long time have developed working groups and sandboxes and proofs of concept to move off of Zero and realize that they're actually going to need to deal with this asset class, and there isn't a better time than now for them to figure out what's their approach going to be and are they going to be late to the party or stand to lose business to other banks who move faster than they do.

Brett Messing: (20:20)
So it seems like we're getting de-risked from a regulatory standpoint. I guess Dan, you've been in this for a bit. Over the last three years are there other risks that had tended to be gaining items for people that you think have been mitigated meaningfully?

Dan Morehead: (20:37)
Yeah. There was one final one, custody. Five, six, seven years ago I was evangelizing institutional investors on investing and some did and got rewarded. Our first fund's up 140x. So there definitely was some reward for taking the risk. But custody's been a legitimate gating item for institutional investors. As I said, the regulatory stuff mainly went away a few, four, five years ago. But the custody thing was a real issue. And in the last two years have been some massive regulated custodians that have come out and it makes it just so much easier for a fiduciary to allocate capital to the bitcoin space. You have the New York stock exchange's parent has a company called Back that does custody. Fidelity does custody. Coinbase is now massive and well trusted. BitGo is one of the largest custodians within the blockchain space. And all those are highly regulated, have all the regulation that institutional investor would want. I think that's really helped open the door to much larger institutional investment.

Brett Messing: (21:47)
I have a question I'm trying to ask both of you which I ask with love as a bitcoiner which is we have this sort of amazing macro environment for bitcoin where incredible fiscal stimulus, monetary stimulus. We have Paul Tudor Jones putting 2% of his fund in it. We have Microstrategy, a public company putting 425 million in. We have Square putting $50 million in. We have Grayscale vacuuming up almost all the bitcoin that's mined. So it just leaves me wondering why aren't we above last year's high on the bitcoin price? Do you want to go first Dan? You have any thoughts on that? It just, it doesn't ... It feels like as bitcoin you couldn't have asked for a better sequencing event in this year, and yet we haven't breached the high of 19.

Dan Morehead: (22:36)
Yeah. So that'd be my main argument for why someone should put 2% or 3% of their networth into bitcoin is you love being invested in an asset where people are complaining it's only up 60% year-to-date in a global depression pandemic crisis. So that would be my argument, is it's up 100% from four or five months ago. It's up 60% year-to-date. And over the next year or two I think it will hit new highs. The bitcoin market goes in these two or three year cycles. It averages 209% compound annual growth rate over the last nine years with all the macro tailwinds and the fundamentals. I would think it's going to outpace that over the next couple of years, so it's a nice problem to have that we're kind of griping that it's only up 60.

Dan Morehead: (23:24)
And the bitcoin maximalist in you would lead me to point out that other things in the blockchain space are massively outpacing bitcoin. We're very bullish on bitcoin but other things have done well. Ethereum's up almost 200% year-to-date. So the blockchain space is really surging. Kind of a good mix of all the assets is a fund we run that invests in all the major currencies, trades them on a long short basis, it's up 122% this year. So the market is ripping. In the next couple years we'll probably see more of that.

Brett Messing: (23:59)
Right.

Michael Sonnenshein: (23:59)
I think, I've been through quite a few bubbles and bursts in the bitcoin price. And if you kind of look at the repetitive nature of this, bitcoin kind of goes through these big bubbles, it bursts, it kind of bases for a while, and then kind of makes its next move. I think certainly one thing that we probably would not want to see is just one of these parabolic moves out of nowhere because they're just not sustainable and they don't necessarily inspire a ton of investor confidence. But typically, when you see bitcoin going through this kind of range-bound time where it is now, flirting between kind of $10,000 and $12,000, it usually predates a pretty dramatic move in the bitcoin price, either to the upside or to the downside. And I think one of the reasons why we're seeing a period of more sustained price movement just kind of being in this range bound area really has to do with the development of a much healthier two-sided market.

Michael Sonnenshein: (25:01)
One of the things that I think has been a catalyst to draw a lot more investors into this asset class is the development of the derivatives market around digital assets, bitcoin and others are really healthy lending and borrowing market, the ability for folks to short. I mean, a lot of the institutions that we deal with would not be making their bitcoin investments in the way or the magnitude that they are if they weren't having the ability to put on a bonafide hedge against those positions. And that really again speaks to kind of the build out of the infrastructure. And to Dan's point, whether it's custodianship, the development of the futures on CME Group, what Bakkt is doing at NYSE, all of these are really important developments.

Brett Messing: (25:46)
Mm-hmm (affirmative). No, it feels like it's grown up a lot. In addition, you have very big four accounting firms willing to write audits about it, and Microstrategy and Square submitting SEC filings with it on their balance sheet, so I think it's interesting.

Brett Messing: (26:07)
It feels like more and more people are talking about it as digital gold. Dan, is that the right way to think about it, and does the macro trader in you like the idea of a long bitcoin short gold trade?

Dan Morehead: (26:20)
Oh yeah, I love that trade. Gold's been awesome for 5,000 years, but it's a little past its sell by date. And bitcoin is the 21st century version of gold. You can do everything the same as gold, is a fixed quantity. It's like the gold standard. But you can send it in one second to anyone anywhere on earth essentially for free, which is different if you have a lot of your savings as a brick of gold in a vault in Zurich. So digital gold is one of the many use cases of blockchain. Bitcoin's fantastic version of that. And you're seeing it in countries. Like China used to be one of the largest importers of gold. It's now one of the largest importers of bitcoin. It's just a great way to store your wealth, get it out of banking systems that might be suspect.

Dan Morehead: (27:05)
So I think one of the great use cases of bitcoin is digital gold. And with all the money printing that's happening right now, it's very much front and center all the gold bugs that I know are at least shifting some of their assets into bitcoin. And you mentioned Paul Tudor Jones. He wrote his investor letter a few months ago. It reminds him of gold in the '70s. And I think that's a great analog that in the '70s we were heading into a period of very high global inflation. The US even had the long bond go to 13%, and gold performed very well. I think we have even bigger version of that now.

Dan Morehead: (27:41)
And if you're talking about the global macro story, the numbers that the US is printing are literally off the charts. In June the United States printed more dollars than they did in the first 200 years of our country's history. So if your choice is own dollars, own gold, or own bitcoin, I would go all bitcoin. But if you're a normal investor that hasn't spent eight years thinking about it, you might as well put 3% or 4% of your assets in bitcoin.

Brett Messing: (28:10)
Right.

Michael Sonnenshein: (28:11)
Yeah, I think that's exactly right. Brett, I don't know if this predates your getting involved in the bitcoin space and becoming a bitcoin maximalist, but my team actually devoted the better part of last year to a national advertising campaign called #dropgold. We feel quite fervently that the next generation of investors, those who haven't even hit their prime earning years yet will not be investing in gold. It doesn't resonate with them. It's not something that they are going to have had a tangible experience with the way that they are buying things like Apple and Netflix and are growing up in a time when the things that are important to them are their airline miles and their credit card points and paying their friends on Venmo and buying bitcoin.

Michael Sonnenshein: (29:05)
So we think that with over $68 trillion passing over the next 25 years from older generations, baby boomers down to millennials and younger generations, that the way that those assets are currently postured today are going to change as that generational wealth transfer happens. And we're not going to go out and say we think all 68 trillion of it is moving into bitcoin in digital currency, but we'd be hard-pressed to believe that some portion of it doesn't make its way into crypto. And that's already starting to happen. Schwab put out this survey last year looking at what the top 10 equity holdings were for millennials, I think gen x-ers, and then baby boomers. And you guys wouldn't be surprised what they're invested in. They own stocks like Apple and Disney and Berkshire Hathaway, but noticeably the millennial segment, their fifth largest holding was Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. They're already allocating to this asset class and the empirical data is there.

Michael Sonnenshein: (30:08)
That's kind of our view on it. While gold is as Dan said had its time, we do believe that digital gold or a digital form of inflation hedge, things like that, bitcoin can really serve that role in a lot of investors portfolios.

Brett Messing: (30:24)
Well, I guess in the spirit of sort of the world changing, I saw yesterday that PayPal's market cap is bigger than Bank of America's and Square's is bigger than Goldman Sachs' which is amazing to me. It makes one think that why shouldn't bitcoin be bigger than gold, which I guess is a good transition point too. Dan, how does someone value this? How do you think about it in terms of it's undervalued, it's overvalued? I don't know that we have time to get into the stock to flow model but there are different ways that people are trying to value it by analogy. I don't know if they make sense but I'll be curious in your thoughts and then yours also Michael.

Dan Morehead: (31:09)
Yeah. I had a fun argument with one of my Tiger Cub friends who runs a big TMT fund. He said, "Hey, there are no cash flows to discount, so we can't invest in bitcoin." And I just, I love that mentality. It's like, "Well, where the cash flows of gold?" And it's worth $10 trillion. Everyone's gotten their head around that.

Dan Morehead: (31:26)
Part of the argument is just supply and demand. There's 21 million bitcoins. 8, 10 years ago there was probably 50,000 people on earth that thought bitcoin was interesting and they should own a bit. A few years ago was 500,000. Now it's probably 50 million people. And if five years from now it's 500 million people, the price will be higher. It is as simple as that. People, you don't really even need to know why people want to use it. Some people are using it as migrants sending money back home to their parents in their home country. Some people are using it to store wealth because they think their banking system might be bankrupt in their country. There's hundreds of different use cases. And the more people that do that.

Dan Morehead: (32:11)
You can do relative value analysis between the different blockchains. So you can say, "I think Polkadot is cheap relative to Ethereum," or, "I think bitcoin is cheap." Bitcoin right now is 58% of the entire market cap of the industry. That's been as high, recently as almost 70, and it's been as low as 33 so you can make those kinds of views. But ultimately, it really is a bet on whether you think at 350 billion, which is the total market cap of the entire blockchain cryptocurrency industry, is that appropriate? It's a very small fraction of what gold is. Currencies are 100 trillion and there's a lot of really crappy ones out there. So bitcoin could definitely take market share over. There's 200 currencies on earth. Bitcoin could probably replace about 150 of them. There's some really bad currencies out there.

Dan Morehead: (33:05)
To my mind that's the easiest way to value it, is to think, "Hey, it's a 350 billion. It's competing with things that are tens of trillions, hundreds of trillions. And if it has a 20% chance of getting a 20% market share in cash, it's going to be a 10x type trade." So that is the basics.

Dan Morehead: (33:24)
You do see some Wall Street firms trying to do very fundamental analyses of adding this and that and discounting it and stuff. I'm very suspect on those. I think it's more of a speculative trade, is definitely very volatile. But if you choose to invest you're thinking, "I'm risking 1x my money and I might make 10x, 20x, 30x my money."

Michael Sonnenshein: (33:46)
I think Dan's exactly right. And the way he just started that off with a friend of his sharing that, he couldn't come up with a traditional model to try and value bitcoin is actually exactly where we end up as well. It's frustrating that a lot of investors are trying to take an asset like bitcoin which didn't even exist 10, 12 years ago, and trying to throw it through the same kind of valuation models and metrics that they would for Bank of America stock or a municipal bond or whatever it may be. The truth is that as an investment bitcoin doesn't have any of the same attributes as those do. So when you look at trying to value it, you really have to take that entire lens off and look at it in a very different way.

Michael Sonnenshein: (34:33)
My team just authored a report called actually Valuing Bitcoin because we're experiencing this so much with our investors. And in the report we probably go through about 8 or 10 different metrics that individuals and institutions can look at to try and determine the health of bitcoin and whether or not there are certain signals that we can pay attention to help determine bitcoin's value. Some of those things include dormancy. We can look at how long bitcoins are being held. The blockchain gives us that forensic tool to allow folks to understand. Are people holding onto their bitcoins longer or are they moving around more? Are more bitcoins sitting on exchanges, meaning that they're more likely to be bought and sold? Or are more of them sitting off exchanges and in wallets because people are holding them and speculating on the price movement?

Michael Sonnenshein: (35:25)
There's a lot of different analytics that we can look at and they just don't resemble anything like a discounted cash flow or anything of the sort. I think outside of looking at blockchain analytics, a lot of folks do look at bitcoin to Dan's point on Wall Street about maybe markets that bitcoin stances disrupt. So if there is a couple hundred billion dollars worth of bitcoin in existence today, maybe just look at the market cap of gold. There's a couple trillion dollars of gold. If you apply some percentage that you think bitcoin is going to take of the gold market, with some probability you get to some pretty crazy number quite quickly if bitcoin captures 1%, 2%, 3%, 5% of the investable market for gold. So a lot of folks start messing around with metrics like that or taking share of the M2 money supply, things of that nature. But ultimately, the best way that we've seen people really look at this is looking at the underlying metrics that the blockchain provides.

Brett Messing: (36:25)
I think people need to realize that it's just bitcoin. It's just a new thing, and you can't value it the way ... All the these analyses feel somewhat torture to me, you know what I mean? It feels like it's likely to go up and trying to figure out how much it will go up feels like, you know?

Michael Sonnenshein: (36:44)
How do you value a Honus Wagner rookie baseball card.

Brett Messing: (36:48)
There you go. Exactly.

Dan Morehead: (36:50)
One of the examples I love using on that when people say, "I'm not to buy bitcoin because there's no intrinsic value." First, the US dollar has no intrinsic value. They just printed a trillion of them in June. There's nothing behind that. But the better example would be the intrinsic value of a Jackson Pollock painting's 40 bucks. There's some house paint, some canvas, but it's got a 70-year track record of appreciating so it's a good asset to hold. Bitcoin's track rate's only 11 years so I'm not saying it's as good as Jackson Pollock, but 10 years from now that'll be 20 years, and every decade that it adds, it adds more credibility to its long-term compounding annual growth rate.

Michael Sonnenshein: (37:31)
Yeah. And I think Brett, one of the things that we've been talking about with a lot of investors especially in this environment is bitcoin's verifiable scarcity. People are looking often at how much fiscal stimulus is being injected into the system and contrasting that with the finite amount of bitcoin that will ever enter circulation.

Michael Sonnenshein: (37:52)
It's almost as though when supply and demand typically intersect to create price discovery, bitcoin supply is known and predictable and so that doesn't really become much of a variable with respect to its value. So it's much more of a demand driven asset, which I think again is a different lens that folks need to look at it through when thinking about value.

Dan Morehead: (38:12)
And the last point I want to mention Brett, something we talked about before the show started is it's basically the demand is monotonically increasing all the time because people evangelize you. And then you buy some, and you read some more about it and then you start talking to your co-workers, and then they buy some. And there are very few people that ever actually just exit the market. So you're always attract ... It's like a one-way valve. You're always attracting buyers and there's very few people that ever sell.

Dan Morehead: (38:40)
One of my main thoughts is there's so many incredibly intelligent professionals like you that once you read about and you actually spend a couple days, you end up buying it. There's really very few people to go, "Oh, this thing's just a bubble. I'm going to get short." And you occasionally see a curmudgeon like Warren Buffett doing a one sentence negative thing about bitcoin being rat poison, but I've never seen like a multi-page negative report on bitcoin. Literally, I've been in this business for nine years and I've never seen anyone actually write a well-thought-out, very long thing on why one should be short bitcoin. And that's basically proof that almost everybody that actually does the work ultimately ends up buying it and getting long. And if we all just keep getting long, it probably just grinds up.

Brett Messing: (39:27)
No. Well, last thing, I know John has some viewer questions, but do you think it grinds up? Dan, in a prior life I traded oil. And it seems like in commodities, when you have a fixed supply, when the demand comes, Michael, whether you like it or not, it tends to get parabolic. And I agree that you want buyers to validate higher prices, but doesn't that seem quite possible here just given the [inaudible 00:39:54] dynamic?

Dan Morehead: (39:56)
Occasionally a bunch of things all come together and it's on TV all the time and it shoots up at a rate that's too fast. And one of the best stats about bitcoin is it's had a lot of down 80% bear markets. In the normal world like oil or whatever, that would scare people to death. The wild statistic is in nine years of its existence, bitcoin's only had one year where the low for the year was below a prior low. So even though it's had five down 80% years, even at down 80% it's higher than it was the prior year.

Dan Morehead: (40:31)
Bitcoin's definitely volatile octane stuff but it's grinding up at such a fast rate that you net-net come out. Anyone that's owned bitcoin for three and a quarter years has made money. It's one of those things. Which is not true your favorite market oil recently went negative. You had to pay people to take your production and essentially oil hasn't done anything for 30 years. It's basically flat. Bitcoin is the polar opposite of that type of asset class.

Brett Messing: (41:01)
No. I guess, so just to make your point Michael, I think that at 20,000 is almost like a straight print in an equity trading market. You just don't ... It almost shouldn't be counted. It was one month up and down. And if you took that off the chart, it looks much healthier, the upward grind that you guys are sort of talking about.

Brett Messing: (41:21)
Anyway, John, do we have a question or two-

John Darsie: (41:22)
Yeah. We have several emailed questions and some questions in the chat that I think are interesting. Obviously, we have now the cryptocurrency skeptics lining up to poke holes in this conversation about crypto. But the first question is, obviously you had the whole situation with Silk Road and some of the origins in terms of public perception of bitcoin being around sort of the nefarious exchange of money on black markets for things like drugs or whether it be weapons or whatever it may be. So it has that perception that continues to dog it. So how long term will digital currencies like bitcoin overcome that stigma and also overcome real issues like anti-money laundering, tax related issues, and other financial regulations?

Michael Sonnenshein: (42:05)
Yeah. John, whoever asked that question, respectfully has not looked at bitcoin recently, and they're holding on to some preconceived notions about this. Bitcoin, the best analogy I can think of is every time somebody uses bitcoin, it leaves a digital breadcrumb. So it is quite frankly the worst mechanism possible to use if you want to do anything the least bit nefarious or something that you wouldn't want to be known for doing. Today our parent company, Dan's firm, we've all invested in blockchain forensic and analytical tools, companies that have developed products and services around monitoring tainted addresses, tainted coins, and who are the biggest customers of these companies, the FBI, the CIA, the Treasury, you name it.

Michael Sonnenshein: (43:01)
So this idea that bitcoin is somehow for the underbelly of the world or nefarious activity is ridiculous. Not to mention that you've had now several auctions by the US Marshals Service actually auctioning off bitcoin that they've seized. If they thought that this was an illegal or illicit asset that they were auctioning off to the general public, I have a hard time believing they would be doing that if they didn't somehow believe that this was something that was permissible and was not going to be saying they were going to crack down on and that they got the right comfort around the asset in order to conduct multiple auctions.

Dan Morehead: (43:38)
John, I was involved in that prosecution, and the truth is actually the exact opposite of what your questioner is supposing, is there is a permanent paper trail of every transaction that's ever happened on bitcoin. It's published every 10 minutes to the public. We all know every transaction that's ever happened. That's really a terrible feature for committing crimes. And in the Silk Road, obviously the Silk Road guy was taking bitcoin. Everybody knows that. It makes the newspapers a lie.

Dan Morehead: (44:04)
The real story which doesn't sell a lot of newspapers so not that many people know is there were two US federal agents on the Silk Road task force that went rogue and were actually extorting money from the Silk Road guy and other criminals and laundering it. And they laundered it through five big banks and a big mutual fund complex in the United States and they also laundered it through Bitstamp which is the largest exchange in Europe.

Dan Morehead: (44:29)
I was the chairman of Bitstamp at the time and the CEO said, "Hey, I think we have a federal agent laundering money on our website." And I'm like, "You guys watch too many Tom Cruise movies. That's just not happening." So I went through all the data and I'm like, "Oh, that's bad. We got to report this." So we reported it to a second federal agent and he quit that day. And I'm like, "Oh, that's not a good sign. Why'd the federal agent resign today?"

Dan Morehead: (44:52)
And so we reported to a third one, and the punchline is, the first two were stealing money from criminals and laundering it with bitcoin. And we have every transaction that's ever happened. You could look it up yourself. It's all public, and they pled guilty and immediately sentenced 10 years in prison. That's the truth of using bitcoin for committing crimes. It's terrible.

John Darsie: (45:14)
Right. That's a pretty thorough answer. And I think it's something that the public is still getting comfortable in terms of mass adoption with bitcoin, but as you said, fidelity backed which is affiliated with a large institution, the custody situation, everything's moving in the right direction for certain.

Dan Morehead: (45:33)
Yeah, I think if the government had the choice today to approve either bitcoin or cash, there's no chance they would allow cash. Cash is mega sketchy. People do all kinds of bad things with it. And bitcoin really is terrible for committing crimes.

John Darsie: (45:47)
You can't catch coronavirus from bitcoin but they say you can transmit it through cash. I have another question. It's around China. It's sort of a multi-layered question around China. I know in the early life of bitcoin, as you mentioned Dan, a popular use case for it was people moving currency out of a country in which they didn't trust the future of that currency and that I know happened in China. People were evading capital controls. But then China while at first was attempting to regulate bitcoin and potentially stamp it out, they realized the power of distributed currencies and they're now trying to launch a sort of regulated digital currency. Why do you think they went through that evolution and what do you think if any is the future of regulated digital currencies? Would that undermine a truly independent digital currency like bitcoin or do you think it's a step in the right direction in terms of building multiple parallel blockchains that can act as a more efficient means of financial transaction?

Dan Morehead: (46:45)
Yes, a super important question. China has very unique nationalistic policies to build state champions in all the different industries, essentially freezing out western technologies and replicating them. They're doing the same with bitcoin. Bitcoin is a global technology and they're essentially replicating it within their own borders. Their announcement of their own national cryptocurrency was not a coincidence that came out three days after Facebook announced their Libra project which is a similarly identical to what China's trying to do.

Dan Morehead: (47:19)
It's essentially game on now. China is definitely developing a cryptocurrency that they would like it to be the payment rail of their citizens and then obviously their region and maybe the rest of the world. So now other countries, other regions need to get engaged and roll out a competitor because as much as you would love to get the toothpaste back in the tube, it's out. There will be a blockchain payment system in the world and it's essentially a question who you want managing that one.

Dan Morehead: (47:51)
The other projects like stablecoins like USDC that Circle does or Facebook's Libra, those will be popular. The former chairman of the CFTC, Chris Giancarlo, had a great op-ed right after the Chinese announcement. He said it's our Sputnik moment in currency that it's now a race between the superpowers of the world and the West should get engaged.

John Darsie: (48:17)
Michael, do you have anything to add?

Michael Sonnenshein: (48:19)
No, I think one of the big overhangs for a lot of folks has really been that they think that so much of the mining power is concentrated in China. We just publicly came out with one of our subsidiary businesses called Foundry which is a digital currency mining and staking business and really working to bring a lot of that hash power back to the US. The folks that, again, this is kind of similar to folks that may be looking at bitcoin or digital currencies from a couple years ago. A lot of that has been shrugged off and this has really been something that has been turned into a global phenomenon and that there's global participation around. So I think over time you'll see that even more evenly distributed around the world.

John Darsie: (49:07)
All right guys. We'll leave it there. I think we could go on for several more hours about this topic, and I think we're going to need to have you guys back maybe after the election as the regulatory landscape continues to improve and maybe bitcoin continues to trade higher. It's been a fascinating conversation. Again, it's an area that both from a SALT perspective and a SkyBridge perspective is of growing interest to us, and you guys are two pioneers in the space so it's been a real treat to have you guys on.

Michael Sonnenshein: (49:33)
Thank you.

Brett Messing: (49:33)
Thanks both.

Michael Sonnenshein: (49:33)
It's been great.

Dan Morehead: (49:34)
John, Brett, thank you.